Refined determination of metal availability in sediments (Acid Volatile Sulphide measurements) Presentation for the CMA meeting Paris, 17 November 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Moving the process forward Sálvano Briceño UN/ISDR.
Advertisements

Katrien Delbeke, ECI, Frank Van Assche,IZA- Europe Frank Van Assche,IZA- Europe On behalf of the Eurometaux Water Project Team Accounting for bioavailability.
The EU Water Framework Directive and Sediments The Water Framework Directive was transposed into law in EU Member States at the end of Nearly two.
Funded by European Commission GA Welcome to the PRO AKIS Final conference University Foundation Brussels, May 20, 2015.
Survey of Environmental Monitoring Programmes in the CBSS Anne Liv Rudjord Topcal Day on Monitoring of Radioactivity in the Environment Oslo.
UNLEASH MICROHYDRO POTENTIAL IN EUROPE. Renewable Energy Sources Transforming Our Regions (RESTOR) Hydro is a project is co-financed by the European Commission.
Development of Censuses in Europe and Development for EC Statistical Co-operation European Commission (Eurostat) Jurgen Heimann UNFPA/PARIS 21 International.
JRC - IRMM – 17/18 June 2008 – EAQC-WISE project workshop – Held1 The EAQC-WISE blueprint: Recommendations for a quality control system for chemical monitoring.
Refined determination of metal availability in sediments (Acid Volatile Sulphide measurements) K. Delbeke, on behalf of Metals assoxiations and Euras.
EU Public Procurement Learning Lab “Proposal for a Working Plan” Rome, November 28 th 2003.
SEA in the Czech Republic Prague, 24 September 2008.
A study to the effectiveness of the HM & POP Protocols and costs of additional measures Phase II - Emission reduction and cost of a possible revision of.
A practical approach to account for the bioavailability of metals Bruce Brown WCA Environment REPRESENTING Eurometaux November 25 th 2010.
LAKE HYDROMORPHOLOGY. BACKGROUND No standard methods for assessing lake hydromorphology No standard methods for assessing lake hydromorphology Work began.
DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC 2 nd MEETING CHEMICAL MONITORING ACTIVITY (CMA) BRUSSELS, 17 th NOVEMBER 2005 Chemical Monitoring Activity Draft Outline of a Guidance.
DG ENV Environmental assessment procedures for energy infrastructure projects of common interest (PCIs)
Stela Barova, senior expert, “Marine environmental protection and Monitoring” Department, “Plans and Permits” Directorate State of play of MSFD implementation.
Creating the environment for business Assessment of the Implementation by the Member States of the IPPC Directive Advisory Group Meeting Friday 13 th January.
Task on Harmonisation of Freshwater Biological Methods
Regional experiences, case of the Mediterranean Sea
Intercalibration progress: Central - Baltic GIG Rivers
Marine Environment and Water Industry Unit
SW/MW guidance Milestones
Working Group A ECOSTAT October 2006 Summary/Conclusions
The Marine Strategy Framework Directive
Working Group on cultural statistics - Luxembourg 30 June/1 July 2008
Chemical Monitoring mandate
Taking forward the common understanding of Art. 8, 9 and 10 MSFD
Carl Bro a/s - Team Leader - IPPC-experts - Quality Assurance
EU Water Framework Directive
USING ALIEN SPECIES DATA FOR THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE
Identification of standardisation needs in the light of the SW/MW Guidance development - 3rd CMA meeting - 23 March 2006, Brussels Ulrich Borchers,
on Priority Substances Strategic Coordination Group
Water Directors meeting - Dresden
Developing European standards for victimisation surveys
RECARE set-up Rudi Hessel on behalf of coordination team
Agenda Item 6(a): Review of the list of priority substances (Decision 2455/2001/EC) WG-E(1)-17/10/INERIS - Data collection.
Harmonisation of exposure and risk assessment models for the BeNeKempen project Griet Van Gestel OVAM.
Inventory preparation for priority substances
London Water Directors Meeting
Standardisation - What to expect from it?
Expert Advisory Forum on
Cost Effectiveness Analysis Questionnaire Results
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
CBriv GIG Macrophyte Intercalibration Status Overview
WGC-2 DG Meeting Towards a Guidance on Groundwater Chemical Status and Threshold Values 14:00 – 16:00 21 April 2008 Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Nickel Risk Assessment
Commission report on Art. 8 WFD Monitoring programmes
Update on progress since last WG meeting (13-14 June 2002)
LIFE and the implementation of the Water Framework Directive
Information on projects
- Priority Substances - Strategic Coordination Group
REPORTING ON DELIVERY OF EU BIODIVERSITY ACTION PLAN
WFD, Common Implementation Strategy  Water Scarcity and Droughts Expert Group Madrid, February 17, 2010.
Fitness Check EU Water Policy
EU Water Framework Directive
BLModel boundaries BIOmet tool is a read across tool based on the ‘full BLM’, used for EQS compliance assessment. Number of EU waters fell outside of the.
Water Directors meeting Mondorf-les-bains, June 2005
Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC
Workshop on metals bioavailability under the Water Framework Directive
WG E on Priority Substances
10th TFMM meeting, June, 2009, France, Paris
WFD CIS 4th Intercalibration Workshop
Scene setter European Commission DG Environment
OSPAR progress on use of the decentralised option for reporting on monitoring programmes required under Article 11 of the MSFD.
My name is VL, I work at the EEA, on EA, and particularly on developing a platform of exchange which aims at facilitating the planning and development.
Concept paper on the assessment of WFD River Basin Management Plans
ASSIGNING WATER BODY TYPES IN THE WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION Wouter van de Bund EC Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and sustainability,
Welcome TFMM workshop on the implementation of the EMEP monitoring strategy Introduction to the monitoring strategy QA/QC activities of EMEP organisation.
Why are we reviewing reference conditions in intercalibration?
Presentation transcript:

Refined determination of metal availability in sediments (Acid Volatile Sulphide measurements) Presentation for the CMA meeting Paris, 17 November 2006 Eurométaux Lidia Regoli, Lynette Chung, Katrien Delbeke

Proposal for monitoring sediments for EU Metal Risk Assessments “ Proposal for a multi-metal monitoring campaign aiming at a refined determination of metal availability in sediments” The proposal was presented and agreed by member states at TC NES III ’06 A Steering Group will be set up composed of : members of the TC NES and/or CMA, monitoring experts from the member states, and Industry representatives.

Some backround Various divalent metals (Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb, Ni,..) show high affinity with sulfides in sediments. This limits their bioavailability, as they form insoluble metal sulfide complexes EU metal risk assessments (Zn, Cd, and ongoing Ni, Cu, Pb RAs) recognize the use of the SEM-AVS concept to increase the accuracy of predicting the actual risks of these metals in the sediment compartment. Application of the SEM-AVS concept : The SEM-AVS concept can be applied to the local/regional scale using paired measured data. If not available, the use of a conservative default AVS value can be considered. SEM-AVS : Simultaneous Extracted Metals – Acid Volatile Sulfides

TC NES discussions on choosing a default AVS The Flanders database: the largest database (n = 200 sediments) available on SEM-AVS data in the EU. 10Percentile AVS based on Flanders database was suggested as default AVS value for Europe TC NES questioned the representativeness of the Flanders region (and the subsequent derived default AVS) for all of Europe. Whereas Flanders region is representative of EU lowlands (the Netherlands, Germany, Northern France), not enough data available to evaluate if it is representative for other EU regions. Proposed way forward for ongoing EU metal risk assessments: A multi-metallic conclusion i) program aimed at collecting AVS data in relevant river systems in order to fill data gaps in AVS in other EU regions.

Selection of relevant EU regions Focus on identified regions for which little data exists with the final objective to derive representative region-specific default AVS values Considering : The WFD distinguishes 26 ecoregions in EU based on fauna living in EU inland waters FOREGS stream sediment maps (total organic carbon, iron oxides, silicon and sulfur content) show differences in Northern and Southern EU in comparison to EU lowlands. Choosing particular EU regions relevant for the EU risk assessments (regions where production sites are located)

WFD: Distinguishes 26 ecoregions in EU

FOREGS : TOC and Silicon content across the EU

Selection of relevant EU regions Northern Europe (Scandinavian countries) (Ecoregion 20 and 22) United Kingdom (Ecoregion 18) Belgium (Flanders), the Netherlands, Germany and France (midland river sediments) (Ecoregion 13-14) (already covered by the Flanders AVS) Southern Europe (Ecoregion 1-3-6)

Selection of sampling sites & surfacewater body types within the selected regions For each of the selected regions focus on: Main river basins/lakes Need the collaboration of MS expert to identify these Depositional sediments from the larger rivers/lakes that are at the higher end of the metal exposure spectrum (e.g. nearby local production sites) Minimum of 90 samples (30 per region), and depending on possible collaboration of MS who could assist with the sampling as part of their regional / national monitoring campaigns

Proposed sampling & analysis methodology Sediment collection : Stringent quality assurance/quality control guidelines Sampling will be conducted in Spring 2007 (April-June 2007) Laboratory Analysis : Analysis under approved standard procedures Data analysis : Data will be analysed to derive the 10th and 50th Percentile of the AVS for the different regions, that could be then used as a default reasonable worst case and typical value in case no other site specific AVS measurement are available. The details of the sampling strategy will be discussed with the steering group

Conclusion The AVS sampling campaign will allow for deriving default AVS values relevant for different EU regions where information is currently lacking. A steering group meeting will be organized to agree on the technical details related to the sampling and analysis. Sampling program will be conducted in Spring 2007 (April–June 2007) We solicit the cooperation of Member State experts that could provide logisitic support with regards to the sampling and participation in the steering group.