Computing Before Computers

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
B.F. Skinner & Radical Behaviorism Dr. Alan Zollman Mathematical Sciences MATH 610.
Advertisements

Operant Conditioning Compare and contrast the four methods used to modify behavior in operant conditioning (positive reinforcement, negative reinforcement,
Operant Conditioning Module 16 Demo Activity HO 16.1 Pkt. p. 7 See outline in pkt. p. 6 ½ DVD: Discovering Psychology: Disc 2: “Learning”
Operant Conditioning What is Operant Conditioning?
Behavioral Theories Of Learning
Operant Conditioning Operant conditioning - the learning of voluntary behavior through the effects of pleasant and unpleasant consequences to responses.
Operant Conditioning What the heck is it? Module 16.
Operant Conditioning Big Question: Is the organism learning associations between events that it does not control (classical) OR is it learning associations.
Behaviorism Ed Tech Masters Program Summer What is behaviorism all about? Psychology is purely the study of external behavior Behavior is objective.
Wynne Harlen Fibonacci European Training Session, March 21 st 2012.
Major philosophies of Education Philosophies PerennialismProgressivism EssentialismExistentialism SocialReconstructionism Fishbone organizer.
COSC 4126 learning - D Goforth Automation of learning learning machines.
What is Operant Conditioning? Module 16: Operant Conditioning.
Learning Chapter. Operant Conditioning Module 20.
What is Operant Conditioning?. Operant Conditioning A type of learning in which the frequency of a behavior depends on the consequence that follows that.
Instruction & Reinforcement. Identify a student and using instructional procedures in your book teach a skill: Use at least 4 strategies. Incorporate.
A Look Into Modern Education Mary Deal Elijah Salazar Marie-Louise Skidd.
WHAT IS THE NATURE OF SCIENCE?. SCIENTIFIC WORLD VIEW 1.The Universe Is Understandable. 2.The Universe Is a Vast Single System In Which the Basic Rules.
Transfer Like a Champ! By Michelle Brazeal. Transfer Training Why do we teach?
Thinking About Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behavior Charles T. Blair-Broeker Randal M. Ernst.
Operant Conditioning. A type of learning in which the frequency of a behavior depends on the consequence that follows that behavior. The frequency will.
Thinking About Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behavior 2e Charles T. Blair-Broeker Randal M. Ernst.
Learning Theories An overview. What’s a Theory, and Why Does it Matter?? Theories are ideas based on psychology, research, hard sciences, and/or evidence.
3 types of Learning 1. Classical 2. Operant 3. Social This Is our second type of Learning.
Thinking About Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behavior Charles T. Blair-Broeker Randal M. Ernst.
Operant Conditioning Module 15. Operant Conditioning A type of learning in which the frequency of a behavior depends on the consequence that follows that.
 A theoretical perspective that attempt to understand behavior by focusing on:  the external contingencies of reinforcement (any consequence of an.
Hawthorn Effect A term referring to the tendency of some people to work harder and perform better when they are participants in an experiment. Individuals.
Operant Conditioning The Main Features of Operant Conditioning: Types of Reinforcement and Punishment.
PROGRAMMED LEARNING MATERIAL ( PLM)
Unit 6: Learning (Behaviorism)
OperanT conditioning.
Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice Chapter 5
Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching
Kasey Tate & Sam Cocks EDUC2322, Flinders University
Panel on the Development, Maintenance, and Use of Course Web Sites
3.3 Learning Theories- Conditioning
Philosophy of Education
© 2008 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
PROGRAMMED LEARNING October 20, 2008.
CURRICULUM COMPACTING
Unit 6 Learning.
Development and Theorists
REINFORCEMENT AND FEEDBACK
Principles of Learning
Thinking About Psychology: The Science of Mind and Behavior 2e
Theme: “Learning with computer”
Operant Conditioning.
Discrete Event Simulation - 4
Chapter 6.
Essentials of Learning for Instruction
A-Level PE What is operant conditioning?
Quick Quiz Describe the 5 types of transfer and give an example of how each of them can be used in sports. (5)
Building an Educational Philosophy in a Changing World
II. Operant Conditioning
B.F. Skinner “Education is what survives when what has been learnt has been forgotten.” - B.F. Skinner.
Operant Conditioning.
Do-Now: Describe the following phenomena of Classical Conditioning:
Human Learning.
CURRICULUM COMPACTING
Module 27 – Operant Conditioning 27
Change Management Plan
Panel on the Development, Maintenance, and Use of Course Web Sites
CURRICULUM COMPACTING
CURRICULUM COMPACTING
Two principles of conditioning that have aided our learning and improved our adaptability as a species are stimulus generalization and stimulus discrimination.
Behaviorism B. F. Skinner. B.F. Skinner ( )
Agenda To Get: To Do: Guided notes Intro Unit 7: Learning
EDUC 2130 Quiz #10 W. Huitt.
Operant Conditioning What the heck is it?
Presentation transcript:

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Computing Before Computers A Look at the History of Educational Technology Jesse M. Heines, Ed.D. Dept. of Computer Science Univ. of Massachusetts Lowell MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Yikes! MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Can we make better use of educational technology by studying its past? 3 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Predicting the Future Anyone who tries to draw the future in hard lines and vivid hues is a fool. The future will not sit for a portrait. It will come around a corner we never noticed, take us by surprise. – George Leonard, 1968 Education and Ecstasy MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Educational Device Wish List Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Educational Device Wish List Easy-To-Use – no training needed Easy-To-Read – typeset-quality text Flexible – graphics and images Small – carry in a pocket Portable – doesn’t need to be plugged in, doesn’t even need batteries Reliable – never breaks down Durable – different students can share it and it can be reused year after year Inexpensive – under $5/student MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines The Bible of 42 Lines printed 1456 6 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Johannes Gutenberg 1456 1398-1468 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Monitorial School 1839 Joseph Lancaster, 1778-1838 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines St. Louis Museum 1905 9 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Cleveland Museum 1909 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Maria Montessori 1870-1952 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Montessori Method 1911 Respect for the learner’s individuality Encouragement of the learner’s freedom MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines John Dewey 1859-1952 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Dewey Psychology 1896 Stimulus and response are not fully independent events, they are organically related Learning involves two-way interaction between learners and their environment Learners’ experiences within their environments are the basis of the meanings they deduce and the goals and actions they pursue MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Edward L. Thorndike 1874-1949 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Thorndike Laws 1913 Law of Exercise The more often a stimulus-induced response is repeated, the longer it will be retained. Law of Effect A response is strengthened if followed by pleasure and weakened if followed by displeasure. Law of Readiness In any given situation, certain “units” are more predisposed to conduct than others due to the structure of the nervous system. MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Thorndike Principles 1913 Self-activity Interest (motivation) Preparation and mental set Individualization Socialization MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Jean Piaget 1896-1980 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Piaget Conservation 1969 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Piaget Conservation 1969 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Thorndike on Technology Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Thorndike on Technology If, by a miracle of mechanical ingenuity, a book could be so arranged that only to him who had done what was directed on page one would page two become visible, and so on, much that now requires personal instruction could be managed by print. – Education, 1912 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Sidney L. Pressey 1924 A self-scoring multiple-choice apparatus that gives tests and scores – and teaches MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Sidney L. Pressey 1926 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Sidney L. Pressey 1927 A multiple-choice device that omits items from further presentation once the student can consistently answer them correctly. MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Pressey Variant by Skinner Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Pressey Variant by Skinner 1958 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Rheem-Califone Variant Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Rheem-Califone Variant 1959 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Pressey Punch- board 1950 27 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Pressey Punchboard 1950 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines B.F. Skinner 1904-1990 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Skinner Questions 1953 What behavior is to be established? What reinforcers are available? What responses are available? How can reinforcements be most efficiently scheduled? MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Programmed Instruction Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Programmed Instruction The whole process of becoming compe-tent in any field must be divided into a very large number of very small steps, and reinforcement must be contingent upon the accomplishment of each step... By making each successive step as small as possible, the frequency of reinforcement can be raised to a maximum, while the possible aversive consequences of being wrong are reduced to a minimum. – Science and Human Behavior, 1953 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Skinner Machine 1954 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Skinner Machine 1954 33 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Skinner Disk 1958 Student at work in a self-instruction room. Material appears in the left-hand window. Student writes his response on a strip of paper exposed at the right. MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Skinner Disk 1958 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Skinner Disk 1958 36 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Skinner Variant by Porter Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Skinner Variant by Porter 1958 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines James G. Holland 1960 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Holland Discrimination Task Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Holland Discrimination Task MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines “A Teaching Machine... ...for Lower Organisms” Holland, 1960 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Skinner: “We’re Done” There is a simple job to be done. The task can be stated in concrete terms. The necessary techniques are known. The equipment needed can easily be provided. Nothing stands in the way but cultural inertia. – B.F. Skinner, 1954 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Teaching Rats and Humans Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Teaching Rats and Humans There is, to the best of my knowledge, no science of maze running to be taught. ... The only reason a rat should turn to the right rather than the left at a certain point is that it is that turn which leads to reinforcement. No better reason can be learned because there is none. Students sometimes pass courses in logic and mathematics in the same way. ... – John W. Blyth, 1960 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Teaching Rats and Humans Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Teaching Rats and Humans A student who gives a particular response merely because that is the one the teacher reinforces has not learned a subject... The reason for giving some response must be more than the fact that it causes the teacher to say “correct.” Our experience has convinced us that the most effective method of presenting a program of questions and answers is a machine using microfilm and designed for individual use. – Heines paraphrase of Blyth, 1960 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Teacher Super- vision Porter, 1958 Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Teacher Super- vision Porter, 1958 44 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Briggs Subj.-Matter Trainer Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Briggs Subj.-Matter Trainer 1958 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Enter the Computer 1959 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Crowder Self-Instructional Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Crowder Self-Instructional 1960 “The program of materials presented can be arranged so that the presentation of new items depends upon the student’s own performance.” MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Adaption to Failure 48 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Adaption to Success 49 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Intrinsic Programming 1 Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Intrinsic Programming 1 Norman A. Crowder, 1960 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Intrinsic Programming 2 Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Intrinsic Programming 2 Norman A. Crowder, 1960 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Intrinsic Programming 3 Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Intrinsic Programming 3 Norman A. Crowder, 1960 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Intrinsic Programming 4 Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Intrinsic Programming 4 Norman A. Crowder, 1960 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Intrinsic Programming 5 Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Intrinsic Programming 5 Norman A. Crowder, 1960 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Types of Test Error MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Type I: False Negative Error Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Type I: False Negative Error True master classified as a non-master Student takes unneeded instruction Less serious than a Type II error MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Type II: False Positive Error Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Type II: False Positive Error True non-master classified as a master Student skips needed instruction More serious than a Type I error MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Decision Model To minimize the probability of an error, we use a decision model that takes these error conditions into account. MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Decision Model 1 Standard Criterion-Referenced Decision Model 100% Correct Mastery and Non-Mastery Criterion Score 0% Correct MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Decision Model 2 Basic Sequential Testing Criterion-Referenced Decision Model 100% Correct Mastery Criterion Score Uncertainty Interval Non-Mastery Criterion Score 0% Correct MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Decision Model 3 Sequential Testing Criterion-Referenced Decision Model With Decision Certainty Factor Based on Test Length 100% Correct } Mastery Criterion Score Variable Size Uncertainty Interval Non-Mastery Criterion Score 0% Correct MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Decision Model 4 } Sequential Testing Criterion-Referenced Decision Model For Tests 1-2 Items Long } All scores fall within the uncertainty interval } MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Decision Model 5 } Sequential Testing Criterion-Referenced Decision Model For Tests 4 Items Long } Uncertainty interval } 25% Non-Mastery Classification 0% MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Decision Model 6 } Sequential Testing Criterion-Referenced Decision Model For Tests 6 Items Long } } Uncertainty interval 33% Non-Mastery Classification 0% MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Decision Model 7 Sequential Testing Criterion-Referenced Decision Model For Tests 9 Items Long } 100% Mastery Classification } } Uncertainty interval 40% Non-Mastery Classification 0% MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Decision Model 8 Sequential Testing Criterion-Referenced Decision Model For Tests 15 Items Long 100% Mastery Classification 90% } Uncertainty interval 45% Non-Mastery Classification 0% MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Influencing Factors Fixed Mastery Criterion Non-Mastery Criterion Allowable Probability of a Type I Error Allowable Probability of a Type II Error Variable Test Length MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines For Pretests Mastery Criterion 90% Non-Mastery Criterion 65% Type I Error Probability 0.025 Type II Error Probability 0.058 We want to be very sure the student is a master before letting instruction be skipped. Note the low probability of a Type I (false positive) error. MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines For Posttests Mastery Criterion 85% Non-Mastery Criterion 60% Type I Error Probability 0.050 Type II Error Probability 0.104 The student has already gone through the material at least once, so the criteria can be loosened. Note that the probability of a Type I error is twice as high as before. MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Pretest Decision Rules Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Pretest Decision Rules Number of Items Answered Correctly Number of Items Presented MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Posttest Decision Rules Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Posttest Decision Rules Number of Items Answered Correctly Number of Items Presented MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Decision Rules Compared Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Decision Rules Compared Pretest Posttest MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Technology’s Role 1 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Technology’s Role 2 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Technology’s Role 3 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Technology’s Role 4 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Technology’s Role 5 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Technology’s Role 6 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines The Best Teacher The best teacher uses books and appliances as well as his own insight, sympathy, and magnetism. – Edward L. Thorndike Education , 1912 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Jesse M. Heines, Ed.D. Dept. of Computer Science Univ. of Massachusetts Lowell heines@cs.uml.edu or heines@mit.edu http://www.cs.uml.edu/~heines MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Primary Reference 81 MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Primary References Lumsdaine, A.A. and Glaser, Robert, 1960. Teaching Machines and Programmed Learning: A Source Book. National Education Association of the United States, Washington, D.C. Saettler, Paul, 1968. A History of Instructional Technology. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY. Saettler, Paul, 1990. The Evolution of American Educational Technology. Libraries Unlimited, Englewood, CO. MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001

Some Secondary References Computing Before Computers Jesse M. Heines Some Secondary References Pressey, S.L., 1926. A simple apparatus which gives tests and scores – and teaches. School and Society 23:586, March 20, 1926. Pressey, S.L., 1927. A machine for automatic teaching of drill material. School and Society 25:645, May 7, 1927. Skinner, B.F., 1954. The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review 24(2). Skinner, B.F., 1958. Teaching machines. Science 128, October 24, 1958. MIT CAES Tech Lunch, March 13, 2001