Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Advertisements

Structure of the Rho Transcription Terminator
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Crystal structure of the chemotaxis receptor methyltransferase CheR suggests a conserved structural motif for binding S-adenosylmethionine  Snezana Djordjevic,
Jue Chen, Gang Lu, Jeffrey Lin, Amy L Davidson, Florante A Quiocho 
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Crystal Structure of M. tuberculosis ABC Phosphate Transport Receptor
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Crystal Structure of an Octameric RuvA–Holliday Junction Complex
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2002)
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Volume 85, Issue 7, Pages (June 1996)
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (December 2002)
Structure of the Endonuclease Domain of MutL: Unlicensed to Cut
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages (August 1997)
The Mechanism of E. coli RNA Polymerase Regulation by ppGpp Is Suggested by the Structure of their Complex  Yuhong Zuo, Yeming Wang, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Catalytic Center Assembly of HPPK as Revealed by the Crystal Structure of a Ternary Complex at 1.25 Å Resolution  Jaroslaw Blaszczyk, Genbin Shi, Honggao.
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Rong Shi, Laura McDonald, Miroslaw Cygler, Irena Ekiel  Structure 
Volume 94, Issue 4, Pages (August 1998)
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Crystal Structure of a G:T/U Mismatch-Specific DNA Glycosylase
Crystal Structure of a SIR2 Homolog–NAD Complex
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Structure and Mechanism of Yeast RNA Triphosphatase
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (May 1999)
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Crystallographic Analysis of the Recognition of a Nuclear Localization Signal by the Nuclear Import Factor Karyopherin α  Elena Conti, Marc Uy, Lore Leighton,
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Mark Del Campo, Alan M. Lambowitz  Molecular Cell 
The basis for K-Ras4B binding specificity to protein farnesyl-transferase revealed by 2 Å resolution ternary complex structures  Stephen B Long, Patrick.
Volume 91, Issue 7, Pages (December 1997)
Transformation of MutL by ATP Binding and Hydrolysis
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2002)
Qun Liu, Qingqiu Huang, Xin Gen Lei, Quan Hao  Structure 
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
David Jeruzalmi, Mike O'Donnell, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Structural Insight into AMPK Regulation: ADP Comes into Play
Carl C. Correll, Betty Freeborn, Peter B. Moore, Thomas A. Steitz  Cell 
Structure of BamHI Bound to Nonspecific DNA
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Crystal Structures of RNase H Bound to an RNA/DNA Hybrid: Substrate Specificity and Metal-Dependent Catalysis  Marcin Nowotny, Sergei A. Gaidamakov, Robert.
Crystal Structure of the Tyrosine Phosphatase SHP-2
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Structure of a HoxB1–Pbx1 Heterodimer Bound to DNA
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (July 2002)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Yong Xiong, Fang Li, Jimin Wang, Alan M. Weiner, Thomas A. Steitz 
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Rachelle Gaudet, Andrew Bohm, Paul B Sigler  Cell 
Volume 126, Issue 4, Pages (August 2006)
Structural and Biochemical Analysis of the Obg GTP Binding Protein
The Crystal Structure of an Unusual Processivity Factor, Herpes Simplex Virus UL42, Bound to the C Terminus of Its Cognate Polymerase  Harmon J Zuccola,
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Morgan Huse, Ye-Guang Chen, Joan Massagué, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages 65-75 (July 1997) Identification and Structural Characterization of the ATP/ADP-Binding Site in the Hsp90 Molecular Chaperone  Chrisostomos Prodromou, S.Mark Roe, Ronan O'Brien, John E. Ladbury, Peter W. Piper, Laurence H. Pearl  Cell  Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages 65-75 (July 1997) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80314-1

Figure 1 Nucleotide Binding by the Hsp90 N-Terminal Domain (a) Secondary structure cartoon of the yeast Hsp90 N-domain dimer showing the position of the bound ADP/ATP. The base, sugar, and phosphates of the bound nucleotide are colored green, red, and magenta, respectively. (b) Stereo view of the ADP/ATP-binding site in one monomer. (c) Stereo view of electron density for the bound nucleotide and associated solvent from the Hsp90 N-domain–ATP complex. The electron density is from an Fo-Fc Fourier, phased from protein coordinates only, refined against the data at 2.0 Å using simulated annealing. Contours are at 3.0σ. Cell 1997 90, 65-75DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80314-1)

Figure 2 ADP/ATP Interactions in the Nucleotide Binding Pocket of Hsp90 (a) Overall view of ADP bound in the pocket on the helical face of the Hsp90 N-domain monomer. The solvent accessible protein surface is colored to reflect the electrostatic potential, going from negative (red) to positive (blue). The bound ADP molecule is colored as in Figure 1a. (b) Schematic diagram of ADP interactions. Hydrogen bonds are shown as dashed lines, van der Waals interactions are indicated by fur. (c) Stereo view of ADP bound in the nucleotide-binding pocket. Residues from the protein are drawn as green sticks, and the ADP is shown in ball-and-stick representation with CPK colors for the atoms. Water molecules are red spheres, and the Mg2+ ion is a white sphere. Hydrogen bonds are shown as broken yellow rods, and the magnesium-ligand interactions as broken blue rods. Cell 1997 90, 65-75DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80314-1)

Figure 3 Comparison of Bound Nucleotide Conformations in Hsc70 and Hsp90 Conformations of ADP bound to (a) Hsc70 (Flaherty et al. 1994) and (b) Hsp90. The N1, N6, which make specific contacts in the ADP/ATP-binding pocket, are indicated, as is the adenine base C8 atom, which is unhindered in the Hsc70-bound conformation but hindered in the Hsp90-bound conformation. Cell 1997 90, 65-75DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80314-1)

Figure 6 A Model for the ATP-Dependent Conformational Changes in the Molecular Clamp of the Hsp90 N-Terminal Domain (a and b) Conformational flexibility of the N-domain dimer, in the (a) closed and (b) open conformations (Prodromou et al. 1997). The bound nucleotides observed in the closed form of the dimer is modeled into the corresponding position on the open conformation. (c) Cartoon of a possible model for ATP-switched opening and closing of the N-domain molecular clamp. Binding of ATP to the N-domains recruits p23, which interacts with the bound ATP and a site in the C-terminal region of Hsp90, promoting a conformational change that allows the release of a bound protein or peptide. Hydrolysis of the ATP releases bound p23, and the clamp closes. Cell 1997 90, 65-75DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80314-1)

Figure 4 Comparison of the ATP-Binding Domains of DNA Gyrase B and Hsp90 (a and b) Side-by-side comparison of the backbone folds of Hsp90 (right) and DNA gyrase B (left) N-terminal domains. The amino-terminal strand in gyrase B and the C-terminal strand in Hsp90, which participate in dimer formation, are highlighted in cyan and red, respectively. The lid segment is highlighted in magenta. Bound nucleotides are shown as green CPK models. Cell 1997 90, 65-75DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80314-1)

Figure 5 Structural Alignment of the Amino Acid Sequences of Hsp90 and DNA Gyrase B Alignment of the amino acid sequences of E. coli DNA gyrase B (SwissProt: GYRB_ECOLI) and S. cerevisiae Hsp90 (SwissProt: HS82_YEAST) N-domains, based on the alignment of their secondary structures by the SSAP algorithm (Orengo and Taylor 1996). Helices are shown as cylinders, with α helices colored red, and helices with a primarily 310 conformation colored magenta. β strands are shown as green arrows. Sequence identities are indicated by vertical bars between the sequences, and the three motifs identified as common to type II topoisomerases and Hsp90s (Bergerat et al. 1997) are highlighted in red. Cell 1997 90, 65-75DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80314-1)