Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Role of Bmi-1 and Ring1A in H2A Ubiquitylation and Hox Gene Silencing
Advertisements

Volume 124, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Takashi Tanaka, Michelle A. Soriano, Michael J. Grusby  Immunity 
Volume 49, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Purusharth Rajyaguru, Meipei She, Roy Parker  Molecular Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Autoinhibition of c-Abl
H-NS2 protein interacts with Lon and H-NS protein in vitro.
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
The structure of the GPIb–filamin A complex
Hsp104, Hsp70, and Hsp40  John R Glover, Susan Lindquist  Cell 
NRF2 Is a Major Target of ARF in p53-Independent Tumor Suppression
Richard C. Centore, Stephanie A. Yazinski, Alice Tse, Lee Zou 
Monica C. Rodrigo-Brenni, Erik Gutierrez, Ramanujan S. Hegde 
The Plasticity of the Hsp90 Co-chaperone System
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 6, Pages (September 2005)
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages (November 2014)
Crystal Structure of the Rab9A-RUTBC2 RBD Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis for the Binding Specificity of Rab9A with RUTBC2  Zhe Zhang, Shanshan Wang,
SUMO Promotes HDAC-Mediated Transcriptional Repression
Richard J. Sessler, Noa Noy  Molecular Cell 
Volume 55, Issue 4, Pages (August 2014)
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
MAGE-RING Protein Complexes Comprise a Family of E3 Ubiquitin Ligases
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages (June 2011)
ClpS, a Substrate Modulator of the ClpAP Machine
Volume 19, Issue 12, Pages (December 2011)
Structural Basis for Endosomal Targeting by the Bro1 Domain
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages e5 (May 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e4 (February 2018)
Volume 24, Issue 16, Pages (August 2014)
Jiao Yang, Melesse Nune, Yinong Zong, Lei Zhou, Qinglian Liu  Structure 
Per Stehmeier, Stefan Muller  Molecular Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Lizhong Xu, Veronica Lubkov, Laura J. Taylor, Dafna Bar-Sagi 
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Structural Basis for Specific Recognition of Reelin by Its Receptors
A Critical Role for Noncoding 5S rRNA in Regulating Mdmx Stability
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Yi Tang, Jianyuan Luo, Wenzhu Zhang, Wei Gu  Molecular Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 11, Pages (November 2006)
Flora Ambre Honoré, Vincent Méjean, Olivier Genest  Cell Reports 
Volume 19, Issue 14, Pages (July 2009)
Two Functional Modes of a Nuclear Receptor-Recruited Arginine Methyltransferase in Transcriptional Activation  María J. Barrero, Sohail Malik  Molecular.
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Involvement of PIAS1 in the Sumoylation of Tumor Suppressor p53
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 43, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Cooperation of a ubiquitin domain protein and an E3 ubiquitin ligase during chaperone/proteasome coupling  Jens Demand, Simon Alberti, Cam Patterson,
USP15 Negatively Regulates Nrf2 through Deubiquitination of Keap1
Proteasome-Mediated Degradation of p21 via N-Terminal Ubiquitinylation
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (April 2004)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 65, Issue 5, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (October 2017)
Role of Bmi-1 and Ring1A in H2A Ubiquitylation and Hox Gene Silencing
Presentation transcript:

Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 472-482 (March 2015) A Bipartite Interaction between Hsp70 and CHIP Regulates Ubiquitination of Chaperoned Client Proteins  Huaqun Zhang, Joseph Amick, Ritu Chakravarti, Stephanie Santarriaga, Simon Schlanger, Cameron McGlone, Michelle Dare, Jay C. Nix, K. Matthew Scaglione, Dennis J. Stuehr, Saurav Misra, Richard C. Page  Structure  Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 472-482 (March 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2015.01.003 Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Structure 2015 23, 472-482DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.01.003) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Structure of the CHIP-TPR:Hsc70-Lid-Tail Complex (A) Arrangement of domains within CHIP and Hsc70. (B) Cartoon view of the Hsc70-lid-tail (Hsc70541–646Δ626–638) in complex with the CHIP-TPR domain (CHIP21–154). Hsc70-lid-tail and CHIP-TPR domains are colored orange and gray, respectively. Specific CHIP-TPR residues that interact with Hsc70-lid, Hsc70-tail, or both domains are colored green, purple, and yellow, respectively. (C) Alignment of human, murine, and bovine Hsc70-lid-tail and Hsp70-lid-tail sequences with secondary structure overlay. Lid and tail residues that interact with the CHIP-TPR are colored orange. See also Figures S1–S3. Structure 2015 23, 472-482DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.01.003) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Residues that Mediate CHIP-TPR:Hsc70-Lid Interactions Modulate CHIP-Mediated Ubiquitination (A) Western blot with anti-GST antibody to detect ubiquitination of GST-Hsc70395–646 by wild-type (WT) and mutant CHIP1–303. (B) Western blot with anti-CHIP antibody to detect autoubiquitination of wild-type (WT) and mutant CHIP1–303. (C) Pull-down of GST∼Hsc70395–646 (GST∼Hsc70-SBDβ-lid-tail) by wild-type (WT) and mutant His6-CHIP1–303 bound to Ni2+ mag-Sepharose beads analyzed by SDS-PAGE with Coomassie staining. Lanes indicate GST∼Hsc70395–646 and CHIP1–303 components utilized (INPUT), the final wash fraction (Wash), and the elution fraction (Elute). See also Figure S4. Structure 2015 23, 472-482DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.01.003) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Hsc70 Residues that Mediate CHIP-TPR:Hsc70-Lid Interactions Modulate CHIP-Mediated Ubiquitination (A) Western blot with anti-GST antibody to detect ubiquitination of wild-type (WT) and mutant GST∼Hsc70395–646 (GST∼Hsc70-SBDβ-lid-tail) constructs by wild-type CHIP1–303. (B) Pull-down of wild-type (WT) and mutant GST∼Hsc70395–646 constructs by wild-type His6-CHIP1–303 bound to Ni2+ mag-Sepharose beads analyzed by SDS-PAGE with Coomassie staining. Lanes indicate the GST∼Hsc70395–646 and CHIP1–303 components utilized (INPUT), the final wash fraction (Wash), and the elution fraction (Elute). Structure 2015 23, 472-482DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.01.003) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 CHIP-Mediated Chaperoned Ubiquitination In Vitro and Ex Vivo (A) CHIP-mediated ubiquitination of firefly luciferase was monitored by western blot using an anti-luciferase antibody. Control reactions were carried out with all reagents present except Hsp70, UbcH5b, or CHIP, respectively. (B) iNOS expression, induced by LPS and IFN-γ treatment, was monitored for 36 hr in Raw264.7 macrophages transfected with wild-type CHIP and CHIP mutants in which interactions between the U-box and E2 enzymes are disrupted (I235A, R272A) or the Hsp70-lid:TPR interaction is disrupted (V59D/L129D). Protein levels were monitored by western blot with anti-iNOS, anti-CHIP, and anti-GAPDH (loading control). (C) HEK293 cells were transfected with GFPiNOS and CHIP or CHIP mutants that disrupt E2:U-box interactions (I235A or R272A) or the Hsp70-lid:TPR interaction (V59D/L129D). Cells were incubated for 48 hr prior to imaging. (D) Cells from (C) were then collected, lysed, and analyzed by western blot with anti-GFP, anti-CHIP, and anti-β-actin (loading control). (E) Western blots from (D) were repeated six times and band intensities were quantified. Data represent mean ± SD. ∗p < 0.05. ∗∗p < 0.01. ∗∗∗p < 0.001. Structure 2015 23, 472-482DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.01.003) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Posttranslational Modifications of Hsc70 Residues Modulate CHIP-Mediated Ubiquitination (A) Western blot with anti-GST antibody to detect ubiquitination of GST∼Hsc70395–646Y611E phosphomimic, GST∼Hsc70395–646K561R -dimethyl-mimetic in comparison with wild-type (WT) GST∼Hsc70395–646 by wild-type CHIP1–303. (B) Pull-down of GST∼Hsc70395–646 Y611E and K561R mutant constructs by wild-type His6-CHIP1–303 bound to Ni2+ mag-Sepharose beads, analyzed by SDS-PAGE with Coomassie staining. Lanes indicate the GST∼Hsc70395–646 and CHIP1–303 components utilized (INPUT), the final wash fraction (Wash), and the elution fraction (Elute). See also Figure S5. Structure 2015 23, 472-482DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.01.003) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Models of Chaperoned Ubiquitination Complexes in ADP- and ATP-Bound States (A) A model of Hsp70, based on the structure of ADP-bound E. coli DnaK (Bertelsen et al., 2009), is fully compatible with binding to the TPR domain of CHIP protomer with an occluded U-box. CHIP, CHIP-TPR, UbcH5, Ubiquitin, Hsc70-Lid, Hsc70-Tail, Hsc70-SBDβ, and Hsc70-NBD are colored white, gray, purple, green, orange, black, wheat, and blue, respectively. (B) ADP-bound Hsp70 is also compatible with binding to TPR domain of CHIP protomer with accessible U-box. (C) A model of ATP-bound Hsp70, based on the structure of DnaK in the ATP-bound form (Qi et al., 2013), is compatible with binding to CHIP via the TPR domain of the protomer with an occluded U-box. (D) The CHIP-TPR from a protomer with an accessible U-box is also compatible with binding to ATP-bound Hsp70. Structure 2015 23, 472-482DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.01.003) Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions