Janin Glaenzer, Martin F. Peter, Gavin H. Thomas, Gregor Hagelueken 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
Advertisements

Volume 96, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 101, Issue 7, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 109, Issue 7, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Olivier Fisette, Stéphane Gagné, Patrick Lagüe  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 98, Issue 11, Pages (June 2010)
Phase Transitions in Biological Systems with Many Components
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 24, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Tamas Yelland, Snezana Djordjevic  Structure 
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (March 2006)
Po-Chao Wen, Emad Tajkhorshid  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Large-Scale Conformational Dynamics of the HIV-1 Integrase Core Domain and Its Catalytic Loop Mutants  Matthew C. Lee, Jinxia Deng, James M. Briggs, Yong.
Volume 110, Issue 10, Pages (May 2016)
Monika Sharma, Alexander V. Predeus, Nicholas Kovacs, Michael Feig 
Influence of Protein Scaffold on Side-Chain Transfer Free Energies
Regulation of Contraction by the Thick Filaments in Skeletal Muscle
Volume 107, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
EPR Spectroscopy Targets Structural Changes in the E
Christian Kappel, Ulrich Zachariae, Nicole Dölker, Helmut Grubmüller 
Volume 112, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Macromolecular Crowding Modulates Actomyosin Kinetics
Solution and Crystal Structures of a Sugar Binding Site Mutant of Cyanovirin-N: No Evidence of Domain Swapping  Elena Matei, William Furey, Angela M.
Shu-Chun Cheng, Gu-Gang Chang, Chi-Yuan Chou  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 99, Issue 8, Pages (October 2010)
Tianjun Sun, Peter L. Davies, Virginia K. Walker  Biophysical Journal 
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 106, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 114, Issue 5, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 111, Issue 9, Pages (November 2016)
“DFG-Flip” in the Insulin Receptor Kinase Is Facilitated by a Helical Intermediate State of the Activation Loop  Harish Vashisth, Luca Maragliano, Cameron F.
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
The Structure of the Tiam1 PDZ Domain/ Phospho-Syndecan1 Complex Reveals a Ligand Conformation that Modulates Protein Dynamics  Xu Liu, Tyson R. Shepherd,
Volume 110, Issue 12, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (May 2013)
Volume 99, Issue 2, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 103, Issue 5, Pages (September 2012)
Cholesterol Modulates the Dimer Interface of the β2-Adrenergic Receptor via Cholesterol Occupancy Sites  Xavier Prasanna, Amitabha Chattopadhyay, Durba.
Thomas H. Schmidt, Yahya Homsi, Thorsten Lang  Biophysical Journal 
Min Wang, Mary Prorok, Francis J. Castellino  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 114, Issue 3, Pages (February 2018)
Structural Basis of cis- and trans-Combretastatin Binding to Tubulin
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Allosteric Control of Syntaxin 1a by Munc18-1: Characterization of the Open and Closed Conformations of Syntaxin  Damian Dawidowski, David S. Cafiso 
Volume 101, Issue 7, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Mechanism of Anionic Conduction across ClC
Christina Bergonzo, Thomas E. Cheatham  Biophysical Journal 
Anisotropic Membrane Curvature Sensing by Amphipathic Peptides
Volume 19, Issue 8, Pages (August 2011)
Tianjun Sun, Peter L. Davies, Virginia K. Walker  Biophysical Journal 
Damian Dawidowski, David S. Cafiso  Structure 
Volume 84, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Yongli Zhang, Junyi Jiao, Aleksander A. Rebane  Biophysical Journal 
Po-chia Chen, Jochen S. Hub  Biophysical Journal 
Structural and Thermodynamic Basis for Enhanced DNA Binding by a Promiscuous Mutant EcoRI Endonuclease  Paul J. Sapienza, John M. Rosenberg, Linda Jen-Jacobson 
Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
Shayantani Mukherjee, Sean M. Law, Michael Feig  Biophysical Journal 
Interactions of the Auxilin-1 PTEN-like Domain with Model Membranes Result in Nanoclustering of Phosphatidyl Inositol Phosphates  Antreas C. Kalli, Gareth.
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (March 2018)
Cotranslational Folding Increases GFP Folding Yield
Volume 108, Issue 8, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Zackary N. Scholl, Weitao Yang, Piotr E. Marszalek  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Presentation transcript:

PELDOR Spectroscopy Reveals Two Defined States of a Sialic Acid TRAP Transporter SBP in Solution  Janin Glaenzer, Martin F. Peter, Gavin H. Thomas, Gregor Hagelueken  Biophysical Journal  Volume 112, Issue 1, Pages 109-120 (January 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.12.010 Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Structural changes of P domains. (A) Difference distance matrix (diffDM) for the substrate-bound and -free forms of HiSiaP (PDB: 3B50 (37), PDB: 2CEY (10)). (Dark violet regions) Pairs of residues, where the Cβ-Cβ distance does not change between both conformations. (Yellow peaks) Large distance changes of up to 18 Å. (White circles) Pairs of residues that were selected as spin labeling sites. The violet squares along the diagonal of the matrix (dashed, white lines) can be interpreted as rigid domains (I–IV) of the P domain. Note that the matrix is symmetric along its diagonal. (B) The substrate-free structure of VcSiaP (PDB: 4MAG (23)). The protein is shown as cartoon model. A color gradient is running from yellow (N-terminus) to red (C-terminus) to indicate the trace of the polypeptide chain. Models of spin labels at positions highlighted in (A) were attached with MtsslWizard (blue lines). (C) Cartoon models of the individual structures of the rigid domains I-IV of substrate-free VcSiaP. (D) Model of the closed form of VcSiaP. The model was produced by superposing the rigid domains I-IV in (C) onto the structure of closed HiSiaP (PDB: 3B50 (37)). The model of the bound Neu5Ac is shown as spheres. Biophysical Journal 2017 112, 109-120DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.12.010) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 PELDOR measurements on spin-labeled VcSiaP. (A, C, E, and G) Background corrected PELDOR time traces of the indicated VcSiaP double mutant either with or without Neu5Ac, as indicated in the figure. (B, D, F, and H) Distance distributions (solid lines) calculated from time traces on the left using DEER Analysis 2016. Predicted distance distributions (mtsslWizard (mW) and MMM) are shown as translucent shades, as indicated. Hence, darker shades correspond to distances that are predicted by both programs. The error bars were calculated with DEER Analysis 2016. Spin-Spin distances from the crystal structure of the spin labeled 54/173 mutant are shown as vertical lines in (D). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 112, 109-120DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.12.010) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Open-close transition of VcSiaP followed by PELDOR spectroscopy. (A) PELDOR time traces of VcSiaP Q54R1/L173R1 titrated with the indicated amounts of Neu5Ac (black traces). (Superposed curves) Fits resulting from linear combinations of the 0 μM (open) and 600 μM (closed) Neu5Ac time traces using the equation y = a × open + (1−a) × closed. Note that small differences in modulation depths were corrected by scaling the time traces to a modulation depth of 100% before the fitting procedure. The fitting results were then back-scaled to the original modulation depth. (B) Distance distributions (DeerAnalysis 2016) corresponding to the time traces shown in (A). The distributions were normalized, so that their integral equals 1.0. The error bars were calculated using the evaluation procedure from DEER Analysis 2016. (C) Binding isotherm of the VcSiaP Q54R1/L173R1 × Neu5Ac interaction. (Black dots) Calculated VcSiaP/Neu5Ac concentrations (see main text). (Solid red line) Fit of the equation y = ((Ptot +Ligtot + Kd) −sqrt((Ptot + Ligtot + Kd)2 −4 × Ptot × Ligtot))/2 (41) to the data points. Ptot is the total concentration of VcSiaP, Ligtot is the total amount of Neu5Ac, and Kd is the dissociation constant. A Kd of 0.8 ± 0.4 μM was determined. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 112, 109-120DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.12.010) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Conformational changes upon Neu5Ac binding. (A) Detail of the substrate-bound HiSiaP structure (PDB: 3B50 (37)), showing the Neu5Ac molecule and its interaction with the R125, E184, and H207 triade (VcSiaP numbering). (B) Superposition of the four rigid bodies of substrate-bound HiSiaP (compare Fig. 1) with substrate-free HiSiaP (PDB: 2CEY (10)). (C) Detail of the superposition in (B), showing the R125, E184, H207 triade. (D) Open/closed state (percentage) of VcSiaP mutants as determined by PELDOR spectroscopy. The PELDOR data is shown in Fig. S4. The ++/+/− indicates if 10 mM (++), 1 mM (+), or no (−) Neu5Ac was present in the experiment. The error bars represent ±3 times the SD calculated in the linear combination fitting procedure. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 112, 109-120DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.12.010) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 X-ray structure of spin-labeled VcSiaP R125A Q54R1/L173R1. (A) The R1 side chain at position 54. The protein backbone is shown as a cartoon/stick model. A neighboring molecule in the crystal is indicated. (Gray mesh) The refined 2mFo-DFc electron density contoured at 1.0 σ. Residual difference electron density (mFo-DFc) contoured at 3.0 σ is indicated. (B) The R1 side chain at position 173. The figure is analogous to (A). (Broken arrow) Distance vector between the two spin centers. Its absolute value is 42.7 Å (The N-N distance was measured). To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2017 112, 109-120DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2016.12.010) Copyright © 2017 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions