Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Advertisements

Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Ying Wang, Veit Riechmann  Current Biology 
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016)
Malay Haldar, Goutam Karan, Petr Tvrdik, Mario R. Capecchi 
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (September 2012)
Volume 33, Issue 4, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Zhongjuan Zhang, Elise Tucker, Marita Hermann, Thomas Laux 
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages e4 (March 2017)
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages e3 (December 2017)
Volume 25, Issue 9, Pages (September 2017)
RBM24 Is a Major Regulator of Muscle-Specific Alternative Splicing
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages (April 2005)
Distinct Protein Domains and Expression Patterns Confer Divergent Axon Guidance Functions for Drosophila Robo Receptors  Bettina Spitzweck, Marko Brankatschk,
Wenqian Hu, Bingbing Yuan, Harvey F. Lodish  Developmental Cell 
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages (July 2015)
SoxE Factors Function Equivalently during Neural Crest and Inner Ear Development and Their Activity Is Regulated by SUMOylation  Kimberly M. Taylor, Carole.
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Jianjun Sun, Wu-Min Deng  Developmental Cell 
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (January 2016)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
IL-22 Promotes Fibroblast-Mediated Wound Repair in the Skin
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Volume 27, Issue 2, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 143, Issue 1, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Alternative Mechanisms for Talin to Mediate Integrin Function
The BMP Signaling Gradient Patterns Dorsoventral Tissues in a Temporally Progressive Manner along the Anteroposterior Axis  Jennifer A. Tucker, Keith.
Haguy Wolfenson, Irena Lavelin, Benjamin Geiger  Developmental Cell 
Ying Wang, Veit Riechmann  Current Biology 
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Vangl2 Promotes Wnt/Planar Cell Polarity-like Signaling by Antagonizing Dvl1-Mediated Feedback Inhibition in Growth Cone Guidance  Beth Shafer, Keisuke.
Jin Wan, Rajesh Ramachandran, Daniel Goldman  Developmental Cell 
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Codependent Activators Direct Myoblast-Specific MyoD Transcription
Bmp2 Signaling Regulates the Hepatic versus Pancreatic Fate Decision
Whole-Genome Analysis of Muscle Founder Cells Implicates the Chromatin Regulator Sin3A in Muscle Identity  Krista C. Dobi, Marc S. Halfon, Mary K. Baylies 
Volume 24, Issue 5, Pages (March 2013)
Recruitment of Ectodermal Attachment Cells via an EGFR-Dependent Mechanism during the Organogenesis of Drosophila Proprioceptors  Adi Inbal, Talila Volk,
Mariana Melani, Kaylene J. Simpson, Joan S. Brugge, Denise Montell 
Drosophila ASPP Regulates C-Terminal Src Kinase Activity
Xuepei Lei, Jianwei Jiao  Stem Cell Reports 
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 14, Pages (July 2006)
Muscle Satellite Cells Are Primed for Myogenesis but Maintain Quiescence with Sequestration of Myf5 mRNA Targeted by microRNA-31 in mRNP Granules  Colin G.
Volume 35, Issue 3, Pages (November 2015)
Drosophila Maelstrom Ensures Proper Germline Stem Cell Lineage Differentiation by Repressing microRNA-7  Jun Wei Pek, Ai Khim Lim, Toshie Kai  Developmental.
FGF Signaling Controls Somite Boundary Position and Regulates Segmentation Clock Control of Spatiotemporal Hox Gene Activation  Julien Dubrulle, Michael.
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Regulation of Focal Adhesions by Flightless I Involves Inhibition of Paxillin Phosphorylation via a Rac1-Dependent Pathway  Zlatko Kopecki, Geraldine.
Volume 129, Issue 2, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Kaumudi Joshi, Seunghee Lee, Bora Lee, Jae W. Lee, Soo-Kyung Lee 
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 11, Pages (June 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
Zhen Zhang, Jamie M. Verheyden, John A. Hassell, Xin Sun 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages 550-561 (March 2016) Localized LoxL3-Dependent Fibronectin Oxidation Regulates Myofiber Stretch and Integrin-Mediated Adhesion  Ortal Kraft-Sheleg, Shelly Zaffryar-Eilot, Olga Genin, Wesal Yaseen, Sharon Soueid-Baumgarten, Ofra Kessler, Tatyana Smolkin, Gal Akiri, Gera Neufeld, Yuval Cinnamon, Peleg Hasson  Developmental Cell  Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages 550-561 (March 2016) DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.02.009 Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Developmental Cell 2016 36, 550-561DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.02.009) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 LoxL3 Is Expressed in the Extremities of Differentiated Myofibers (A–A″) Whole-mount staining of LoxL3 (A, red in merge) and MHC (A′, green in merge) in an E10.0 embryo. Arrows highlight myofibers that have not reached the somitic boundaries yet express LoxL3 at their tips (A″). (B–C″) Transverse sections through an E10.5 mature somite at the somitic boundary (B) or at the somite's central domain (C) as shown in insets. Somites were immunostained for LoxL3 (B, C, and red in merge) and myosin heavy chain (B′, C′; green, MHC). Whereas LoxL3 is co-expressed with MHC at the ends of the somite (B, white arrows), it is not present in the center of the somite (C, empty arrows). (D–D″) Lateral section through an E11.5 embryo stained for LoxL3 (D) and Pax3 (D′) demonstrating that LoxL3 is not expressed in Pax3-expressing dermomyotomal cells. (E–E″) LoxL3 RNA in situ hybridization at E10.5 demonstrates that LoxL3 mRNA is also localized to somitic boundaries (E, black arrows). Somite myofibers are marked by MHC (E′, green). Developmental Cell 2016 36, 550-561DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.02.009) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 LoxL3 Mutant Mice (A) Cassette used to generate the LoxL3 mutant allele (adapted from https://www.mousephenotype.org/data/alleles/MGI:1337004/tm1a(EUCOMM)Wtsi/). (B) qRT-PCR demonstrates that no transcript is present in mutant embryos. RQ, relative quantity of LoxL3 to Hprt. (C) Western blot analysis for LoxL3 protein from wt, heterozygous, and homozygous mutant embryos demonstrates reduced amounts of LoxL3 protein in heterozygous embryos and no protein in LoxL3−/− embryos. (D) Table summarizing genotyping results from LoxL3 heterozygous intercrosses. Developmental Cell 2016 36, 550-561DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.02.009) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Myogenesis Is Affected in LoxL3 Mutants (A) qRT-PCR analysis of MyoD demonstrates no significant changes between wt and LoxL3 mutant E10.5 embryos. Data represent mean ± SD. (B and C) RNA in situ hybridization for MyoD demonstrates defective somitogenesis in LoxL3 mutant embryos; somites are smaller and have a triangular rather than rectangular shape in mutants. (D–G) Whole-mount MHC immunostaining in a wild-type (D) or Scx-GFP background (F) reveals the two main observed phenotypes displayed in LoxL3 mutant embryos: wavy and unstretched myofibers that anchor at an adjacent somite (E) or at the center of the somite (G, arrow). Tendon progenitors are also disorganized in mutants (F″ and G″). (D′–G′) are higher magnifications of the boxed areas in (D–G), respectively. (H and I) Immunostaining for CD31/PECAM reveals that intersomitic vessels are not affected by the loss of LoxL3. Developmental Cell 2016 36, 550-561DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.02.009) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Lox Enzymatic Activity Regulates Myofiber Anchorage at the Somitic Boundary Inhibition of chick Lox family members' enzymatic activity following the administration of BAPN results in wavy and unstretched (arrowhead) myofibers that disobey the somitic boundaries (arrows) as determined by MHC immunostaining at HH 18. (A′) and (B′) show higher magnifications of boxed areas in (A) and (B). Developmental Cell 2016 36, 550-561DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.02.009) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Integrin Signaling Is Reduced in LoxL3 Mutant Myofibers In vitro differentiated myofibers derived from wt (A, B, D, F, and F′) or LoxL3−/− (C, E, G, and G′) SCs. LoxL3 is expressed at myofiber termini (red; arrowheads; composite image from two stitched images; white line) (A). Straight and tense fibers are derived from wt SCs (B) but not from mutant SCs (C). F-actin staining reveals that the cytoskeletal arrangement is abnormal in LoxL3 mutant myofibers (D and E). Phosphorylated Paxillin (p-Pax) marking integrin-dependent focal adhesions is strongly reduced in LoxL3−/− myofibers; two examples of each genotype are shown (F and G). Arrows in (F-G′) mark myofiber termini. Note the reduced size and number of p-Pax foci in mutant myofibers. Arrowheads in (G) and (G′) mark p-Pax staining in nearby fibroblasts demonstrating the validity of the immunostaining procedure. Developmental Cell 2016 36, 550-561DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.02.009) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 LoxL3 Directly Oxidizes Fibronectin to Activate Integrin Signaling (A and B) Immunoprecipitation of LoxL3 reveals that Laminin (A) and FN (B) are co-precipitated. (C) In vitro oxidation assay demonstrates that FN, but not Laminin, is oxidized by LoxL3, an oxidation which is inhibited by BAPN. (D) Western blot analysis shows that MCF7LOXL3 cells have augmented levels of p-Pax when compared with the control cells (MCF7Vector; n = 3). (E and F) Significant enhancement of p-Pax, relative to total Pax, in MCF7 cells is induced following the pretreatment of FN matrix with CMLOXL3 (E, n = 3) or with purified recombinant LOXL3 (F, n = 6). (G–I′) Representative images demonstrating a higher number of p-Pax foci observed in myofibers (wt and LoxL3−/−) when differentiated on FN matrix that was pretreated with CM containing LOXL3. WT SCs plated on FN matrix pretreated with CMVector (G and G′) or CMLOXL3 (H and H′). LoxL3−/− SCs plated on FN matrix pretreated with CMLOXL3 (I and I′). White arrowheads in (G), (H), and (I) mark prominent intrafiber p-Pax foci, whereas empty arrows mark p-Pax foci at myofiber tips. In (G′), (H′), and (I′) p-Pax alone is shown. (J) Quantification of the number of intrafiber p-Pax following the distinct treatments. Data in (E), (F), and (J) represent mean ± SD. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗∗p < 0.001. N.S., not significant. Developmental Cell 2016 36, 550-561DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.02.009) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Assembly of Fibronectin Matrix Depends on LoxL3 Fibronectin matrix (red) forms along the somitic boundaries in wild-type E10.5 embryos (A) but is abnormal in LoxL3 mutants (B). This effect is most pronouncedly observed in locations where myofibers (green) cross the somitic borders (arrows in B). Developmental Cell 2016 36, 550-561DOI: (10.1016/j.devcel.2016.02.009) Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions