Update on AASHTO’s Comments Jim McDonnell, P.E. AASHTO

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Metro Muncipal Agreement Program
Advertisements

Agenda Introduction Advisory Circular Changes Consultant Selection Procedures Contract Format and Provisions Methods of Contracting and Allowable Costs.
SAFETEA-LU Efficient Environmental Review Process (Section 6002) Kelly Dunlap.
Use of Uniformed Police Officers on Federal-Aid Highway Construction Projects Executive Summary Presentation Prepared by Editor’s Ink Subcontractor to.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC February 5, 2004.
FOIA and NEPA Federal Highway Administration Environmental Conference June 2006.
1 CFR CHAPTER I AND 1 CFR PART 51 REGULATORY UPDATE.
OASIS PKI Action Plan – Overcoming Obstacles to PKI Deployment and Usage Steve Hanna, Co-Chair, OASIS PKI Technical Committee.
Environmental Justice: Policies, Guidance, and Answers to Frequently Asked Questions FTA Region VII Civil Rights Training.
Texas Department of Transportation Corpus Christi District Harbor Bridge Project U.S. 181 (Harbor Bridge)/SH 286 (Crosstown Expressway) Agency Scoping.
Amending FOISA and Widening Scope Sam Baker FOI Unit, Scottish Government.
1 State Water Resources Control Board Environmental Review for State Bond Funded Grant Projects Presented by Lisa Lee, Environmental Review Unit.
Tribal Benefits from State Implementation Plan (SIP) Process Involvement Rosanne Sanchez New Mexico Environment Department Air Quality Bureau.
Value Engineering at FHWA
Old Policy – which no one ever seem to have heard of.
Overview of the Work Zone Safety and Mobility Rule Module 1.
A Few Quick Items from AASHTO June 2006 Jim McDonnell, PE Associate Program Director, Engineering.
WORK ZONE SAFETY & MOBILITY Meeting the Federal Rule Jim Allen Safety Implementation Engineer ATSSA Illinois Chapter Meeting.
Halifax, 31 Oct – 3 Nov 2011ICT Accessibility For All ATIS Intellectual Property Rights Activities 2011 – An Update Thomas Goode General Counsel, ATIS.
PennDOT’s Study of NCHRP Research Results Implementation TRB State Representatives & AASHTO National RAC Meetings July 27, Michael Bonini Transportation.
U N I T E D S T A T E S D E P A R T M E N T O F C O M M E R C E N A T I O N A L O C E A N I C A N D A T M O S P H E R I C A D M I N I S T R A T I O N State.
Recommended Draft Policy ARIN Out of Region Use.
TEXAS NODAL Board of Directors Austin, Texas July 15, 2003.
Clear Zone Conflicts in AASHTO Publications Dick Albin Washington State Department of Transportation Presented at the AASHTO Subcommittee on Design Meeting.
Personal Independence Payment Rob O’Carroll, Nick Smith, Claire de Banke, Craig Isherwood Department for Work and Pensions nawra national association of.
Connected Vehicles Workforce FHWA Vehicle-to-Infrastructure
Public Involvement Meeting December 10,  Introduce the project  Explain the benefits of the project  Discuss tasks completed since last public.
CIPA (Children’s Internet Protection Act) Helping You Succeed Schools and Libraries Division Washington, DC Newark Atlanta Chicago Orlando.
Section 4.9 Work Group Members Kris Hafner, Chair, Board Member Rob Kondziolka, MAC Chair Maury Galbraith, WIRAB Shelley Longmuir, Governance Committee.
FHWA: Revision of Thirteen Controlling Criteria for Design; Notice for Request and Comment. Comments Due: December 7, 2015 Jeremy Fletcher, P.E., P.S.M.
Lecturer: Lina Vladimirovna Zhornyak, Associate Professor.
Transitioning from High School to College Disability Resource Center.
Welcome to the Public Comment Hearing on the Proposed Regulatory Update to the California Environmental Quality Act AB 52, Gatto (2014) Heather Baugh Assistant.
Proposed Rule to Streamline the NEPA Process Steve Leathery, NMFS NEPA Coordinator Marian Macpherson, Office of Sustainable Fisheries.
XBRL Voluntary Program on the EDGAR System
IUCN’s ‘One Programme’ approach:
Disability Support Services (DSS) and CUA Faculty
National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Environmental Planning in the Army Corps of Engineers
Division of Energy, Mineral, and Land Resources
Single Event Violations
Consultation on VICH Concept Papers and Draft Guidelines
Grace Anderson Chair, Budget Work Group April 19, 2017
Department of Environmental Quality
Sheung Li Task Group J Chairperson May 14, 2004
Unit 6 NEPA.
Consultation (C) After approval of the EIS, FONSI, or CE designation, the applicant shall consult with the Administration prior to requesting any major.
Kathy Harvey, P.E. State Design Engineer Missouri DOT
WG Technical Editor’s Report
Grace Anderson Chair, Budget Work Group April 19, 2017
Agreed Procedure Updates
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
Modify HOPE Act Variance to Include Other Organs
Federal Rulemaking Process for Significant Regulatory Actions
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision
Grace Anderson Chair, Budget Work Group April 19, 2017
Grace Anderson Chair, Budget Work Group April 19, 2017
SCHIP Advisory Council Duties and Responsibilities:
SCOHTS Meeting April 29-May 1, 2009
Environmental Requirements and planning grants
TPM/PBPP Implementation Timeline
Review of the 1958 Agreement
WG Technical Editor’s Report
Item 5.1. Learning Mobility in Higher Education
WisTMP 2.0 Update Andy Heidtke, PE Statewide Work Zone Design Engineer
Meeting of PAP/RAC Focal Points, Split, Croatia, 8-9 May 2019
NC’s 111(d) Plan Develop 111(d) State Plan consistent with Clean Air Act requirements Information requested from subject facilities Best System of Emissions.
Summary of GSC-13 IPR WG Meeting
Roles and Responsibilities
Presentation transcript:

Update on AASHTO’s Comments Jim McDonnell, P.E. AASHTO Supplemental Notice of Proposed Rule Making on Work Zone Safety and Mobility Update on AASHTO’s Comments Jim McDonnell, P.E. AASHTO

Original NPRM Released in Summer 2003 State DOTs had significant concerns, including: flexibility in the development of work zone policies and procedures scalability of those policies and procedures to a wide range of projects potential for litigation cost and time commitments potentially required

AASHTO’s response to the NPRM AASHTO submitted significant comments Requested another chance to review a draft rule, through the release of a “supplemental” NPRM Supplemental rule released in mid-May 2004 for a 30-day comment period Ad-hoc task force that developed original comments reviewed and commented on the supplemental

Supplemental NPRM Supplemental rule accommodated a vast majority of AASHTO’s comments Gave back to the states the ability to make decisions based on their own policies and engineering judgment Still a few minor points that need to be clarified, on which AASHTO will comment

Concerns with Supplemental Rule Biggest concern involves project “significance” Determination leads to varying degrees of work and documentation related to the work zone impacts For most projects, significance is determined based on sustained impacts that are anticipated to be greater than that considered tolerable based on agency policy or engineering judgment For Interstates, however, any work zone with lane closures for more than 3 days would be considered “significant”

Other Concerns A few remaining inconsistencies Requirements for specific participants in various procedures A few “shall” statements Some confusion regarding the requirement that “preexisting roadside safety features be maintained” during construction “Cooperation” or “coordination” used where “consultation” would be preferred

Next Steps Draft version of AASHTO’s response was sent to the Chief Engineers yesterday AASHTO encourages all states to submit comments, either by supporting AASHTO’s position, expanding on AASHTO’s comments, or submitting comments of their own Responses are due Monday, June 14