Questionnaire Results December 1999 & June 2000 2019/4/26 Questionnaire Results December 1999 & June 2000 2019/4/26

Overall Evaluation December 1999 Excellent…2 (11%) Good …….5 (28%) So-so……..9 (50%) Bad……….2 (11%) June 2000 Excellent..….1 (4%) Good………10 (37%) So-so………12 (44%) Bad………….4 (15%) 2019/4/26

Excellent ….3 (7%) December 1999 2019/4/26 Excellent ….3 (7%) December 1999 I could listen to it as many times as I liked. The necessity of computers has been rising. June 2000 It provided an comfortable listening environment. 2019/4/26

Good . ….15 (33%) December 1999 It was a new approach for me. 2019/4/26 Good . ….15 (33%) December 1999 It was a new approach for me. I was able to work on it at my own pace . Good opportunity to learn how to use the computer, It was interesting. 2019/4/26

Good (continued) June 2000 I think my listening skills have improved. A new way for the 21st centry. It was good that I was able to listen to it as often as possible. 2019/4/26

2019/4/26 So-so…… 21 (47%) December 1999 I wonder if this test really tests my ability. There were many machine-related problems. There were many obstacles as I am not familiar with the use of the computer. 2019/4/26

(So-so, continued) June 2000 2019/4/26 (So-so, continued) June 2000 I prefer normal paper tests, because the preset test is not fair. I say many times, but I am not familiar with the use of the Macintosh computer, so I had a hard time. I lost time because of my unfamiliarity about the computer. 2019/4/26

2019/4/26 Bad……… 6 (13%) December 1999 I could not begin soon due to problems on the computer. June 2000 It made me very tired. There are so many things I don't understand. 2019/4/26