Daichi Okuno, Masayoshi Nishiyama, Hiroyuki Noji  Biophysical Journal 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
Advertisements

Daichi Okuno, Masayoshi Nishiyama, Hiroyuki Noji  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 105, Issue 12, Pages (December 2013)
Yinghao Wu, Barry Honig, Avinoam Ben-Shaul  Biophysical Journal 
Kinetic Hysteresis in Collagen Folding
Volume 105, Issue 3, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 90, Issue 10, Pages (May 2006)
María del Rocío Cantero, Horacio F. Cantiello  Biophysical Journal 
Single-Molecule Motions of MHC Class II Rely on Bound Peptides
Santosh K. Dasika, Kalyan C. Vinnakota, Daniel A. Beard 
Volume 111, Issue 8, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 130, Issue 2, Pages (July 2007)
Lara Scharrel, Rui Ma, René Schneider, Frank Jülicher, Stefan Diez 
Joseph M. Johnson, William J. Betz  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 2009)
He Meng, Johan Bosman, Thijn van der Heijden, John van Noort 
On the Origin of Kinesin Limping
Jennifer L. Ross, Henry Shuman, Erika L.F. Holzbaur, Yale E. Goldman 
Megan T. Valentine, Steven M. Block  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 106, Issue 12, Pages (June 2014)
Physiological Pathway of Magnesium Influx in Rat Ventricular Myocytes
A Programmable Optical Angle Clamp for Rotary Molecular Motors
Mechanical Distortion of Single Actin Filaments Induced by External Force: Detection by Fluorescence Imaging  Togo Shimozawa, Shin'ichi Ishiwata  Biophysical.
Volume 107, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Qiaochu Li, Stephen J. King, Ajay Gopinathan, Jing Xu 
Shiori Toba, Hiroyuki Iwamoto, Shinji Kamimura, Kazuhiro Oiwa 
Volume 103, Issue 4, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 107, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Greta Faccio, Stefan Salentinig  Biophysical Journal 
Shu-Chun Cheng, Gu-Gang Chang, Chi-Yuan Chou  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 79, Issue 2, Pages (August 2000)
Volume 100, Issue 5, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 111, Issue 7, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Importance of the Voltage Dependence of Cardiac Na/K ATPase Isozymes
Volume 111, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Kinetic Hysteresis in Collagen Folding
Catalysis-Enhancement via Rotary Fluctuation of F1-ATPase
Probing the Cell Peripheral Movements by Optical Trapping Technique
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (November 2013)
L. Stirling Churchman, Henrik Flyvbjerg, James A. Spudich 
Volume 95, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Torque Generation by Axonemal Outer-Arm Dynein
Blocking of Single α-Hemolysin Pore by Rhodamine Derivatives
Volume 112, Issue 4, Pages (February 2017)
Rikiya Watanabe, Makoto Genda, Yasuyuki Kato-Yamada, Hiroyuki Noji 
Microscopic Analysis of Bacterial Motility at High Pressure
Differences between Cardiac and Skeletal Troponin Interaction with the Thin Filament Probed by Troponin Exchange in Skeletal Myofibrils  Zhenyun Yang,
Volume 101, Issue 7, Pages (October 2011)
Elementary Functional Properties of Single HCN2 Channels
Volume 102, Issue 8, Pages (April 2012)
Volume 108, Issue 12, Pages (June 2015)
Interaction of Oxazole Yellow Dyes with DNA Studied with Hybrid Optical Tweezers and Fluorescence Microscopy  C.U. Murade, V. Subramaniam, C. Otto, Martin.
Volume 95, Issue 10, Pages (November 2008)
Mitsuhiro Sugawa, Kaoru A. Okada, Tomoko Masaike, Takayuki Nishizaka 
Volume 107, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
Mechanical Coupling between Myosin Molecules Causes Differences between Ensemble and Single-Molecule Measurements  Sam Walcott, David M. Warshaw, Edward P.
Use Dependence of Heat Sensitivity of Vanilloid Receptor TRPV2
Volume 98, Issue 9, Pages (May 2010)
Small Peptide Binding Stiffens the Ubiquitin-like Protein SUMO1
A New Angle on Microscopic Suspension Feeders near Boundaries
S. Rüdiger, Ch. Nagaiah, G. Warnecke, J.W. Shuai  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 98, Issue 7, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 108, Issue 8, Pages (April 2015)
Volume 101, Issue 7, Pages (October 2011)
Torque Transmission Mechanism via DELSEED Loop of F1-ATPase
Role of the DELSEED Loop in Torque Transmission of F1-ATPase
Jennifer L. Ross, Henry Shuman, Erika L.F. Holzbaur, Yale E. Goldman 
Presentation transcript:

Single-Molecule Analysis of the Rotation of F1-ATPase under High Hydrostatic Pressure  Daichi Okuno, Masayoshi Nishiyama, Hiroyuki Noji  Biophysical Journal  Volume 105, Issue 7, Pages 1635-1642 (October 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.08.036 Copyright © 2013 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Direct observation of rotation of single F1-ATPase molecules at high pressure (not to scale). (A) Schematic diagram of the high-pressure microscope (19). (B) Experimental system. F1-ATPase molecules were fixed on the surface of Ni2+-NTA glass set on the observation window with double-faced adhesive tape. The bead for visualization was attached onto the γ-subunit of F1-ATPase. The rotational direction was clockwise from the view of bottom side. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2013 105, 1635-1642DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2013.08.036) Copyright © 2013 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Rotation of wild-type F1-ATPase. (A and B) Time courses and their centroid traces of the rotation of F1-ATPase at two concentrations, [ATP] = 2 mM (A) and [ATP] = 200 nM (B). Data were obtained from different molecules at each condition. (C) Reversible inhibition of rotation of F1-ATPase at 2 mM (upper; n = 18–43, total = 87) and 200 nM ATP (lower; n = 38–56, total = 148) (mean ± SD). (D) Rising phase of single 120° step at 120 MPa and 200 nM ATP. Data were recorded at 100 frames s−1. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2013 105, 1635-1642DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2013.08.036) Copyright © 2013 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Stepping rotation of wild-type F1-ATPase (A) Time courses of rotation of F1-ATPase at 120 MPa, at various ATP concentrations. (B) Histograms of the angle from the traces in A. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2013 105, 1635-1642DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2013.08.036) Copyright © 2013 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Rotational rate of wild-type F1-ATPase. (A) Pressure dependence of rotational rates under saturating (2 mM, n = 12–43, total = 173) and limiting ATP concentrations (200 nM, n = 38–75, total = 406) (mean ± SD). (B) Rotational rates (mean ± SD) as a function of ATP concentration at 0.1 (circles, n = 22–81, total = 314), 60 (triangles, n = 12–102, total = 294), and 120 MPa (squares, n = 25–79, total = 283). Curves show the fitting line with the Michaelis-Menten equation, V = Vmax × [ATP]/(Km + [ATP]); Vmax = 8.9 ± 0.3, 6.5 ± 0.5, and 3.4 ±1.1 s−1; Km = 2.4 ± 0.1, 5.3 ± 0.6, and 18 ± 8 μM at 0.1, 60, and 120 MPa, respectively. (C) Pressure dependence of the apparent ATP binding rate, konATP (squares) and maximum ATP turnover rate, 3 × Vmax (circles). The plots of konATP were fitted by Eq. 1 with konATP(0.1) = 14 ± 2 ×106 M−1 s−1 and ΔV‡ = +100 ± 10 Å3. The plots of 3 × Vmax were fitted by Eq. 2 with kp-ind = 33 ± 5 s−1, k0 = 180 ± 90 s−1 and ΔV‡ = +88 ± 15 Å3. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2013 105, 1635-1642DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2013.08.036) Copyright © 2013 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Rotation of a mutant F1(βE190D). [ATP] = 2 mM. (A) Time courses of rotation at 0.1 and 40 MPa, respectively. (B) Histograms of the angle from traces in A at 0.1 (upper) and 40 MPa (lower). Each pair of two peaks was fitted by a sum of two Gaussian curves to determine the peak positions and area intensities. Arrows indicate major peaks at every pair. (C) Histogram of the angular distance, Δθ, between the emerging angle position at 40–60 MPa (θ2) and the nearest catalytic angle position on the minus direction side at 0.1 MPa (θ1). The peak angle was 45 ± 9° (mean ± SD, n = 36). (D) Fraction of area intensity of left (circles) and right peaks (squares) (mean ± SD). Each peak intensity was obtained from the angular histograms as shown in C. (E) Ratio of catalytic angle position to binding angle position. (F) Rotational rate as a function of pressure (mean ± SD, n = 25–47, total = 217). The plots in E and F were fitted by kp-dep/kp-ind and Eq. 2, respectively, with kp-ind = 2.5 ± 0.7 s−1, k0 = 4.0 ± 1.9 s−1, and ΔV‡ = +100 ± 30 Å3. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2013 105, 1635-1642DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2013.08.036) Copyright © 2013 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions