L. GOURCY BRGM Wien, October 2018

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Katrien Delbeke, ECI, Frank Van Assche,IZA- Europe Frank Van Assche,IZA- Europe On behalf of the Eurometaux Water Project Team Accounting for bioavailability.
Advertisements

WG 3: Impact assessment ► 9 members – good discussions ► Xenobiotics in the Urban Water Cycle ?? COST 636 Xenobiotics in the Urban Water Cycle – Kick-off.
Economic and environmental considerations
Session 9. New activities André Obregón, Rapporteur GEO Work Plan Symposium Geneva, 5-7 May 2015.
JRC Ispra - IES 1 Overview of soil data at European scales F. Carré & T. Mayr.
29 th International conference SEGH, 8-12 July Toulouse, FRANCE 2013 Health risk estimate for groundwater and soil contamination in the.
Unit 08b : Advanced Hydrogeology Groundwater Chemistry.
Mikael Pedersen, GEUS – WP2 leader Katy Lee, BGS – WP3 leader EGDI-Scope Full Consortium Meeting, Vienna 28 th April 2014.
The Other Carbon Dioxide Problem Ocean acidification is the term given to the chemical changes in the ocean as a result of carbon dioxide emissions.
IMPACT OF ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS ON PSYCHIC DISORDERS AND SOMATIC DISEASES IN LITHUANIA Dr.Habil. Saulius Šliaupa 1, Prof. Gediminas Žukauskas 2 Msc. Larisa.
WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Towards a pan-European Environment and Health Information System World Health Organization European Centre.
Sign env. Risk Human uses What is the (weighted) extent of exceedance of a GW-QS or criteria’s value in a GWB? Further assessments verify GWB is of good.
Information Systems for Water, Land & Ecosystems Towards evidence-based decision making for sustainable agricultural intensification Ecosystem Health –
FP7* support to GEO activities Update for 5 th GEO ADC Meeting A Edwards Washington, D.C., U.S.A September 2007 * FP7 is the European Community’s.
30th WGE, September 2011Berit Kvaeven, chairwoman ICP Waters International Cooperative Programme on Assessment and Monitoring Effects of Air Pollution.
Soil contamination Proposed EEA/ETC contribution to the working group on Soil Contamination European Topic Centre on Terrestrial Environment SESSION 2.
Proposal for estimation of surface water bodies background levels for selected metals Slovak Republic.
Water Quality LV/2005-IB/EN/01 Final Meeting 26 June 2007 Water monitoring assessment.
Groundwater bodies, chemical characterisation and monitoring for the Water Framework Directive C.R. Meinardi, RIVM.
Official Recognition of Natural Mineral Water. Legal Frame and Practical Implementation Including Recognition of Natural Mineral Waters from Third Countries.
NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS SCHOOL OF MINING AND METALLURGY KARST SPRINGS OF GREECE MAPPING AND EVALUATION USING GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM.
Ljubljana, | Slide 1 Groundwater Quality Assessment Determination of chemical status and assessment on individual sites Austrian experience.
Associate Prof. Meral TOPCU SULAK
Methods  Two codes were coupled together to establish a robust simulator for thermo-hydro-mechanic-chemical coupling issue raised in CCS projects, as.
Sustainable Development Goal for Water: Indicator 6.3.2
Shale gas impacts on groundwater resources
Essential Biodiversity Variables: towards an agreement on a common approach for biodiversity Rob Jongman, Wageningen UR Henrique Pereira, University of.
Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers
UNESCO-IHP Contribution to SDG 6 on Water and Sanitation
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds BRIDGE Project Presentation Contract N° (SSPI) Co-ordinator: BRGM (Fr)
French groundwater monitoring networks
METREAU part II Analysis Division March 10,
The Geological Society of America North-Central Section 2018
Groundwater Dependent Terrestrial Ecosystems…
Development of a methodological framework (EEA contributions)
Formation of a solid AgCl
BRIDGE WP5 Socio-Economic Assessment of Groundwater Threshold Values
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
GWB Visualisation – GIS
Speed Dating Speed Dating H Na Speed Dating Speed Dating K Be.
Purpose Independent piece of legislation, closely integrated in a larger regulatory framework (complement to WFD): prevent deterioration protect, enhance.
Taking forward the common understanding of Art. 8, 9 and 10 MSFD
Environmental Engineering
Interim Report Objectives of the project
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater ThrEsholds
Directive 2006/118/EC Short overview
Monitoring Guidance Johannes Grath Rob Ward 12th October 2005.
WGC-2 Status Compliance and Trends
GROUNDWATER MONITORING FOR THE WFD UK approach
GROUNDWATER QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN SLOVENIA (STATUS & TRENDS)
EAF - GW The EU Water Framework Directive: Statistical aspects of the identification of groundwater pollution trends, and aggregation of.
Transboundary Aquifer Management Obligations
at Umweltbundesamt GmbH Wien
Introduction- Link with WG E activity CMEP PLENARY MEETING-PRAGUE
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds BRIDGE Summary of BRIDGE achievements Contract N° (SSPI) Co-ordinator:
Background CRiteria for the IDentification of Groundwater thrEsholds: BRIDGE Co-ordinator: BRGM (Fr) Groundwater Characterisation workshop, 25 June 2004.
Threshold Values rationalisation current state of work
Hydrologic Investigation Summary
GeoERA - GROUNDWATER VoGERA - rationale Increased pressure on deep sub-surface in Europe for energy related activities e.g. oil and gas, geothermal, energy.
Results and perspectives
WGC-2 Status Compliance and Trends
Juhani Gustafsson, Finnish Environment Institute, SYKE
ETC/WTR under contract to the EEA
Assessment scales and aggregation
WGGW Bratislava – 26 October 2016
River basin management plans in Europe
KO meeting, Brussels, July 4th 2018
Table 5. Water quality A3 well during pumping test
Table 9. Water quality of DiSi- Mudawarra groundwater resources
Good groundwater chemical status
Presentation transcript:

L. GOURCY BRGM Wien, October 2018 Hydrogeological processes and Geological settings over Europe controlling dissolved geogenic and anthropogenic elements in groundwater of relevance to human health and the status of dependent ecosystems L. GOURCY BRGM Wien, October 2018

GeoERA - GROUNDWATER Objectives to gain understanding of the controls on groundwater quality across Europe using the combined expertise and data held by member states

Main focus Studying geogenic and anthropogenic pollutants GeoERA - GROUNDWATER Main focus Studying geogenic and anthropogenic pollutants In relation to drinking water, human and ecosystem health Linking geology, processes and variability of groundwater quality Considering data sharing, technical and scientific exchange Producing maps and web services

GeoERA - GROUNDWATER Structure

GeoERA - GROUNDWATER The WP3 Hydrogeochemistry and health: Mapping groundwater characteristics for the management of aquifers naturally enriched in dissolved elements 23 partners/country participating -> more to attract?

Three main axes of work Thermal and mineral water : Inventory and data existing at EU scale ad representing (web service most probably) the information. Natural background levels (NBL) : Identifying the aggregation units and ways of representing the information and best way to calculate the NBL for some specific elements at EU scale Determination and selection of health indicators : At some hot spot (“anomalies”) for some specific elements the HydroGeoToxicity (HGT) indicators will be calculated and anomalies be explained by geological/human being parameters in order to propose management recommendation

Natural Background Level Elements considered: T, pH, TDS, temperature, Eh, O2 Ca, Mg, Na, Cl HCO3, K, Cl, SO4 As, B, Ba, Br, Cr, F, Hg, I, Li, Ni, Pb, Sr, U, V Objectives : Proposing a litho-geological classification system based on the capacities of rocks to release elements to GW Data set and mapping of the results of the statistical data treatment i.e. concentrations of elements of natural origin per typologies (litho-geological classification system)

Natural Background Level Method : Inventory of background maps available in Europe (lithology, geology, faults, mining activities,…) in shape files (and publicly available) Inventory of data available (chemical data and associated information on monitoring points) Defining the spatial working units in order to have a pertinent information at EU scale and that can be used to extrapolate the information in sectors without data -> If possible, web service at EU scale and if not methods and pilot sites

Natural Background Level Inventory of methods/NBL used at country level At working unit -> calculating the NBL (centile 90 for example) for each unit with enough data Trying to calculate NBL also in sectors under pressure for some elements (and not only natural environment such as with BRIDGE project) using sophisticated statistical tests and pressure information

Natural Background Level An overview of the results per working units would confirm the posibilies of extrapolation of the NBL for sectors without data (and under which conditions) The results will also allow confirming the favorable conditions for high concentration of some elements at EU scale Permit to confirm the selection of the pilot sites/areas for the health impact evaluation (task 4 of the WP)

Natural Background Level and health The objective of this task is to determine the processes that explain the “hot spot” of natural origin and calculate indicators such as hydrogeotoxicity risk (HGT) -> at pilot site (not possible at EU scale) – most probably sedimentary areas exploited as detritic aquifers -> for only few (and more toxic) elements – at least As Coupling HGT to structural geological features (main faults), agricultural land use, carbonate equilibria, pumping “exploitation rate”, temperature…. Forcada et al. 2017

Timeframe Information platform (EGDI)