Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages (August 2007)
Advertisements

Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2000)
Structural Basis for NHERF Recognition by ERM Proteins
Structure and Protein Design of a Human Platelet Function Inhibitor
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1995)
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Transmembrane Signaling across the Ligand-Gated FhuA Receptor
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Structure of the Papillomavirus DNA-Tethering Complex E2:Brd4 and a Peptide that Ablates HPV Chromosomal Association  Eric A. Abbate, Christian Voitenleitner,
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 124, Issue 2, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 1999)
Crystal Structure of the Soluble Form of Equinatoxin II, a Pore-Forming Toxin from the Sea Anemone Actinia equina  Alekos Athanasiadis, Gregor Anderluh,
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2001)
Yiqun Deng, Jie Liu, Qi Zheng, Wei Yong, Min Lu  Structure 
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Structural Basis for an Unexpected Mode of SERM-Mediated ER Antagonism
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Phage Pierces the Host Cell Membrane with the Iron-Loaded Spike
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Crystal Structure of the Rab9A-RUTBC2 RBD Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis for the Binding Specificity of Rab9A with RUTBC2  Zhe Zhang, Shanshan Wang,
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Volume 18, Issue 11, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Molecular Basis of Lysosomal Enzyme Recognition: Three-Dimensional Structure of the Cation-Dependent Mannose 6-Phosphate Receptor  David L Roberts, Daniel.
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Substrate Recognition Mechanism of Atypical Protein Kinase Cs Revealed by the Structure of PKCι in Complex with a Substrate Peptide from Par-3  Chihao.
Jennifer J Kohler, Carolyn R Bertozzi  Chemistry & Biology 
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages e3 (May 2017)
Crystal Structure of the Human High-Affinity IgE Receptor
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages (July 2008)
Crystal Structure of Human CD38 Extracellular Domain
Elif Eren, Megan Murphy, Jon Goguen, Bert van den Berg  Structure 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Structural Basis for the EBA-175 Erythrocyte Invasion Pathway of the Malaria Parasite Plasmodium falciparum  Niraj H. Tolia, Eric J. Enemark, B. Kim Lee.
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 22, Issue 10, Pages (October 2014)
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Volume 2, Issue 8, Pages (August 1994)
Structure of the RGS-like Domain from PDZ-RhoGEF
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2008)
Crystal Structure of the Borna Disease Virus Nucleoprotein
Crystal Structure of Human CD38 Extracellular Domain
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages (October 1996)
Tianjun Zhou, Liguang Sun, John Humphreys, Elizabeth J. Goldsmith 
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 85, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Structural Basis of Swinholide A Binding to Actin
Ying Huang, Michael P. Myers, Rui-Ming Xu  Structure 
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Structural Basis for NHERF Recognition by ERM Proteins
Crystal Structure of a Polymeric Immunoglobulin Binding Fragment of the Human Polymeric Immunoglobulin Receptor  Agnes E. Hamburger, Anthony P. West,
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
E. coli Hemolysin E (HlyE, ClyA, SheA)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages (November 2011)
Eva M. Huber, Michael Groll  Structure 
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Pingwei Li, Gerry McDermott, Roland K. Strong  Immunity 
Vikram A. Kanda, Anthony Lewis, Xianghua Xu, Geoffrey W. Abbott 
Yiqun Deng, Jie Liu, Qi Zheng, Wei Yong, Min Lu  Structure 
Crystal Structure of the Human Neuropilin-1 b1 Domain
The Structure of the GGA1-GAT Domain Reveals the Molecular Basis for ARF Binding and Membrane Association of GGAs  Brett M. Collins, Peter J. Watson,
Crystal Structure of Escherichia coli RNase D, an Exoribonuclease Involved in Structured RNA Processing  Yuhong Zuo, Yong Wang, Arun Malhotra  Structure 
Volume 20, Issue 5, Pages (May 2012)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 75-85 (January 2005) Structure and Intracellular Targeting of the SARS-Coronavirus Orf7a Accessory Protein  Christopher A. Nelson, Andrew Pekosz, Chung A. Lee, Michael S. Diamond, Daved H. Fremont  Structure  Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 75-85 (January 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2004.10.010 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Three-Dimensional Structure of the Orf7a Luminal Domain (A) Stereoview of the 2Fo − Fc electron density composite omit map shown as gray mesh with orf7a residues depicted as a ball-and-stick model. The view is of the F-G loop drawn at a contour level of 2σ. (B) Ribbon trace of the orf7a luminal domain showing the two sheets of the Ig-like β sandwich. The disulfides are labeled by their Cys positions. Two reported polymorphisms (Gly23 and His47) are indicated in silver. (C) Topological diagram of the orf7a fold. A dashed line separates the BED and AGFC sheets. The β strands are labeled A–G and displayed in green. (D) Structure-based alignment of orf7a with the N-terminal domains of IL-1R and ICAM-2. The β strands in each are highlighted in green, and Cys residues are in yellow. Symbols indicating the solvent accessibility of the orf7a side chains are shown below each position. Filled circles represent greater than 60% solvent inaccessible, half-filled between 30% and 60% inaccessible, and empty circles less than 30% inaccessible. Regions within the orf7a sequence are labeled: signal peptide, stalk, transmembrane (Tm), and cytoplasmic tail. Positions of polymorphism are indicated with asterisks. Structure 2005 13, 75-85DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.10.010) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Intracellular Retention of Orf7a Vero cells were either mock infected ([A], [C], and [E]) or infected with SARS-CoV ([B], [D], and [F]) for 18 hr at an moi of 5. As expected, the spike protein was clearly present at the surface of the SARS-CoV-infected but not mock-infected cells ([A] and [B]). Incubation with the anti-orf7a monoclonal antibody 2E11 demonstrated only limited cell-surface expression of orf7a. An intracellular pool of orf7a was clearly evident after saponin permeabilization ([E] and [F]). The anti-SARS antibody is a mixture of hybridoma supernatants specific for SARS proteins and found to primarily recognize the S protein by Western blotting (a gift of Larry Anderson, CDC). Intracellular retention of orf7a does not require other viral proteins. When an orf7a cDNA is used to transiently transfect 293T cells, very little orf7a can be detected at the cell surface using 2E11 (G). Again, saponin pretreatment allowed staining of the intracellular orf7a (H). Addition of a C-terminal GFP tag did not significantly alter this intracellular distribution. A good colocalization was observed between orf7a staining (red) and GFP fluorescence (green) in this transfectant ([I] and [J]). The orf7a-GFP distribution was distinct from that seen for GFP alone (K). Structure 2005 13, 75-85DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.10.010) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Intracellular Localization of Orf7a (A) Flow cytometry analysis of protein expression levels on 293T cell transfectants. Direct comparison of orf7a-GFP with its cytoplasmic tail mutant, orf7aAA-GFP, in which Lys103 and Lys105 were replaced by Ala. The extent of transfection is revealed by GFP fluorescence. Both intact and saponin-permeabilized cells were stained with the anti-orf7a mAb 2E11. Significantly more anti-orf7a mAb staining was seen in the permeabilized cells, suggesting that the majority of the protein was intracellular. (B) The same cDNA constructs were introduced into Vero cells and examined by confocal microscopy. Orf7a-GFP colocalizes best with the Golgi marker Golgin 97 (see Golgin 97 merge in upper row), while orf7a-AA-GFP colocalizes best with the ER resident protein calnexin (see calnexin merge in lower row). In all cases, the nuclei were counterstained blue with Topro, and the GFP fluorescence appears green. Optical slices were reconstructed into a three-dimensional image to show colocalization before compression into a two-dimensional representation. Structure 2005 13, 75-85DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.10.010) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 The Intracellular Retention Signal of Orf7a (A) The majority of the CD4-GFP control protein is seen at the plasma membrane by FACS analysis using intact 293T cells (left). This distribution did not change when the cytoplasmic tail of CD4 was replaced with that of orf7a (middle). In contrast, significantly more protein was retained inside the cell when the entire CD4 transmembrane domain and tail were replaced by the orf7a transmembrane domain and tail (right). (B) Vero cells expressing the CD4-fusion constructs were permeabilized 24 hr posttransfection and stained for Golgin 97 (red). Confocal microscopy was used to generate a three-dimensional reconstruction of the cells. Only the merged (Golgin 97 + GFP) images are shown (lower panels). In all three images, total fluorescence was normalized to the area of the cell displaying the most intense staining (cell surface for CD4 and CD4-tail, Golgi for CD4-Tm tail). Structure 2005 13, 75-85DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.10.010) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Surface Features of the Orf7a Luminal Domain (A) Backbone worm shown in the same orientation as Figure 1B (right), and also the reverse orientation (left). (B) The molecular surface is shown color coded by curvature to highlight local topography. The B strand and A pocket are indicated. Positions of known polymorphism are labeled. The deep groove that runs along the base of the molecule is indicated. (C) Electrostatic potential mapped onto the accessible molecular surface; blue denotes a net positive charge (+4 kT), and red denotes a negative (−4 kT). The membrane distal face (top) is primarily acidic. Structure 2005 13, 75-85DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2004.10.010) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions