Marc Swisdak The Second Workshop on Thin Current Sheets April 20, 2004

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Particle acceleration in a turbulent electric field produced by 3D reconnection Marco Onofri University of Thessaloniki.
Advertisements

MHD Concepts and Equations Handout – Walk-through.
Particle Simulations of Magnetic Reconnection with Open Boundary Conditions A. V. Divin 1,2, M. I. Sitnov 1, M. Swisdak 3, and J. F. Drake 1 1 Institute.
William Daughton Plasma Physics Group, X-1 Los Alamos National Laboratory Presented at: Second Workshop on Thin Current Sheets University of Maryland April.
The Many Scales of Collisionless Reconnection in the Earth’s Magnetosphere Michael Shay – University of Maryland.
Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection J. F. Drake University of Maryland Magnetic Reconnection Theory 2004 Newton Institute.
The Structure of the Parallel Electric Field and Particle Acceleration During Magnetic Reconnection J. F. Drake M.Swisdak M. Shay M. Hesse C. Cattell University.
Modeling of Whistler Amplification Anatoly V. Streltsov Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH Thayer School of Engineering,
Relativistic reconnection Yuri Lyubarsky Ben-Gurion University, Israel.
SECTPLANL GSFC UMD The Collisionless Diffusion Region: An Introduction Michael Hesse NASA GSFC.
Utilizing CISM MHD Results in SEP Modeling S. A. Ledvina, D. Odstrcil, J. G. Luhmann, D. Krauss-Varban, and I. Roth.
Hybrid Simulation of Ion-Cyclotron Turbulence Induced by Artificial Plasma Cloud in the Magnetosphere W. Scales, J. Wang, C. Chang Center for Space Science.
ASYMMETRIC THIN CURRENT SHEETS: A 1-D TEST PARTICLE MODEL AND COMPARISON WITH SW DATA J. Chen 1 and R. A. Santoro 2 1 Plasma Physics Division, Naval Research.
In-situ Observations of Collisionless Reconnection in the Magnetosphere Tai Phan (UC Berkeley) 1.Basic signatures of reconnection 2.Topics: a.Bursty (explosive)
Transformation of MHD waves in sunspots and simulation of HMI level1 data Konstantin Parchevsky, Sebastien Couvidat, Richard Wachter, Alexander Kosovichev.
The Structure of Thin Current Sheets Associated with Reconnection X-lines Marc Swisdak The Second Workshop on Thin Current Sheets April 20, 2004.
A Fermi Model for the Production of Energetic Electrons during Magnetic Reconnection J. F. Drake H. Che M. Swisdak M. A. Shay University of Maryland NRL.
Magnetic Reconnection in Multi-Fluid Plasmas Michael Shay – Univ. of Maryland.
Magnetic Fields Magnetic fields emerge from the North pole of a magnet and go into the South pole. The direction of the field lines show the direction.
Kinetic Modeling of Magnetic Reconnection in Space and Astrophysical Systems J. F. Drake University of Maryland Large Scale Computation in Astrophysics.
Tuija I. Pulkkinen Finnish Meteorological Institute Helsinki, Finland
Massively Parallel Magnetohydrodynamics on the Cray XT3 Joshua Breslau and Jin Chen Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory Cray XT3 Technical Workshop Nashville,
Shu Nishioka Faculty of Science and Technology, Keio Univ.
Challenging problems in kinetic simulation of turbulence and transport in tokamaks Yang Chen Center for Integrated Plasma Studies University of Colorado.
Multiscale issues in modeling magnetic reconnection J. F. Drake University of Maryland IPAM Meeting on Multiscale Problems in Fusion Plasmas January 10,
The Hall Current in Collisionless Reconnection and Reconnection in an Electron-Positron Plasma Manfred Scholer Max-Planck-Inst. Extraterrestrische Physik,
Accelerator Physics with Relativity By Mark, Jack and Frances (Designing the LHC in an hour and a half)
Neutrino Factory / Muon Collider Target Meeting Numerical Simulations for Jet-Proton Interaction Wurigen Bo, Roman Samulyak Department of Applied Mathematics.
Reconnection rates in Hall MHD and Collisionless plasmas
Valentina Zharkova 1 and Olga Khabarova Department of Mathematics, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK ( ) 2.
PIC simulations of magnetic reconnection. Cerutti et al D PIC simulations of relativistic pair plasma reconnection (Zeltron code) Includes – Radiation.
Electron behaviour in three-dimensional collisionless magnetic reconnection A. Perona 1, D. Borgogno 2, D. Grasso 2,3 1 CFSA, Department of Physics, University.
Адиабатический нагрев электронов в хвосте магнитосферы. Физика плазмы в солнечной системе» февраля 2012 г., ИКИ РАН Зеленый Л.М., Артемьев А.В.,
IMPRS Lindau, Space weather and plasma simulation Jörg Büchner, MPAe Lindau Collaborators: B. Nikutowski and I.Silin, Lindau A. Otto, Fairbanks.
Multi-beams simulation in PIC1D Hands-on section 4.
Ion pickup and acceration in magnetic reconnection exhausts J. F. Drake University of Maryland M. Swisdak University of Maryland T. Phan UC Berkeley E.
Collisionless Magnetic Reconnection J. F. Drake University of Maryland presented in honor of Professor Eric Priest September 8, 2003.
Kinetic Alfvén turbulence driven by MHD turbulent cascade Yuriy Voitenko & Space Physics team Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy, Brussels, Belgium.
Simulation Study of Magnetic Reconnection in the Magnetotail and Solar Corona Zhi-Wei Ma Zhejiang University & Institute of Plasma Physics Beijing,
Multiple Sheet Beam Instability of Current Sheets in Striped Relativistic Winds Inertial Parallel E in Neutron Star Magnetospheres: Return Cuurent Sheets.
Multiple Sheet Beam Instability of Current Sheets in Striped Relativistic Winds Jonathan Arons University of California, Berkeley 1.
IPM EM Simulations 9 th DITANET Topical Workshop on Non-Invasive Beam Size Measurement for High Brightness Proton and Heavy Ion Accelerators April.
Magnetic Reconnection in Plasmas; a Celestial Phenomenon in the Laboratory J Egedal, W Fox, N Katz, A Le, M Porkolab, MIT, PSFC, Cambridge, MA.
MHD Turbulence: influences on transport and acceleration of energetic particles W H Matthaeus Bartol Research Institute, University of Delaware Pablo Dmitruk.
MHD and Kinetics Workshop February 2008 Magnetic reconnection in solar theory: MHD vs Kinetics Philippa Browning, Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics,
Fast Reconnection in High-Lundquist- Number Plasmas Due to Secondary Tearing Instabilities A.Bhattacharjee, Y.-M. Huang, H. Yang, and B. Rogers Center.
Multi-Fluid/Particle Treatment of Magnetospheric- Ionospheric Coupling During Substorms and Storms R. M. Winglee.
二维电磁模型 基本方程与无量纲化 基本方程. 无量纲化 方程化为 二维时的方程 时间上利用蛙跳格式 网格划分.
NIMROD Simulations of a DIII-D Plasma Disruption S. Kruger, D. Schnack (SAIC) April 27, 2004 Sherwood Fusion Theory Meeting, Missoula, MT.
A Global Hybrid Simulation Study of the Solar Wind Interaction with the Moon David Schriver ESS 265 – June 2, 2005.
THE DYNAMIC EVOLUTION OF TWISTED MAGNETIC FLUX TUBES IN A THREE-DIMENSIONALCONVECTING FLOW. II. TURBULENT PUMPING AND THE COHESION OF Ω-LOOPS.
“Harris” Equilibrium: Initial State for a Broad Class of
Data-Model Comparisons
Kinetic Structure of the Reconnection Layer and of Slow Mode Shocks
PIC code simulations of solar flare processes Astronomical Institute
NASA’s MMS Uncovers Dance of Electrons in Space
Olga Khabarova 1, valentina zharkova 2 & vladimir kuznetsov 1
The Magnetosphere Feifei Jiang, UCLA
THEMIS multi-spacecraft observations of a 3D magnetic
Fermi Collaboration Meeting
Electric Fields AP Physics C.
Chapter 27 Early Quantum Theory
The Physics of the Collisionless Diffusion Region
DOE Plasma Science Center Control of Plasma Kinetics
Kevin J. Genestreti, R. B. Torbert, I. Dors, R. E. Denton, A. Le, T. K
MHD Simulation of Plasmoid-Induced-Reconnection in Solar Flares
Non linear evolution of 3D magnetic reconnection in slab geometry
Modelling the Effect of Magnetic Field Variation on Solar Flares
Marit Øieroset UC Berkeley
CfE Higher Unit 2 – Particles and Waves
Presentation transcript:

Marc Swisdak The Second Workshop on Thin Current Sheets April 20, 2004 The Structure of Thin Current Sheets Associated with Reconnection X-lines Marc Swisdak The Second Workshop on Thin Current Sheets April 20, 2004

Collaborators J. Drake U. of Maryland M. Shay J. McIlhargey B. Rogers A. Zeiler U. of Maryland UMBC Dartmouth College MPP-Garching

z y Simulation: x J Bguide Breconn Reconnecting field: x Inflow velocity: y Guide field/Current: z

p3d Details Also: Relativistic PIC code Double Harris sheet Periodic BCs Relativistic PIC code Boris algorithm for particles Trapezoidal leapfrog for fields Multigrid for Poisson’s equation MPI parallelization Biggest runs: 512x256x256 2048 processors ~109 particles How we cheat: me/mi large c/cA small

The Point Q: At what strength does the guide field become important? A: Bg  0.1 B0

No Guide Field: Overview

Development of Bifurcation

Temperature

Velocity Distributions @ x-line: Beams are due to Speiser figure-8 orbits @ bifurcation: Multiple peaks from two beams

Balancing the Reconnection Electric Field Ideal MHD Pressure tensor Electron Inertia

Balancing the Reconnection Electric Field

Guide Field: Bg=1B0 Current sheet not bifurcated Electrons magnetized at the x-line Canted separtrices E|| interacting with Bg

Temperature, Bg=1

Balancing the Reconnection Electric Field

Guide Field Criterion What is the minimum Bg so that the e- excursions are less than de? Reconnection Rate:

X-line Structure: Bg = 0, 0.2, 1

Temperature, Bg=0.2

Off-Diagonal Pressure Tensor, Pyz

X-line Distribution Functions Why is this important? Development of x-line turbulence. Why does it happen? Bg means longer acceleration times.

Conclusions Bg ~ 0.1B0 is enough to influence the structure of x-lines. Affects: Flow geometries, separatrices, particle orbits (temperatures), particle energization, development of turbulence (?) Doesn’t affect: Reconnection rate, breaking of frozen-in condition Implication: Anti-parallel reconnection is rare in real systems. Most reconnection is component reconnection