Moderator : DR.UMA MAHESWARI presentor : dr.a.p.jaganathan

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Technical Aspects: the machine the image
Advertisements

IMAGE ARTIFACTS.
Artifact analysis.
Chapter 20 Film Processing.
Darkroom and Film Processing
Radiographic Quality Chapter 5.
Radiographic Film Artifacts n DMI 50B n Kyle Thornton.
Manual Film Processing Clifford R. Berry, DVM Adjunct Associate Professor, University of Tennessee Veterinary Specialists Center, Maitland, FL ACVR Artifacts.
Radiology Artifacts.
DARKROOM ,PROCESSING & Artifacts REVIEW
Week 10 a Artifacts.
Technical Artifacts and Errors
RADIOGRAPHIC ARTIFACTS
FILM ARTIFACTS.
Chapter 14 Processing the Latent Image
RADIOGRAPHIC PROCESSING
Image Formation Differential Absorption of X-rays by the Patient  Absorption of non-attenuated x-rays by screen  Emission of light  Formation of Film.
Chapter 11 The X-ray Darkroom.
Printing in the Darkroom: Ch. 7. Physical Characteristics of Paper Texture: The surface pattern of a paper. Ranges from smooth to slightly rough. Some.
The Darkroom. Photosensitive Paper Kept in a safe to protect from white light. Emulsion – Covered in a gelatin and silver-halide crystals – Crystals trap.
Dental X-ray Film Processing
 QC testing of screen speed should occur on acceptance and then yearly.  Evaluate first whether similar cassettes marked with the same relative speed.
Darkroom: A light-tight room containing the equipment to develop photographs.
Chapter 12 Darkroom Procedures.
Dental X-Ray Film Processing
1 Components of Image Quality & Radiographic Artifacts Radiologic Technology A SPRING 2012.
Quality Control.
About the 35mm Manual Film Camera Nickie Cardano Greyson Shane Per. 4.
Dr Mohamed El Safwany, MD.
Processing The Latent Image
Image Receptor Systems
1 Possible Radiographic Errors Radiology. 2 During Exposure Film is bent during set up and exposure Causing distortion Film is bent during set up and.
Darkroom and Film Processing Rad Tech A – Week 9 Fall 2010.
1 ARTIFACTS: AN UNWANTED DENSITY ON THE FILM
RADIOGRAPHIC ARTIFACTS
Radiographic Quality Visibility and Sharpness
Processing the latent Imaging. Processing the Latent Image The processing of the latent image produces the manifest image. The exposed silver ions in.
Quality Assurance in the Dental Office
FILM CASSETTES & INTENSIFYING SCREENS WEEK 9
Dental radiology د. باسم الاعسم.
Processing of films Definition of processing Processing theory Diagram.
Film Imaging Lavin: Chapter 5 CTVT: Ronnie’s snood
Darkroom and Film Processing Rad Tech A – Week 10 Fall 2007.
TECHNICAL ARTIFACTS & ERRORS Lavin: pp CTVT: pp
THE FINAL STEP: IMAGE PROCESSING
DENTAL X-RAY FILM PROCESSING
Film Processing.
Troubleshooting Your Photos. Film Exposure problems Problem: Large areas of light or dark tones Possible reasons: Wrong ISO – too low Light meter malfunction.
Quality Assurance in Dental Radiography
Film, Cassettes, and Developing Processes
Processing the Image Chapter 8
Film Processing ChemicalsSafety The Enlarger What’s Wrong?
AJADI ADETOLA DEPARTMENT OF VETERINARY MEDICINE AND SURGERY.
Darkroom Construction Since x-ray films are more sensitive to light than most photographic films, it is important to have a good darkroom.
Film Development Objectives:
Radiography Dentalelle Tutoring.
Photography Lab.
DENTAL X-RAY FILM PROCESSING
Darkroom and Film Processing
RADIOGRAPHIC ERRORS AND ARTIFACTS
Film and Film Processing
Quality Control Testing of Screen Speed
Light Microscope: – light passes through one or more lenses to produce an enlarged image of a specimen compound light microscope – light microscope that.
Processing Radiographs
Light Microscope: – light passes through one or more lenses to produce an enlarged image of a specimen compound light microscope – light microscope that.
Artifacts and Errors.
X-RAY FILM.
Printing a Photograph .
Copy all: Introduction to The developing process:
Presentation transcript:

Moderator : DR.UMA MAHESWARI presentor : dr.a.p.jaganathan X-RAY ARTIFACTS Moderator : DR.UMA MAHESWARI presentor : dr.a.p.jaganathan

DEFINITION Artifact (or Artefact) is a non anatomical image observed in radiography. An unwanted density on the radiograph Interferes with diagnosis.

SOURCES OF ARTEFACT X-ray tube Imaged object Grid X-ray film Image intensifying screen Others

1. X RAY TUBE ARTIFACTS Anode –heel effect Collimator

1. X RAY TUBE ARTIFACTS Anode –heel effect Collimator HEEL EFFECT Refers to a reduction in the x-ray beam intensity toward the anode side of the x-ray field Magnitude depends on anode angle, FFD & film size

1. X RAY TUBE ARTIFACTS Anode –heel effect Collimator Reduced by Keeping the film at a longer distance from the source Increased anode angle Using small films. By keeping thicker parts of the body placed at cathode side with higher intensity of x-rays

1. X RAY TUBE ARTIFACTS Anode –heel effect Collimator

1. X RAY TUBE ARTIFACTS Anode –heel effect Collimator Due to collimator malpositioning Back…

2. IMAGED OBJECT ARTIFACTS Movement unsharpness Magnified distortion Ornaments,prosthesis,etc

2. IMAGED OBJECT ARTIFACTS Movement unsharpness Magnified distortion Ornaments,prosthesis,etc Due to movement of any of the components of the imaging chain namely focal spot ,imaged object (mc),film screen system Motion artifacts

2. IMAGED OBJECT ARTIFACTS Movement unsharpness Magnified distortion Ornaments,prosthesis,etc Alteration in size ,shape or relative proportion of an object’s components due to varying distance of the components from the film level Eg. Magnification of heart in AP view of x-ray chest

2. IMAGED OBJECT ARTIFACTS Movement unsharpness Magnified distortion Ornaments,prosthesis,etc Back… HAIR ARTIFACT

3. GRID ARTIFACT GRID Used to reduce the scattered radiation reaching the film cassette

3. GRID ARTIFACT MALALIGNMENT OF GRID

3. GRID ARTIFACT LATERAL DECENTERING & FOCAL DECENTERING

3. GRID ARTIFACT If the grid stops moving while taking X-ray because of nonfunctioning bucky or short exposure time Back…

4. X-RAY FILM Improper exposure Improper handling Improper processing Aka SOLARISATION means over exposure when the film is exposed beyond the time required, there is decreased density of the image

4. X-RAY FILM Improper exposure

4. X-RAY FILM Improper exposure double exposure

4. X-RAY FILM Improper exposure Improper handling Improper processing If covering paper is not removed

4. X-RAY FILM Improper handling If film is not caught at the corners –CRIMP MARKS and finger prints are seen Minus density finger prints – if touched with moist fingers prior to exposure Positive density - if touched after exposure but prior to processing

4. X-RAY FILM Static marks Improper handling due to discharge of static electricity produced by friction or pressure Filigree pattern Smudge pattern

4. X-RAY FILM Static marks Improper handling due to discharge of static electricity produced by friction or pressure Avoided by humid atmosphere cotton dress touching grounded object before the film opening cassettes slowly not pulling the film rapidly from holders

4. X-RAY FILM Improper handling Improper handling of cassettes – film exposed to light before developing

4. X-RAY FILM Improper handling Film handling artefects Dark room was opened before the film was fed into the developer

4. X-RAY FILM Improper handling Two exposed films placed one above another after removing from the cassette, before processing in the dark room

4. X-RAY FILM Kink marks When the film is not handled at the corners during processing – crescent shaped nail marks occur Improper handling

4. X-RAY FILM Finger Prints When the xray film is touched prior to exposure – “MINUS DENSITY FINGER PRINTS” When the film is touched after the exposure but prior to processing - “ POSITIVE DENSITY FINGER PRINTS” Improper handling

4. X-RAY FILM Improper exposure Improper handling Improper processing Processor derived Developing Rinsing Fixing Washing

4. X-RAY FILM Improper processing Processor derived Developing Rinsing Fixing Washing

Processing artefacts : Dirty rollers : Leave deposits on the film Appear as areas of increased / decreased density Occasionally some sludge may not be washed off and may be dried onto the film

Run back artefacts: Look like fluid drips at the trailing edge of the film. The upper rollers in the processor are designed to remove the excess chemicals before the film moves to the next tank If these excess chemicals are left behind runback artifacts occur Prevented by proper cleaning of the cross over rollers.

Scratches Black scratches: before the film goes into the fixer Clear scratches happen in the fixer, wash or drier assemblies

Shoes marks : Several types of shoe marks can occur. Result when film rubs against guide shoes during transport Manifests as a series of evenly spaced lines parallel to the direction of film transport Plus-density marks are caused by the guide shoes in the developer tank Minus-density shoe marks often occur in the fixer-to-washer crossover

Guide shoe scratches Guide shoes marks are parallel and run in the direction of film travel

Hesitation scratches: Parallel, widely spaced scratches Due to bad rollers in roller racks in the chemical tanks

Tractor marks : When the film is jammed in the processor. Back…

Developing defects Fogging Exhausted developer Contaminated developer Dirt in the developer tank Kissing artifact Poor agitation of developer Insufficient developing time

Developing defects Fogging : Fogging occurs due to increased density of the silver bromide crystals which were unexposed during the process of taking the x ray. Leaves a uniform dull gray haze on the film Causes : i. due to storage in warm, humid environment ii. prolonged storage time Can occur in 2 different colors “DICHOIC STAINS”

White fog :

Exhausted developer When the developer goes bad due to inadequate replenishment, the latent image is not developed before the image is fixed and washed

Contaminated developer

Dirt in the developer tank The rollers in the developer tank or cross over are dirty. This causes the black artifacts on the middle of the film. Oxidized developer is left on the film.

KISSING ARTIFACT When two films stick together during developing process

Poor developer agitation Mottled streak like densities - lack of proper agitation of developer

Insufficient developing time Yellow coloured Back…

Improper rinsing When the rinsing solution is contaminated with the developer Back…

Improper fixing If gets splashed before developing, white areas are seen Back…

Improper washing If the wash tank is not properly filled, fixer is retained on the emulsion The retained fixer form silver sulfide and turns the image brown

hyporetention Yellowish stain that appears on finished radiograph Due to inadequate washing Remaining thiosulfate from fixer solution

Improper washing If inadequately washed the film becomes brown with age due to silver sulphonate deposition Back…

5. IMAGE INTENSIFYING SCREEN Poor screen film contact

5. IMAGE INTENSIFYING SCREEN Old screens with exhausted phosphorescent chemicals Back…

OTHERS Reticulation artifact-wrinkling of film emulsion coz of shrinkage of film base –yrs of storage

OTHERS Dirt on the screen

others Water stains

others Screen Artefacts Old, worn out screen with exhausted phosphorescent chemicals - white spots

others Hearing aid Deodarant

others Therapeutic Prostheses

Prevention Screen: cleaned monthly with a screen cleaner. Never use alcohol or detergents for cleaning. Always make sure the light spectrum of the screen and film are matched. Cleaning the rollers on a regular basis – reduces chance of having old developer dried on the roller. Hands are to be clean and dry. Hold the x-ray film in the corners. Maintain humidity in the processing area.

Prevention Most patient derived artefacts are avoidable Check for jewellery, hair clips, use of deo sprays, wet hair, etc The x-ray should be dried in a dust free area. The safe light of the dark room is to be tested periodically to prevent fogging of films.

THANK YOU