Jianfeng Luo, David Dornfeld

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Normal Distribution
Advertisements

BEOL Al & Cu.
Master’s Dissertation Defense Carlos M. Teixeira Supervisors: Prof. José Carlos Lopes Eng. Matthieu Rolland Direct Numerical Simulation of Fixed-Bed Reactors:
Effects of Pad Properties on Cu Dishing During CMP Caprice Gray PhD Student, Mechanical Engineering Tufts University, Medford, MA Intel Intern Presentation.
An Experimental Study and Fatigue Damage Model for Fretting Fatigue
Factors Effecting Reaction Rate. Collision Theory In order to react molecules and atoms must touch each other. They must hit each other hard enough to.
October 13, 2006 Kyushu Institute of Technology Kyushu Institute of Technology Prof. Keiichi Kimura Keiichi Kimura, Katsuya Nagayama, Yosuke Inatsu, Panart.
CMP-MIC 2006 Modeling Wafer Surface Damage Caused During CMP Terry A. Ring ◊, Paul Feeney, Jaishankar Kasthurirangan, Shoutian Li, David Boldridge, James.
Instantaneous Fluid Film Imaging in Chemical Mechanical Planarization Daniel Apone, Caprice Gray, Chris Rogers, Vincent P. Manno, Chris Barns, Mansour.
James Sprittles ECS 2007 Viscous Flow Over a Chemically Patterned Surface J.E. Sprittles Y.D. Shikhmurzaev.
Simulation of Polymer Morphology in Nano-feature Replication Yingrui Shang & David Kazmer Department of Plastics Engineering UML Nanomanufacturing Center.
Nelson Research, Inc – N. 88 th St. Seattle, WA USA aol.com Two Phase “Bubbly” Fluid Flow in a Vertical Chamber A.
CMP FtF 9 Nov 06 Friction Updates 1.Last FtF Past issues & solutions 2.Latest data CoF vs. slurry dilution CoF vs. rotation rate Fz vs. slurry dilution.
1 An Analysis of Potential 450 mm Chemical-Mechanical Planarization Tool Scaling Questions L. Borucki, A. Philipossian, Araca Incorporated M. Goldstein,
1 Colloidal Aspects of Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) Tanuja Gopal & Jan Talbot Chemical Engineering Program University of California, San Diego May.
ABRASIVE JET MACHINE.
FLCC March 19, 2007 CMP 1 FLCC Seminar Title: Effects of CMP Slurry Chemistry on Agglomeration of Alumina Particles and Copper Surface Hardness Faculty:
NanotechnologyNanoscience Modeling and Simulation Develop models of nanomaterials processing and predict bulk properties of materials that contain nanomaterials.
Impact of Nanotopography on STI CMP in Future Technologies D. Boning and B. Lee, MIT N. Poduje, ADE Corp. J. Valley, ADE Phase-Shift W. Baylies, Baytech.
CMP Modeling as Part of Design for Manufacturing
8:30 – 9:00Research and Educational Objectives / Spanos 9:00 – 9:45 CMP / Doyle, Dornfeld, Talbot, Spanos 9:45 – 10:30 Plasma & Diffusion / Graves, Lieberman,
Space Environment Neutral Environment Hydrogen
1 Chemical Engineering Tools for Semiconductor Fabrication David Cohen, PhD AIChE Norcal Symposium April 12, 2005.
In-Situ Measurements for Chemical Mechanical Polishing James Vlahakis Caprice Gray CMP-MIC February 20, 2006.
IMA Workshop on Multiscale Models for Surface Evolution and Reacting Flows June 5-9, 2000 Taking on the Multiscale Challenge Even Small-Scale Victories.
Sedimentation.
11/8/ Chemical Aspects of CMP SFR Workshop November 8, 2000 Tanuja Gopal and Prof. Jan Talbot UC San Diego La Jolla, CA 2001 GOAL: Build integrated.
Sedimentation of a polydisperse non- Brownian suspension Krzysztof Sadlej IFT UW IPPT PAN, May 16 th 2007.
1 M.Sc. Project of Hanif Bayat Movahed The Phase Transitions of Semiflexible Hard Sphere Chain Liquids Supervisor: Prof. Don Sullivan.
Introduction to Wafer fabrication Process
November 14, 2013 Mechanical Engineering Tribology Laboratory (METL) Experimental and Analytical Investigation of Transient Friction Abdullah Alazemi Ph.D.
Fixed Abrasive Design for Chemical Mechanical Polishing
CMP Modeling – Current Status Goal is to develop a comprehensive CMP model that complements experimental program Begin with hydrodynamic slurry flow model.
Feature Level Compensation and Control: Chemical Mechanical Planarization Investigators Fiona M. Doyle, Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering David.
Pad Characterization Update Caprice Gray Nov. 9, 2006 Cabot Microelectronics Aurora, IL.
ATF2 background and beam halo study D. Wang(IHEP), S. Bai(IHEP), P. bambade(LAL) February 7, 2013.
Feature-level Compensation & Control F LCC CMP April 5, 2006 A UC Discovery Project.
Chemical Techniques and Developments Mechanical Planarization.
Andrew Chang, David Dornfeld
Research Institute of Petroleum Industry
 Laboratory for Manufacturing Automation, 2005 University of California at Berkeley Modeling of CMP David Dornfeld CMP researchers: Jihong Choi, Sunghoon.
Particles in Motion. Particles In Motion2 Velocities and Speeds of Particles ► Consider a Cartesian system with orthogonal axes (x,y,z) ► N(v x )dv x.
HAPTEX-Meeting Tampere, Feb , 2006 Haptic Rendering / Small Scale Model Guido Böttcher haptex.miralab.unige.ch Funded by: FET-IST-FP6 (IST-6549)
Don State Technical University Department “Machine Building" 7/6/2016.
SQM,UC Berkeley 27 June- 1July 2016
Caprice Gray MRS Spring Meeting San Francisco, CA March 30, 2005
Brian Tang and Duane Boning MIT Microsystems Technology Laboratories
Don H. Rasmussen Chemical Engineering
Date of download: 3/4/2018 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Andrew Chang, David Dornfeld
3rd Annual SFR Workshop, November 8, 2000
Section 9: CMP EE143 – Ali Javey.
Current Model Model is 2D. FIDAP equates force and moment on the wafer surface and rotates the wafer into equilibrium.
Hydration Force in the Atomic Force Microscope: A Computational Study
Porous Flow.
Enabling Full Profile CMP Metrology and Modeling
Is Co-existence Possible?
REACTION RATES.
REACTION RATES.
The CTD Data Set. What is Responsible for the Variance Observed in the Structure of the Data?
Silicon Self-Interstitial and Dopant Diffusion
Acoustic Emission Sensing for Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP)
Scratch Testing of Silicon Wafers for Surface Characterization
Volume 105, Issue 10, Pages (November 2013)
Jianfeng Luo, Prof. David Dornfeld
Jianfeng Luo and David A. Dornfeld
Full Profile CMP Metrology
X-ray–driven reaction front dynamics at calcite-water interfaces
Prepared by: Shayfull Zamree Abd Rahim
Role of Glycine in Chemical Mechanical Planarization (CMP) of Copper
Presentation transcript:

Jianfeng Luo, David Dornfeld Effect of Particle Size Distribution in Chemical-Mechanical Polishing: Modeling and Verification SFR Workshop November 8, 2000 Jianfeng Luo, David Dornfeld Berkeley, CA 2001 GOAL: To build an integrated CMP model for basic mechanical and chemical elements by 9/30/2001. 11/8/2000

Modeling of Abrasive Geometry and Size Two Abrasive Geometries Spherical Shape for Obtuse Abrasives Conical Shape for Sharp Abrasives 100nm     X X Schematic of Spherical and Conical Abrasive Shapes in the Model   SEM Picture of Slurry Abrasives for Si CMP (Moon, PhD Thesis, 1999) y Abrasive Size and Size Distribution Nano-Scale Size X Normal Distribution (Xavg , ) and p((Xavg , ) Xavg, Xmax and Standard Deviation  Xmax Xavg Portion of Active Abrasive Schematic of Abrasive Size Distribution 11/8/2000

Role of Abrasive Size in the Architecture of the Integrated CMP Model Contact Mechanics( Pad Topography/Abrasive Size/Pressure ) ? Chemical Reaction Slurry pH Value and so on a12= F2/Hw  V = Vol Abrasive Geometry Material Removal Rate Function: MRR= N Vol= C1Hw-3/2 {1-(1-C2P01/3}P01/2V. Correct on both average scale & local single points Schematic of Wafer-Chemical-Abrasive-Pad Interaction to Model the Volume Removed by A Single Abrasive 1 Surface Damage N Contact Mechanics( Pad Topography/Abrasive Size/Pressure ) Abrasive Size Distribution Abrasive Geometry WIWNU a22= F2/Hp Pad Hardness Xmax-Y=2 Pressure and velocity distribution over wafer-scale WIDNU n Schematic of Wafer-Abrasive-Pad Interaction to Model the Number of Active Abrasive Number Pattern Density Detailed Fluid Model 11/8/2000

MRR As A Function of Particle Size Distribution Before Saturation (Luo & Dornfeld, 2000) MRR as A Function of Down Pressure and Velocity: MRR= N Vol= C1Hw-3/2 {1-(1-C2P01/3}P01/2V. MRR= C3: A Function of Down Pressure, Velocity, Weight Concentration etc. C4: 0.25(4/3)2/3(1/Hp)Ep2/3/b1P01/3 A Function of Down Pressure, Pad Hardness and Pad Topography. Function p: The probability of the appearance of abrasive size Function : Probability density function. Contribution of Active Particle Number Contribution of Active Particle Size (Larger than Xavg) Contribution of Total Number of Particles over the Wafer-Pad Interface MRR as A Function of Particle Size and Size Distribution 11/8/2000

Particle Size Distribution Measurement Dynamical Light Scattering Mean Size (m) Standard Deviation (m) AKP50 0.29 0.070222 AKP30 0.38 0.118959 AKP15 0.60 0.210633 AA07 0.88 0.288768 AA2 2.00 1.056197 *Bielmann et. al. 1999 11/8/2000

Particle Size Dependence on MRR: Experiment VS. Model Predictions (0.29, 0.07022) (0.38, 0.118959) (0.60, 0.210633) (0.88, 0.288768) (2.0, 1.056197) C4: 0.25(4/3)2/3(1/Hp)Ep2/3/b1P01/3= 0.015 *Bielmann et. al. 1999 11/8/2000

Fraction of Active Particles Based on Model Prediction [0.726, 0.737m] 0.1827% [1.213, 1.231m] 0.1798% [1.720, 1.746m] 0.1815% [0.49, 0.50m] 0.19105% [5.091, 5.169m] 0.1719% 11/8/2000

Relationship between Standard Deviation and MRR Based on Model Prediction Number Dominant Region Size Dominant Region 11/8/2000

2003 Goals   Develop comprehensive chemical and mechanical model. Perform experimental and metrological validation, by 9/30/2003. Down Pressure Wafer Smaller contact area Larger contact area H H a 11/8/2000