Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages (April 2015)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 84, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Advertisements

Maryam Sayadi, Seiichiro Tanizaki, Michael Feig  Biophysical Journal 
Coarse-Grained Model of SNARE-Mediated Docking
Young Min Rhee, Vijay S. Pande  Biophysical Journal 
Membrane-Induced Structural Rearrangement and Identification of a Novel Membrane Anchor in Talin F2F3  Mark J. Arcario, Emad Tajkhorshid  Biophysical.
Peter J. Mulligan, Yi-Ju Chen, Rob Phillips, Andrew J. Spakowitz 
Steered Molecular Dynamics Studies of Titin I1 Domain Unfolding
Molecular Dynamics Simulation Analysis of Membrane Defects and Pore Propensity of Hemifusion Diaphragms  Manami Nishizawa, Kazuhisa Nishizawa  Biophysical.
SAXS versus FRET: A Matter of Heterogeneity?
Β-Hairpin Folding Mechanism of a Nine-Residue Peptide Revealed from Molecular Dynamics Simulations in Explicit Water  Xiongwu Wu, Bernard R. Brooks  Biophysical.
Jing Han, Kristyna Pluhackova, Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Rainer A. Böckmann 
Volume 92, Issue 11, Pages (June 2007)
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 86, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
Volume 111, Issue 4, Pages (August 2016)
Theoretical and Computational Investigation of Flagellin Translocation and Bacterial Flagellum Growth  David E. Tanner, Wen Ma, Zhongzhou Chen, Klaus.
Robert M. Elder, Arthi Jayaraman  Biophysical Journal 
Liqun Zhang, Susmita Borthakur, Matthias Buck  Biophysical Journal 
Monika Sharma, Alexander V. Predeus, Nicholas Kovacs, Michael Feig 
Michel A. Cuendet, Olivier Michielin  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2007)
Volume 96, Issue 2, Pages (January 2009)
Mechanism of the αβ Conformational Change in F1-ATPase after ATP Hydrolysis: Free- Energy Simulations  Yuko Ito, Mitsunori Ikeguchi  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 113, Issue 11, Pages (December 2017)
Anton Arkhipov, Wouter H. Roos, Gijs J.L. Wuite, Klaus Schulten 
Rainer A. Böckmann, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical Journal 
Christian Kappel, Ulrich Zachariae, Nicole Dölker, Helmut Grubmüller 
Coarse-Grained Peptide Modeling Using a Systematic Multiscale Approach
Molecular Recognition of CXCR4 by a Dual Tropic HIV-1 gp120 V3 Loop
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 98, Issue 8, Pages (April 2010)
Dániel Szöllősi, Gergely Szakács, Peter Chiba, Thomas Stockner 
“DFG-Flip” in the Insulin Receptor Kinase Is Facilitated by a Helical Intermediate State of the Activation Loop  Harish Vashisth, Luca Maragliano, Cameron F.
Volume 107, Issue 8, Pages (October 2014)
Li Sun, Jeffrey K. Noel, Herbert Levine, José N. Onuchic 
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Azobenzene Photoisomerization-Induced Destabilization of B-DNA
Till Siebenmorgen, Martin Zacharias  Biophysical Journal 
Comparative Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies of Protegrin-1 Monomer and Dimer in Two Different Lipid Bilayers  Huan Rui, Jinhyuk Lee, Wonpil Im 
Hisashi Ishida, Hidetoshi Kono  Biophysical Journal 
Protein Collective Motions Coupled to Ligand Migration in Myoglobin
The Unbinding of ATP from F1-ATPase
Firdaus Samsudin, Alister Boags, Thomas J. Piggot, Syma Khalid 
Volume 108, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
Dissecting DNA-Histone Interactions in the Nucleosome by Molecular Dynamics Simulations of DNA Unwrapping  Ramona Ettig, Nick Kepper, Rene Stehr, Gero.
Histone Acetylation Regulates Chromatin Accessibility: Role of H4K16 in Inter- nucleosome Interaction  Ruihan Zhang, Jochen Erler, Jörg Langowski  Biophysical.
Sequence and Crowding Effects in the Aggregation of a 10-Residue Fragment Derived from Islet Amyloid Polypeptide  Eva Rivera, John Straub, D. Thirumalai 
Grischa R. Meyer, Justin Gullingsrud, Klaus Schulten, Boris Martinac 
Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Simulations Provide Insight into Substrate Recognition by Small Heat Shock Proteins  Sunita Patel, Elizabeth Vierling,
Velocity-Dependent Mechanical Unfolding of Bacteriorhodopsin Is Governed by a Dynamic Interaction Network  Christian Kappel, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical.
Dynamics of Active Semiflexible Polymers
Insight into Early-Stage Unfolding of GPI-Anchored Human Prion Protein
Chi H. Mak, Tyler Matossian, Wen-Yeuan Chung  Biophysical Journal 
Hierarchical Cascades of Instability Govern the Mechanics of Coiled Coils: Helix Unfolding Precedes Coil Unzipping  Elham Hamed, Sinan Keten  Biophysical.
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Ion-Induced Defect Permeation of Lipid Membranes
Michel A. Cuendet, Olivier Michielin  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 104, Issue 9, Pages (May 2013)
Christina Bergonzo, Thomas E. Cheatham  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (March 2018)
Volume 111, Issue 11, Pages (December 2016)
Pawel Gniewek, Andrzej Kolinski  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 98, Issue 10, Pages (May 2010)
Modelling Toehold-Mediated RNA Strand Displacement
A Critical Residue Selectively Recruits Nucleotides for T7 RNA Polymerase Transcription Fidelity Control  Baogen Duan, Shaogui Wu, Lin-Tai Da, Jin Yu 
Shayantani Mukherjee, Sean M. Law, Michael Feig  Biophysical Journal 
Christian Kappel, Ulrich Zachariae, Nicole Dölker, Helmut Grubmüller 
Structure and Response to Flow of the Glycocalyx Layer
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Progressive DNA Bending Is Made Possible by Gradual Changes in the Torsion Angle of the Glycosyl Bond  Leonardo Pardo, Nina Pastor, Harel Weinstein  Biophysical.
Presentation transcript:

Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages 1727-1738 (April 2015) Free-Energy Landscape and Characteristic Forces for the Initiation of DNA Unzipping  Ahmet Mentes, Ana Maria Florescu, Elizabeth Brunk, Jeff Wereszczynski, Marc Joyeux, Ioan Andricioaei  Biophysical Journal  Volume 108, Issue 7, Pages 1727-1738 (April 2015) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.01.025 Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Schematic representation of the DNA sequence and the forces applied for unzipping. Bases G, C, A, and T are shown in yellow, orange, blue, and magenta, respectively, and the bonds forming the basepairs are shown with a dotted line. Forces were applied on two backbone atoms of the first basepair: 1) the O3′ atom of the C1 residue at the 5′ end of one strand and on the O3′ atom of the G12 residue at the 3′ end of the other strand in the all-atom simulations and 2) the pseudo-atoms describing the sugars of the same residues in the coarse-grained simulations. The terminal C1-G12 basepair is an example of what we refer to in the text as the first basepair that needs a higher force to be unzipped in comparison with the subsequent basepairs. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 1727-1738DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.01.025) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Free energy of DNA unzipping from all-atom simulations with various frayed − paired populations for the first basepair: fully paired (black), fully frayed (green), 10% − 90% frayed − paired (blue), and 30% − 70% frayed − paired (pink). Arrows point to the onset of first and second basepair unzipping. The significantly deeper, antlion-pit free-energy well for first basepair separation (between 0 and 2 Å) is a key feature that explains the steep increase in the force required for initial unzipping (see main text). Inset: the conformational entropy contribution to the free-energy profile along the separation distance for unzipping the first basepair. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 1727-1738DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.01.025) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Mean force on the terminal basepairs need to maintain them at a given separation, as a function of that separation distance. Shown are atomistic simulations for the fully paired first basepair (red), first basepair 10% frayed and 90% (orange dashed line), and 30% frayed and 70% paired (light-brown dashed line), together with the results of Cocco et al. (37) (green dashed line), the PB model (dark-blue dotted line), and coarse-grained simulations (pink dotted line). We also show results (in light blue and black) for coarse-grained simulations of the same sequence with the first basepair and second basepairs changed from C-G to A-T. The vertical lines mark the distances beyond which the first and second basepairs are fully unzipped. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 1727-1738DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.01.025) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Select terms of the all-atom Hamiltonian as a function of separation distance, averaged over all simulation windows. (a) Native H-bond energy between the first and second basepairs (solid red and dashed green lines, respectively), and some nonnative H-bond energies. (b) van der Waals term between the first basepair and different bases on the same DNA strand and/or complementary DNA strands. (c) Electrostatic interactions between the first basepair and different bases on the same DNA strand and/or complementary DNA strands. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 1727-1738DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.01.025) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Select terms of the coarse-grained Hamiltonian as a function of separation distance, averaged over all simulation runs. (a) Pairing energies between the first and second basepairs (solid red line and green dots, respectively). (b) Base-stacking energies between the first and second bases, and first and third bases on one of the two DNA strands (the curves for the second strand are similar). (c) Electrostatic interactions between the first basepair and different bases on the complementary DNA strands. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 1727-1738DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.01.025) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Snapshots of some of the intermediate structures that form while unzipping DNA, extracted from our atomistic simulations using VMD. Transient bonds that form during unzipping are shown with a dashed blue line. Nucleotides G, C, A, and T are shown in yellow, orange, blue, and magenta, respectively. The two DNA strand backbones are shown in blue and red. To see this figure in color, go online. Biophysical Journal 2015 108, 1727-1738DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2015.01.025) Copyright © 2015 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions