The Level of C/EBP Protein Is Critical for Cell Migration during Drosophila Oogenesis and Is Tightly Controlled by Regulated Degradation  Pernille Rørth,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bifocal Is a Downstream Target of the Ste20-like Serine/Threonine Kinase Misshapen in Regulating Photoreceptor Growth Cone Targeting in Drosophila  Wenjing.
Advertisements

Kálmán Somogyi, Pernille Rørth  Developmental Cell 
Pralay Majumder, George Aranjuez, Joseph Amick, Jocelyn A. McDonald 
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
Steroid Signaling Establishes a Female Metabolic State and Regulates SREBP to Control Oocyte Lipid Accumulation  Matthew H. Sieber, Allan C. Spradling 
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (November 2001)
Ying Wang, Veit Riechmann  Current Biology 
RNAi Related Mechanisms Affect Both Transcriptional and Posttranscriptional Transgene Silencing in Drosophila  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James.
Kibra Is a Regulator of the Salvador/Warts/Hippo Signaling Network
Christian Frei, Bruce A Edgar  Developmental Cell 
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages (April 2002)
Erika R Geisbrecht, Denise J Montell  Cell 
Gáspár Jékely, Hsin-Ho Sung, Carlos M. Luque, Pernille Rørth 
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 17, Issue 9, Pages (May 2007)
Mutual Repression by Bantam miRNA and Capicua Links the EGFR/MAPK and Hippo Pathways in Growth Control  Héctor Herranz, Xin Hong, Stephen M. Cohen  Current.
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Pralay Majumder, George Aranjuez, Joseph Amick, Jocelyn A. McDonald 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Rho-LIM Kinase Signaling Regulates Ecdysone-Induced Gene Expression and Morphogenesis during Drosophila Metamorphosis  Guang-Chao Chen, Patrycja Gajowniczek,
Act up Controls Actin Polymerization to Alter Cell Shape and Restrict Hedgehog Signaling in the Drosophila Eye Disc  Aude Benlali, Irena Draskovic, Dennis.
Douglas J Guarnieri, G.Steven Dodson, Michael A Simon  Molecular Cell 
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Matthew H. Sieber, Carl S. Thummel  Cell Metabolism 
Integrin Signaling Regulates Spindle Orientation in Drosophila to Preserve the Follicular- Epithelium Monolayer  Ana Fernández-Miñán, María D. Martín-Bermudo,
Helen Strutt, Mary Ann Price, David Strutt  Current Biology 
Jianjun Sun, Wu-Min Deng  Developmental Cell 
Volume 21, Issue 13, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 14, Issue 7, Pages (April 2004)
Decapentaplegic Is Essential for the Maintenance and Division of Germline Stem Cells in the Drosophila Ovary  Ting Xie, Allan C Spradling  Cell  Volume.
Volume 16, Issue 21, Pages (November 2006)
Apical/Basal Spindle Orientation Is Required for Neuroblast Homeostasis and Neuronal Differentiation in Drosophila  Clemens Cabernard, Chris Q. Doe  Developmental.
Juan Mata, Silvia Curado, Anne Ephrussi, Pernille Rørth  Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Joanna Chen, Esther M. Verheyen  Current Biology 
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Rongwen Xi, Jennifer R. McGregor, Douglas A. Harrison 
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (August 2000)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Ying Wang, Veit Riechmann  Current Biology 
Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (September 2003)
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Let-7-Complex MicroRNAs Regulate the Temporal Identity of Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons via chinmo  Yen-Chi Wu, Ching-Huan Chen, Adam Mercer, Nicholas S.
The Role of Oocyte Transcription, the 5′UTR, and Translation Repression and Derepression in Drosophila gurken mRNA and Protein Localization  Carol Saunders,
Jillian L. Brechbiel, Elizabeth R. Gavis  Current Biology 
Mariana Melani, Kaylene J. Simpson, Joan S. Brugge, Denise Montell 
Drosophila ASPP Regulates C-Terminal Src Kinase Activity
Drosophila atonal Fully Rescues the Phenotype of Math1 Null Mice
Posterior Localization of Dynein and Dorsal-Ventral Axis Formation Depend on Kinesin in Drosophila Oocytes  Robert P. Brendza, Laura R. Serbus, William.
PHYL Acts to Down-Regulate TTK88, a Transcriptional Repressor of Neuronal Cell Fates, by a SINA-Dependent Mechanism  Amy H Tang, Thomas P Neufeld, Elaine.
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2000)
Phosphorylation of PERIOD Is Influenced by Cycling Physical Associations of DOUBLE- TIME, PERIOD, and TIMELESS in the Drosophila Clock  Brian Kloss, Adrian.
The sterol-sensing domain of Patched protein seems to control Smoothened activity through Patched vesicular trafficking  Verónica Martı́n, Graciela Carrillo,
Regulation of Invasive Cell Behavior by Taiman, a Drosophila Protein Related to AIB1, a Steroid Receptor Coactivator Amplified in Breast Cancer  Jianwu.
Guidance of Cell Migration by the Drosophila PDGF/VEGF Receptor
The Drosophila Homolog of C
Paracrine Signaling through the JAK/STAT Pathway Activates Invasive Behavior of Ovarian Epithelial Cells in Drosophila  Debra L. Silver, Denise J. Montell 
The Drosophila Cell Survival Gene discs lost Encodes a Cytoplasmic Codanin-1-like Protein, Not a Homolog of Tight Junction PDZ Protein Patj  Jan Pielage,
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
F. Christian Bennett, Kieran F. Harvey  Current Biology 
Oocyte polarity is disrupted in the presence of FP41 mutant PFCs
Cosuppression of Nonhomologous Transgenes in Drosophila Involves Mutually Related Endogenous Sequences  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James A. Birchler 
The Drosophila dCREB2 Gene Affects the Circadian Clock
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Drosophila DDP1, a Multi-KH-Domain Protein, Contributes to Centromeric Silencing and Chromosome Segregation  Dori Huertas, Alfred Cortés, Jordi Casanova,
Matthew H. Sieber, Carl S. Thummel  Cell Metabolism 
Salvador-Warts-Hippo Signaling Promotes Drosophila Posterior Follicle Cell Maturation Downstream of Notch  Cédric Polesello, Nicolas Tapon  Current Biology 
Marelle Acts Downstream of the Drosophila HOP/JAK Kinase and Encodes a Protein Similar to the Mammalian STATs  Xianyu Steven Hou, Michael B Melnick, Norbert.
Presentation transcript:

The Level of C/EBP Protein Is Critical for Cell Migration during Drosophila Oogenesis and Is Tightly Controlled by Regulated Degradation  Pernille Rørth, Kornelia Szabo, Gemma Texido  Molecular Cell  Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 23-30 (July 2000) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(05)00008-0

Figure 1 Slbo Is Required in Outer Border Cells for Migration (A) Slbo expression during normal border cell migration. Anti-slbo (green and single panels to the right) and anti-β-galactosidase (red) staining of egg chambers from females carrying one copy of the slbo1310 enhancer trap (lacZ reporter gene). ppc indicates posterior polar cells; the anterior polar cells are the two central, smaller nuclei in the migrating border cell cluster. (B) Clonal analysis with the slbo8ex2 null mutant. Lack of the β-galactosidase marker (green, also single channel in enlarged images on the right) indicates homozygous mutant cells. FasIII (red) marks polar cells. The arrows in the middle panels point to the single wild-type border cell; the arrows in the bottom panels point to the single mutant border cell. Scale bars are 20 μM in all panels. In an additional experiment using GFP as clonal marker, 185 border cell clusters with one or more mutant cells were analyzed. In the following, numbers given in parenthesis indicates number of cases observed. In a few cases, APCs and outer border cells (OBCs) could not be clearly assigned. No migration was observed if all cells were mutant (22 cases) or if only one (4) or both (9) APCs were wild type. Conversely, if only one (17) or both (6) APCs were mutant, migration was unaffected. If only one (5) or two (7) OBCs were wild type, these would initiate movement but remained associated with the mutant border cells and moved very little (middle panel). If only one (50) or two (28) OBCs were mutant, these would mostly (57/78) remain associated with the wild-type border cells and be “dragged along” (bottom panel). The mutant OBCs were always in the rear. For 9/28 of clusters with two OBCs mutant and for 7/19 clusters with three OBCs mutant, some or all mutant cells were split (as a cluster) from the front cluster somewhere along the migration path. Only in a minority of such cases (6/16) were cells strictly segregated into wild-type (front) and mutant (rear) clusters. Molecular Cell 2000 6, 23-30DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(05)00008-0)

Figure 2 A Ubiquitin Hydrolase Suppresses the slbo Phenotype by Increasing Slbo Protein Levels (A) Map of Ubp64 locus. EP3584 is inserted at position 2777 of genomic sequence with accession AC014815. The 5′ end of the cDNA isolated is at position 3560 and corresponds from +30 to several ESTs (LD26688) in the database. The coding region corresponds to that of Ubp64 (Henchoz et al. 1996). The map of the locus was made by aligning cDNA and genomic sequences. (B) Quantification of border cell migration in slboGAL4,slbo1310/slbo1310; UAS-Ubp64/+ (two different insertion lines) and slboGAL4,slbo1310/slbo1310 control females. Border cells were detected by X-gal staining of ovaries. The percent stage 10 egg chambers with migrated border cells is shown. A minimum of 376 (top), 216 (middle), and 123 (bottom) egg chambers were scored per genotype. (C) Immunodetection of Slbo and β-galactosidase (slbo-lacZ) in border cell nuclei from females of the genotype slboGAL4,slbo1310/slbo1310 (control) and slboGAL4,slbo1310/slbo1310; UAS-UBP64/+. Stainings were done in parallel and all confocal scans made at the same settings. Representative examples are shown. To obtain average nuclear pixel intensity (Slbo protein), nuclei were defined in the anti-β-gal channel, measurements were done in the anti-Slbo channel with background from surrounding tissue subtracted. The slbo-lacZ signal (red) is from lacZ reporter gene in the slbo1310 enhancer trap and was unaffected by Ubp64. Molecular Cell 2000 6, 23-30DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(05)00008-0)

Figure 3 Slbo Protein Is Selectively Unstable in Border Cells Females of the genotype +/+; HS-slbo/+ (left panels) or slbo8ex2/slbo1310; HS-slbo/+ (right panels) were subjected to a 1 hr heat shock (37°C), and ovaries were fixed for antibody staining after the indicated amount of recovery time (at room temperature). White arrows indicate border cells; pink arrows indicate other (main body) follicle cells. Because the border cells have not migrated in the slbo mutant, the anterior 2/3 of the egg chambers is shown rather than the posterior 2/3 as for the control. In each case, main body follicle cells at the anterior and posterior parts of the egg chamber showed similar staining. The exact times at which Slbo protein accumulated and disappeared varied in different experiments and in individual egg chambers. However, in +/+ egg chambers, Slbo protein always disappeared from border cells first. In slbo/slbo egg chambers border cells and other follicle cells showed similar Slbo staining at all time points. At 3–4 hr, Slbo protein finally disappeared precipitously from all follicle cells. Molecular Cell 2000 6, 23-30DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(05)00008-0)

Figure 4 Tribbles Downregulates Slbo Protein Level In Vivo In all pictures, anterior is to the left; border cells would migrate to the right. (A–D) X-gal staining of stage 10 egg chambers from females of the genotype slboGAL4,slbo1310/+ plus the indicated transgenes. Red arrows indicate border cells; black arrows indicate centripetal cells that normally migrate during stage 10. In slboGAL4,slbo1310/+, UAS-src64, the centripetal cells do not migrate between nurse cells and oocyte as they should, but usually remain on the surface of the egg chamber. (E and F) Anti-slbo (green and single channel to the right) and anti-β-galactosidase (red) staining of late stage 9 border cells from slboGAL4,slbo1310/+ (E) or slboGAL4,slbo1310/+; UAS-tribbles/+ (F) females. The β-galactosidase signal is from the lacZ reporter gene in the slbo1310 enhancer trap and is unaltered by tribbles expression. (G–I) Slbo protein in tribbles1119 mutant border cells. The tribbles1119 mutant is a severe loss-of-function allele (Mata et al. 2000). Clones were produced using the FLP/FRT technique (Xu and Rubin 1993) in heterozygous FRT80,tribbles1119 females. Lack of the clonal marker (red) indicates a homozygous mutant cell (arrows). The egg chambers were early stage 9 (G), midstage 9 (H), and stage 10A (I). Molecular Cell 2000 6, 23-30DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(05)00008-0)

Figure 5 Tribbles Stimulates Slbo Ubiquitination and Proteolysis (A) tribbles counteracts the effect of overexpressing slbo in ectopic locations. Wings from female flies of the indicated genotype. (B) Total cell extracts from cells transfected with vectors encoding HA-slbo alone (control) or with HA-slbo and T7-tribbles (tribbles). (C) Northern blots of mRNA from Schneider cells transfected as in (B). Induced transcripts are mark with arrowheads. tribbles is expressed endogenously at a low level (small arrow). (D) Transfection as in (B), lactacystin (+) or solvent (−) was added to cells for 6 hr before harvest. (E) Transfection as in (B), but including a vector expressing His-tagged ubiquitin. Loading was adjusted to give equal amount of total HA-Slbo in each lane (see short exposure in lower panel). Higher molecular weight forms (bracket) are presumptive ubiquitinated forms of HA-Slbo. (F) HA-slbo, but not a negative control HA-nle (Royet et al. 1998), coimmunoprecipitated with T7-tribbles from transfected cells. (B), (D), (E), and (F) are Western blots probed with HA antibody; for (B), T7 antibody was also included. Equal amounts of Mt-HA-slbo and Mt-T7-tribbles (or empty vector control) expression vectors were used, except in (E) where vectors encoding His-tagged ubiquitin, HA-slbo, and T7-tribbles (or empty vector) were used in 5:2:1 ratio. Molecular Cell 2000 6, 23-30DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(05)00008-0)

Figure 6 Tribbles Does Not Affect Another bZIP Protein, DJun (A–C) Eye disc from UAS-tribbles/+; sevenless-GAL4/+ third instar larvae, double-stained with anti-DJun ([B], and green in [A]) and anti-tribbles ([C], and red in [A]). (D) Western blots of extracts from cells transfected with DJun expression vector alone or with tribbles expression vector. Molecular Cell 2000 6, 23-30DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(05)00008-0)

Figure 7 Increased Slbo Activity Perturbs Border Cell Migration (A–D) X-gal staining of stage 10 egg chambers. (A) and (B) show egg chambers from females of the genotype slboGAL4,slbo1310/+ plus the indicated transgenes, raised at 25°C. In (C) and (D), slboGAL4,slbo1310/slbo1310; UAS-slbo-control/+ (C) or slboGAL4,slbo1310/slbo1310; UAS-slbo-LZmut/+ (D) females were raised at 18°C, where GAL4 induced expression is lower. (E and F) Antibody staining of stage 10A egg chambers from females of the genotype slboGAL4,slbo1310/+; UAS-slbo/+ (control) (E) or slboGAL4,slbo1310/+; UAS-slbo-LZmut/+ (F), raised at 28°C. White arrowheads mark the most posterior position of stretch follicle cells, which in wild type corresponds to the position of border cells along the anterior–posterior axis. (G) Schematic drawing illustrating the effect of the leucine-to-proline mutation in the leucine zipper (Slbo-LZmut), details are given in Experimental Procedures. Molecular Cell 2000 6, 23-30DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(05)00008-0)