Song LIANG ihep.ac.cn CMS-IHEP, China

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Particle identification in ECAL Alexander Artamonov, Yuri Kharlov IHEP, Protvino CBM collaboration meeting
1 Calice ECAL Meeting UCL 8/06/09David Ward Thoughts on transverse energy profile for e/m showers David Ward  We have work from G.Mavromanolakis on this.
April 19th, 2010Philippe Doublet (LAL) Hadronic showers in the SiW ECAL (with 2008 FNAL data) Philippe Doublet.
PFA-Enhanced Dual Readout Crystal Calorimetry Stephen Magill - ANL Hans Wenzel - FNAL Outline : Motivation Detector Parameters Use of a PFA in Dual Readout.
ECAL Spike Plot Approval ECAL Anomalous Signal Plots Approval Adi Bornheim for ECAL
1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.
Using  0 mass constraint to improve particle flow ? Graham W. Wilson, Univ. of Kansas, July 27 th 2005 Study prompted by looking at event displays like.
Status of Tracking at DESY Paul Dauncey, Michele Faucci Giannelli, Mike Green, Hakan Yilmaz, Anne Marie Magnan, George Mavromanolakis, Fabrizio Salvatore.
1Calice-UK Cambridge 9/9/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare Feb’05 DESY data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. Work in progress – no definitive conclusions.
CSC Note Jet 8 Meeting – April 11 '07 Status and plan for single hadron scale check with minimum bias events N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
Calculating the Beam Position at the Ecal for DESY Run (Independent of Tracking) Hakan Yilmaz.
 Track-First E-flow Algorithm  Analog vs. Digital Energy Resolution for Neutral Hadrons  Towards Track/Cal hit matching  Photon Finding  Plans E-flow.
The TA Energy Scale Douglas Bergman Rutgers University Aspen UHECR Workshop April 2007.
Page 1 Calculating the Beam Position at the Ecal for DESY Run (Independent of Tracking) Hakan Yilmaz.
1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007.
1 N. Davidson Calibration with low energy single pions Tau Working Group Meeting 23 rd July 2007.
Final state study Jaewon Park University of Rochester MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting, May 09, 2007.
Status of calorimeter simulations Mikhail Prokudin, ITEP.
I have made the second half of the poster, first half which is made by tarak will have neutrino information. A patch between the two, telling why we do.
Energy Flow and Jet Calibration Mark Hodgkinson Artemis Meeting 27 September 2007 Contains work by R.Duxfield,P.Hodgson, M.Hodgkinson,D.Tovey.
Energy Flow Technique and *where I am Lily Have been looking at the technique developed by Mark Hodgkinson, Rob Duxfield of Sheffield. Here is a summary.
Event Reconstruction in SiD02 with a Dual Readout Calorimeter Detector Geometry EM Calibration Cerenkov/Scintillator Correction Jet Reconstruction Performance.
16-Nov-2002Konstantin Beloous1 Digital Hadron Calorimeter Energy Resolution.
Development of a Particle Flow Algorithms (PFA) at Argonne Presented by Lei Xia ANL - HEP.
CaloTopoCluster Based Energy Flow and the Local Hadron Calibration Mark Hodgkinson June 2009 Hadronic Calibration Workshop.
May 3rd, 2010Philippe Doublet (LAL) Hadronic interactions in the SiW ECAL (with the 2008 data) Philippe Doublet, Michele Faucci-Giannelli, Roman Pöschl,
Pandora calorimetry and leakage correction Peter Speckmayer 2010/09/011Peter Speckmayer, WG2 meeting.
Detection of electromagnetic showers along muon tracks Salvatore Mangano (IFIC)
Charge Sharing & Hit Identification & Cluster Information.
Feasibility Study of Forward Calorimeter in ALICE experiment Sanjib Muhuri Variable Energy Cyclotron Centre Kolkata.
CBM ECAL simulation status Prokudin Mikhail ITEP.
Interactions of hadrons in the SiW ECAL Towards paper Naomi van der Kolk.
05/04/06Predrag Krstonosic - Cambridge True particle flow and performance of recent particle flow algorithms.
Cedar and pre-Daikon Validation ● CC PID parameter based CC sample selections with Birch, Cedar, Carrot and pre-Daikon. ● Cedar validation for use with.
13 July 2005 ACFA8 Gamma Finding procedure for Realistic PFA T.Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.), M-C. Chang(Tohoku Univ.), K.Fujii(KEK), A.Miyamoto(KEK), S.Yamashita(ICEPP),
Photon reconstruction and matching Prokudin Mikhail.
Tth study Lepton ID with BDT 2015/02/27 Yuji Sudo Kyushu University 1.
1 D.Chakraborty – VLCW'06 – 2006/07/21 PFA reconstruction with directed tree clustering Dhiman Chakraborty for the NICADD/NIU software group Vancouver.
Reconstructing energy from HERD beam test data Zheng QUAN IHEP 3 rd HERD work shop Xi’an, 20 Jan
Mitchell Naisbit University of Manchester A study of the decay using the BaBar detector Mitchell Naisbit – Elba.
Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.
22 January 2009 David1 Look at dead material and fake MET in Jx samples mc08 10 TeV simulations, release J0 to J6 are tag s479_r586, ‘ideal geometry’
Calice Meeting Argonne Muon identification with the hadron calorimeter Nicola D’Ascenzo.
7/13/2005The 8th ACFA Daegu, Korea 1 T.Yoshioka (ICEPP), M-C.Chang(Tohoku), K.Fujii (KEK), T.Fujikawa (Tohoku), A.Miyamoto (KEK), S.Yamashita.
Interactions of hadrons in the SiW ECAL (CAN-025) Philippe Doublet - LAL Roman Pöschl, François Richard - LAL SiW ECAL Meeting at LLR, February 8th 2011.
Interactions of pions in the Si-W ECAL prototype Towards a paper Naomi van der Kolk.
Use of the D0 Central Preshower in Electron Identification John Gardner University of Kansas APS April 6, 2003.
ECAL Interaction layer PFA Template Track/CalCluster Association Track extrapolation Mip finding Shower interaction point Shower cluster pointing Shower.
IHEP Hadron Shower Shape Song LIANG ihep.ac.cn CMS-IHEP, China
Τ HLTrigger Optimization Mike B 6 th Nov. 2 M. Bachtis - UW The tau High Level Trigger scheme in CMS For the events that pass the L1 Trigger jet reconstruction.
Michele Faucci Giannelli
Missing ET resolution Aim:
Methods of Experimental Particle Physics
Interactions of hadrons in the Si-W ECAL
CMS-Bijing weekly meeting
First look at data/MC comparison for period 8 reference runs
Detector Configuration for Simulation (i)
CMS-Bijing weekly meeting
Hough Transform on SZ Plane
Plans for checking hadronic energy
Project Presentations August 5th, 2004
CMS-Bijing weekly meeting
Michele Faucci Giannelli
Song LIANG ihep.ac.cn CMS-IHEP, China
Contents First section: pion and proton misidentification probabilities as Loose or Tight Muons. Measurements using Jet-triggered data (from run).
Song LIANG ihep.ac.cn CMS-IHEP, China
Steve Magill Steve Kuhlmann ANL/SLAC Motivation
CMS-Bijing weekly meeting
Zhiwen Zhao,UVa for EC group
Presentation transcript:

Song LIANG Email: liangs @ ihep.ac.cn CMS-IHEP, China 2009.11.27 Hadron Shower Shape Song LIANG Email: liangs @ ihep.ac.cn CMS-IHEP, China 2009.11.27

Outline 1. Motivation 2. Process 3. Problem 4. Conclusion

1. Motivation Test if the shower shape formula is fitting for the hadron shower shape in ECAL. Lateral formula: R1=6.21 Longitudinal formula: PS: I just get the primary result, there must be some errors. Hope that you can find the problems and help me to make it better. Any of your suggestion, please tell me. dE/dt =E0b(bt)a-1e-bt/Γ(a)

2. Process 1). Data sample: pi Eta : -1.479~1.479 Phi : -3.14~3.14 E : 20GeV~100GeV Events:800000

2). Track extrapolation Devide the ECAL into 100 layers, Find the 100 points on the track through track extrapolation

3). iEta and iPhi of ECAL crystals: iEta and iPhi are two signs of ECAL crystals iEta: -85~ 1, 1~85; iPhi: 1~360 Calculate the iEta and iPhi of the 100 track points Trough the value of iEta and iPhi to calculate the crystal ID. From the crystal ID, I calculate the number of crystals which the hadron track pass through.

The number of crystals which the pion track pass through

4). 9x9 crystals: 9x9 crystals around the crystal which the hadron hit the ECAL. Calculate the iEta and iPhi of the crystal which the hadron hit ECAL. Get the iEta and iPhi value of 9x9 crystals around that crystal

5). Cut condition: Event: 800000 Events only have one track: 637089 Remove ionization events(Esum9x9<1.2, CMS CR-2008/040): 545542

The distribution of the 9x9 crystals deposit energy

(1)nCrystal=1: 2D fitting 6). Fitting method: (1)nCrystal=1: 2D fitting Only using the lateral formula to fit the shower shape. Lateral formula: R1=6.21 (2)nCrystal>2: very few events, I want to fit it when the other two switchs get better results. nCrystal: the number of crystals which the hadron pass through

(3)nCrystal=2: 3D fitting Lateral formula: R1=6.21 Longitudinal formula: a=0.67*log(E/Ec)-0.29=2.024 tmax=l.04*log(E/Ec)-0.16=3.432 b=(a-1)/tmax=0.298 Ec=0.00874 E=24.83, It is the average of the deposit energy (Etot). dE/dt =E0b(bt)a-1e-bt/Γ(a)

Fit the start point: (1) Suppose one of the 100 track points is the start point (2) Calculate the deposit energy of the 9x9 crystal through the formula. (3) Calculate the chisquare of the deposit energy in the two crystals. (4) Use the point which have the minimum chisquare as the start point.

The distribution of the minimum chisquare

The distribution of the start point t_start: The distance from the start point to the point which the hadron hits ECAL.

7)Result The shower shape in 9x9 crystals around the crystal which has the highest deposit energy. From the fitting of the shower formula From the reconstruction hit

3. Problem 1) minimum chisquare: Trough it has a peak near zero, but it has a very long tail. The value of many of them is too large.

Longitudinal formula: 2)nCrystal=2: 3D fitting Longitudinal formula: a=0.67*log(E/Ec)-0.29, tmax=l.04*log(E/Ec)-0.16=3.432, b=(a-1)/tmax=0.298, Ec=0.00874 E, It is the average of the deposit energy (Etot). From EM shower, parameter a and b are depended on parameter E. Could the formulas above be fitted to hadron Shower? E: the average of all the deposit energy OR the average of deposit energy of 9x9 crystal? dE/dt =E0b(bt)a-1e-bt/Γ(a)

3)The distribution of the R1 with the deposited energy is as the following plots (left). Etot is the deposited Energy. Profile R1=0.7021-0.002191*Etot From the plots above we can see that parameter R1 distributes a large range. If I use the average value, the shower shape may not be fit well. 19

4. Conclusion From the shower shape, we can see that the shape calculated by the formula is not fit for that by the hitting very well. There must be something wrong in my work. And many details should be corrected. This is a long and hard work, any small mistake may make a large error. Hope that you can help me to correct it.

The End! Backup