Krista L. Clarke Davidson, MSc, Cheryl L. Hubley-Kozey, PhD 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Healthy Back Test Self-Assessment.
Advertisements

The Healthy Back Test Self-Assessment.
Shoulder Circles While seated or standing, rotate your shoulders backwards and down in the largest circle you can make.
Warrior Princess Arm muscles, abdomen, buttocks and legs are exercised here. Stand with legs wide apart, right foot pointing right, ankle in the line.
EXERCISES TO MINIMIZE PROBLEMS WITH BACK PAIN With exercises that make the muscles in your back, stomach hips and thighs strong and flexible. With Recreational.
Mobility and Stability for Streamlining Diane Elliot England Programmes.
Situps/Curl-Ups Reminders: Refinement: Extension:
Bennett Orthopedics bennettorthopedics.com
Back muscle strength and fatigue in healthy and chronic low back pain subjects: A comparative study of 3 assessment protocols  Rubens A. da Silva, MSc,
Preliminary Evaluation of an Automatically Stance-Phase Controlled Pediatric Prosthetic Knee Joint Using Quantitative Gait Analysis  Jan Andrysek, MASc,
Exercises for Spine Stabilization: Motion/Motor Patterns, Stability Progressions, and Clinical Technique  Stuart M. McGill, PhD, Amy Karpowicz, BSc, MPT 
Temporal Coordination of the Sit-to-Walk Task in Subjects With Stroke and in Controls  Gunilla E. Frykberg, MSc, Anna Cristina Åberg, PhD, Kjartan Halvorsen,
Electromyographic activity of the trunk extensor muscles: Effect of varying hip position and lumbar posture during Roman chair exercise  John M. Mayer,
Does Exercise Reduce Pain and Improve Physical Function Before Hip or Knee Replacement Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled.
Bergson C. Queiroz, MSc, Mariana F. Cagliari, PT, César F
Ela N. Benz, MSPT, T. George Hornby, PhD, Rita K. Bode, PhD, Robert A
Temporal Patterns of the Trunk Muscles Remain Altered in a Low Back–Injured Population Despite Subjective Reports of Recovery  Janice M. Moreside, PhD,
Lumbar Multifidus Muscle Thickness Does Not Predict Patients With Low Back Pain Who Improve With Trunk Stabilization Exercises  Kristen A. Zielinski,
Sarah P. Shultz, PhD, Michael R. Sitler, EdD, Ryan T
Exercises for Spine Stabilization: Motion/Motor Patterns, Stability Progressions, and Clinical Technique  Stuart M. McGill, PhD, Amy Karpowicz, BSc, MPT 
The Effects of Foot Position on the Performance of the Sit-To-Stand Movement With Chronic Stroke Subjects  Ana Cristina R. Camargos, PT, MSc, Fátima Rodrigues-de-Paula-Goulart,
Suzanne E. Halliday, DPhil, Amy B. Zavatsky, DPhil, Kazunori Hase, PhD 
Bergson C. Queiroz, MSc, Mariana F. Cagliari, PT, César F
Activation of lumbar paraspinal and abdominal muscles during therapeutic exercises in chronic low back pain patients1  Jari P Arokoski, DMSc, Taru Valta,
Back and abdominal muscle function during stabilization exercises
Rients B. Huitema, MSc, At L. Hof, PhD, Theo Mulder, PhD, Wiebo H
Near-Normal Gait Pattern With Peroneal Electrical Stimulation as a Neuroprosthesis in the Chronic Phase of Stroke: A Case Report  Roos van Swigchem, PT,
Vanessa D. Sherk, MS, Michael G. Bemben, PhD, Debra A. Bemben, PhD 
Aerobic Exercise Training in Addition to Conventional Physiotherapy for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial  Carol W. Chan, PT, MSc,
Effects of Multijoint Spastic Reflexes of the Legs During Assisted Bilateral Hip Oscillations in Human Spinal Cord Injury  Tanya Onushko, MS, Allison.
Jan P. K. Halbertsma, PhD, Ludwig N. H. Göeken, MD, PhD, At L
An Exercise Therapy Program Can Increase Oxygenation and Blood Volume of the Erector Spinae Muscle During Exercise in Chronic Low Back Pain Patients 
Aging with a spinal cord injury: Factors associated with the need for more help with activities of daily living1  Nathania R. Liem, MD, MSc, Mary Ann.
Temporal Coordination of the Sit-to-Walk Task in Subjects With Stroke and in Controls  Gunilla E. Frykberg, MSc, Anna Cristina Åberg, PhD, Kjartan Halvorsen,
Paul S Sung, PT, DHSc  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 
Relationship Between Hip Abductor Rate of Force Development and Mediolateral Stability in Older Adults  Shuo-Hsiu J. Chang, PT, MS, Vicki S. Mercer, PT,
Core stability exercises on and off a Swiss ball
Deborah Givens Heiss, PT, PhD, OCS, Richard K. Shields, PT, PhD, H
Muscle activation in therapeutic exercises to improve trunk stability
Effects of Stimulating Hip and Trunk Muscles on Seated Stability, Posture, and Reach After Spinal Cord Injury  Ronald J. Triolo, PhD, Stephanie Nogan.
Cory L. Christiansen, PT, PhD 
Lumbar Multifidus Muscle Thickness Does Not Predict Patients With Low Back Pain Who Improve With Trunk Stabilization Exercises  Kristen A. Zielinski,
Effect of lower-extremity muscle fatigue on postural control1
David A. Krause, PT, MBA, OCS, James W. Youdas, PT, MS, John H
Electromyographic activity of the trunk extensor muscles: Effect of varying hip position and lumbar posture during Roman chair exercise  John M. Mayer,
The Effects of Lower-Extremity Functional Electric Stimulation on the Orthostatic Responses of People With Tetraplegia  Clare Y. Chao, MSc, Gladys L.
Yong-Hao Pua, PhD, Ross A. Clark, PhD, Adam L. Bryant, PhD 
The Effect of Stretching on Muscle Responses and Postural Sway Responses During Computerized Dynamic Posturography in Women and Men  Nancy L. Lewis, ScD,
Sami P. Tarnanen, MSc, Jari J. Ylinen, MD, PhD, Kirsti M
Jonathan Mark Williams, PhD, Inam Haq, MBBS, Raymond Y. Lee, PhD 
Wearable Sensor-Based Biofeedback Training for Balance and Gait in Parkinson Disease: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial  Ilaria Carpinella, MSc, Davide.
Muscle Strength and Flexibility Characteristics of People Displaying Excessive Medial Knee Displacement  David R. Bell, MEd, ATC, Darin A. Padua, PhD,
Gary M. Souza, DPT, OCS, Lucinda L. Baker, PhD, PT, Christopher M
Low Interrater Reliability of Examiners Performing the Prone Instability Test: A Clinical Test for Lumbar Shear Instability  Margaret M. Ravenna, BS,
Thomas Bandholm, PhD, Henrik Kehlet, PhD 
Is There a Dose Response for Valgus Unloader Brace Usage on Knee Pain, Function, and Muscle Strength?  Sean T. Hurley, BSc, Gillian L. Hatfield Murdock,
Aleksandar Dejanovic, PhD, Erin P. Harvey, MSc, Stuart M. McGill, PhD 
Cheryl L. Hubley-Kozey, PhD, M.Johanne Vezina, MSc 
Anticipatory postural adjustment in selected trunk muscles in poststroke hemiparetic patients1  Ruth Dickstein, DSc, Sara Shefi, MSc, Emanuel Marcovitz,
Ruud W. Selles, PhD, Johannes B. Bussmann, PhD, Lisette M
Anne M. Bryden, OTR/L, Kevin L. Kilgore, PhD, Benjamin B
Test Methods to Detect Hip and Knee Muscle Weakness and Gait Disturbance in Patients With Hip Osteoarthritis  Anton Rasch, MD, Nils Dalén, MD, PhD, Hans.
Craniocervical Orientation Affects Muscle Activation When Exercising the Cervical Extensors in Healthy Subjects  James M. Elliott, PT, PhD, Shaun P. O'Leary,
Sarah P. Shultz, PhD, Michael R. Sitler, EdD, Ryan T
ACRM News Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Dynamic analysis of trunk flexion after stroke1
Postural Control of the Lumbar Spine in Unstable Sitting
Fingertip-to-Floor Test and Straight Leg Raising Test: Validity, Responsiveness, and Predictive Value in Patients With Acute/Subacute Low Back Pain  Harald.
Ulla-Britt Flansbjer, PT, MSc, David Downham, PhD, Jan Lexell, MD, PhD 
Endurance Times of Trunk Muscles in Male Intercollegiate Rowers in Hong Kong  Romy H. Chan, DPT, MS, OCS  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 
Presentation transcript:

Trunk muscle responses to demands of an exercise progression to improve dynamic spinal stability1  Krista L. Clarke Davidson, MSc, Cheryl L. Hubley-Kozey, PhD  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  Volume 86, Issue 2, Pages 216-223 (February 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.04.029

Fig 1 (A) An example of the entire sequence is illustrated in panels 1 through 6. The only difference among levels is panel 4, and the differences are illustrated (B) for levels 2 to 5. The initial instructions for all levels were: “Place your fingertips on each side of your abdomen just under your ribcage, and pull your abdomen in and up toward your chest as if to tuck your stomach under your ribcage” (panel 1). The right foot is lifted off the floor until the hip is flexed to 90°, and in contact with the wooden frame (panel 2). The left leg is then lifted to the same position (panel 3). The leg-extension phase is shown in panel 4. For all levels, the legs are then flexed back to the 90° hip angle position until contact is made with the wooden frame (panel 5). The left leg (panel 6), then the right leg, are lowered to the starting position (panel 1). (B) The differences for the leg-extension phase for each level. In level 2, the right leg extends as the heel lightly slides until the leg is fully extended, then the leg is flexed back to the original 90° hip angle position (level 2 panel). Level 3 is the same as level 2, except the foot does not touch the table until the leg is fully extended. Then the leg is lifted and flexed back to the 90° hip angle position. In level 4, both feet are lowered to lightly touch the table, and the heels slide along the table until legs are fully extended. Then the subject slides both legs back to the 90° hip angle position. In level 5, both feet are lowered without touching the table until the legs are fully extended; they are then set down on the table. The legs are then lifted and flexed back to the 90° hip angle position. All exercises were performed to a count of 8. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2005 86, 216-223DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2004.04.029)

Fig 2 The event marker provided a voltage change for each event to divide the total exercise into 3 phases. Phase 1 is the leg-lifting phase, phase 2 is the leg-extension phase (including hip and knee extension and flexion), and phase 3 is the leg-lowering phase. Abbreviations: R, right; F, foot; L, left; T, thigh. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2005 86, 216-223DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2004.04.029)

Fig 3 Interaction plots for (A) abdominal muscle sites and (B) trunk extensor muscle sites. ∗Level 2 differs statistically from levels 3, 4, and 5; †level 3 differs statistically from levels 4 and 5; ‡level 3 differs statistically from level 5; ∥level 4 differs statistically from level 5 (P<.001 for abdominals, P<.002 for trunk extensors). All of the abdominal muscle sites had similar differences, as indicated in panel A, whereas the erector spinae and multifidus did not, as indicated in panel B. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2005 86, 216-223DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2004.04.029)