Yusuke Nakasone, Kazunori Zikihara, Satoru Tokutomi, Masahide Terazima 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Probing α-310 Transitions in a Voltage-Sensing S4 Helix
Advertisements

Probing α-310 Transitions in a Voltage-Sensing S4 Helix
Maryam Sayadi, Seiichiro Tanizaki, Michael Feig  Biophysical Journal 
(Un)Folding Mechanisms of the FBP28 WW Domain in Explicit Solvent Revealed by Multiple Rare Event Simulation Methods  Jarek Juraszek, Peter G. Bolhuis 
Conformational Heterogeneity in the Activation Mechanism of Bax
Kinetic Hysteresis in Collagen Folding
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Structural States and Dynamics of the D-Loop in Actin
Volume 95, Issue 6, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 112, Issue 12, Pages (June 2017)
Structure and Dynamics of the Membrane-Bound Form of Pf1 Coat Protein: Implications of Structural Rearrangement for Virus Assembly  Sang Ho Park, Francesca.
Volume 112, Issue 7, Pages (April 2017)
Gil Rahamim, Dan Amir, Elisha Haas  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 95, Issue 11, Pages (December 2008)
Volume 91, Issue 8, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 97, Issue 1, Pages (July 2009)
Volume 113, Issue 12, Pages (December 2017)
The N-Terminal Actin-Binding Tandem Calponin-Homology (CH) Domain of Dystrophin Is in a Closed Conformation in Solution and When Bound to F-actin  Surinder M.
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Joseph M. Johnson, William J. Betz  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 106, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Conversion of Red Fluorescent Protein into a Bright Blue Probe
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Jérôme Lang, Amandine Maréchal, Manon Couture, Jérôme Santolini 
Emily I. Bartle, Tara M. Urner, Siddharth S. Raju, Alexa L. Mattheyses 
Volume 99, Issue 10, Pages (November 2010)
Volume 107, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
A Second Look at Mini-Protein Stability: Analysis of FSD-1 Using Circular Dichroism, Differential Scanning Calorimetry, and Simulations  Jianwen A. Feng,
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Carlos R. Baiz, Andrei Tokmakoff  Biophysical Journal 
Xiao-Han Li, Elizabeth Rhoades  Biophysical Journal 
Paolo Mereghetti, Razif R. Gabdoulline, Rebecca C. Wade 
Volume 103, Issue 2, Pages (July 2012)
Kinetic Hysteresis in Collagen Folding
Volume 99, Issue 8, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Volume 108, Issue 6, Pages (March 2015)
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Site-Directed Spin-Labeling Study of the Light-Harvesting Complex CP29
Volume 106, Issue 4, Pages (February 2014)
Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics Simulations Provide Insight into Substrate Recognition by Small Heat Shock Proteins  Sunita Patel, Elizabeth Vierling,
Rita Pancsa, Daniele Raimondi, Elisa Cilia, Wim F. Vranken 
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 2009)
Conformational Heterogeneity in the Activation Mechanism of Bax
Shelly Tzlil, Diana Murray, Avinoam Ben-Shaul  Biophysical Journal 
Velocity-Dependent Mechanical Unfolding of Bacteriorhodopsin Is Governed by a Dynamic Interaction Network  Christian Kappel, Helmut Grubmüller  Biophysical.
Saswata Sankar Sarkar, Jayant B. Udgaonkar, Guruswamy Krishnamoorthy 
Volume 108, Issue 4, Pages (February 2015)
Satomi Matsuoka, Tatsuo Shibata, Masahiro Ueda  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Multi-Image Colocalization and Its Statistical Significance
Volume 97, Issue 8, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 108, Issue 9, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 111, Issue 11, Pages (December 2016)
Interaction of Oxazole Yellow Dyes with DNA Studied with Hybrid Optical Tweezers and Fluorescence Microscopy  C.U. Murade, V. Subramaniam, C. Otto, Martin.
Emily I. Bartle, Tara M. Urner, Siddharth S. Raju, Alexa L. Mattheyses 
Volume 107, Issue 3, Pages (August 2014)
The N-Terminal Actin-Binding Tandem Calponin-Homology (CH) Domain of Dystrophin Is in a Closed Conformation in Solution and When Bound to F-actin  Surinder M.
Cardiolipin Interactions with Proteins
Volume 97, Issue 5, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 114, Issue 6, Pages (March 2018)
Kinetic Folding Mechanism of Erythropoietin
Paolo Mereghetti, Razif R. Gabdoulline, Rebecca C. Wade 
A Delocalized Proton-Binding Site within a Membrane Protein
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Role of the DELSEED Loop in Torque Transmission of F1-ATPase
Volume 108, Issue 9, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
The NorM MATE Transporter from N
Presentation transcript:

Kinetics of Conformational Changes of the FKF1-LOV Domain upon Photoexcitation  Yusuke Nakasone, Kazunori Zikihara, Satoru Tokutomi, Masahide Terazima  Biophysical Journal  Volume 99, Issue 11, Pages 3831-3839 (December 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.10.005 Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 (a) Ribbon structures of simulated FKF1-LOV (magenta) and phy3-LOV domain (cyan). A three-dimensional structure prediction for FKF1-LOV was carried out using an automated comparative protein-modeling server, Swiss Model (http://swissmodel.expasy.org/) (20). The characteristic loop (Pro99–Leu107) is shown in yellow. (b) Multiple sequence alignment of several LOV domains. LOV sequences in the alignment include A. thaliana FKF1 (AF216523), phot2 (AAC27293), and Adiantum phy3 (BAA36192). Asterisks indicate 100% identity, and dots indicate similarity. The LOV core region is indicated by arrows. The characteristic loop region of FKF1-LOV is shown by red letters. The additional removed part of FKF1-LOV and the four inserted amino acid residues of phot2LOV2 are shown in purple and blue, respectively. The indicated amino acid sequence of FKF1 (Asp28–Arg174) was used in this experiment. Biophysical Journal 2010 99, 3831-3839DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2010.10.005) Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 A TG signal (gray broken line) of FKF1-LOV at 350 μM and q2 = 1.8 × 1010 m−2. The best-fitted curve, obtained using Eq. 1 and Eq. S3, is indicated by the solid line, which essentially overlaps with the observed signal. Biophysical Journal 2010 99, 3831-3839DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2010.10.005) Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 (a) TG signals (broken lines) of FKF1-LOV at q2-values of 1), 1.1 × 1013; 2), 1.4 × 1012; 3), 1.5 × 1011; and 4), 1.8 × 1010 m−2 (from left to right). The signals representing the molecular diffusion processes are shown, and these signals are normalized in the initial part of the diffusion signal. The best-fitted curves to the observed TG signals, obtained by Eq. S3, are shown by the solid black lines. The signals are well reproduced by the fitted curves. (b) The signals are normalized at the peak intensity and plotted against q2t. The times of the diffusion peaks are 1.8, 13, 100, and 870 ms, respectively, and are indicated in the figure. Biophysical Journal 2010 99, 3831-3839DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2010.10.005) Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Concentration dependence of the TG signal (dotted line) of FKF1-LOV measured at q2 = 2.8 × 1012 m−2. The concentrations were 350, 250, 160, and 99 μM. The signal intensities are normalized in the initial part of the diffusion signal. They are completely overlapped. Biophysical Journal 2010 99, 3831-3839DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2010.10.005) Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 (a) The absorption spectra of dark- and light-adapted states of FKF1-LOV (solid lines) and FKF1-LOV-NL (broken lines). (b) The absorption change associated with the dark recovery process of FKF1-LOV (open square) and FKF1-LOV-NL (open circle) monitored at 450 nm. The signals are well reproduced by a single exponential function (black lines are fitting curves). Biophysical Journal 2010 99, 3831-3839DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2010.10.005) Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 (a) A TG signal (broken gray line) of the FKF1-LOV-NL mutant measured at q2 = 9.6 × 1010 m−2. The best-fitted curve to the observed TG signal (Eq. 2) is shown by the solid black line. The lower panel of the figure shows the magnified signal at the diffusion peak. (b) The q2 dependence of the TG signal of the FKF1-LOV-NL mutant measured at q2 = 8.1 × 1011 m−2 and 9.6 × 1010 m−2. Biophysical Journal 2010 99, 3831-3839DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2010.10.005) Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 CD spectra of FKF1-LOV and FKF-LOV-NL before (green solid line for FKF1-LOV and pink solid line for FKF1-LOV-NL) and after (red broken line for FKF1-LOV and blue broken line for FKF1-LOV-NL) light illumination. Biophysical Journal 2010 99, 3831-3839DOI: (10.1016/j.bpj.2010.10.005) Copyright © 2010 Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions