Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages (July 2013)
Advertisements

Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages (May 2009)
The Pore Structure of the Closed RyR1 Channel
Volume 25, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
A Corkscrew Model for Dynamin Constriction
Conformational Changes of the Flavivirus E Glycoprotein
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages (December 2005)
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
Structural Basis for Vertebrate Filamin Dimerization
Transmembrane Signaling across the Ligand-Gated FhuA Receptor
Atomic Model of CPV Reveals the Mechanism Used by This Single-Shelled Virus to Economically Carry Out Functions Conserved in Multishelled Reoviruses 
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2018)
Chen-Chou Wu, William J. Rice, David L. Stokes  Structure 
Volume 15, Issue 12, Pages (December 2007)
Microtubule Structure at 8 Å Resolution
Cryo-EM Study of the Pseudomonas Bacteriophage φKZ
Barbie K. Ganser-Pornillos, Anchi Cheng, Mark Yeager  Cell 
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 124, Issue 3, Pages (February 2006)
Structure and Organization of Coat Proteins in the COPII Cage
Subunit Folds and Maturation Pathway of a dsRNA Virus Capsid
Volume 108, Issue 2, Pages (January 2002)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e3 (February 2018)
Microtubule Structure at 8 Å Resolution
Volume 16, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
The Pore Structure of the Closed RyR1 Channel
DNA packaging intermediates of bacteriophage φX174
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Solution Structures of Engineered Vault Particles
Structural Basis of Pore Formation by the Bacterial Toxin Pneumolysin
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (February 2000)
Structure of Dengue Virus
Elizabeth A Hewat, Emmanuelle Neumann, Dieter Blaas  Molecular Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 10, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2008)
Stacy D Benson, Jaana K.H Bamford, Dennis H Bamford, Roger M Burnett 
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Electron Cryotomography of the E
Structural Basis for Vertebrate Filamin Dimerization
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2008)
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 2014)
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages e5 (October 2017)
Each Actin Subunit Has Three Nebulin Binding Sites
A Corkscrew Model for Dynamin Constriction
Volume 99, Issue 2, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 1998)
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (March 2005)
Volume 26, Issue 4, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages (March 2008)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (April 1994)
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Volume 2, Issue 7, Pages (July 1994)
Fig. 1 Overall structure and organization of the major and minor capsid proteins in HAdV-D26. Overall structure and organization of the major and minor.
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (October 2005)
Stacy D Benson, Jaana K.H Bamford, Dennis H Bamford, Roger M Burnett 
Volume 31, Issue 5, Pages (September 2008)
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Topologies of a Substrate Protein Bound to the Chaperonin GroEL
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
Segmentation and Comparative Modeling in an 8
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2011)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages 1819-1828 (December 2005) Membrane Proteins Modulate the Bilayer Curvature in the Bacterial Virus Bam35  Pasi Antero Laurinmäki, Juha Tapio Huiskonen, Dennis Henry Bamford, Sarah Jane Butcher  Structure  Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages 1819-1828 (December 2005) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2005.08.020 Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Overall Architecture of Bam35 (A) Cryo-electron micrograph of Bam35 taken at 3 μm underfocus. Intact (black arrowhead) and empty (white arrowhead) virions, with a diameter of roughly 70 nm. The icosahedral shape of the particles is reflected in the hexagonal outline of the virion images. Spikes are seen occasionally projecting out from the virion surface (black arrows). The viral membrane is visible, underlying the protein capsid in the empty particles. The membrane occasionally forms tubes (inset). (B and C) Central 0.7 nm thick sections through the (B) intact virion and the (C) empty particle reconstructions. The different layers are labeled in (B). (D) Surface representation of the 7.3 Å resolution virion reconstruction viewed down a 2-fold axis of symmetry using the threshold giving the correct mass for the MCP shell (1.3σ above the mean). The icosahedral unit contained 12 copies of the MCP arranged as 4 trimers colored in yellow, green, blue, and cyan. The pentameric protein is colored in magenta. One asymmetric unit is outlined. The positions of an icosahedral 2-fold (ellipse), 3-fold (triangle), and 5-fold (pentagon) axis of symmetry are marked in (C) and (D). The scale bar in (A) represents 100 nm; the scale bar in (C) represents 20 nm for both (B) and (C). Structure 2005 13, 1819-1828DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.08.020) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Comparison of the Major Coat Protein from Bam35 with the Atomic Model of that of PRD1 (A and B) Averaged Bam35 MCP density is shown in transparent gray from the (A) top and from the (B) side. The PRD1 MCP X-ray structure is shown as a ribbon with α helices colored in cyan and β strands colored in blue. The loops missing in Bam35, and thus projecting out from the MCP density, are in red. The N-terminal α helix is labeled in (B) (NT-α). (C) A section from (A) showing the agreement in the labeled α helices and in the β sheets. (D) A close-up from (B) showing the evident separation of β sheets in the density of the β barrel and the good fit of some of the loops that are the same length in Bam35 and PRD1 (black). (C) and (D) are contoured at a high threshold (2.0σ) to illustrate the high-resolution details in the structure. (E and F) The PRD1 MCP N termini project out from the Bam35 density (red, residues 15–24). The N termini of Bam35 MCPs are in a different conformation (indicated with an arrow) from those of the PRD1 MCP N termini (labeled with N) either (E) pointing toward the membrane or (F) touching it. The PRD1 MCP trimers shown as a Cα trace are colored as in Figure 1D. (G and H) The C termini of Bam35 MCP form intertrimeric bridges around both the (G) quasi and the (H) true 3-fold axes of symmetry outlined with a black, dotted rectangle on the side of the trimer facing the membrane. The conformations of Bam35 MCP C termini could be derived from PRD1 MCP C termini (in purple) conformations by a change in the angle (indicated with an arrow). The N termini (red) point directly toward the membrane, not toward the bridges. Structure 2005 13, 1819-1828DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.08.020) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Comparison of the Minor Components of the Bam35 Capsid with Those of PRD1 (A and B) View of the Bam35 vertex complex from the (A) side and from the (B) outside of the virion with the Cα backbones of the PRD1 atomic models of peripentonal MCP (yellow), vertex penton protein P31 (purple), and tape measure protein (orange) superposed. The density contributing to the spike is in violet, and density between the penton and the membrane is in brown. (C) Close-up of the superposition between PRD1 P31 and Bam35 density illustrates the similarity of the β barrels. The PRD1 P31 N-terminal arm (blue, residues 6–11) protrudes out from the difference map density. (D) The vertex complex as in (B) and the spike and the penton base were removed to reveal the density analogous to PRD1 P16 (red, residues 42–56). The PRD1 P16 C-terminal α helix diverging from the Bam35 density (residues 94–116) is in blue. (E) The PRD1 tape measure protein (orange, residues 28–79), running along the facet edges, is superimposed on the Bam35 density map. The N-terminal dimerization domain is not visible in Bam35 (blue, residues 1–27, N terminus labeled). The icosahedral 2-fold axis of symmetry is indicated (ellipse). The gray isosurface corresponds to a difference map, where contribution from the MCP is subtracted. Structure 2005 13, 1819-1828DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.08.020) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Transmembrane Helices in Bam35 (A) A partial central cross-section through a 3-fold axis of symmetry showing transmembrane densities (arrows). (B) A section along the plane indicated in (A) (dashed line) shows that the transmembrane densities are clustered into three bundles per facet (arrow). (C) Isosurface representation with membrane density in gold and capsid in gray. The Cα traces for fitted PRD1 MCP (blue, green, and cyan) are shown. (D) The N termini from trimers 2 (green) and 4 (cyan) are in close proximity to the transmembrane density (gold isosurface). The scale bar in (B) represents 20 nm for both (A) and (B). Structure 2005 13, 1819-1828DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.08.020) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Membrane Curvature and Thickness Related to Transmembrane Protein Position (A and B) (A) The degree of curvature in the outer leaflet of the Bam35, PRD1, and Dengue virus membranes and the (B) corresponding membrane thickness are plotted over the icosahedral asymmetric unit. The relative position of the central cluster of Bam35 transmembrane densities (black circle) and the six peripheral helices are indicated (black dots), as are the single transmembrane helix of PRD1 (black dot) and the position of the Dengue virus transmembrane proteins E (black triangle) and M (black square). The thickness is marked in nanometers for one of the contour lines in each plot in (B). Structure 2005 13, 1819-1828DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.08.020) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Schematic Diagram of a Bam35 Facet The major capsid protein (MCP) trimers belonging to one facet are color coded according to the position within the asymmetric unit. Neighboring MCP trimers from adjacent facets are shown in white. The true icosahedral and local 3-fold axes are shown as small black and gray triangles, respectively. MCP C termini forming interhexameric bridges are shown as yellow arrows. The base of the arrow indicates the monomer from which the terminus originates. Structure 2005 13, 1819-1828DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2005.08.020) Copyright © 2005 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions