Rare Codons Regulate KRas Oncogenesis

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2007)
Advertisements

Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2009)
An Opiate Cocktail that Reduces Morphine Tolerance and Dependence
Volume 12, Issue 5, Pages (November 2007)
Neuronal RNA Granules Neuron
Volume 50, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Reduction in the requirement of oncogenic Ras signaling to activation of PI3K/AKT pathway during tumor maintenance  Kian-Huat Lim, Christopher M. Counter 
The vacuolar-ATPase B1 subunit in distal tubular acidosis: novel mutations and mechanisms for dysfunction  D.G. Fuster, J. Zhang, X.-S. Xie, O.W. Moe 
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages (April 2004)
An Enzyme that Regulates Ether Lipid Signaling Pathways in Cancer Annotated by Multidimensional Profiling  Kyle P. Chiang, Sherry Niessen, Alan Saghatelian,
Megan van Overbeek, Titia de Lange  Current Biology 
Botao Liu, Yan Han, Shu-Bing Qian  Molecular Cell 
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Translational Regulatory Mechanisms Generate N-Terminal Glucocorticoid Receptor Isoforms with Unique Transcriptional Target Genes  Nick Z. Lu, John A.
Volume 120, Issue 6, Pages (March 2005)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (June 2014)
Volume 21, Issue 11, Pages (November 2014)
Exon Circularization Requires Canonical Splice Signals
The Translational Landscape of the Mammalian Cell Cycle
Identification and Characterization of an IκB Kinase
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (February 2013)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Enxuan Jing, Stephane Gesta, C. Ronald Kahn  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Identification and differential expression of human collagenase-3 mRNA species derived from internal deletion, alternative splicing, and different polyadenylation.
Volume 135, Issue 3, Pages e3 (September 2008)
Coiled Coils Direct Assembly of a Cold-Activated TRP Channel
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Xiaolong Wei, Hai Xu, Donald Kufe  Cancer Cell 
EB3 Regulates Microtubule Dynamics at the Cell Cortex and Is Required for Myoblast Elongation and Fusion  Anne Straube, Andreas Merdes  Current Biology 
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (March 2013)
Regulation of YAP by Mechanical Strain through Jnk and Hippo Signaling
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Volume 158, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 53, Issue 6, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (August 2008)
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages (April 2010)
Lizhong Xu, Veronica Lubkov, Laura J. Taylor, Dafna Bar-Sagi 
Synthetic Lethal Screening Identifies Compounds Activating Iron-Dependent, Nonapoptotic Cell Death in Oncogenic-RAS-Harboring Cancer Cells  Wan Seok Yang,
ADAR Regulates RNA Editing, Transcript Stability, and Gene Expression
Botao Liu, Yan Han, Shu-Bing Qian  Molecular Cell 
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Yuichiro Mishima, Yukihide Tomari  Molecular Cell 
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages (May 2007)
Kari Barlan, Wen Lu, Vladimir I. Gelfand  Current Biology 
Diverse Herpesvirus MicroRNAs Target the Stress-Induced Immune Ligand MICB to Escape Recognition by Natural Killer Cells  Daphna Nachmani, Noam Stern-Ginossar,
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2007)
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages (September 2007)
Yap1 Phosphorylation by c-Abl Is a Critical Step in Selective Activation of Proapoptotic Genes in Response to DNA Damage  Dan Levy, Yaarit Adamovich,
Volume 125, Issue 4, Pages (May 2006)
Nuclear Localization and Transcriptional Repression Are Confined to Separable Domains in the Circadian Protein CRYPTOCHROME  Haisun Zhu, Francesca Conte,
Ulf Andersson Ørom, Finn Cilius Nielsen, Anders H. Lund  Molecular Cell 
Brandon Ho, Anastasia Baryshnikova, Grant W. Brown  Cell Systems 
Merkel Cell Polyomavirus–Positive Merkel Cell Carcinoma Cells Do Not Require Expression of the Viral Small T Antigen  Sabrina Angermeyer, Sonja Hesbacher,
Regulation of LKB1/STRAD Localization and Function by E-Cadherin
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages (September 2014)
Nuclear Localization and Transcriptional Repression Are Confined to Separable Domains in the Circadian Protein CRYPTOCHROME  Haisun Zhu, Francesca Conte,
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 16, Issue 14, Pages (July 2006)
A Splicing-Independent Function of SF2/ASF in MicroRNA Processing
Volume 121, Issue 4, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 24, Issue 11, Pages (June 2014)
Presentation transcript:

Rare Codons Regulate KRas Oncogenesis Benjamin L. Lampson, Nicole L.K. Pershing, Joseph A. Prinz, Joshua R. Lacsina, William F. Marzluff, Christopher V. Nicchitta, David M. MacAlpine, Christopher M. Counter  Current Biology  Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 70-75 (January 2013) DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.031 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Current Biology 2013 23, 70-75DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.031) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Translation of KRAS Is Limited by Rare Codons (A) Immunoblot of lysates isolated from human HEK-HT cells stably infected with the retrovirus pBABEpuro encoding the indicated N-terminal FLAG epitope-tagged oncogenic (G12V) human Ras proteins (FLAG-RasG12V) with an α-FLAG or α-tubulin antibody. One of three experiments is shown. (B) Immunoblot of lysates isolated from HEK-HT cells transiently transfected with the plasmid pCIneo encoding GST cDNA, a STOP codon where indicated, and in frame the indicated FLAG-Ras cDNAs, with an α-GST or α-tubulin antibody. One of three experiments is shown. (C) Amino acid identity of HRas and KRas is shown in the middle bar. Blue indicates identical amino acids; white indicates nonidentical amino acids. Relative codon usage of HRAS versus KRAS is shown in the upper and lower bars, respectively. Increasingly dark shades of red indicate increasing relative rarity of the codon for identical amino acids; gray indicates gaps in alignment or nonidentical amino acids. (D) Immunoblot of lysates isolated from human HEK-HT cells stably infected with the retrovirus pBABEpuro encoding the indicated FLAG-Ras proteins isolated from the indicated species with an α-FLAG or α-tubulin antibody. One of two experiments is shown. (E) Immunoblot of lysates isolated from human HEK-HT cells stably infected with the retrovirus pBABEpuro encoding FLAG-HRas, FLAG-KRas, or FLAG-KRas∗ (in which the indicated rare codons were progressively converted to the indicated common codons) with an α-FLAG or α-tubulin antibody. One of two experiments is shown. Detailed methodologies and reagent descriptions are provided in Supplemental Experimental Procedures. See also Figure S1. Current Biology 2013 23, 70-75DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.031) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Rare Codon Bias Limits Endogenous KRAS Translation (A) AAV-based recombination targeting strategy to knock into exon 1 of the endogenous KRAS gene in human HCT116 colon cancer cells (ATCC) an oncogenic KRASG13D cDNA in which either 130 rare codons were optimized to common codons (opKRASG13D) or left unaltered (uaKRASG13D) [16]. (B) Immunoblot of lysates isolated from the parental HCT116 cell line, stable clones with nonhomologous vector integration, clones with homologous integration of uaKRASG13D, and clones with homologous integration of opKRASG13D, with an α-KRas or α-tubulin antibody. Data shown are representative of at least one experiment. (C) Semiquantitative RT-PCR using primers specific for HRAS and the nontargeted KRAS mRNA of the indicated sedimentation fractions (relative positions of ribosome-free, ribosome subunits 40S, 60S, and 80S, and polysome fractions) isolated from HCT116 opKRASG13D clone 5 pre (−) and post (+) pactamycin (pacta) treatment to halt translation initiation. (D) Quantitative RT-PCR using primers specific for the KRASG13D knockin mRNA of the indicated sedimentation fractions isolated from HCT116 opKRASG13D clone 5 and uaKRASG13D clone 1 pre and post pactamycin treatment to halt translation initiation. Detailed methodologies and reagent descriptions are provided in Supplemental Experimental Procedures. See also Figure S2. Current Biology 2013 23, 70-75DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.031) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Rare Codons Limit Oncogenic KRas-Driven Tumorigenesis (A–C) Photograph (A) and mean weight ± SEM (B) of tumors at endpoint, as well as mean size ± SEM of tumors over time (C) derived from HEK-HT cells stably expressing empty vector (black circles), HRasG12V (blue squares), KRasG12V (red triangles), and KRas∗G12V (green triangles) (n = 4). One of two experiments is shown. ∗∗∗p < 0.001. (D–F) Photograph (D) and mean weight ± SEM (E) of tumors at endpoint, as well as mean size ± SEM of tumors over time (F) derived from HCT116 clones expressing opKRasG13D (clone 5; green triangles), uaKRasG13D (clone 1; red squares), or uaKRasG13D (clone 2; black triangles) (n = 6). One of two experiments is shown. ∗∗∗p < 0.001. (G) Change in IMR90 cell number over time following acute expression of the indicated FLAG-RasG12V constructs. Left: fold change in crystal violet absorbance at 590 nm at the indicated time points after cell plating is normalized to day 1 for each cell line. Relative cell number for IMR90 cells expressing any of the oncogenic FLAG-Ras constructs was significantly lower than empty vector control cells on days 8, 12, and 18 (p < 0.01). Additionally, relative cell numbers for both empty vector and FLAG-KRASG12V-expressing cells were significantly different from each other and FLAG-KRAS∗G12V and FLAG-HRASG12V cells on days 12 and 18 (p < 0.0001). Right: crystal violet staining of intact cells at day 18, representative of four replicates. Data shown are representative of at least one experiment. Detailed methodologies and reagent descriptions are provided in Supplemental Experimental Procedures. See also Figure S3. Current Biology 2013 23, 70-75DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.031) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Gene Pairs with Divergent Codon Bias Demonstrate Correlating Differences in Expression and Cluster in Unique Signaling Protein Classes (A) Percent amino acid identity versus log difference in CDS GC3 content of individual protein pairs identified by BLAST alignment (gray points). Black points: gene pairs with ≥80% identity and ≥1.8-fold difference in GC3 content; blue crosses: gene pairs tested for protein expression; red cross: HRAS-KRAS gene pair. (B) Immunoblot of lysates isolated from human 293 cells (ATCC) stably infected with the retrovirus pBABEpuro encoding the indicated N-terminal FLAG epitope-tagged cDNAs corresponding to human gene pairs of high amino acid sequence identity that have a common (first) versus a rare (second) codon bias, or the gene pair enriched in rare codons after rare codons were optimized (op) to common codons, with an α-FLAG or α-tubulin antibody. Data shown are representative of at least one experiment. (C and D) Histogram comparing p values of gene ontology categories (C) or KEGG signaling pathways (D) enriched in lists of gene pairs with high amino acid sequence identity and high GC3 difference (green), high identity and low GC3 difference (pink), low identity and high GC3 difference (purple), or lists of genes with high GC3 content (brown) or low GC3 content (aquamarine). Detailed methodologies and reagent descriptions are provided in Supplemental Experimental Procedures. See also Tables S1, S2, and S3. Current Biology 2013 23, 70-75DOI: (10.1016/j.cub.2012.11.031) Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions