Kevin Lyday, CISSP, PMP, CIPP/G

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation at NRCan: Information for Program Managers Strategic Evaluation Division Science & Policy Integration July 2012.
Advertisements

Project Cycle Management
Project Quality Plans Gillian Sandilands Director of Quality
Paulo Manso CDM EB September, 2011 Proceeder for Submission & Approval Standardized Baselines.
Session No. 4 Implementing the State’s Safety Programme Implementing Service Providers SMS
CDCs 21 Goals. CDC Strategic Imperatives 1. Health impact focus: Align CDCs people, strategies, goals, investments & performance to maximize our impact.
Maryland Higher Education Commission BRAC Higher Education Investment Fund Technical Assistance Meeting June 21, 2010.
Orientation to EVALUATION PROCEDURES August, 2006.
Gaining Senior Leadership Support for Continuity of Operations
Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.
Achieving Success as President Club Leadership Training Session.
Enterprise Performance Life Cycle (EPLC) Stage Gate Reviews
Project Selection Overview By Tim Washington September 14 th, 2011.
Acquisition Office The Acquisition Process Acquisition Staff.
  16 th Annual OSC Readiness Training Program NCP Community Involvement Requirements and Additional Recommendations Katy Miley,
1 LBNL Enterprise Computing (EC) January 2003 LBNL Enterprise Computing.
Overarching Roles of Critical Partners In A Project 9:30 – 10:00 Rob Curlee, FMO Joseph Dominque, OCISO Mike Perry, EA.
Small Projects & Tailoring Using the PPA 1:15 – 2:15 Teresa Kinley, OPHPR With Panelists: Susan Wilkin, NCCDPHP Andy Autry, NCBDDD Carol Waller, NCEH/ATSDR.
Jim Seligman Chief Information Officer Welcome & Opening Remarks.
IT Strategic Planning Project – Hamilton Campus FY2005.
Adjusting EPLC to your Project Colleen Robinson & Teresa Kinley Friday, February 6, 2009.
COUNCILLORS, MAYOR & ADMINISTRATOR ROLES and RESPONSIBILITIES.
R OLES AND R ESPONSIBILITIES Your Role as Area President  Represent the area on the KEHA Board of Directors  Preside at all area meetings.
Series 2: Project Management Advanced Project Management for Behavioral Health Electronic Health Records (EHRs) 9/2013 From the CIHS Video Series “Ten.
Sense of Initiative and Entrepreneurship This project has been funded with support from the European Commission. This [publication] communication reflects.
Presenter: Jennifer LoGalbo RHP 8 Monthly Learning Collaborative Call March 10,
PMP® Exam Preparation Course
Roles & Responsibilities
Module 3 Develop the Plan Planning for Emergencies – For Small Business –
Professional Science Master’s Programs: Federal Budget Strategy April 4, 2008 Council of Graduate Schools.
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
BSBPMG405A Apply Human Resource Management Approaches Apply Human Resource Management Approaches Unit Guide C ertificate IV in Project Management
Building our Future: Programme Board TOR PURPOSE To be the governing forum for the design & effective delivery of the Building our Future Programme To.
Background Management Council (MC) was briefed on approach in early Feb 2003 and approved it Agreed that every Service Group (SG) will participate in.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. This edition is intended for use outside of the U.S. only, with content that may be different from the U.S.
Learning by Experience A Project in the Design Phase 2:15 – 3:00 Performed by: A Cast of Many.
Investment Management Process (IMP) ACF-1 John DiNofrio Gary Graybill Alex Storoz March 31, 2003.
Project Management Processes for a Project
OMB’s Management Watch List (MWL) & High Risk Projects List How to More Effectively Track, Analyze and Evaluate Your Agency IT Investments October 9, 2007.
Committees. Executive Committee Terms of Reference Committee Type – standing Purpose -. Manage the business and technical affairs of Open Health Tools.
Standard Stage Gate Review Process
Walter S. Harris, MBA, PMP Acting Director of the Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services (proposed) 2010 Project Management Summit.
Environmental Assessment in British Columbia Forum of Federations Conference September 14, 2009.
SOLUTION What kind of plan do we need? How will we know if the work is on track to be done? How quickly can we get this done? How long will this work take.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
SPC Advisory Committee Training Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office SPC 10/9/20151.
Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response Division of Emergency Operations Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Project Management Processes for a Project
Multistate Research Program Roles & Responsibilities Eric Young SAAESD Meeting Corpus Christi, TX April 3-6, 2005.
HHS CEA Executive Briefing HHS Enterprise Performance Life Cycle (EPLC) and Program/Project Manager (PM) Certification NIH PM Forum September 12, 2007.
Best Practices Performance Measurement for Governing Boards and Commissions Prepared for training presented in April 2008.
Small Business Programs Tatia Evelyn-Bellamy Director Small Business Division Small Business Center February 2016.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
 As of July 1, 2014, 61 operational courts: › 28 Adult Drug Courts  5 Hybrid Drug/OWI Courts › 14 OWI Courts › 9 Veterans Treatment Courts › 4 Mental.
Driver Education – Assessing What Works and What Doesn’t The Assessment Team Perspective AAMVA Region 1 Conference July 18, 2011 Baltimore, MD.
Winning with KEHA Roles and Responsibilities
Roles and Responsibilities of VDH Epidemiologists
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF VARIOUS LEVELS IN ESTABLISHING AND IMPLEMENTING THE ADDO PROGRAM August 2009.
TechStambha PMP Certification Training
KEHA Roles and Responsibilities
Project Management Processes
Roles and Responsibilities
Roles & Responsibilities
Project Management Group
Roles and Responsibilities
Software Reviews.
Position descriptions
Presentation transcript:

Kevin Lyday, CISSP, PMP, CIPP/G Role of IR Governance in Stage Gate Reviews Enterprise & Local Governance 10:00– 10:30 Kevin Lyday, CISSP, PMP, CIPP/G Associate Director, Information Resources Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response Joe Nay, MBA, PMP, CISSP Acting Associate Director Project Execution Office Office of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services (proposed)

CDC IR Governance Federated Decision-making Model

National Center/Office IR Governance Roles in EPLC Each National Center/Office should Establish an IR Governance Process & Structure Appoint and train Critical Partners Decide appropriate delegation of Stage Gate Reviews and project reviews Perform Stage Gates Provide recommendation on those going to Enterprise IR Governance (project > $1million annual FY budget) Make decision for those that are their responsibility (project <$1million annual FY budget) Establish appropriate reports, metrics, and tracking mechanisms

Stage Gate Reviews ` IR Governance – Enterprise or National Center/Office National Center or as delegated

Stage Gate Reviews The Stage Gate Review is: An evaluation process by which a project is authorized to progress from one life cycle phase to the next A collaborative practice in which key stakeholders play an important role in assessing the project’s overall health and quality of execution A phase-driven go/no-go decision point where project deliverables and activities are reviewed by Critical Partners to form a recommendation regarding appropriateness to proceed to the next phase Emphasis of Stage Gate reviews The successful accomplishment of the phase objectives The risks associated with moving into the next life cycle phase The plan for the next life cycle phase

Benefits of Stage Gate Reviews Provides greater transparency of projects and involvement by the business owners and leaders Ensures decision-makers are involved at appropriate points Supports early identification and mitigation of risks enables corrective action Ensures projects are on track for success Ensures greater accountability of projects

Stage Gate Review - Thresholds Project annual FY Budget > $1 M for “Yellow Diamond Gates” Projects with variances is Cost, Schedule & Performance > 10% Enterprise IR Governance Project Annual FY Budget < $1 M – All Gates All Projects for “Blue Triangle Gates” National Center/Office IR Governance

Stage Gate Review Process `

Stage Gate Review Process – Roles & Functions Stage Gate Review Lead (CPIC) Schedules Stage Gate meeting and communicates the schedule with other participants Collects / distributes the appropriate documentation Ensures that the Stage Gate Review purpose is achieved and agreed upon next steps Coordinates with IT Governance organization or delegated authority regarding Stage Gate Presents findings and recommendations from Critical Partners to the IT Governance organization or delegated authority IT Governance Organization or delegated authority Decision authority to pass the project to the next phase Reviews recommendations from the Critical Partners designated points of the EPLC Defines standard for remediation passage IT Project Manager Certifies that the project is prepared for the Stage Gate Review Ensures Project Reviews have been conducted Requests scheduling from the appropriate Stage Gate Review Lead Provides deliverables to the Stage Gate Review Lead Integrated Project Team Including Critical Partners Evaluate project deliverables and activities to form recommendations on whether the project should proceed to the next phase Participate in the Stage Gate Review meetings Monitor corrective action and approves upon completion to allow the project to advance to the next gate Others to Consider Project Team Members End Users Development Teams Support Teams External Partners

Summary Stage Gate Reviews are an integral component of the EPLC National Centers/Offices must have a IR governance structure and critical partners identified There is latitude for deciding who does the 6 gates that can be delegated All IT projects should be conducting Stage Gates by the end of September 2010 Assistance is available by contacting the Capital Planning & Investment Control Office

BREAK PROJECT REVIEW SESSION BEGINS AT 10:45