Reconciling Cancer Care Costs Reported by Different Government Agencies in Taiwan: Why Costing Approach Matters? Chun-Ru Chien, MD, PhD, Ya-Chen Tina Shih, PhD Value in Health Regional Issues Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages 111-117 (May 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2012.03.020 Copyright © 2012 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Terms and Conditions
Fig. 1 Selection of study population and definitions used in costing approaches. Value in Health Regional Issues 2012 1, 111-117DOI: (10.1016/j.vhri.2012.03.020) Copyright © 2012 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Terms and Conditions
Fig. 2 Comparisons of total costs of cancer by costing method. BNHI, Bureau of National Health Insurance; DOH, Department of Health; NHRI, National Health Research Institute; RVU, relative value unit. Value in Health Regional Issues 2012 1, 111-117DOI: (10.1016/j.vhri.2012.03.020) Copyright © 2012 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Terms and Conditions
Fig. 3 Comparison of cancer cases by costing method. BNHI, Bureau of National Health Insurance; DOH, Department of Health; NHRI, National Health Research Institute. Value in Health Regional Issues 2012 1, 111-117DOI: (10.1016/j.vhri.2012.03.020) Copyright © 2012 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Terms and Conditions
Fig. 4 Comparison of mean cost per patient, by costing method. BNHI, Bureau of National Health Insurance; DOH, Department of Health; NHRI, National Health Research Institute; RVU, relative value unit. Value in Health Regional Issues 2012 1, 111-117DOI: (10.1016/j.vhri.2012.03.020) Copyright © 2012 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) Terms and Conditions