Volume 108, Issue 2, Pages (January 2002)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Role of Bmi-1 and Ring1A in H2A Ubiquitylation and Hox Gene Silencing
Advertisements

Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Zhiyu Li, Alfonso Mondragón, Russell J DiGate  Molecular Cell 
Crystal Structure of a Flp Recombinase–Holliday Junction Complex
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Sebastian D Fugmann, David G Schatz  Molecular Cell 
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Haley D.M. Wyatt, Shriparna Sarbajna, Joao Matos, Stephen C. West 
The Unique N Terminus of the UbcH10 E2 Enzyme Controls the Threshold for APC Activation and Enhances Checkpoint Regulation of the APC  Matthew K. Summers,
Daniel Chi-Hong Lin, Alan D Grossman  Cell 
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
The Smc5/6 Complex Is an ATP-Dependent Intermolecular DNA Linker
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
DNA transposition: Assembly of a jumping gene machine
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
RAG1/2-Mediated Resolution of Transposition Intermediates
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (August 2006)
Volume 108, Issue 2, Pages (January 2002)
ATP-Dependent Positive Supercoiling of DNA by 13S Condensin: A Biochemical Implication for Chromosome Condensation  Keiji Kimura, Tatsuya Hirano  Cell 
The Structure of Supercoiled Intermediates in DNA Replication
Volume 54, Issue 5, Pages (June 2014)
Kåre L. Nielsen, Nicholas J. Cowan  Molecular Cell 
Bernard Hallet, Lidia K Arciszewska, David J Sherratt  Molecular Cell 
Ivar Ilves, Tatjana Petojevic, James J. Pesavento, Michael R. Botchan 
ClpX-Mediated Remodeling of Mu Transpososomes
V(D)J Recombination and RAG-Mediated Transposition in Yeast
Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages (July 1999)
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 31, Issue 4, Pages (August 2008)
Mu Transpososome Architecture Ensures that Unfolding by ClpX or Proteolysis by ClpXP Remodels but Does Not Destroy the Complex  Briana M. Burton, Tania.
Jung-Ok Han, Sharri B Steen, David B Roth  Molecular Cell 
Yasuto Murayama, Frank Uhlmann  Cell 
Topological Selectivity in Xer Site-Specific Recombination
The Hin dimer interface is critical for Fis-mediated activation of the catalytic steps of site-specific DNA inversion  Michael J. Haykinson, Lianna M.
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
HMGN Proteins Act in Opposition to ATP-Dependent Chromatin Remodeling Factors to Restrict Nucleosome Mobility  Barbara P. Rattner, Timur Yusufzai, James.
Ana Losada, Tatsuya Hirano  Current Biology 
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
Targeted Myostatin Gene Editing in Multiple Mammalian Species Directed by a Single Pair of TALE Nucleases  Li Xu, Piming Zhao, Andrew Mariano, Renzhi.
Volume 22, Issue 12, Pages (December 2014)
How Integration of Positive and Negative Regulatory Signals by a STAND Signaling Protein Depends on ATP Hydrolysis  Emélie Marquenet, Evelyne Richet 
Volume 48, Issue 4, Pages (November 2012)
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages (October 2008)
DNA Topology and Global Architecture of Point Centromeres
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Three-Site Synapsis during Mu DNA Transposition: A Critical Intermediate Preceding Engagement of the Active Site  Mark A Watson, George Chaconas  Cell 
Pierre-Henri L Gaillard, Eishi Noguchi, Paul Shanahan, Paul Russell 
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 1999)
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages (November 2006)
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)
Replisome Assembly at oriC, the Replication Origin of E
HURP Is Part of a Ran-Dependent Complex Involved in Spindle Formation
George Simos, Anke Sauer, Franco Fasiolo, Eduard C Hurt  Molecular Cell 
SWI/SNF Chromatin Remodeling Requires Changes in DNA Topology
Transcriptional Regulation by p53 through Intrinsic DNA/Chromatin Binding and Site- Directed Cofactor Recruitment  Joaquin M Espinosa, Beverly M Emerson 
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (January 1998)
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages (January 2002)
The V(D)J Recombinase Efficiently Cleaves and Transposes Signal Joints
Jachen A. Solinger, Konstantin Kiianitsa, Wolf-Dietrich Heyer 
DNA transposition: Assembly of a jumping gene machine
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
CRISPR Immunological Memory Requires a Host Factor for Specificity
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Role of Bmi-1 and Ring1A in H2A Ubiquitylation and Hox Gene Silencing
Presentation transcript:

Volume 108, Issue 2, Pages 195-205 (January 2002) FtsK Is a DNA Motor Protein that Activates Chromosome Dimer Resolution by Switching the Catalytic State of the XerC and XerD Recombinases  Laurent Aussel, François-Xavier Barre, Mira Aroyo, Andrzej Stasiak, Alicja Z Stasiak, David Sherratt  Cell  Volume 108, Issue 2, Pages 195-205 (January 2002) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00624-4

Figure 1 FtsK50C Is Sufficient for Full Activation of Xer Recombination at dif In Vivo and In Vitro (A) FtsK derivatives. Vertical black bars represent the four transmembrane regions of FtsK. The AAA domain of FtsK is contained within the region from residues 818–1329. Shaded boxes indicate the two regions required for maximal Xer recombination. Amino acid positions are given on top. (B) In vivo dimer resolution assay. Resolution of a low-copy plasmid carrying two dif sites in direct repeats was measured in FtsKc− cells expressing different levels of the FtsK proteins. The FtsK derivatives were expressed from the arabinose promoter on high-copy plasmids. (C) Western blot analysis of in vivo levels of FtsK50C and FtsKC. (D) Map of the plasmid used for in vitro dimer resolution assays and of the different possible outcomes of the reaction. The dif site is depicted as a black triangle. (E) In vitro dimer resolution assay. The plasmid substrate (3 nM) was incubated in the presence of the XerCD recombinases (100 nM), the FtsK50C protein (120 nM monomer), ATP (2.5 mM), and glycerol (40%), as indicated. Abbreviations are as follows: γS, γS-ATP; s, substrate; p, product; dsc, supercoiled deletion substrate; HJ, Holliday junction; sc, supercoiled; L, linear; and h, HindIII cleavage site. Cell 2002 108, 195-205DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00624-4)

Figure 2 FtsK50C Forms a Ring-Shaped Multimeric Structure with an Intrinsic DNA Translocase Activity (A) 8% PAGE-SDS gel of FtsKC and FtsK50C after purification by immunoaffinity. (B) Gel filtration analysis relative to protein standards. FtsK50C and FtsKC were loaded at ∼2 μM on Superose 6 and Superose 12 columns, respectively. Shaded areas indicate the fractions within which the derivatives could be detected by Western blotting using the anti-FLAG antibody. (C) Three principal views of FtsK rings, as observed by electron microscopy. Tilted and side views (panels 1 and 2, respectively) were characteristic for DNA bound rings. Top views (panel 3) were observed for the rings not bound to DNA. (D) Kinetics of ATP hydrolysis by FtsKC and FtsK50C in the presence (triangles) or the absence (squares) of supercoiled plasmid DNA. The initial rate of ATP hydrolysis by FtsK50C in the presence of supercoiled DNA was 30 ATP/FtsK50C monomer/sec and 5 ATP/FtsK50C/sec in the absence of DNA. (E) Detection of positive supercoils generated by FtsK. Abbreviations are as follows: k, prokaryote Topo I at 0.02 mg/ml; e, 1 or 10 units of eukaryote Topo I; N, AMPPNP; and rx, relaxed. (F) Cruciform extrusion assay. (G) DNA tracking enzymes generate domains of positive (+) and negative (−) supercoils, depicted by a change in twist of the double helix. Cell 2002 108, 195-205DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00624-4)

Figure 3 FtsK Activates Xer Recombination Independently of Substrate Topology (A) Restriction analysis of Xer reactions performed on a supercoiled deletion substrate (dsc), two different linear substrates (dn and dx), an intermolecular recombination substrate (dh), and a supercoiled inversion substrate (isc). A map of each substrate and of the different outcomes of the reaction is shown on the left of each gel. (B) Topology of the products of Xer recombination on supercoiled substrates. Right: Schematic of the supercoiled deletion substrate and of the possible catenated or uncatenated products. Substrate and product bands are indicated on the right of the gels. Abbreviations are as follows: oc, open circle; 3, trefoil; n, Nde1; and x, Xho1. Cell 2002 108, 195-205DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00624-4)

Figure 4 Xer Recombination at dif Can Trap Positive and Negative Supercoils Generated by FtsK (A) Agarose gel analysis of the products of Xer recombination on linear (dn and dx) or relaxed substrates (drx and irx). Substrate and product bands of deletion (dn, dx, and drx) and inversion (irx) reactions are indicated on the left of the gel. Topoisomers are indicated on the right. (B) Two-dimensional agarose gel analysis of the deletion products of Xer recombination. Abbreviations are as follows: +, positive supercoils; −, negative supercoils; 1st D, first dimension; and 2nd D, second dimension in the presence of chloroquine. Cell 2002 108, 195-205DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00624-4)

Figure 5 FtsK Reverses the Order of Strand Exchanges at dif by the XerCD Recombinases (A) In vivo dimer resolution assay using strains carrying different combinations of catalytically inactive recombinases. The resolution of a plasmid carrying two dif sites in direct repeats was measured at different levels of FtsK50C expression in a strain carrying the wild-type chromosomal FtsK gene. (B) In vitro dimer resolution assay. Abbreviations are as follows: CYF, XerCYF; DYF, XerDYF. Cell 2002 108, 195-205DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00624-4)

Figure 6 FtsK-Dependent and -Independent Pathways of Xer Recombination at dif (A) In the absence of FtsK, the Xer synaptic complex adopts a conformation suitable for XerC-mediated strand exchanges, depicted by a kink at the XerD binding site. FtsK can use the energy of ATP to switch the Xer synaptic complex to a conformation suitable for XerD-strand exchanges, depicted by a kink at the XerC binding site. Note that this action might require the presence of several FtsK complexes, which might bind several arms of the junction. The intensity of the arrows reflects the probability of recombinational events. XerC- and XerD-cleavage sites are shown by white and black triangles, respectively. (B) Model showing how the DNA translocase activity of FtsK can influence the topological outcome of the Xer recombination. Although models (A) and (B) show a single duplex DNA molecule passing through the ring, a situation where two duplexes are associated with the ring would generate the same outcome. Cell 2002 108, 195-205DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00624-4)