Figure 1. DisA foci remain highly dynamic upon DNA damage in ΔrecO or ΔrecA cells. (A–F) Dynamic localization of ... Figure 1. DisA foci remain highly.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Figure 1. Schematic of the corA leader mRNA
Advertisements

Figure 2. BRCA2–RAD51 complexes organize into filament-like structures
Figure 1. Inhibition of GSK3β reduces MiR biogenesis through repression of pri-MiR processing. (A) qRT-PCR analysis of miR-27a, miR-23a, miR-24, miR-141.
Figure 1. A3B NTD mediates enzyme activity and oligomerization
Figure 1. Stabilization of the hairpin structure by non-nucleotide linkers (-L-) following enzymatic circularization. Structures of the stilbene diether.
Figure 2. Force and concentration dependence of the rate at which ScTopA initiates DNA relaxation. (A) The initial time lag (ITL) for ScTopA activity displays.
From: Calcium-driven DNA synthesis by a high-fidelity DNA polymerase
Figure 1. PARP1 binds to abasic sites and DNA ends as a monomer
Figure 2. Sodium dodecylsulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis of recombinant wild-type (WT) and mutant VSV L proteins. The WT.
Figure 1. Loss of H2Bub1 promotes mutagenesis under conditions of replicative stress. (A) The graph shows the rates of spontaneous Canr mutation.
Figure 1. Sgs1 binds to RPA-coated ssDNA
Figure 1. A novel image analysis tool to monitor epigenetic changes in spatiotemporal distribution of chromatin in live ... Figure 1. A novel image analysis.
Figure 1. Flow chart illustrating the experimental strategy used for the mass spectrometry analyses. Two cell ... Figure 1. Flow chart illustrating the.
Figure 1. Effect of recombinantly expressed RNase T on growth behavior of E. coli. Growth was assessed for E. coli ... Figure 1. Effect of recombinantly.
Figure 1. Overview of the workflow of NetworkAnalyst 3.0.
Figure 1. (A) Diagram of artificial microDNA creation by LAMA
Figure 1. SSB strand transfer and the Escherichia coli replisome
Figure 7. Primary cells from prostate tumours are more sensitive to ML than adjacent non-cancerous cells from the ... Figure 7. Primary cells from.
Figure 4. (A) Venn diagram showing the overlap of peaks differentially changed in DHT as compared to NT with peaks ... Figure 4. (A) Venn diagram showing.
Figure 1. Aminoacylation of 3′-NH2-tRNA catalyzed by flexizymes
Figure 1. Effect of random T/A→dU/A substitutions on transcription by T7 RNAP using a 321 bp DNA transcription template ... Figure 1. Effect of random.
Figure 1. Site-specific replication fork stalling at Tus/Ter barriers causes localized mutagenesis. (A) Schematic ... Figure 1. Site-specific replication.
Figure 1. Zebrafish Sas10 and Mpp10 are nucleolar proteins and display dynamic expression patterns during early ... Figure 1. Zebrafish Sas10 and Mpp10.
Figure 6. HU sensitivity is due to the failure to process multiple consecutive ribonucleotides. 10-fold serial ... Figure 6. HU sensitivity is due to the.
Figure 1. Designing a cell-specific Cas-ON switch based on miRNA-regulated anti-CRISPR genes. (A) Schematic of the ... Figure 1. Designing a cell-specific.
Figure 1. (A) Domain structure of p53 and localization of the PAR binding motif (PBM) as identified in (2). Structures ... Figure 1. (A) Domain structure.
Figure 1. Ratios of observed to expected numbers of exon boundaries aligning to boundaries of domain and disorder ... Figure 1. Ratios of observed to expected.
Figure 1. Comparison of weighted estimates of diarrhoea prevalence in children under five by country between PMA Figure 1. Comparison of weighted.
Figure 1. Nanopore methylation calls are consistent with expected results and established technologies. (A) Metaplot of ... Figure 1. Nanopore methylation.
Fig. 1 Kaplan-Meier plot of cumulative incidence of cancer onset following dermatomyositis diagnosis stratified ... Anti-TIF1-Ab: anti-transcriptional.
Figure 1. Chemical structures of DNA and tc-DNA
Point estimates with ... Point estimates with 95% CI. HR: hip replacement; KR: knee replacement. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright.
FIGURE 1 Participant flow diagram. Exercise Counseling Clinic (ECC).
Figure 6. The DNA lyase activity of hNTHL1 contributes to the processing of lesions in nucleosomes, even in the ... Figure 6. The DNA lyase activity of.
Figure 1. Analysis of human TRIM5α protein with Blast-Search and PhyML+SMS ‘One click’ workflow. (A) NGPhylogeny.fr ... Figure 1. Analysis of human TRIM5α.
Figure 1. A, Crude incidence rates per 100 person-years of follow-up and 95% confidence intervals for each solid organ ... Figure 1. A, Crude incidence.
FIGURE 1 Study consort diagram
Figure 1. Illustration of DGR systems and their prediction using myDGR
Figure 1. The pipeline of Aggrescan3D 2.0 server.
Figure 1. The workflow of Cistrome-GO
Figure 1. EBOV VP35 has NTP-binding and NTPase activities
Figure 1. Prediction result for birch pollen allergen Bet v 1 (PDB: 1bv1), as obtained by comparison to the cherry ... Figure 1. Prediction result for.
Figure 1. Using Voronoi tessellation to define contacts
Figure 1. Designed cotranscriptional RNA structures
Figure 1. Analysis of the AP lyase activity of BsuLigD
Figure 4. RLS spectra of (A) TMPipEOPP and (B) OMHEPzEOPP in the presence of different concentrations of KRAS. The RLS ... Figure 4. RLS spectra of (A)
Figure 1. PaintOmics 3 workflow diagram
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Figure 1. Concept of poly(A) tail labeling for translation and localization analyses of reporter mRNAs. Azido-modified ... Figure 1. Concept of poly(A)
Figure 1. Uncertainty reduction, value creation, and appropriation in two case studies. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies.
Figure 1. The configuration menu allows the user to choose among the main visualization/processing options of the ... Figure 1. The configuration menu.
Figure 1. ULS1 deletion causes sensitivity to ACF due Top2 activity
Figure 1. (A) Architecture of Doc2Hpo. (B) Interactive user interface
Figure 1. The framework of NetGO with seven steps
Figure 1. Overview of features that can be assessed in a single RegulationSpotter VCF analysis run. Depending upon a ... Figure 1. Overview of features.
Figure 1. Scheme of a phosphorothioated-terminal hairpin formation and self-priming extension (PS-THSP) for selection ... Figure 1. Scheme of a phosphorothioated-terminal.
Figure 1 Correlation between en face Oil-Red O staining and aortic root lesion size vs. plasma cholesterol and ... Figure 1 Correlation between en face.
Figure 1. Excess cost of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) compared with methicillin-susceptible S. ... Figure 1. Excess cost of methicillin-resistant.
Figure 1. 3C analysis of HEM3, BLM10, and SEN1 genes in rpb4Δ and isogenic wild type cells. (A) Schematic ... Figure 1. 3C analysis of HEM3, BLM10, and.
Figure 1. CSB does not affect the recruitment of OGG1 to oxidative DNA damage. (A) Representative stills of time-lapse ... Figure 1. CSB does not affect.
Figure 1. Prevalence of parasitic infection and anemia among the children. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the.
Figure 1. Homologous joint formation by RecA involves two reactions
Figure 1. DNA-guided RNA cleavage activity
Figure 6. Protein-protein interactions
Figure 1. GWAS Catalog associations for coronary artery disease plotted across all chromosomes. Associations added ... Figure 1. GWAS Catalog associations.
Figure 1 The workflow of CAR development from a hybridoma
Figure 1. Crystal structures of Rim1
Figure 1 Mechanisms of mitral regurgitation.
Figure 1. Removal of the 2B subdomain activates Rep monomer unwinding
Figure 5. The endonucleolytic product from PfuPCNA/MR activity is displaced from dsDNA. Results from real-time ... Figure 5. The endonucleolytic product.
Presentation transcript:

Figure 1. DisA foci remain highly dynamic upon DNA damage in ΔrecO or ΔrecA cells. (A–F) Dynamic localization of ... Figure 1. DisA foci remain highly dynamic upon DNA damage in ΔrecO or ΔrecA cells. (A–F) Dynamic localization of DisA-GFP foci demonstrated by time-lapse microscopy from individual cells of the DisA-GFP-producing strain. Time-lapse microscopy images (400 ms intervals) from DisA-GFP-producing strains stained with DAPI (blue), FM 4–64 (red) and DisA-GFP (green) seeing as foci in unperturbed ΔaddAB ΔrecJ (A), ΔrecO (C) or ΔrecA cells (E). The corresponding movies are displayed in the Supplemental data (Movies S3, S5 and S7). Time-lapse microscopy images (400 ms intervals) from DisA-GFP-producing strains in ΔaddAB ΔrecJ (B), ΔrecO (D) or ΔrecA cells (F) upon addition of 350 μg/ml Nal at the onset of sporulation. The corresponding movies are displayed in the Supplemental data (Movies S4, S6 and S8). Selected images were chosen for demonstration. Scale bars correspond to 5 μm. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Nucleic Acids Res, gkz219, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz219 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 2. DisA interaction with RecA Figure 2. DisA interaction with RecA. (A) Scheme of the bacterial two-hybrid assay to test DisA-RecA in vivo ... Figure 2. DisA interaction with RecA. (A) Scheme of the bacterial two-hybrid assay to test DisA-RecA in vivo interaction. (B) Bacterial two-hybrid assay shows an interaction of DisA with RecA in vivo. (C) His-tagged DisA alone (1.5 μg, lane 1) or native RecA alone (1.5 μg, lane 2) were loaded onto a 50-μl Ni<sup>2+</sup> microcolumn at room temperature in Buffer A containing 20 mM imidazole. After extensive washing, the retained protein was eluted with 50-μl Buffer A containing 1 M NaCl and 0.4 M imidazole. (D) His-tagged DisA and native RecA (1.5 μg each) were loaded onto a 50-μl Ni<sup>2+</sup> microcolumn at room temperature in Buffer A containing 20 mM imidazole in the presence or the absence of 5 mM ATP and 10 μM ssDNA. After extensive washing, the retained protein(s) was eluted with 50-μl Buffer A containing 1 M NaCl and 0.4 M imidazole. (C and D) The proteins present in the different fractions were separated by SDS-PAGE, and stained with Coomassie Blue. Western blot analysis of the protein mixtures highlighted with polyclonal anti-RecA (α-RecA) or monoclonal anti-His (α-His) antibodies was perfomed. FL, flow-through; W wash; E, elution with imidazole.The proteins present in the different fractions are indicated. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Nucleic Acids Res, gkz219, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz219 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 3. RecA-mediated ATPase activity in the presence of DisA Figure 3. RecA-mediated ATPase activity in the presence of DisA. (A) Circular 3,199-nt ssDNA (10 μM in nt) was ... Figure 3. RecA-mediated ATPase activity in the presence of DisA. (A) Circular 3,199-nt ssDNA (10 μM in nt) was incubated with RecA (0.8 μM), DisA (0.1 or 0.2 μM) or both in buffer B containing 5 mM ATP and the ATPase activity measured for 30 min. (B) Circular ssDNA was incubated with RecA, DisA D77N or DisA ΔC290 (0.1 μM), or both in buffer B containing 5 mM ATP and the ATPase activity measured for 30 min. (C) Circular ssDNA was pre-incubated with stoichiometric SsbA (0.3 μM, 1 SsbA tetramer/33-nt) and RecO (0.2 μM, 1 RecO monomer/50-nt), and then incubated with RecA (0.8 μM, 1 RecA monomer/12-nt)), DisA (0.1 or 0.2 μM, 1 DisA monomer/100- and 50-nt) or both in buffer B containing 5 mM ATP and the ATPase activity measured for 30 min. (D) Circular ssDNA was pre-incubated with SsbA (0.3 μM) and RecO (0.2 μM), and then incubated with RecA (0.8 μM) in buffer B containing 5 mM ATP and the ATPase activity measured for 5 min. Then, DisA (0.1, 0.2 or 0.4 μM) was added and the ATPase activity measured for 25 min more. All reactions were repeated three or more times with similar results. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Nucleic Acids Res, gkz219, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz219 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 4. DisA negatively affects recombination Figure 4. DisA negatively affects recombination. (A) Circular 3,199-nt ssDNA (10 μM) and homologous dsDNA (20 μM in nt) ... Figure 4. DisA negatively affects recombination. (A) Circular 3,199-nt ssDNA (10 μM) and homologous dsDNA (20 μM in nt) were pre-incubated or not with SsbA and then incubated with RecA and increasing DisA concentrations (doubling from 0.025 to 0.2 μM) in buffer B containing 5 mM dATP (lanes 2–11) for 60 min at 37°C. (B) The circular ssDNA and homologous linear dsDNA were pre-incubated with SsbA, RecO and then with RecA and increasing DisA (doubling from 0.025 to 0.4 μM), DisA D77N or DisA ΔC290 (doubling from 0.1 to 1.6 μM) concentrations in buffer B containing 5 mM ATP for 60 min at 37°C. (C) Circular ssDNA and homologous linear dsDNA were pre-incubated with SsbA and DisA in buffer B containing 5 mM dATP, 5 min later RecA was added, and the reaction incubated for variable time (10, 20, 30, 45 and 60 min) at 37°C. (D) Circular ssDNA and homologous linear dsDNA were pre-incubated with SsbA and RecA in buffer B containing 5 mM dATP, then DisA was added and the reaction was incubated for variable time (in min) at 37°C and separated by 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis. The position of the bands corresponding to substrates (css, lds), intermediates (joint molecule, jm), products (nicked circular, nc) and covalently closed circular duplex DNA (cds) are indicated. C denotes the control DNA substrates. The quantification of intermediates/products indicated at the bottom is the mean of ≥3 independent experiments. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Nucleic Acids Res, gkz219, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz219 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 5. DisA-mediated c-di-AMP synthesis is not affected by RecA·ATP Figure 5. DisA-mediated c-di-AMP synthesis is not affected by RecA·ATP. Circular ssDNA and homologous linear dsDNA were ... Figure 5. DisA-mediated c-di-AMP synthesis is not affected by RecA·ATP. Circular ssDNA and homologous linear dsDNA were incubated with increasing DisA concentrations (doubling from 0.025 to 0.4 μM) (lanes 3–7), and with SsbA and RecO (lanes 8–12), or SsbA, RecO and RecA (lanes 13–17) in buffer B containing 5 mM ATP and 0.05 μM [α-<sup>32</sup>P]-ATP for 60 min at 37°C. (A) The reaction was separated as indicated in Figure 4. In lane 1, the respective css and lds substrates (termed C) were electrophoresed. The positions of the bands corresponding to css, lds and the nc products are indicated. The percentage of recombination products (nc) is shown. Results are the mean of ≥3 independent experiments. The – denotes the absence of the indicated condition. (B) In parallel the DAC activity of DisA was measured. The reaction products were separated by TLC and quantified using ImageJ. The quantification values of relative c-di-AMP amounts are shown, and the positions of the substrate (ATP), the intermediate (pppApA) and the product (c-di-AMP) are indicated. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Nucleic Acids Res, gkz219, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz219 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.

Figure 6. Proposed mechanisms for DisA in RecA-mediated DNA damage tolerance pathways. (A) An unrepaired DNA lesion on ... Figure 6. Proposed mechanisms for DisA in RecA-mediated DNA damage tolerance pathways. (A) An unrepaired DNA lesion on the leading strand template (grey dot) causes blockage of replication fork movement. DisA regulates RecA-mediated annealing of the nascent strands, reversal of the leading and lagging daughter strands to form a HJ DNA structure. Then, DNA synthesis of the DNA complementary to the damaged site (denoted by dotted line) is followed by fork regression. (B) An unrepaired DNA lesion on the lagging strand template (grey dot) causes blockage of replication fork movement. DisA regulates RecA-mediated annealing of the nascent strands with DNA synthesis initiating from the alternative template (template switching). Removal of the lesion by a specific repair pathway then occurs. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Nucleic Acids Res, gkz219, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz219 The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.