Volume 125, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Genetic Specification of Axonal Arbors
Advertisements

Dscam Proteins Direct Dendritic Targeting through Adhesion
Differential Functions of the C
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Volume 131, Issue 5, Pages (November 2007)
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Identification of E2/E3 Ubiquitinating Enzymes and Caspase Activity Regulating Drosophila Sensory Neuron Dendrite Pruning  Chay T. Kuo, Sijun Zhu, Susan.
Alternative Splicing of the Robo3 Axon Guidance Receptor Governs the Midline Switch from Attraction to Repulsion  Zhe Chen, Bryan B. Gore, Hua Long, Le.
Dopaminergic Modulation of Sucrose Acceptance Behavior in Drosophila
Jung Hwan Kim, Xin Wang, Rosemary Coolon, Bing Ye  Neuron 
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages (October 2007)
The Cadherin Flamingo Mediates Level-Dependent Interactions that Guide Photoreceptor Target Choice in Drosophila  Pei-Ling Chen, Thomas R. Clandinin 
Volume 18, Issue 21, Pages (November 2008)
Melissa Hernandez-Fleming, Ethan W. Rohrbach, Greg J. Bashaw 
Luyuan Pan, Yong Q. Zhang, Elvin Woodruff, Kendal Broadie 
Volume 25, Issue 10, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (May 2005)
The Conserved Immunoglobulin Superfamily Member SAX-3/Robo Directs Multiple Aspects of Axon Guidance in C. elegans  Jennifer A Zallen, B.Alexander Yi,
Distinct Protein Domains and Expression Patterns Confer Divergent Axon Guidance Functions for Drosophila Robo Receptors  Bettina Spitzweck, Marko Brankatschk,
Li E. Cheng, Wei Song, Loren L. Looger, Lily Yeh Jan, Yuh Nung Jan 
Helen Strutt, Mary Ann Price, David Strutt  Current Biology 
Elliot A. Perens, Shai Shaham  Developmental Cell 
Hierarchical Deployment of Factors Regulating Temporal Fate in a Diverse Neuronal Lineage of the Drosophila Central Brain  Chih-Fei Kao, Hung-Hsiang Yu,
Volume 84, Issue 4, Pages (February 1996)
Genetic Analysis of the Mechanisms Controlling Target Selection: Complementary and Combinatorial Functions of Netrins, Semaphorins, and IgCAMs  Margaret.
HBL-1 Patterns Synaptic Remodeling in C. elegans
Qiong Wang, Mirka Uhlirova, Dirk Bohmann  Developmental Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 15, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Dendrites of Distinct Classes of Drosophila Sensory Neurons Show Different Capacities for Homotypic Repulsion  Wesley B. Grueber, Bing Ye, Adrian W. Moore,
Propagation of Dachsous-Fat Planar Cell Polarity
Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Border Cell Migration Analyzed Using Time- Lapse Live-Cell Imaging  Mohit Prasad, Denise J. Montell  Developmental.
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Dendrite Self-Avoidance Is Controlled by Dscam
Volume 16, Issue 9, Pages (May 2006)
The EGF and FGF Receptors Mediate Neuroglian Function to Control Growth Cone Decisions during Sensory Axon Guidance in Drosophila  Luis García-Alonso,
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2006)
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Evolution of yellow Gene Regulation and Pigmentation in Drosophila
From Lineage to Wiring Specificity
Kang Shen, Richard D Fetter, Cornelia I Bargmann  Cell 
Control of Dendritic Field Formation in Drosophila
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (January 2003)
Let-7-Complex MicroRNAs Regulate the Temporal Identity of Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons via chinmo  Yen-Chi Wu, Ching-Huan Chen, Adam Mercer, Nicholas S.
Benjamin J. Matthews, Wesley B. Grueber  Current Biology 
Drosophila atonal Fully Rescues the Phenotype of Math1 Null Mice
Epigenetic Regulation of Stem Cell Maintenance in the Drosophila Testis via the Nucleosome-Remodeling Factor NURF  Christopher M. Cherry, Erika L. Matunis 
Aljoscha Nern, Yan Zhu, S. Lawrence Zipursky  Neuron 
Tyson J. Edwards, Marc Hammarlund  Cell Reports 
MAX-1, a Novel PH/MyTH4/FERM Domain Cytoplasmic Protein Implicated in Netrin- Mediated Axon Repulsion  Xun Huang, Hwai-Jong Cheng, Marc Tessier-Lavigne,
The Hippo Pathway Regulates the bantam microRNA to Control Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis in Drosophila  Barry J. Thompson, Stephen M. Cohen  Cell 
Volume 15, Issue 15, Pages (August 2005)
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
Shree Ram Singh, Wei Liu, Steven X. Hou  Cell Stem Cell 
Islet Coordinately Regulates Motor Axon Guidance and Dendrite Targeting through the Frazzled/DCC Receptor  Celine Santiago, Greg J. Bashaw  Cell Reports 
Interaxonal Interaction Defines Tiled Presynaptic Innervation in C
Sugar Receptors in Drosophila
F. Christian Bennett, Kieran F. Harvey  Current Biology 
Volume 22, Issue 2, Pages (February 1999)
Volume 17, Issue 18, Pages (September 2007)
Control of Dendritic Field Formation in Drosophila
Epigenetic Regulation of Stem Cell Maintenance in the Drosophila Testis via the Nucleosome-Remodeling Factor NURF  Christopher M. Cherry, Erika L. Matunis 
Piezo-like Gene Regulates Locomotion in Drosophila Larvae
Sexually Dimorphic unc-6/Netrin Expression Controls Sex-Specific Maintenance of Synaptic Connectivity  Peter Weinberg, Matthew Berkseth, David Zarkower,
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
The Transmembrane Semaphorin Sema I Is Required in Drosophila for Embryonic Motor and CNS Axon Guidance  Hung-Hsiang Yu, Houmam H Araj, Sherry A Ralls,
Different Levels of the Homeodomain Protein Cut Regulate Distinct Dendrite Branching Patterns of Drosophila Multidendritic Neurons  Wesley B Grueber,
Brent Neumann, Massimo A. Hilliard  Cell Reports 
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 125, Issue 3, Pages 607-620 (May 2006) The Molecular Diversity of Dscam Is Functionally Required for Neuronal Wiring Specificity in Drosophila  Brian E. Chen, Masahiro Kondo, Amélie Garnier, Fiona L. Watson, Roland Püettmann-Holgado, David R. Lamar, Dietmar Schmucker  Cell  Volume 125, Issue 3, Pages 607-620 (May 2006) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.034 Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Analysis of Neuronal Connectivity in the Adult Drosophila Somatosensory System at Single Axon Resolution Using MARCM and Dye-Labeling (A) Schematic of the axon trajectory of a single mechanosensory neuron. Four mechanosensory bristles are shown: aDc, pDc, aSc, and pSc with its corresponding ms-neuron and axonal branching pattern (red) within the CNS (blue). (B) Each bristle is innervated by a single ms-neuron. Side view of an adult thorax and with a single GFP-labeled pDc neuron (arrow) situated below its corresponding macrochaeta. Additional ms-neurons associated with microchaetae (arrowheads) indicate additional clones and are also GFP-labeled. (C) Mechanosensory axons extend complex arbors within the thoracic ganglion. Lateral (left) and ventral (middle) views of the thoracic ganglion with a single pSc axon labeled. The thoracic ganglion comprises three distinct segments, with prothoracic, mesothoracic, and metathoracic neuromeres (right image, schematic). Ms-axons enter the CNS between the prothoracic and mesothoracic neuromeres (arrows). The pSc axon extends its arbor within all three segments and has two contralateral projecting secondary branches (arrowheads). Dotted lines mark the midline of the CNS. (D) Analysis of axon branch length and position in pSc neurons. Left: Lengths of the axonal branches of the posterior pSc neuron in wild-type flies were measured. Eleven primary and secondary branches constitute the prototypic branching pattern. Right: Average lengths and positions of primary and secondary branches of the wild-type pSc neurons. Black lines represent the average lengths with standard deviations in red. Gray lines represent average positions of branches with standard deviations in blue. All numbers are in micrometers. Arrow denotes an ectopic branch in wild-type flies. Scale bars = 50 μm. Cell 2006 125, 607-620DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.034) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 The Axon Guidance Receptor Dscam Is Required for Axonal Connectivity of ms-neurons within the CNS but Not for the Initial Pathfinding (A and D) Different ms-neurons form unique branching patterns within the CNS. Primary and secondary axon branches of the pSc (A) and pDc (D) ms-neurons in wild-type flies connect with different cells. (B, C, E, and F) Dscam is essential for targeting of axonal branches, and ms-neurons that are null for Dscam fail to elaborate any arbors. Representative examples for pSc (B and C) and pDc (E and F) projections are shown. (G) Axonal projection of a heterozygous pSc neuron (red, left side) exhibiting normal branching pattern. In contrast, a pSc neuron lacking Dscam (green, right side) failed to elaborate axonal branches. A homozygous Dscam20 (GFP-positive) ms-neuron and a neighboring heterozygous Dscam20/+ (GFP-negative) ms-neuron were labeled with different fluorescent dyes in the same animal. Note the homozygous Dscam null neuron (green axon, right) enters the thoracic ganglion at the correct position but does not contact any targets. The contralateral ms-neuron containing Dscam (red axon, left) branches appropriately. (H and I) Dscam null neurons fail to extend axonal branches toward appropriate targets. Nevertheless, a Dscam null ms-neuron is able to form axonal branches (arrowheads) and bears varicosities but does not extend branches away from the “decision point.” Scale bars for (A)–(H) = 50 μm; for (I) = 25 μm. (J) Axon targeting errors in Dscam null neurons occur at 100% penetrance. All ms-neurons and all DscamLOF alleles tested fail to contact any appropriate targets. Cell 2006 125, 607-620DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.034) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Single Dscam Isoforms Can Rescue the Basic Primary Axon Branch Extension but Not Specific Branch Targeting (A and G) Wild-type branching patterns of aSc and pSc neurons in control animals. Scale bar = 50 μm. (B and H) Axons that lack Dscam cannot extend normal branches and remain tightly clustered. (C and I) Expression of a single Dscam isoform (A = 1.30.30.2) exclusively within Dscam null neurons only partially rescues the null phenotype. Occasionally isoform A rescued the proximal, anterior-extending secondary axonal branch (red arrow) and a distal ipsilateral branch (arrowhead). (D and J) The single Dscam isoform B (1.34.30.2) equally rescues the primary axon extension posteriorly. Occasionally a distal ipsilateral branch (arrowhead) and a posterior midline-crossing branch (arrow) were present. However, no proximal anterior branch was observed. In contrast, an abnormal mesothoracic branch (asterisk) was observed in (J). (E and K) Isoform C (7.6.19.2) also can restore the primary axon extension in Dscam null ms-neurons. The secondary branch structures that are specific to the aSc or pSc neurons, however, are generally not rescued. A single example of a contralateral extending branch was found (arrow). (F, L, and R) Two copies of single Dscam isoforms within Dscam null neurons do not rescue the axonal branch phenotype. Ms-axons with two copies of Dscam isoforms enter the CNS correctly and exhibit normal posterior extension. However, these neurons occasionally overextend the primary branch beyond the metathoracic neuromere. (M–Q) Schematic of the pSc axonal arbors from wild-type, Dscam null, and Dscam null plus single isoform ms-neurons. The observed frequencies of specific branch formations in pSc and aSc neurons are shown next to each branch (# observed / # samples total). Dotted lines mark the midline of the CNS. Abnormal ectopic branches are indicated by asterisks (L). Cell 2006 125, 607-620DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.034) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Molecular Analysis of Reduced Diversity Alleles (A) Partial Dscam gene map and expanded view of exon 4 cluster indicating deficiency borders. The DscamP05518 allele was mobilized to induce small deletions. Two “clean” excision strains were created, R43 and R87. DscamΔR265 flies lack alternative sequences 4.2–4.6, whereas DscamΔR272 flies lack sequences 4.4–4.8. Microarray analysis of DscamΔR265 and DscamΔR272 flies confirmed the deletion of excised sequences and intact expression of remaining sequences (examples with images of array spots are shown underneath each corresponding exon sequence; RNA levels from reduced diversity flies are in red; levels in control flies are green). (B) Dscam protein levels in revertant flies are similar to clean-excision flies. Semiquantitative fluorescent Western blot analysis was used, and fluorescence levels (green) were normalized to β actin levels (red), which are listed in arbitrary units (a.u.) underneath each band. (C) Some exon 4 sequences are upregulated in DscamΔR265 and DscamΔR272 flies. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of the reduced diversity fly strains showed a 2- to 4-fold upregulation of the exon 4 sequences directly upstream of the excision. Heterozygous flies (DscamΔR265/+ and DscamΔR272/+) have up to 50% reduction in the exon 4 sequences that are excised in the parental revertant strains. Error bars are standard deviation from the mean. Cell 2006 125, 607-620DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.034) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 DscamΔR265 Flies Exhibit Characteristic Connectivity Errors (A–D) The pSc branching pattern in control animals. The pSc neuron in “clean-excision” flies, R43 or R87, is labeled with fluorescent dye (A and B). The axonal arbor within the mesothoracic neuromere is shown in (A). Dotted lines mark the midline of the CNS. The pSc neuron of heterozygous flies, DscamΔR265/R43 or DscamΔR265/R87, has a wild-type branching pattern (C and D). (E–M) Dscam mutant flies lacking 42% isoform diversity have multiple axon targeting errors and deviations from the prototypic wild-type projection pattern. DscamΔR265 homozygous mutant flies have ectopic branch errors in the pro- and mesothoracic neuromeres. DscamΔR265 transheterozygous flies with a Dscam null allele (Dscam21) have similar but slightly more severe defects compared to DscamΔR265 homozygotes. DscamΔR265 /Dscam21 flies have multiple ectopic axonal branches (arrows). Errors are denoted by arrows. Scale bar = 50 μm. (N) Schematic depicting errors common to DscamΔR265 mutant flies. The left panel depicts branching of primary and secondary axonal branches in control flies. The right panel depicts a summary of errors that occur with a frequency of 13%–70% (see text) in DscamΔR265 mutant flies. Cell 2006 125, 607-620DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.034) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 DscamΔR272 Flies Exhibit Axonal Targeting Errors (A–D) The axon branching pattern in control animals. The pSc neuron in control flies, or transheterozygous flies, DscamΔR272/R43 or DscamΔR272/R87 has few deviations from the prototypic wild-type branching pattern. (E–J) DscamΔR272 mutant flies exhibit axonal connectivity errors predominantly toward the posterior CNS region. DscamΔR272 flies have more severe axon branch “routing” errors (arrowheads) rather than the stereotyped ectopic branch errors in DscamΔR265 (Figure 5). The main primary axon extension that occurs ipsilaterally in wild-type flies often extends contralaterally (E, H, and I) or completely fails to extend posteriorly (J). (K–M) The pSc neurons of DscamΔR272/DscamLOF flies have defects similar to DscamΔR272 homozygotes. Multiple errors of axonal misrouting (arrowheads) and ectopic branches (arrows) were common among DscamΔR272 flies. Scale bar = 50 μm. (N) Schematic of axonal branch errors common to DscamΔR272 mutant flies. Left panel: control flies. The right panel depicts errors that occur with a frequency of 10%–30% (see text) in DscamΔR272 mutant flies. Cell 2006 125, 607-620DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.034) Copyright © 2006 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions