Vincenzo Vagnoni INFN Bologna CKM Workshop Durham, April 8th 2003

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prospect for  s measurement at LHC Alessia Satta on behalf of the LHCb collaboration + some Atlas and CMS results Physics at LHC, 3 rd october 2008.
Advertisements

6/2/2015Attila Mihalyi - Wisconsin1 Recent results on the CKM angle  from BaBar DAFNE 2004, Frascati, Italy Attila Mihalyi University of Wisconsin-Madison.
B 0 , B 0  and the measurement of  at LHCb Patrick Robbe, LAL Orsay, 26 September 2006, for the LHCb Collaboration.
16 May 2002Paul Dauncey - BaBar1 Measurements of CP asymmetries and branching fractions in B 0   +  ,  K +  ,  K + K  Paul Dauncey Imperial College,
Radiative LHCb Vanya BELYAEVVanya BELYAEV (NIKHEF/Amsterdam & ITEP/Moscow) Vanya BELYAEV On behalf of LHCb Collaboration.
Angelo Carbone INFN Bologna (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration) BEAUTY 2006 Oxford, UK.
LHCb Strategies for  from B→DK Yuehong Xie University of Edinburgh for the LHCb Collaboration ADS with B + →DK + and B 0 → DK* 0 Dalitz with B + →DK +
Laurence Carson, Beauty Charmless Hadronic B Decays at LHCb Laurence Carson, University of Glasgow (on behalf of the LHCb collaboration) 12 th International.
A Method to measure  + /   detection efficiency asymmetry at LHCb Liming Zhang 08/15/07.
Peter Fauland (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity for the B S - mixing phase  S at LHCb.
B 0 s  J/   LHC review Nicolò Magini University and INFN, Firenze For the ATLAS, CMS and LHCb collaborations Oxford, 28 th September 2006 Beauty 2006.
Ulrich Uwer University of Heidelberg On behalf of the LHCb collaboration Beauty 2003, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA Physics Performance.
Beauty 2006 R. Muresan – Charm 1 Charm LHCb Raluca Mureşan Oxford University On behalf of LHCb collaboration.
Donatella Lucchesi1 B Physics Review: Part II Donatella Lucchesi INFN and University of Padova RTN Workshop The 3 rd generation as a probe for new physics.
B S Mixing at Tevatron Donatella Lucchesi University and INFN of Padova On behalf of the CDF&D0 Collaborations First Workshop on Theory, Phenomenology.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Cano Ay, Johannes Gutenberg Universität, B mixing and flavor oscillations at DØ Cano Ay University Mainz for the DØ Collaboration 23 may.
1 CP violation in B → ,  Hiro Sagawa (KEK) FLAVOR PHYSICS & CP VIOLATION, Ecole Polytechnique, Paris, France on June 3-6, 2003.
2 Ready sections (I) 3 Ready sections (II) 4 Sections still in preparation  It would be also worth adding a brief section on possible strategies for.
M. Adinolfi - University of Bristol1/19 Valencia, 15 December 2008 High precision probes for new physics through CP-violating measurements at LHCb M. Adinolfi.
RooFit toy MC sensitivity studies for  +  s and  m s from B s →D s  /K channels at LHCb Shirit Cohen NIKHEF MSc Colloquium May 11 th 2007.
1 Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment Marcel Merk NIKHEF Representing the LHCb collaboration 19 th.
DIS 2004, Strbske Pleso,April LHCb experiment sensitivity to CKM phases and New Physics from mixing and CP violation measurements in B decays LHCb.
CP violation measurements with the ATLAS detector E. Kneringer – University of Innsbruck on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration BEACH2012, Wichita, USA “Determination.
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
Prospects for B  hh at LHCb Eduardo Rodrigues On behalf of the LHCb Collaboration CKM2008 Workshop, Rome, 9-13 September 2008 LHCb.
18 december 2002, NIKHEF Jamboree Tracking and Physics Studies, Jeroen van Tilburg 1 Tracking and Physics Studies in LHCb Jeroen van Tilburg NIKHEF Jaarvergadering.
LHCb: Xmas 2010 Tara Shears, On behalf of the LHCb group.
Paper on J/  and b production Wenbin Qian, Patrick Robbe for the F-WG, Tsinghua Beijing/LAL Orsay, 2 Dec 2009.
Sergey Burdin FNAL DØ Collaboration 8/12/2005 Chicago Flavor New Bs Mixing Result from DØ.
CHARM MIXING and lifetimes on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration XXXVIIth Rencontres de Moriond  March 11th, 2002 at Search for lifetime differences in.
LHCb  Extraction with B s →D s K and B d →D (*)  Guy Wilkinson University of Oxford March 17,2005 Physics Motivation and Observables Experimental Essentials.
CP Violation Studies in B 0  D (*)  in B A B A R and BELLE Dominique Boutigny LAPP-CNRS/IN2P3 HEP2003 Europhysics Conference in Aachen, Germany July.
B 0 s  J/   with the ATLAS and CMS detectors Nicolò Magini University and INFN, Firenze Nagoya, 15 th December 2006 CKM th International Workshop.
Measurements of sin2  1 in processes at Belle CKM workshop at Nagoya 2006/12/13 Yu Nakahama (University of Tokyo) for the Belle Collaboration Analysis.
LHCb performance for B s  J/   and B d  J/  K s decays Jeroen van Hunen.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
Prospects for  at LHCb Val Gibson (University of Cambridge) On behalf of the LHCb collaboration Physics at the LHC Split, October 3 rd 2008.
Jeroen van Hunen (for the LHCb collaboration) The sensitivity to  s and  Γ s at LHCb.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
Sinéad Farrington University of Glasgow for the CDF Collaboration European Physical Society Aachen, 17 th -23 rd July 2003 B Lifetimes and Flavour Tagging.
Measurements of  at LHCb Mitesh Patel (CERN) (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration) 14th December 2006.
2010/09/01cpv from b factories to tevatron and lhcb1 Recent B Physics Results from CDF Tomonobu Tomura (University of Tsukuba)
Reaching for  (present and future)
Eduardo Rodrigues, Chris Parkes University of Glasgow
Measurement of the phase of Bs mixing with Bs ϕϕ
γ determination from tree decays (B→DK) with LHCb
The LHC collider in Geneva
VELO systematics and physics LHCb VELO meeting, CERN, 28 March 2008
For the BaBar Collaboration
Vincenzo Vagnoni INFN Bologna (on behalf of the LHCb Collaboration)
Representing the BaBar Collaboration
Lepton Number and Lepton Flavour Violation
CP violation in the charm and beauty systems at LHCb
Attila Mihalyi University of Wisconsin-Madison
W boson helicity measurement
Event Reconstruction and Physics Performance of the LHCb Experiment
Performance Studies for the LHCb Experiment
CP violation in Bs→ff and Bs → K*0K*0
Prospects for quarkonium studies at LHCb
8th International Conference on Advanced Technology and
B Physics at the LHC Neville Harnew University of Oxford.
LHCb Rare Decays Status
Jacopo Nardulli NIKHEF (On behalf of the LHCb collaboration)
LHCb Rare Decays Status
Università di Milano Bicocca LHC2003 International Symposium
Measuring γ at LHCb with Dalitz Methods and Global Sensitivity
Bs Physics and Prospects at the Tevatron
LHCb  Extraction with Bs→DsK and Bd→D(*)
Time dependent measurements of gamma at LHCb Angelo Carbone (INFN-Bologna) on behalf of LHCb collaboration CKM 2008 Roma, 12 September 2008.
Presentation transcript:

Vincenzo Vagnoni INFN Bologna CKM Workshop Durham, April 8th 2003

Physics motivation LHCb can collect large samples of B0(s)  hh decays The combined determination of the B0  + - and Bs  K+ K- CP asymmetries can be used to extract the  angle of the unitarity triangle R. Fleischer, Phys. Lett. B459 (1999) The decays are related by U-spin flavour symmetry interchanging d s quarks Within the validity of U-spin symmetry the system can be solved and  is determined d =2 s 0 Bs  J/ 

VELO: 21stations (Rmin= 8mm) Si 220 mm, strips R e φ ~65 m2 3 Tracking stations IT : Si strips OT: straw tubes TT~1.41.2 m2 Si microstrips

B0(s)  hh Monte Carlo simulation MC samples used: size (number of events) B0  + - 60k Bs  K+ K- 65k B0  K+ - 62k Bs  K- + 24k b  p K- 20k b  p - 21k inclusive bb background 1.144M Full Geant simulation Full Pattern Recognition MC mass production going on now to increase statistics in order to improve background studies only ~20 times the signal statistics, but BR(signal) << 1/20 only ~1/2 minute of data-taking at nominal LHCb luminosity !

B0(s)  hh Selection cuts , K , K IP IPB L B candidate: Cuts on pT IP/IP L/L mass Charged tracks Each leg identified as a K, or a particle lighter than K (using RICH) Cuts on p max. pT min. pT max. IP/IP min. IP/IP 2 of common vertex Assume combinatorial background to be dominated by generic bb events With these cuts we can reject all generated bb background also when relaxing mass cut

Rejection of physics background Relying on – RICH PID – mass resolution (~18 MeV/c2 single Gaussian) B0  + - mass with RICH PID B0  + - mass without RICH PID GeV/c2 GeV/c2

Annual yields and B/S ratios Event type B/S preliminary estimate (90% CL) Untagged annual yield B0  + - < 0.8 27000 B0  K+ - < 0.25 115000 Bs  K+ K- < 0.55 35000 B/S include physics and combinatorial background MC mass production for a better B/S estimate going on now

B0  + - Proper time acceptance and resolution Proper time resolution ps Single Gaussian fit: =41±1 fs

B0  + - BS  K+ K- CP sensitivities Tagged event samples generated by means of a toy MC B0  + - BS  K+ K- Annual event yield (1 year) 27000 35000 Background over signal ratio 0.8 0.55 Mixing parameter 0.755 20 Effective Tagging Power 6.4% -0.30 0.16 0.58 -0.17 TOY MC inputs Values used as illustrative example Assume background lifetime and signal lifetime to be the same Assume negligible CP violation in the background Preliminary assumptions: need more study and MC statistics

Max likelihood estimation to extract CP asymmetries After one year of data taking Standard error ellipse B0  + - 68.27% 95.45% 99.73% Bs  K+ K-

Example of binned asymmetries Results of log likelihood fit superimposed on binned asymmetries B0  + - Bs  K+ K-

Dependence of CP sensitivity on B/S and on the effective tagging power Current estimate of B/S ratio Bs  K+ K- Current estimate of B/S ratio On B/S B0  + - TP tagging power Bs  K+ K- TP tagging power On tagging

Dependence of CP sensitivity on xs Error increases by a factor 1.6 from xs=20 to xs=40 Bs  K+ K-

Dependence of CP sensitivity on s Bs  K+ K- A can be determined from untagged Bs rates In this example A is fixed with negligible error in the fit

Summary The current simulations show large event yields for the decays B0(s)  hh CP sensitivity after one year of LHCb data taking has been estimated LHCb can measure CP violation in the Bs  KK @ xs=40 with an error increase on the asymmetry amplitudes by a factor 1.6 w.r.t. xs=20 Event type B/S preliminary estimate (90% CL) Untagged annual yield B0  + - < 0.8 27000 B0  K+ - < 0.25 115000 Bs  K+ K- < 0.55 35000 B0  + - BS  K+ K-

Towards … R. Fleischer Phys. Lett. B459 (1999)