Workspace comparison of Delta robots.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Demonstrations I, II, and III.

Advertisements

Self-folding triangular devices at two scales.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

Basic design concept of human mimetic humanoid.

TPAD controller schematic and testing for WPC.

TPAD controller performance for three force components.

Cable-driven system diagram for structure matrix.

Fabrication process for Peano-HASEL actuators.

Demonstration of high-speed and precise actuation.

Three different types of transfer functions with a codomain of [0,1].

TPAD training protocol.

Force-strain characteristics of Peano-HASEL actuators using hydrogel and aluminum electrodes. Force-strain characteristics of Peano-HASEL actuators using.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

Invisible Peano-HASEL actuators.

Schematic representation of the milliDelta.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

Visual explanation of the interaction terms.

Power-free sterilization of culture plate.

The foldable robotic arm with seven modules assembled in series.

Prosthesis grasping and control.

Comparison of repertoire distributions to baseline.

Signal flow within the system.

A novice user executing various subtasks from study 1.

Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points from objective and subjective measures, displaying results from study 1. Tukey boxplots overlaid on data points.

Tactile features for prosthesis perception.

The milliDelta: a millimeter-scale Delta robot.

Quasi-static and dynamic trajectories.

Online verification using reachable occupancies.

Cell viability tests. Cell viability tests. SEM images of (A) MC3T3-E1 cells and (B) MSCs on days 1, 3, and 5 of culture. (C) Survival rates of MC3T3-E1.

Experimental characterization of the milliDelta’s quasi-static workspace (yellow) compared with the theoretical workspace (blue) generated by the kinematic.

Experimental results for tremor reduction.

Prosthesis system diagram.

SoFi system overview. SoFi system overview. (Top, left to right) Soft robotic fish and diver interface module. (Bottom, left to right) Subcomponents of.

A summary of different energy sources for robotics.

Translation of a spherical object.

Self-sensing of actuator position.

Fig. 1 Map of water stress and shale plays.

Brain-computer interfaces.

Experimental setup for workspace, bandwidth, and force characterization of the milliDelta. Experimental setup for workspace, bandwidth, and force characterization.

Active deformation of an RBC cargo propelled and pushed by a single bacterium through a 2-μm gap. Active deformation of an RBC cargo propelled and pushed.

Untethered kirigami-skinned soft crawlers.

Force-strain characteristics of Peano-HASEL actuators using hydrogel and aluminum electrodes. Force-strain characteristics of Peano-HASEL actuators using.

Degradation of MSP samples in 37°C DPBS solution.

Fig. 2 Principle of attenuation-compensation for a Bessel light sheet.

Fig. 2 Stratigraphic profile of the Area 15 excavation block showing the diagnostic cultural materials and components alongside the stratigraphic sequence.

Underwater observatory.

Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic artery, portal vein, and hepatic vein. Simulation results of magnetic driving ability in hepatic.

Comparison of predicted and measured forces and moments.

In vitro cell-release experiments on a glass substrate.

RAD sampler design. RAD sampler design. (A) One arm of the RAD sampler with revolute joints shown as dotted lines. A fold is initiated by rotating the.

Fig. 2 2D QWs of different propagation lengths.

Overhead snapshots. Overhead snapshots. (A to E) Mark I3, robot experiments (movie S1). (F) Mark I3, simulation (movie S2, side by side with a run on the.

Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Results of a representative participant with multiple training sessions. Average.

Galloping-like gait with the design of a two-legged robot.

AEGIS autonomous targeting process.

Fig. 5 Comparison of the liquid products generated from photocatalytic CO2 reduction reactions (CO2RR) and CO reduction reactions (CORR) on two catalysts.

Laboratory tests. Laboratory tests. (A) Time lapse of the landing process, refilling process, and subsequent launch. (B) Comparison of position and velocity.

Proprioception. Proprioception. (A) Computer-aided design (CAD) model of each component of the cylinder and the completed device with three different stiffness.

The biomimetic pressure sensing ability.

Iron line orientation inside the PDMS matrix.

Floating microrobots with different preferred magnetization directions: Fabrication and control principles. Floating microrobots with different preferred.

Breakdown of incorrect participant responses.

Fig. 4 Spatial mapping of the distribution and intensity of industrial fishing catch. Spatial mapping of the distribution and intensity of industrial fishing.

Fig. 2 Comparison between the different reflective metasurface proposals when θi = 0° and θr = 70°. Comparison between the different reflective metasurface.

Cartoon model for the increased p-HLA display engendered by peptide splicing. Cartoon model for the increased p-HLA display engendered by peptide splicing.

Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison with human trackers. Evaluating the performance of the robotic system through comparison.

Comparison of children’s behavior between the three conditions.

Setup used in the study. Setup used in the study. A child interacts with the robot tutor with a large touchscreen sitting between them, displaying the.

Fig. 2 Time series of secularization versus GDP per capita, from four illustrative countries, over the 20th century. Time series of secularization versus.

Presentation transcript:

Workspace comparison of Delta robots. Workspace comparison of Delta robots. A comparison of (A) a conventional Delta robot design (Dra = 0 mm), (B) the milliDelta (Dra = 0.8 mm), and (C) a Delta robot with 2× axis bias (Dra = 1.6 mm). The xy projection of the workspaces is shown in (D), and the xz projection is shown in (E). Hayley McClintock et al. Sci. Robotics 2018;3:eaar3018 Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works