Barbara Foorman & Jack Fletcher University of Texas-Houston

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Second Information Technology in Education Study (SITES) A Project of the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA)
Advertisements

Data-Driven Decision Making: Essential Conditions for Success.
Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Elementary. The District Heard Your Concerns In teachers requested that the following three documents be merged into one. Instructional Focus.
Wisconsin’s Literacy Screener A training for the administration and scoring of the Phonological Awareness Literacy Screener.
Instructional Decision Making
Contemporary Issues October 27, Technology Report Presentations Introducing…… 1.Laura!!!! 2. Mahogany!!! 3. Stacey!!! Clap! Clap! Clap! Applause!!!!
STEEP Data Management Ease, Reliability, Power. STEEP Data Management Goal: Make it simple to implement RTI correctly –Select Students who Need Intervention.
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
OBJECTIVES:  BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE SMI TEST, THE TESTING TIMELINE, AND SMI REPORTS GUIDE.  KNOW HOW TO NAVIGATE SAM CREATING CLASSES AND PULLING reports.
WEB 2.0 QUIZ AND POLLING TOOLS ASSESSING ONLINE ASSESSMENTS ! Prepared by : John Gillard For :EDU TPACK for Teachers Summer II 2012.
EVIDENCE BASED WRITING LEARN HOW TO WRITE A DETAILED RESPONSE TO A CONSTRUCTIVE RESPONSE QUESTION!! 5 th Grade ReadingMs. Nelson EDU 643Instructional.
SOFTWARE AND EQUIPMENT NEEDED FOR HEALTH EDUCATION CLASS By: Jack Buckley.
School Leaders Professional Learning for School Leaders: The Principal’s Role in School Transformation Cynthia Mruczek Rich Barbacane April 19, 2011.
Goals of This Session Provide background for program review development Describe document make-up.
Wisconsin’s New Kindergarten Screener A training for the administration and scoring of the Phonological Awareness Literacy Screener.
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) “101”
Establishing a Culture of Mathematics Learning in Urban Schools Syracuse City School District / Syracuse University Partnership Beyond Access to Math Achievement.
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION working together to improve education with technology Using Evidence for Educational Technology Success.
Who We Are The Center for Children and Technology (A division of the Education Development Center) A non-profit education research group
SRI & SMS Training Module. Downloading the SRI & SMS Training Module Using a Mac 1.Visit
Using handheld computers to support the collection and use of reading assessment data Naomi Hupert.
Assessment Literacy Interim Assessment Kansas State Department of Education ASSESSMENT LITERACY PROJECT1.
Data for Student Success Using State Assessment Data to Identify School Improvement Goals Lani Seikaly Professional Development Coordinator Data for Student.
Math Units. The following are pictures of what you will see when you go to the internet.
Form Effects on the Estimation of Students’ Progress in Oral Reading Fluency using CBM David J. Francis, University of Houston Kristi L. Santi, UT - Houston.
Lecture by: Chris Ross Chapter 7: Teacher-Designed Strategies.
Reading First Overview of 2004 Site Visits Jane Granger, M.S.
1 Destination Learning Management Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Professional Development Destination Math III – V.
Catholic College at Mandeville Assessment and Evaluation in Inclusive Settings Sessions 3 & /14/2015 Launcelot I. Brown Lisa Philip.
Warilla Public School Journey of Literacy Development with Primary Students.
Where Do You Stand? Using Data to Size Up Your School’s Progress Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia.
Reading and Writing National Standards Phase 2 Workshop (Updated 2 July 2010)
Building an Interim Assessment System: A Workbook for School Districts CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment Detroit, MI June 22, 2010.
1.  Developed to meet the criteria set by the Learning Community and OPS Assessment Steering Committee  Developed as a measure to monitor student progress.
Chapter 6 Assessing Science Learning Updated Spring 2012 – D. Fulton.
Negotiated Curriculum Developing and Implementing a Model for Negotiated Curriculum.
Q K-12 Blueprint Overview. 2 The K-12 Blueprint offers resources for education leaders involved in planning and implementing personalized learning.
Good morning and thank you for coming to the Summer Institute!
What if… You could use data to guide professional development? You could have consistency across grade levels? You could know how well aligned your state.
Curriculum Forum Secondary Tuesday 6 June 2017
EAGLE Hands-On Training Workshop
INCLUSIVE PRACTICES Co-Teaching Models
Session 1, Whole-class Assessments
Chapel Hill ISD Reading First Initiative
Q3: How do we get there? Cohort A
EDU 301 Competitive Success-- snaptutorial.com
EDU 301 Education for Service-- snaptutorial.com
EDU 301 Teaching Effectively-- snaptutorial.com
FSA Parent Information
MD Online IEP System Instructional Series – PD Activity
Vision 20/20: Checks and Balances
AchieveNJ: Teacher Evaluation Scoring Guide
Introduction to Student Achievement Objectives
Information and Guidelines booklets
RTI Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier approach to the early identification and support of students with learning and behavior needs. Struggling.
18-19 Willmar Public Schools
Assessments: Beyond the Claims
18-19 Willmar Public Schools
TAG and the Law
Selecting Baseline Data and Establishing Targets for Student Achievement Objectives Module Welcome to the Polk County Selecting Baseline Data and.
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Oakland Terrace Elementary School
Ensuring Success for Every Reader
PBIS in the Classroom: Expectations Application
English, Literacies and Policy Contexts A
Clickers in the Classroom Engaging All Learners!
Presentation transcript:

Scaling Up Assessment-Driven Intervention Using the Internet and Handheld Computers: An IERI Grant Barbara Foorman & Jack Fletcher University of Texas-Houston David Francis, University of Houston Larry Berger, Wireless Generation

Problem How are results of early reading assessment translated to instruction across Texas, where 95% of the 1100 public school districts use the Texas Primary Reading Inventory (TPRI) and Tejas LEE in grades K-2?

TPRI Screening Tasks Specific reading concepts are assessed in the Screening dependent on the grade level and time of year of the assessment. Explain table.

TPRI Inventory Tasks Book & Print Awareness is a warm-up activity. Specific reading concepts are assessed in the Inventory also dependent on the grade level and time of year of the assessment. Explain table. Book & Print Awareness is a warm-up activity.

Intervention Increase access to interpretation of TPRI/Tejas LEE results through: Professional development Onsite mentoring Web mentoring

Administration Format of Early Reading Assessment Randomized Design Administration Format of Early Reading Assessment

TPRI Data Collected on Handheld Device

Starting from the class summary of results, teachers begin by examining these results and drawing inferences about performance. Examples of how other teachers have used these results, in addition to the web mentor guide, will help teachers begin the instructional planning process

On the Grouping page you will find a skill map that gives the basis for grouping students. This page allows you to see how your class is broken down by performance on different TPRI tasks. The table is organized from easy to difficult according to task progression. It is important to know that students who are still developing on an initial task are listed in bold. The same students are listed in the subsequent tasks in a lightly shaded color. This is a visual to show that the students were not administered these tasks because they were still developing on the previous task. However, they still need instruction in these areas when they have developed the previous skills. This page also gives a visual of how many students are still developing in each skill area along with a percentage so you can determine whether or not a skill should be taught during whole group instruction or small group.

As a first step in this process, teachers will be guided through forming groups for instruction. The system will provide some suggested groupings but will allow the teacher to form groups as she sees fit. Suggested grouping criteria will be presented and the guide will give the teacher multiple grouping options

The Planning section of the web site contains activities from the Intervention Activities Guide that match each task assessed in the TPRI. This allows you to plan instruction for students that will target their TPRI identified needs. Clicking on the “Student Activities of the Planning section takes you to the intervention activities page shown here where you can access activities related to skills tested on the TPRI. First, select a student from the View Student Performance drop down menu. Then, select the activities you wish to use with that student and print them out for home or classroom use.

Hypotheses Re Student Outcomes Cohort effects due to Reading First Hand-held+Desktop > Paper+Desktop > Paper Onsite mentor + Website mentor > Teacher Alone Onsite mentor > website mentor + Teacher Alone in Paper and in Paper + Desktop Urban > Rural in paper/teacher alone due to access to resources and professional development

Sample and Timeline Year 1: Pilot software in K-2 classrooms in selected schools in Houston, Ft. Worth, and DeZavala ISDs Yrs 2-4: Randomized study in 255 schools in 3 urban school districts (Houston, Ft. Worth, El Paso) and 105 rural schools. Year 5: Data analysis and report writing

Measures

Analyses and Results Analysis Results 3-level (student within teacher within school) general and/or generalized mixed linear models of outcomes Qualification/quantification of observations Results Feasibility of mCLASS:TPRITM software established in Year 1. In Yr 2, data collected on 40,000 K-2 students in 1,944 classrooms in 216 schools. Currently beginning Yr. 3

Challenges to Scaling Working with a for-profit company Positives – efficient, state-of-the-art work Negatives – bottom-line drive for sales subverts research; competing products; worries about intellectual property Working with school districts Creating a culture of evidence Communication inversely related to district size Challenge of obtaining stu. IDs/updating rosters Districts want data for reporting, not for instruction

Challenges to Scaling (cont.) Working with teachers What’s in it for me? Incentives (Palms®, time savings, cash, mentoring) Trust and ownership Fear of technology

Implications for Models of Scaling Replication & Sustainability TPRI/Tejas LEE in 50,000 TX classrooms and in several other states; Used for instructional decisions and placement (intervention; summer school) Used in RF for screening, diagnosis, & progress monitoring

Implications for Models…(cont.) Depth and Reform Ownership: Tensions Changes in teaching & learning and ownership of assessment-driven instructional practices Versus Top-down mandates (e.g., state & federal mandates such as Reading First) and accountability pressures

For More Information…. The Center for Academic & Reading Skills website is located at: http://cars.uth.tmc.edu The TPRI website is located at: http://www.tpri.org