Lineage-Biased Stem Cells Maintain Estrogen-Receptor-Positive and -Negative Mouse Mammary Luminal Lineages  Chunhui Wang, John R. Christin, Maja H. Oktay,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (February 2016)
Advertisements

Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Yumi Matsuzaki, Kentaro Kinjo, Richard C Mulligan, Hideyuki Okano 
Chromatin Effector Pygo2 Mediates Wnt-Notch Crosstalk to Suppress Luminal/Alveolar Potential of Mammary Stem and Basal Cells  Bingnan Gu, Kazuhide Watanabe,
Sayaka Sekiya, Shizuka Miura, Kanae Matsuda-Ito, Atsushi Suzuki 
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (October 2013)
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Volume 18, Issue 14, Pages (July 2008)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (September 2016)
Signaling Pathways in Mammary Gland Development
Volume 133, Issue 4, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 26, Issue 5, Pages (September 2013)
Hosein Kouros-Mehr, Euan M. Slorach, Mark D. Sternlicht, Zena Werb 
SOX2 Is a Marker for Stem-like Tumor Cells in Bladder Cancer
Luminal Cells Are Favored as the Cell of Origin for Prostate Cancer
Adult Murine Prostate Basal and Luminal Cells Are Self-Sustained Lineages that Can Both Serve as Targets for Prostate Cancer Initiation  Nahyun Choi,
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages (November 2015)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Huntingtin Regulates Mammary Stem Cell Division and Differentiation
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (February 2018)
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages (March 2016)
Lineage Tracing Using Cux2-Cre and Cux2-CreERT2 Mice
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages (March 2014)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Kimberly M. McDermott, Bob Y. Liu, Thea D. Tlsty, Gregory J. Pazour 
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
High Expression of CD200 and CD200R1 Distinguishes Stem and Progenitor Cell Populations within Mammary Repopulating Units  Gat Rauner, Tania Kudinov,
Volume 14, Issue 8, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (May 2015)
Yuwei Jiang, Daniel C. Berry, Wei Tang, Jonathan M. Graff  Cell Reports 
Marit H. Aure, Stephen F. Konieczny, Catherine E. Ovitt 
SOX2 Is a Marker for Stem-like Tumor Cells in Bladder Cancer
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Fate of Prominin-1 Expressing Dermal Papilla Cells during Homeostasis, Wound Healing and Wnt Activation  Grace S. Kaushal, Emanuel Rognoni, Beate M. Lichtenberger,
Testicular Architecture Is Critical for Mediation of Retinoic Acid Responsiveness by Undifferentiated Spermatogonial Subtypes in the Mouse  Tessa Lord,
Volume 1, Issue 1, Pages (June 2013)
Chromatin Effector Pygo2 Mediates Wnt-Notch Crosstalk to Suppress Luminal/Alveolar Potential of Mammary Stem and Basal Cells  Bingnan Gu, Kazuhide Watanabe,
Volume 5, Issue 2, Pages (August 2015)
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Volume 12, Issue 12, Pages (September 2015)
Marit H. Aure, Stephen F. Konieczny, Catherine E. Ovitt 
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (April 2017)
Identification of White Adipocyte Progenitor Cells In Vivo
A Long-Lived Luminal Subpopulation Enriched with Alveolar Progenitors Serves as Cellular Origin of Heterogeneous Mammary Tumors  Luwei Tao, Maaike P.A.
Malkiel A. Cohen, Styliani Markoulaki, Rudolf Jaenisch 
Joan Sanchez-Gurmaches, Wen-Yu Hsiao, David A. Guertin 
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2014)
Zhiyu Wang, Nathaniel W. York, Colin G. Nichols, Maria S. Remedi 
Marc Leushacke, Annie Ng, Joerg Galle, Markus Loeffler, Nick Barker 
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages (April 2017)
Inflammation is associated with increased basal-cell plasticity in the Nkx3.1 mutant prostate. Inflammation is associated with increased basal-cell plasticity.
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages (December 2015)
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (February 2010)
Cellular Heterogeneity in the Mouse Esophagus Implicates the Presence of a Nonquiescent Epithelial Stem Cell Population  Aaron D. DeWard, Julie Cramer,
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (February 2016)
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages (December 2015)
Wnt Proteins Are Self-Renewal Factors for Mammary Stem Cells and Promote Their Long-Term Expansion in Culture  Yi Arial Zeng, Roel Nusse  Cell Stem Cell 
Zhiyu Wang, Nathaniel W. York, Colin G. Nichols, Maria S. Remedi 
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
Presentation transcript:

Lineage-Biased Stem Cells Maintain Estrogen-Receptor-Positive and -Negative Mouse Mammary Luminal Lineages  Chunhui Wang, John R. Christin, Maja H. Oktay, Wenjun Guo  Cell Reports  Volume 18, Issue 12, Pages 2825-2835 (March 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.02.071 Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Cell Reports 2017 18, 2825-2835DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.02.071) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 SOX9+ Cells Are Long-Term Repopulating and Maintain the ER− Luminal and Basal Lineages in the Postnatal Mammary Gland (A) The mouse models (top) and the experimental schedule (bottom) for lineage-tracing experiments shown in Figures 1B–1F. (B) Representative tdTomato whole-mount images of Sox9-CreERT2; R26R-tdTomato mammary glands at the indicated time points after tamoxifen treatment. Mice without tamoxifen treatment (No TAM) at 24 weeks of age were used as the negative control (inset). A minimum of three animals were examined for each time point. (C) Percentages of tdTomato+ cells in the basal and luminal populations at the indicated time points, as determined by flow cytometry (mean ± SEM, n = 3–8). (D) K8 and K14 immunostaining of mammary gland sections for characterizing the tdTomato+ cells after 20 weeks of lineage tracing. Representative luminal only and bi-lineage tdTomato+ ducts are shown. The arrowhead and arrows point to basal and luminal cells, respectively. A total of 57 tdTomato+ cell clusters in three mice were counted. (E) Percentages of tdTomato+ cells in the Sca1+ and Sca1− luminal populations at the indicated time points, as determined by flow cytometry (mean ± SEM, n = 2–3). (F) ER and PR immunostaining of mammary gland sections 2 weeks after tamoxifen treatment. Magnification of the selected areas is shown on the right of each panel. 98% of tdTomato+ cells were ER− and PR−. (G) Experimental schedule (left) for adult Sox9-CreERT2 lineage-tracing experiments as shown in Figures 1G–1I, and a representative tdTomato whole-mount image (right) of Sox9-CreERT2; R26R-tdTomato mammary glands 20 weeks after the tamoxifen treatment. (H) Percentages of tdTomato+ cells in the basal, Sca1+, and Sca1− luminal populations at indicated time points after the tamoxifen treatment, as determined by flow cytometry (mean ± SEM, n = 3–6). (I) ER immunostaining of mammary glands after 20 weeks of lineage tracing of adult SOX9+ cells. 99.5% tdTomato+ cells were ER−. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001, and ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. See also Figure S1. Cell Reports 2017 18, 2825-2835DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.02.071) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 SOX9+ Cells Contribute to Alveologenesis and Persist after Repeated Pregnancy (A) The experimental schedule for lineage-tracing studies shown in Figure 2. (B) A representative tdTomato whole-mount image of Sox9-CreERT2; R26R-tdTomato mammary glands on day 17.5 of pregnancy (Preg17.5d). (C) Percentages of tdTomato+ cells in the basal and luminal populations of Preg17.5d mice, as determined by flow cytometry (mean ± SEM, n = 3, paired t test). (D) K8 and K14 immunostaining of Preg17.5d mammary gland sections for characterizing the tdTomato+ cells. Examples of alveoli with either tdTomato-labeled luminal or basal cells were shown. The graph on the right shows percentage of alveoli containing the indicated types of tdTomato+ cells. (E) ER immunostaining of Preg17.5d mammary gland sections. 99% tdTomato+ cells were ER−. (F) A representative tdTomato whole-mount image of Sox9-CreERT2; R26R-tdTomato mammary glands at least 3 weeks after weaning of the second litter. (G) Percentage of tdTomato+ cells in the basal, Sca1+ and Sca1− luminal populations 3 weeks after weaning of the second litter (mean ± SEM, n = 6). (H) ER immunostaining of mammary glands after the second pregnancy. 99.5% of tdTomato+ cells were ER−. ∗p < 0.05 and ∗∗p < 0.01. See also Figure S2. Cell Reports 2017 18, 2825-2835DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.02.071) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 PROM1+ Cells Are Long-Term Populating and Specifically Maintain the ER+ Lineage (A) The mouse models (top) and the experimental schedule (bottom) for PROM1+ cell lineage-tracing experiments as shown in Figures 3A–3D. (B) Representative tdTomato whole-mount images of Prom1-CreERT2; R26R-tdTomato mammary glands at the indicated time points after tamoxifen treatment. Mice without tamoxifen treatment (No TAM) at 24 weeks of age were used as the negative control. A minimum of three animals were examined for each time point. (C) Representative flow cytometric profiles of the basal, Sca1+ and Sca1− luminal populations showing percentages of tdTomato+ cells after 20 weeks of lineage tracing. Percentages of tdTomato+ cells in specific cell populations are quantified on the right (mean ± SEM, n = 3–6, paired t test). (D) ER and PR immunostaining of mammary gland sections after 20 weeks of lineage tracing. 97% and 100% of tdTomato+ cells are ER+ and PR+, respectively. (E) The experimental schedule for lineage-tracing studies of Prom1-CreERT2; R26R-tdTomato mice during pregnancy (left), and ER immunostaining of mammary gland sections at Preg17.5d (right). All tdTomato+ cells were ER+. (F) A representative tdTomato whole-mount image of Prom1-CreERT2; R26R-tdTomato mammary glands 3 weeks after two rounds of pregnancy and lactation. (G) Percentages of tdTomato+ cells in the indicated mammary cell types 3 weeks after two rounds of pregnancy and lactation, as determined by flow cytometry (mean ± SEM, n = 6, paired t test). (H) Percentages of tdTomato+ cells in the indicated mammary cell types at the indicated time points of adult PROM1+ cell lineage tracing (n = 2–3). (I) ER immunostaining of mammary gland sections after 8 weeks of adult PROM1+ cell lineage tracing. 96% tdTomato+ cells were ER+. ∗∗∗p < 0.001. See also Figure S3. Cell Reports 2017 18, 2825-2835DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.02.071) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 ER− and ER+ Luminal Lineages Are Regenerated by Different Unipotent Stem Cells during Serial Mammary Gland Transplantation (A) A schematic diagram of the serial transplantation experiments. Sox9-CreERT2; R26R-tdTomato or Prom1-CreERT2; R26R-tdTomato mice were treated with tamoxifen at P28. Small mammary ductal fragments were isolated ≥8 weeks later and used for cleared mammary fat pad transplantation. The fragments of primary outgrowths were then used for secondary transplantation. (B) Representative tdTomato whole-mount images of the primary and secondary outgrowths regenerated by Sox9-CreERT2; R26R-tdTomato mammary ductal fragments. (C) Representative flow cytometric profiles and quantification of percentages of tdTomato+ cells in the indicated cell types of Sox9-CreERT2; R26R-tdTomato primary outgrowths (mean ± SEM, n = 4). (D) ER and PR immunostaining of the secondary outgrowths from Sox9-CreERT2; R26R-tdTomato ductal fragments. 97% and 99% of tdTomato+ cells were ER− and PR−, respectively. (E) Representative tdTomato whole-mount images of the primary and secondary outgrowths derived from Prom1-CreERT2; R26R-tdTomato mammary ductal fragments. (F) Representative flow cytometric profiles and quantification of frequency of tdTomato+ cells in the indicated cell types of Prom1-CreERT2; R26R-tdTomato primary outgrowths (mean ± SEM, n = 7). (G) ER and PR immunostaining of the secondary outgrowths from Prom1-CreERT2; R26R-tdTomato ductal fragments. 97% and 98% of tdTomato+ cells were ER+ and PR+, respectively. ∗∗p < 0.01 and ∗∗∗∗p < 0.0001. See also Figure S4. Cell Reports 2017 18, 2825-2835DOI: (10.1016/j.celrep.2017.02.071) Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions