Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ideas from the Outcomes Think Tank. Gather family’s concerns and general information about child following program procedures Use 3 global outcomes as.
Advertisements

Module 2 Learning More about the Summary of Functional Performance Every day, we are honored to take action that inspires the world to discover, love and.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center1 Refresher: Child Outcome Summary Form Child Outcome Summary Form.
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 1 Virginia’s System for Determination of Child Progress (VSDCP)
July 2013 IFSP and Practice Manual Revisions April 29, 2013 May 3, 2013 Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Practice Manual Infant & Toddler Connection.
Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP)
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011.
Speakers Dr. Blanca Enriquez, Director, Office of Head Start
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Chase Bolds, M.Ed, Part C Coordinator, Babies Can’t Wait program Georgia’s Family Outcomes Indicator # 4 A Systems Approach Presentation to OSEP ECO/NECTAC.
ND Early Childhood Outcomes Process Nancy Skorheim – ND Department of Public Instruction, Office of Special Education.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Baltimore, MD 2008 Child Outcomes Measurement: Practices at the Local Level Amanda Faulkner, Frontier Community Services.
How to Involve Families in the Child Outcome Summary (COS) Process Debi Donelan, MSSA Early Support for Infants and Toddlers Katrina Martin, Ph.D. SRI.
Community Collaboration Module 1 – Section 4. Purpose To provide trainees with an opportunity to understand and experience the importance of including.
Purpose The purpose of Module 1 is to orient new staff to child outcomes measurement and the Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF).
©2016 California Department of Education. All rights reserved.
Working with Families.
Mary Beth Bruder, Ph.D. Cristina Mogro-Wilson, Ph.D.
A Blueprint for Service Delivery
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
What’s Unique about the Child Outcome Summary Process in Minnesota:
4. Designing and Implementing Successful GRP
Did you hear there is a new IFSP coming out?
Using Formative Assessment
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Engaging Families in the Assessment Process
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module
Session 6: Good Teaming, Good Decisions
ESE 315 Innovative Education-- snaptutorial.com
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Linking Standards, IFSPs and Service Delivery
2016 Improving Data, Improving Outcomes Conference
How to Talk to Families about the 3 Global Outcomes and the EI Program
Working with Families of Children with Disabilities
Session 6: Good Teaming, Good Decisions
SETT FRAMEWORK Collaborative Decision Making Process
Strategies to increase family engagement
Evaluating the Quality of Student Achievement Objectives
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Session 6: Good Teaming, Good Decisions
Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data
Siobhan Colgan, ECTA, IDC Michelle Lewis, NH Parent Training Institute
A non-profit organization providing support to North Carolina parents and professionals for more than 25 years.
Lynne Kahn Kathy Hebbeler The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center
Why Collect Outcome Data?
Introduction Introduction
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
OSEP “Hot Topics in Early Childhood” Meeting
Early Childhood Special Education
How to Talk to Families about the 3 Global Outcomes and the EI Program
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Understanding the Outcomes and the COSF: A Quick Review
Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.
Presented by: Marcella Franczkowski, Assistant State Superintendent
Child Outcome Summary Form
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Module
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Oh, the Places You’ll Go! Learning Session 1.
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Developmentally Appropriate Practices (DAP)
Introduction to the Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF)
Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues.
Welcome to the Annual Meeting of Title I Parents
Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data
COS Training to Promote Data Quality: What’s Working, What’s Needed
Presentation transcript:

Implementing the Child Outcomes Summary Process: Challenges, strategies, and benefits July, 2011 Welcome to a presentation on implementation issues related to using the Child Outcomes Summary process for measuring child outcomes. In implementing the Child Outcomes Summary process, states have discovered several important challenges, and have also developed strategies for addressing those challenges. At the same time, states have also discovered and articulated several important BENEFITS related to the use of the Child Outcomes Summary process. We will explore these issues in the following slides.

Purpose This session outlines essential knowledge needed to effectively implement the Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF) process. Participants will identify challenges, strategies, and resources needed to address those challenges Participants will discuss benefits of an effective COSF process

Essential knowledge for an effective Child Outcomes Summary Form (COSF) process Assessment Working as a team Functional outcomes Age-expected child development Involving families An effective Child Outcomes Summary Form process depends on many factors, including the ability to access information about the child’s functioning in the various settings that make up his or her everyday life. Team members should have a good understanding of age-expected child development in the three outcome areas, and be sure they understand the 7 points on the rating scale. The team also needs to be sensitive to cultural differences that affect families’ expectations for their child’s development, and be able to work together throughout the process. The next several slides offer examples of essential knowledge in these areas.

Essential knowledge: Assessment Gathering assessment data to reflect functioning across settings and situations, especially gathering information on child functioning from families Understanding the content of the three child outcomes and how to use the rating scale Understanding the results of assessment data gathered by others Sharing assessment results sensitively and honestly with families One of the first challenges teams have identified when using the summary process is making sure they have enough functional assessment information to determine a rating on the 7 point scale. States and programs have different policies on how families are involved in determining the actual rating of the child’s functioning. However, assessment practices need to include gathering information about the child’s functioning in everyday life- this typically includes information from the child’s family, child care providers, and others who spend time with the child in various settings. Teams need to be skilled at communicating with families for purposes of both gathering information about the child, and sharing assessment information back with families.

Essential knowledge: Working as a team Effective communication among professionals from different disciplines working together as a team Defining the role(s) of team members in the COSF process Handling differences in opinion about the rating Utilizing the skills and strengths of individuals and multiple disciplines in the process Communicating with one another about a child’s development can also be challenging for teams. Team members need the time and the willingness to share functional information with one another about the child, and having multiple sources of information adds to the validity of the rating. The rating must be a team decision (including the family!), not the opinion of one team member.

Essential knowledge: Functional outcomes The meaning of “functional” outcomes: that they are meant to reflect the child’s ability to integrate skills across domains in order to get along with others, learn, and get their needs met. How to use outcome information organized around domains The difference between the broad outcomes we measure for accountability and the individual outcomes/goals we write for IFSPs and IEPs.

Essential knowledge: Age-expected child development The functional expectations for children at different ages with regard to each of the three outcomes The extent to which a child shows age-appropriate functioning, across a variety of settings and situations, in each outcome area Understanding age expectations for child functioning within the child’s culture Another essential area of knowledge for teams is the comparison of children’s skills and behaviors to those of their same-aged peers. To determine a rating in the child outcome summary process, teams must make that comparison. In other words, team members need to have a working knowledge of the skills and behaviors that are expected of children who are developing according to age expectations in the three outcome areas.

Essential knowledge: Involving families Communicating with families about the child’s functioning at home and with family Talking with families about assessment results in ways that are - Sensitive - Accurate - Meaningful Communication skills for working with diverse types of families, of differing economic status, language, culture, family composition, etc. Utilizing family information is a key component of the child outcomes summary process. Team members need to be able to communicate with families about their children’s development, including both gathering information from families about their child’s functioning, and sharing assessment results with families. Team members need to have skills and support in working with a diverse group of children and families, encompassing differences such as economic, language, culture, and family composition, among others.

Benefits of the COSF Process What do you see as some benefits in using the COSF process? For children? For families? For providers and staff? For the program or district? For the state? Some of what we have heard about how participation in the outcomes summary process benefits teams and programs: The collaborative nature of the process ‘forces’ staff to communicate with one another. The functional nature of the outcomes process has improved the functionality of IFSP and IEP goals. Families have expressed appreciation for a more functional, and less domain-specific, conversation about how their children are socializing, learning, and learning to get their own needs met. Opportunities to collaborate with other staff, other programs Stronger collaboration between Part C and preschool (especially when both programs are using the COSF) Improved IFSP/IEP goals Improved communication with families about child’s functioning

Multiple skills, multiple challenges Use the implementation worksheet to discuss the process in small groups: COSF Implementation Issues worksheet What challenges are you facing in implementing the COSF process? What strategies might help address the challenges you discussed? With the vast array of essential skills and required of providers throughout the process, it is not surprising that there are multiple challenges. Limited staff development time Learning age-expected child development Working as a team Including families Shift toward thinking functionally

Discussion: Challenges and Strategies Facilitate discussion and brainstorming strategies: Collaboration Strategies: Collaboration with other programs – preschool and infant-toddler Input from child care, general education and preschool teachers Select a tool that helps develop functional IFSP/IEP goals Use of Early Learning Guidelines Using assessment tools designed for developing functional IFSP and IEP goals to help the teams think more functionally’ Strategies: Training Focus groups scheduled throughout the year for teachers and providers Training materials that include video Individual assistance as needed COSF training integral part of staff development Training modules available on line Strategies: Information sharing Phone conferences Scheduling meetings to coincide with IFSP/IEP team meetings Shared folder on program site that is password protected Topical monthly teleconferences for training and feedback Practice, practice, practice with the 7-point scale and documentation! Other strategies Shift training and practice to incorporate functional assessments and writing functional IFSP/IEP goals Establishing core competencies Incorporating staff feedback into plans for staff development

Follow up: Implementation issues for your program Training materials are available on the ECO website: COSF Training materials and Activities State-Developed Training Materials Email us at: staff@the-eco-center.org Visit us online at: www.the-eco-center.org What are the implementation issues related to the child outcomes summary process that your team is facing? During your next staff development opportunity, you may wish to discuss these issues, as well as strategies for ensuring an effective outcomes summary process. The discussion guide at this link provides an outline for discussion of these issues. Additional resources are also available on the ECO website