Toshiaki Toyota et al. JCIN 2017;10:27-37

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Date of download: 6/21/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Effect of Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treatment on Atrial.
Advertisements

Date of download: 7/8/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: A Meta-Analysis of 16 Randomized Trials of Sirolimus-Eluting.
From: Assessing the Risk of Progression From Asymptomatic Left Ventricular Dysfunction to Overt Heart Failure: A Systematic Overview and Meta-Analysis.
Copyright © 2009 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
A) b) Supplementary Figure 1A: Significance plot(a) and forest plot(b) for the most significant SNP for regions of interest from the meta-analysis of IGP29.
Copyright © 2012 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(11): doi: / Figure Legend:
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
Volume 139, Issue 5, Pages (May 2011)
Coffee Consumption and Risk of Liver Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
Pioglitazone and risk of bladder cancer in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
Amandeep Singh, MD, Harrison J. Alter, MS, MD, Amy Littlepage, MD 
Sigfus Gizurarson et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Shadi Al Halabi et al. JACEP 2015;1:
Dean J. Kereiakes et al. JACC 2017;70:
CHEK2*1100delC and Susceptibility to Breast Cancer: A Collaborative Analysis Involving 10,860 Breast Cancer Cases and 9,065 Controls from 10 Studies 
Ashish Shukla et al. JACEP 2015;1:41-51
Ryoji Nagoshi et al. JCIN 2016;9:e107-e109
Pablo B. Nery et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Tranexamic acid administration for anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis  Hayden N. Box, MD, Breann.
Mohit K. Turagam et al. JACEP 2017;3:
David J.A. Jenkins et al. JACC 2018;71:
John A. Bittl et al. JACC 2016;68:
Ashraf Hamdan et al. JCIN 2015;8:
Yousef Rezaei, MD  American Journal of Kidney Diseases 
Pioglitazone and risk of bladder cancer in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of observational studies.
Hepatic Vein Pressure Gradient Reduction and Prevention of Variceal Bleeding in Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review  Gennaro D’Amico, Juan Carlos Garcia-Pagan,
Prabhat Kumar et al. JACEP 2016;j.jacep
Emilce Trucco et al. JACEP 2018;j.jacep
Hisato Takagi, MD, PhD, Takuya Umemoto, MD, PhD 
Coronary Heart Disease and Dietary Carbohydrate, Glycemic Index, and Glycemic Load: Dose-Response Meta-analyses of Prospective Cohort Studies  Geoffrey.
Masatsugu Hamaji, MD, Syed Osman Ali, MD, Bryan M. Burt, MD 
Kensuke Nishimiya et al. JCIN 2016;9:
Mintu P. Turakhia et al. JACEP 2016;2:
Seung-Yul Lee et al. JCIN 2018;j.jcin
Michael S. Kim et al. JCIN 2009;2:81-90
Neesh Pannu, Braden Manns, Helen Lee, Marcello Tonelli 
Svend A. Mortensen et al. JCHF 2014;2:
Alfredo R. Galassi et al. JCIN 2016;9:
Yohei Ohno et al. JCIN 2015;8:e35-e37
Keratinocyte growth factor (KGF) versus no KGF for the reduction of severe oral mucositis in patients receiving treatment for cancer or undergoing haematopoietic.
Charanjit S. Rihal et al. JCIN 2012;5:
Natasha A. Loghmanpour et al. JCHF 2016;4:
Davide Capodanno et al. JCIN 2009;2:
Are Variants in the CAPN10 Gene Related to Risk of Type 2 Diabetes
Nils P. Johnson et al. JCIN 2015;8:
Alfredo R. Galassi et al. JCIN 2016;9:
Zachary L. Steinberg et al. JACC 2017;69:
Zachary L. Steinberg et al. JACC 2017;69:
Forest plot of randomised controlled trials investigating the effects of pasta in the context of low-GI dietary patterns on body weight (kg). n=2448. Forest.
Pamela E. Scott et al. JACC 2018;71:
Pooled risk with 95% CI of ACM (A) and CVD risk (B) for the highest vs
Ryan R. Reeves et al. JCIN 2015;8:
Scatterplot of the RR estimates of type 2 diabetes reported in the 15 included studies, and the pooled RR estimates with corresponding 95% CIs for five.
Matias B. Yudi et al. JACC 2018;71:
Change in the regular use of inhaled corticosteroids (as a single inhaler or in combination; any use in the last 12 months) in participants with persistent.
Leonard M. Rademakers et al. JACEP 2016;2:
A: Forest plot of the HR of AE of bone fracture between the saxagliptin and placebo groups across subgroups by demographic and medical history parameters.
Meta-analysis of five prospective studies examining the associations between urinary melatonin secretion and breast cancer risk. Meta-analysis of five.
A: Forest plot of Peto odds ratios (ORs) of main glycemic end points, as defined in each trial, from published RCTs of bariatric/metabolic surgery compared.
Relative risks of colon cancer in prospective cohort studies, comparing the highest with the lowest category of heme iron consumption. Relative risks of.
Cryotherapy versus no cryotherapy for the reduction of severe oral mucositis in patients receiving treatment for cancer or undergoing haematopoietic stem.
Maria R. Costanzo et al. JCHF 2016;4:
David J.A. Jenkins et al. JACC 2018;71:
Doses of trial medication in the liraglutide groups (A) and in the placebo groups (B). Doses of trial medication in the liraglutide groups (A) and in the.
David J.A. Jenkins et al. JACC 2018;71:
Pooled estimate of relative risk and 95% CIs of colorectal cancer associated with metformin therapy based on four studies comprising 107,961 diabetic patients.
Forest plot of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus control on tendinopathy pain. Forest plot of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus control on tendinopathy.
Forest plot for one-study removed sensitivity analysis of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) versus control on tendinopathy pain. Forest plot for one-study removed.
Forest plot of the mean overall SMD (95% CI) and the SMD and associated 95% confidence limits and the associated SEs and variance for each study included.
Presentation transcript:

Toshiaki Toyota et al. JCIN 2017;10:27-37 Forest Plot Forest plot with OR of BVS relative to EES for ST and TLF through 2-year follow-up for the individual trials and the pooled population. ORs are shown on a logarithmic scale. The size of the square is proportional to the weight of the individual studies, measured as the inverse of the estimated variance of the log OR. The diamond indicates the effect estimate derived from meta-analysis; the center indicates the point estimate and the left and the right ends demonstrate the 95% CI. Abbreviations as in Figure 2. Toshiaki Toyota et al. JCIN 2017;10:27-37 American College of Cardiology Foundation