Thijs Perik, Jochem Kaas, Frits Wittkämper 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2015 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures Alzheimer's & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer's Association Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages (March.
Advertisements

A multi-center output factor intercomparison to uncover systematic inaccuracies in small field dosimetry  Stefania Clemente, Laura Masi, Christian Fiandra,
Assessment of leakage dose in vivo in patients undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer  Peta Lonski, Tomas Kron, Michael Taylor, Alicia Phipps, Rick.
Auditing local methods for quality assurance in radiotherapy using the same set of predefined treatment plans  Enrica Seravalli, Antonetta C. Houweling,
A multinational audit of small field output factors calculated by treatment planning systems used in radiotherapy  Wolfgang Lechner, Paulina Wesolowska,
Evaluation of diffusion weighted imaging for tumor delineation in head-and-neck radiotherapy by comparison with automatically segmented 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose.
An MRI derived articular cartilage visualization framework
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Pain in cancer survivors; filling in the gaps
Pancreatic tumor motion reduction by use of a custom abdominal corset
Pulmonary Infiltrates and Eosinophilia Associated With Sulfasalazine
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
A multi-centre dosimetry audit on advanced radiotherapy in lung as part of the Isotoxic IMRT study  Yat Tsang, Antony Carver, Nicki Groom, Catherine Harris,
Relationship between dosimetric leaf gap and dose calculation errors for high definition multi-leaf collimators in radiotherapy  Jinkoo Kim, James S.
Patient-induced susceptibility effects simulation in magnetic resonance imaging  Josef Axel Lundman, Mikael Bylund, Anders Garpebring, Camilla Thellenberg.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Radiation Therapy for Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphomas
Emma Hedin, Anna Bäck, Roumiana Chakarova 
Carola Hartel, Elena Nasonova, Martina C. Fuss, Anna V
National audit of a system for rectal contact brachytherapy
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Improving CT quality with optimized image parameters for radiation treatment planning and delivery guidance  Guang-Pei Chen, George Noid, An Tai, Feng.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Changes in apparent diffusion coefficient radiomics features during dose-painted radiotherapy and high dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer  Sangjune.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Advantages of intensity modulated proton therapy during hippocampal avoidance whole brain radiation therapy  Joshua Stoker, Sujay Vora, Ameet Patel, David.
Cone beam computed tomography-based monitoring and management of target and organ motion during external beam radiotherapy in cervical cancer  Nina Boje.
A multi-centre analysis of radiotherapy beam output measurement
Monitoring anatomical changes of individual patients using statistical process control during head-and-neck radiotherapy  Nicholas J. Lowther, David A.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Isolated Gonococcal Extensor Tenosynovitis
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Characterizing geometrical accuracy in clinically optimised 7T and 3T magnetic resonance images for high-precision radiation treatment of brain tumours 
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
On the conversion of dose to bone to dose to water in radiotherapy treatment planning systems  Nick Reynaert, Frederik Crop, Edmond Sterpin, Iwan Kawrakow,
Angjelina Protik, Marcel van Herk, Marnix Witte, Jan-Jakob Sonke 
In This Issue Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Fast 4D cone-beam CT from 60 s acquisitions
What is the impact of diabetes mellitus on radiation induced acute proctitis after radical radiotherapy for adenocarcinoma prostate? A prospective longitudinal.
Skin dose calculation during radiotherapy of head and neck cancer using deformable image registration of planning and mega-voltage computed tomography.
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages 2-3 (October 2006)
E. Schneider, M. NessAiver  Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 
Callistus M. Nguyen, Alan H. Baydush, James D
Clinical and radiobiological evaluation of a method for planning target volume generation dependent on organ-at-risk exclusions in magnetic resonance.
Analysis of intra-fraction prostate motion and derivation of duration-dependent margins for radiotherapy using real-time 4D ultrasound  Eric Pei Ping.
Krzysztof Chełmiński, Wojciech Bulski 
Table of contents The Journal for Nurse Practitioners
Note Pages 4 – 7.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Structure delineation in the presence of metal – A comparative phantom study using single and dual-energy computed tomography with and without metal artefact.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Table of Contents Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Table of contents The Journal for Nurse Practitioners
Aisling Krishnan, Yat Man Tsang, Adéle Stewart-Lord 
Volume 9, Issue 5, (October 2011)
Clinical implementation of magnetic resonance imaging guided adaptive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer  Shyama U. Tetar, Anna M.E. Bruynzeel,
Constantinos Zamboglou, Matthias Eiber, Thomas R
Target definition in radiotherapy of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging only workflow  Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson, Emilia Persson, Christian.
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages 2-3 (February 2006)
Volume 163, Issue 2, (October 2015)
Surface doses of flattening filter free beams with volumetric modulated arc therapy dose delivery for breast cancer  Jan Seppälä, Aleksi Voutilainen,
Probabilistic optimization of dose coverage in radiotherapy
Evaluation of plan adaptation strategies for stereotactic radiotherapy of lymph node oligometastases using online magnetic resonance image guidance  Dennis.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
MRI basics for radiation oncologists
Presentation transcript:

The impact of a 1.5 T MRI linac fringe field on neighbouring linear accelerators  Thijs Perik, Jochem Kaas, Frits Wittkämper  Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology  Volume 4, Pages 12-16 (October 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2017.10.002 Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 Layout of the treatment rooms. The MR-Linac is installed in the upper left corner and surrounded by 3 standard linear accelerators, A, B and C at distances of respectively, 7.5, 5.5 and 11 m. The displayed Gauss lines are 0.5 G (Outer) and 2 G (Inner), and are taken from the vendor specifications. Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2017 4, 12-16DOI: (10.1016/j.phro.2017.10.002) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Relative flatness ratio to 0°, for 2 directions (Left-Right (AB) and Gun-Target (GT)) and 2 arcs (clockwise and counter clockwise) for Linac A 6 MV. Before the ramp-up to 1.5 T (a), directly after the ramp-up without corrections to the Look-Up tables (b), and after correction of the LUT (c). Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2017 4, 12-16DOI: (10.1016/j.phro.2017.10.002) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Difference in integral symmetry to 0°, for 2 directions (Left-Right (AB) and Gun-Target (GT)) and 2 arcs (clockwise and counter clockwise) for Linac A 6 MV. Before the ramp-up to 1.5 T (a), directly after the ramp-up without corrections to the Look-Up tables (b), and after correction of the LUT (c). Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2017 4, 12-16DOI: (10.1016/j.phro.2017.10.002) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 4 Difference in integral symmetry to 0°, for 2 directions (Left-Right (AB) and Gun-Target (GT)) and 2 arcs (clockwise and counter clockwise) for Linac A 6 MV. Before the ramp-down from 1.5 T (a), directly after the ramp-down with the original Look-Up tables (b), and after correction of the LUT (c). Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2017 4, 12-16DOI: (10.1016/j.phro.2017.10.002) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 5 Difference in integral symmetry to 0°, for 2 directions (Left-Right (AB) and Gun-Target (GT)) and 2 arcs (clockwise and counter clockwise) for Linac A 6 MV. Before the scheduled ramp-down (a) and after the 2nd ramp-up using the same LUT values as before the ramp-down (b). Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2017 4, 12-16DOI: (10.1016/j.phro.2017.10.002) Copyright © 2017 The Authors Terms and Conditions