Electroejaculation as a method of fertility preservation in boys diagnosed with cancer: a single-center experience and review of the literature Maria C. Adank, B.Sc., Wendy van Dorp, M.D., Marij Smit, M.D., Ph.D., Niels J. van Casteren, M.D., Ph.D., Joop S.E. Laven, M.D., Ph.D., Rob Pieters, M.D., Ph.D., Marry M. van den Heuvel-Eibrink, M.D., Ph.D. Fertility and Sterility Volume 102, Issue 1, Pages 199-205.e1 (July 2014) DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.038 Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 Hormone levels of patients who underwent electroejaculation (n = 20/29). Lines indicate median values. Mann-Whitney U-test showed a significant difference for T between the two groups. Semen cryopreservation was defined to be successful if motile spermatozoa were found and subsequently banked. Fertility and Sterility 2014 102, 199-205.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.038) Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions
Supplemental Figure 1 Flowchart of literature search. Fertility and Sterility 2014 102, 199-205.e1DOI: (10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.03.038) Copyright © 2014 American Society for Reproductive Medicine Terms and Conditions