Change Highlights January 2013

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AS9102 First Article Inspection Report
Advertisements

Transition from Q1- 8th to Q1- 9th edition
Special Education Student Information System Project New York City Department of Education | Special Education Student Information System Project 1 SESIS.
First Article Inspection Report
EQuIP Rubric and Quality Review Curriculum Council September 26, 2014.
IRS XML Standards & Tax Return Data Strategy For External Discussion June 30, 2010.
ISO 9001:2008 What did the November 2008 amendments to ISO 9001 mean to you?
First Article Inspection
Quality Management Systems P.Suriya Prakash Final Mech Vcet
ISO STANDARDS TRAINING & CONSULTING
International Aerospace Quality Group The Initiatives of the International Aerospace Quality Group (IAQG) Steve Shepherd ~ European Sector Leader.
Configuration Management, Logistics, and Universal CM Issues Larry Bauer Boeing Commercial Airplanes NDIA Conference Miami March 4-5, 2005
Collaborating in the Workplace C H A P T E R 3. In What Settings Do Employees Write Collaboratively? How Do You Manage a Project? How Do You Conduct Effective.
G223 Supplier Audit Questionnaire 2013 Version update 25 Oct 2013.
International Aerospace Quality Group The Initiatives of the International Aerospace Quality Group (IAQG) Steve Shepherd ~ European Sector Leader.
SOFTWARE SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT 4: System Design. Simplified view on software product development process 2 Product Planning System Design Project Planning.
Standards Certification Education & Training Publishing Conferences & Exhibits 1Copyright © 2006 ISA ISA-SP99: Security for Industrial Automation and Control.
SIDI™ ppt V Standardized Information on Dietary Ingredients (SIDI™) A joint trade association initiative to standardize ingredient information.
Other Party Management Team (OPMT) Status Briefing Americas Aerospace Quality Group (AAQG) Registration Management Committee (RMC) Tim Lee – Chair The.
Recall The Team Skills 1. Analyzing the Problem (with 5 steps) 2. Understanding User and Stakeholder Needs 3. Defining the System 4. Managing Scope 5.
CSOC – Certification Structure Oversight Committee Application Guidance October 2015.
WG or TG # SC17 Liaison Report Mohsen Shavandi / Virgilio Garcia Soulé SC17 Liaisons Update from SC18 Summer 2013 Meeting January 2014.
International Aerospace Quality Group The Initiatives of the International Aerospace Quality Group (IAQG) Steve Shepherd ~ European Sector Leader.
First Article Inspection Reports (FAIRs) Instructions for Suppliers
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC July Ballot: What is it all about? Information.
External Provider Control
Quality Management System Deliverable Software 9115 revision A Key changes presentation IAQG 9115 Team March 2017.
Interface Concepts Modeling Core Team
9101 Forms July 20-21, Revision Team Paul Dionne
Final Draft International Standard IS0/FDIS 9001
Safeguards- Feedback on Safeguards ED-2 and Task Force Proposals
Prepared by Rand E Winters, Jr. ASR Senior Auditor October 2014
Les Ginsberg Stefano Previdi Peter Psenak Martin Pilka
SysML 2.0 Model Lifecycle Management (MLM) Working Group
Structure of the Code – Phases 1 and 2
ISO 9001:2015 Auditor / Registration Decision Lessons Learned
First Article Inspection
Structure of the Code – Phase 2 TF Comments and Proposals
eLearning 2.0: From eReading to eEverything
First Article Inspection (Per AS9102)
NANC WG: TF Number Assignment Modernization
Increased Efficiency and Effectiveness
Change Assurance Dashboard
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
Structure of the Code Don Thomson, Task Force Chair IESBA Meeting
Introduction to Survey Design
IAQG 9101:2009 Revision IAQG General Assembly Munich, 15 Oct. 2009
Structure–Feedback on Structure ED-2 and Task Force Proposals
First 8 slides are what was presented in San Fransisco…
Updates about Work Track 5 Geographic Names at the Top-Level
EN/AS/SJAC 9101 Re-Write EN/AS/SJAC 9101 Audit Process Coordination Draft IAQG Working Group Prepared by: Tony Marino The Boeing Company Supplier Quality.
API 14H Task Group Status Proper Classification of Document
Teams What is a team? Maintaining Focus
Larry Bugh ECAR Standard Drafting Team Chair June 1, 2005
IAQG 9120:2009 Revision Overview
Company Name Date By Whomever
Guide for successful completion of First Article Inspection Reports
Guide for successful completion of First Article Inspection Reports
ISO 9001:2008 – Key Changes NOTE: use of this webinar depends on the instructor/speaker using the text in the notes of the slides!! Examples and speaking.
First Article Inspection (Per AS9102)
ISO 9001 – 2008 Changes Summary of Changes
DRAFT ISO 10006:2017 Revision Overview Quality management systems - Guidelines for quality management in projects ISO/TC176 TG 01.
DRAFT ISO 10002:2018 Quality management — Customer satisfaction — Guidelines for complaints handling in organizations ISO/TC176 TG 01.
Alignment of Part 4B with ISAE 3000
DRAFT ISO 10007:2017 Revision Overview Quality management – Guidelines for configuration management ISO/TC176 TG 01.
DRAFT ISO 10015:20XX Revision Overview Quality management — Guidelines for competence management and people development ISO/TC176 TG 01.
DRAFT ISO 10006:2017 Revision Overview Quality management systems - Guidelines for quality management in projects ISO/TC176 TG 01.
DRAFT ISO 10002:2018 Revision Overview Quality management — Customer satisfaction — Guidelines for complaints handling in organizations ISO/TC176 TG 01.
Company Name Date By Whomever
Presentation transcript:

Change Highlights January 2013 9102 Rewrite Team Change Highlights January 2013

9102 Project Changes 9102 Status: All Industry feedback reviewed and dispositioned. Majority embedded into draft standard Consensus of team is to maintain “FAI” naming convention to avoid confusion Incorporated language in 9102 to support the intent and value of accomplishing an effective FAI activity Team utilizing sub teams to address specific topics (MBD, Short Run Production, Planning, & Objective Evidence)

Global feedback Standard last updated 2004 Global sector representatives feedback from 9102 users (250 lines+ feedback globally) 9102 team reviewed and dispositioned all recommendations from the global responses Incorporated recommendations and enhancements that improved the process, added value, and clarified intent

Global feedback Breakdown of Comments 4

9102 Significant Highlights Enhanced Scope and Purpose to emphasize the value of the FAI process to the organization Separated the planning activity from the evaluation activity Enhanced planning activities Enhanced evaluation activities Addressed Digital Product Definitions Deployment support Updating the FAQ and SCMH to clarify the document intent and provide examples of complex concepts Included links to FAQ and SCMH in the standard

9102 Change Highlights Comment Category Evaluation Added conformance to lead sentence of activities Clarified Document vs Evidence FAI Planning Changed “Should” to “Shall” Clarified “Organization” vs “Individual” Enhanced forms and forms instructions Clarified the responsibility when signing forms

9102 Change Highlights Comment Category Partial Re-accomplishment of FAI Clarified Partial FAI handling due to nonconformances Clarified 2 year lapse in production

9102 Change Highlights Comment Category Forms Clarified form instructions Clarified use of electronic signature Multiple other changes Significant clarity added to form instructions

9102 Change Highlights Comment Category Definitions Defined Capability in alignment with ISO 9000 Focus on ability to meet requirements Exclude Cpk and statistical process capability Exclude Capacity and rate readiness Digital Product Definition defined First Production Run clarified COTS clarified Design Tooling defined Special Processes defined Qualified Tooling defined Baseline Part Number FAI defined

9102 Change Highlights Category other Emphasized that FAI improves Quality and Delivery of new products FAI linked to PPV & 9100 Request to 9100 to return to using “FAI” Changed definition of “Should” in introduction Clarified the use of Attribute Gauges as Qualified Tooling in FAI and records Nonconformance section clarification of FAI complete vs. FAI not complete Modified applicability Included reference of FAQ and SCMH

9102 Change Highlights Non conformance handling clarified No significant changes to forms made yet Team intends that legacy forms are usable Use of electronic forms and attachments considered in this revision Clarified use of attachments such as CMM reports Eliminate redundant entry of non-special processes from form 2