Title: Different interpretations LO: To be able to recognise why there are different interpretations of events

Title: Different interpretations LO: To be able to recognise why there are different interpretations of events

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FRWxmUNWb5w My opinion of Frankie Cocozza is…. What types of things influence who people like on X Factor?

When we look at an interpretation of something in History (i. e When we look at an interpretation of something in History (i.e. a source) what 6 things should we consider 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.

Why do Interpretations 1 and 2 have different views about the role of Hitler? Interpretation 1: Adolf’s a swine… He only associates with those on the right… his old friends aren’t good enough for him. What he wants to do is sit and pretend he is God. He knows exactly what I want… The army generals are a load of old fogeys… I am the centre of the new army. Rauchning (a Nazi official in 1934) writing in his book “Hitler” in 1940. He left Germany in 1934 and went to live in the USA. He is describing a conversation with Rohm in 1934. Rohm was drunk. Interpretation 2: Defence Minister General von Blomberg thanked the Fuhrer in the name of the Reich Cabinet and the army for his determined and courageous action, by which he saved the German people from a civil war. The Fuhrer has shown greatness as a politician and a soldier. This has aroused loyalty and devotion from the German people A report from a Reich Cabinet meeting about the Night of the Long Knives, printed in the official Nazi newspaper 5 July 1934

Pair share What opinion of Hitler does Interpretation 1 give us?

Pair share What opinion of Hitler does Interpretation 1 give us? Interpretation 1 tells us Hitler is…. We can see this from the quote…

Pair Share What opinion of Hitler does Interpretation 2 give us?

Pair Share What opinion of Hitler does Interpretation 2 give us? Interpretation 2 tells us Hitler is… we can see this from the quote…

Fill in the pie charts using the words below Interpretation 1 A Nazi Official America It tells us that Rohm thought Hitler was “a swine” and that he was betraying his old friends the SA 1940 This could be a source of American propaganda to persuade Americans that Hitler needed to be fought during WW2 It is a book Interpretation 2 It tells us that Hitler was brave and had protected Germany on the Night of the Long Knives It was written in Nazi Germany It is on 5 July 1934 (one week after the Night of the Long Knives) It is a report from the Reich Cabinet meeting in the Nazi newspaper It is wrote by the Nazis in their newspaper It is a piece of Nazi propaganda wrote a week after the Night of the Long Knives to persuade people that Hitler killed 400 people for the benefit of Germany as they were planning an assassination plot

Interpretation 1 What Who Where Content When Why

Interpretation 2 What Who Where Content When Why

Why do Interpretations 1 and 2 have different views about the role of Hitler? Interpretation 1 is a primary/secondary source. It is… Interpretation 1 tells me that Hitler was… We can see this from the quote… This shows that Hitler was… Interpretation 2 on the other hand gives a different viewpoint of Hitler. Interpretation 2 is a primary/secondary source. It is…It tells us that Hitler was… We can see this from the quote… This shows that Hitler was… Interpretations 1 and 2 show different opinions of Hitler for many reasons for example…