Evaluation Techniques

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Methodology and Explanation XX50125 Lecture 1: Part I. Introduction to Evaluation Methods Part 2. Experiments Dr. Danaë Stanton Fraser.
Advertisements

Human Computer Interaction
Human Computer Interaction
Chapter 11 user support. Issues –different types of support at different times –implementation and presentation both important –all need careful design.
evaluation techniques
Evaluating UI Designs assess effect of interface on user performance and satisfaction identify specific usability problems evaluate users’ access to functionality.
Evaluation techniques Part 2
©N. Hari Narayanan Computer Science & Software Engineering Auburn University 1 COMP 7620 Evaluation Chapter 9.
Designing Help… Mark Johnson Providing Support Issues –different types of support at different times –implementation and presentation both important.
Useability.
Evaluation Methodologies
1 CS 430 / INFO 430 Information Retrieval Lecture 24 Usability 2.
1http://img.cs.man.ac.uk/stevens Evaluation CS2391 Lecture n+1: Robert Stevens.
Evaluation techniques Part 1
Task analysis 1 © Copyright De Montfort University 1998 All Rights Reserved Task Analysis Preece et al Chapter 7.
Usability Evaluation Methods Computer-Mediated Communication Lab week 10; Tuesday 7/11/06.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency The IAEA Safety Culture Assessment Methodology.
Predictive Evaluation
Introduction to SDLC: System Development Life Cycle Dr. Dania Bilal IS 582 Spring 2009.
Chapter 7 evaluation techniques. Evaluation Techniques Evaluation –tests usability and functionality of system –occurs in laboratory, field and/or in.
Evaluation Techniques Material from Authors of Human Computer Interaction Alan Dix, et al.
Human Computer Interaction Chapter 3 Evaluation Techniques.
Multimedia Specification Design and Production 2013 / Semester 1 / week 9 Lecturer: Dr. Nikos Gazepidis
Human Computer Interaction
Usability Evaluation June 8, Why do we need to do usability evaluation?
Evaluation Techniques zEvaluation ytests usability and functionality of system yoccurs in laboratory, field and/or in collaboration with users yevaluates.
Chapter 10 Evaluation. Objectives Define the role of evaluation To understand the importance of evaluation Discuss how developers cope with real-world.
An Overview of Usability Evaluation #15 1. Outline  What is usability evaluation ?  Why perform usability evaluation ?  Types of usability evaluations.
Chapter 9 evaluation techniques. Evaluation Techniques Evaluation –tests usability and functionality of system –occurs in laboratory, field and/or in.
Evaluation Techniques Evaluation –tests usability and functionality of system –occurs in laboratory, field and/or in collaboration with users –evaluates.
1 Lecture 18 chapter 9 evaluation techniques. 2 Evaluation Techniques Evaluation –tests usability and functionality of system –occurs in laboratory, field.
CS 580 chapter 9 evaluation techniques. Evaluation Tests usability and functionality of system Occurs in laboratory, field and/or in collaboration with.
CENG 394 Introduction to Human-Computer Interaction
AMSc Research Methods Research approach IV: Experimental [1] Jane Reid
Chap#11 What is User Support?
1 Human-Computer Interaction Usability Evaluation: 2 Expert and Empirical Methods.
EVALUATION PROfessional network of Master’s degrees in Informatics as a Second Competence – PROMIS ( TEMPUS FR-TEMPUS-JPCR)
Evaluation Methods - Summary. How to chose a method? Stage of study – formative, iterative, summative Pros & cons Metrics – depends on what you want to.
Chapter 15: Analytical evaluation. Aims: Describe inspection methods. Show how heuristic evaluation can be adapted to evaluate different products. Explain.
Oct 211 The next two weeks Oct 21 & 23: Lectures on user interface evaluation Oct 28: Lecture by Dr. Maurice Masliah No office hours (out of town) Oct.
User Interface Evaluation Introduction Lecture #15.
Department of CSE, KLU 1 Chapter 9 evaluation techniques.
Observational Methods Think Aloud Cooperative evaluation Protocol analysis Automated analysis Post-task walkthroughs.
Chapter 9 evaluation techniques. Evaluation Techniques Evaluation –tests usability and functionality of system –occurs in laboratory, field and/or in.
Chapter 9 evaluation techniques. Evaluation Techniques Evaluation Objective –Tests usability –Efficiency – Functionality of system occurs in laboratory,
Chapter 9 evaluation techniques. Evaluation Techniques Evaluation – tests usability and functionality of system – occurs in laboratory, field and/or in.
NURUL IHSANIAH OMAR JABATAN TEKNOLOGI MAKLUMAT, POLITEKNIK BALIK PULAU.
Introduction to Marketing Research
Human Computer Interaction
SIE 515 Design Evaluation Lecture 7.
Evaluation through user participation
Week: 13 Human-Computer Interaction
Human Computer Interaction Lecture 15 Usability Evaluation
Information for marketing management
Evaluation Techniques 1
Experimental & Non-experimental Methods
Chapter Three Research Design.
© 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Evaluation techniques
Obj. 2.2 Discuss considerations involved before, during and after an interview To view this presentation, first, turn up your volume and second, launch.
CSE310 Human-Computer Interaction
Chapter 11 user support.
evaluation techniques
Evaluation.
Week: 14 Human-Computer Interaction
HCI Evaluation Techniques
CSM18 Usability Engineering
Experimental Evaluation
Human-Computer Interaction: Overview of User Studies
evaluation techniques
Presentation transcript:

Evaluation Techniques tests usability and functionality of system occurs in laboratory, field and/or in collaboration with users evaluates both design and implementation should be considered at all stages in the design life cycle

Goals of Evaluation assess extent of system functionality assess effect of interface on user identify specific problems

Laboratory studies Advantages: specialist equipment available uninterrupted environment Disadvantages: lack of context difficult to observe several users cooperating Appropriate if system location is dangerous or impractical for constrained single user systems to allow controlled manipulation of use.

Field Studies Advantages: natural environment context retained (though observation may alter it) longitudinal studies possible Disadvantages: distractions noise Appropriate where context is crucial for longitudinal studies

Participatory Design User is an active member of the design team. Characteristics context and work oriented rather than system oriented collaborative Iterative Methods brain-storming storyboarding workshops pencil and paper exercises

Evaluating Designs - Cognitive Walkthrough Proposed by Polson et al. evaluates design on how well it supports user in learning task usually performed by expert in cognitive psychology expert `walks though' design to identify potential problems using psychological principles forms used to guide analysis

Cognitive Walkthrough (cont.) For each task walkthrough considers • what impact will interaction have on user? • what cognitive processes are required? • what learning problems may occur? Analysis focuses on goals and knowledge: does the design lead the user to generate the correct goals? An example is expanded in Section 11.4.1.

Heuristic Evaluation Proposed by Nielsen and Molich. usability criteria (heuristics) are identified design examined by experts to see if these are violated Example heuristics system behaviour is predictable system behaviour is consistent feedback is provided Heuristic evaluation `debugs' design.

Review-based evaluation Results from the literature used to support or refute parts of design. Care needed to ensure results are transferable to new design. Model-based evaluation Cognitive models used to filter design options e.g. GOMS prediction of user performance. Design rationale can also provide useful evaluation information

Evaluating Implementations Requires an artefact: simulation, prototype, full implementation. Experimental evaluation • controlled evaluation of specific aspects of interactive behaviour • evaluator chooses hypothesis to be tested • a number of experimental conditions are considered which differ only in the value of some controlled variable. • changes in behavioural measure are attributed to different conditions

Experimental factors Subjects representative sufficient sample Variables independent variable (IV) characteristic changed to produce different conditions. e.g. interface style, number of menu items. dependent variable (DV) characteristics measured in the experiment e.g. time taken, number of errors.

Experimental factors (cont.) Hypothesis prediction of outcome framed in terms of IV and DV null hypothesis: states no difference between conditions aim is to disprove this. Experimental design within groups design each subject performs experiment under each condition. transfer of learning possible less costly and less likely to suffer from user variation. between groups design each subject performs under only one condition no transfer of learning more users required variation can bias results.

Analysis of data Before you start to do any statistics: look at data save original data Choice of statistical technique depends on type of data information required Type of data discrete - finite number of values continuous - any value

Analysis of data - types of test parametric assume normal distribution robust powerful non-parametric do not assume normal distribution less powerful more reliable contingency table classify data by discrete attributes count number of data items in each group

Analysis of data (cont.) What information is required? is there a difference? how big is the difference? how accurate is the estimate? Parametric and non-parametric tests address mainly rest of these. Worked examples of data analysis are given in Section 11.5.1. Table 11.1 summarizes main tests and when they are used.

Observational Methods - Think Aloud user observed performing task user asked to describe what he is doing and why, what he thinks is happening etc. Advantages simplicity - requires little expertise can provide useful insight can show how system is actually use Disadvantages subjective selective act of describing may alter task performance

Observational Methods - Cooperative evaluation variation on think aloud user collaborates in evaluation both user and evaluator can ask each other questions throughout Additional advantages less constrained and easier to use user is encouraged to criticize system clarification possible

Observational Methods - Protocol analysis paper and pencil cheap, limited to writing speed audio good for think aloud, diffcult to match with other protocols video accurate and realistic, needs special equipment, obtrusive computer logging automatic and unobtrusive, large amounts of data difficult to analyze user notebooks coarse and subjective, useful insights, good for longitudinal studies Mixed use in practice. Transcription of audio and video difficult and requires skill. Some automatic support tools available

Observational Methods - EVA Workplace project Post task walkthrough user reacts on action after the event used to fill in intention Advantages analyst has time to focus on relevant incidents avoid excessive interruption of task Disadvantages lack of freshness may be post-hoc interpretation of events

Query Techniques - Interviews analyst questions user on one to one basis usually based on prepared questions informal, subjective and relatively cheap Advantages can be varied to suit context issues can be explored more fully can elicit user views and identify unanticipated problems Disadvantages very subjective time consuming

Query Techniques - Questionnaires Set of fixed questions given to users Advantages quick and reaches large user group can be analyzed more rigorously Disadvantages less flexible less probing

Questionnaires (ctd) Need careful design what information is required? how are answers to be analyzed? Styles of question general open-ended scalar multi-choice ranked

Choosing an Evaluation Method Factors to consider (see also Tables 11.3-11.5) when in cycle is evaluation carried out? design vs implementation what style of evaluation is required? laboratory vs field how objective should the technique be? subjective vs objective what type of measures are required? qualitative vs quantitative what level of information is required? High level vs low level what level of interference? obtrusive vs unobtrusive what resources are available? time, subjects, equipment, expertise Tables 11.3-11.5 rates each technique along these criteria.