City of Sunrise Wastewater Reuse Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LEE COUNTY UTILITIES DIVISION Integrated Water Resources Master Plan
Advertisements

Washington State Department of Health Division of Environmental HealthOffice of Drinking Water Mike Dexel Water Resources Policy Lead Municipal Water Law.
City of Farmersville, Texas Water and Wastewater Rate Study February 2011.
Cuba’s Future Development Needs, Funding Models, and Alternatives. A Perspective of the Operation of a Cuban Water & Sewer Utility. Eduardo Vega-Llort,
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
 Why  Project Status  Future Course Lime Sludge Biosolids Water/Wastewater System Life Cycle Raw Water Wells (12) Water Treatment Plant Storage Tanks.
IBM Smarter Cities Challenge City of Tucson Award Recipient for 2013 November 14, 2012.
1 Combined Utility System Cost of Service Rate Study Presentation April 6, 2010.
Overview and Project Approach  Clinton is currently experiencing surface water supply shortages in their raw water source, Clinton Lake, and has been.
Jordan Lake Partnership Western Intake Feasibility Study Jordan Lake Partnership Western Intake Feasibility Study 1.
United Water & Sanitation District Stonegate Village Metro District Water Supply Opportunities 1.
City Of Phoenix Water Rates June 30, 2011 Denise Olson Deputy Finance Director Finance Department.
 Groundwater Supply ◦ Quantity ◦ Quality  Infrastructure ◦ Treatment ◦ Transmission ◦ Distribution  Response Plans ◦ Long-term ◦ Short-term ◦ Emergencies.
Chicago Department of Water Management Thomas H. Powers, P.E. Commissioner Leadership Summit June 2, 2015.
City of Savannah Water, the Lifeline of the Community.
Imagine the result Impact Study on MSD Rate Payers of Proposed Consolidation/Merger Phase II – Towns of Biltmore Forest, Montreat and Weaverville Presentation.
Broward County-wide Master Reuse Plan
Contributions In Aid of Construction Mark Beauchamp Business & Finance Workshop Utility Financial Solutions
Water System Planning Study
Rule 62-40, F.A.C. – What is it? The Water Resource Implementation Rule (State Water Policy). Required by Sec , F.S. Goals, objectives and guidance.
STORMWATER IRRIGATION by Marty Wanielista UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA January 4, 2006.
Orange County Utilities Department Water and Wastewater Budget Challenges March 9, 2010.
South County Reclaimed Water Partnership South County Reclaimed Water Partnership Palm Beach County Water Utilities Department Brian Shields,
City of Renton, WA Water Use Efficiency Margaret Ales PNWS – AWWA CONFERENCE MAY 1, 2008 Copyright © 2008 by R. W. Beck, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Opportunities,
Washington’s Water Use Efficiency Rule May Require Increased Coordination for Many Utilities Dan Sander, P.E. Senior Engineer.
Short and Long Range Water Supply Planning and Aquifer Performance Test (APT)
Withlacoochee Regional Water Supply Authority Water Supply Plan Update - Progress Report #3 May 15 – June 18.
1 Public Hearing User Rate Adjustments April 8, 2008.
POTABLE REUSE THE ALTERNATIVE WATER SUPPLY. Florida Section WateReuse Association November 9, 2015 Chuck Drake, PG.
November 17, 2015 Charting the Future of Water Reuse for the City of Raleigh Sheryl D. Smith, P.E. – CDM Smith Eileen M. Navarrete, P.E., PMP – City of.
City of San Diego’s Recycled Water Study Item W15a October 10, 2012 Presentation to the California Coastal Commission.
The David W. York Award JEA South Grid Reuse System Tom Bartol, P.E.
Water System Master Plan & Rate Study City of DeKalb, Illinois City Council Presentation May 16, 2015.
Water Supply Planning Workshop February 27, 2008 City of Hallandale Beach Commission Mayor Joy Cooper Vice Mayor Bill Julian Commissioner Keith London.
Kevin Burnett Presented by CITY OF TULARE, CALIFORNIA.
City of Fernley, Nevada – 164 th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Redmond, WA April 18, 2007 Rate Study Findings Water and Sewer Utility Rates.
U TILITIES 2013 BUDGET OVERVIEW Electric Department – Fund 520 Water Department – Fund 525.
What are they and how are they calculated? May 2015.
Town of Davie Utilities Department Renuka M. Bajnath John McGeary.
Miami-Dade Water & Sewer Department Miami-Dade Water and Sewer Department |  1   Reuse, Every Drop Has Value Seminar FPL JPA.
Water Supply Municipal Water Demand Civil Engineering Department Faculty of Engineering and Technology The University of Jordan Instructor: Ghada Kassab,
Lecture (11): Water Distribution Systems
JEA’s Initiatives and Capital Improvements Program
Portugal Cove - St. Philip’s
City of Petersburg Water and Wastewater Rates
Water & Wastewater Capacity Charge Work Shop
CITY OF SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO
North Texas Municipal Water District “Regional Service Through Unity … Meeting Our Region’s Needs Today and Tomorrow” Water Supplies Vital for the Future.
MOUNTAIN REGIONAL WATER
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
SEWER SERVICE FEE RATE STRUCTURE ALTERNATIVE
Recycled Water Project – Sharon Heights GCC
City of Sisters, OR 2017 Water & Sewer Rate Study
Wastewater Surcharge Reduction for Manufacturing Processes
Information Technology Department
Water Reclamation Plant Feasibility Study Update May 28, 2014
Davie Green Water Project
Joshua Basin Water District Draft Findings & Rate Scenarios
Outline of Presentation
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES September 26, 2017
Florida and Reclaimed Water
Water Reclamation Plant Feasibility Study Update
Joshua Basin Water District Revised Rate Recommendations
Water & Sewer Rate Study Presented by: Chris Gonzalez, Project Manager
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES NOVEMBER 22, 2016
October 29, 2018 Terry Lauritsen, P.E.
Background Broward County currently operates a 10 MGD reuse facility located at the North Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant. Customers include commercial,
2019 Water and Waste Water Rates
Status after Second Year of Work Implementing the Recommendations of the Santa Cruz Water Supply Advisory Committee Joint Meeting Santa Cruz City Council.
Antelope Valley-East Kern Water Agency
Presentation transcript:

City of Sunrise Wastewater Reuse Program Presented by: Utilities Department May 26, 2016

Introduction Required by the FDEP and encouraged by the SFWMD - fulfills several goals: Conserves a valuable resource which is currently being discharged through deep injection wells Improves the City’s regulatory compliance Provides potential for additional water from the Biscayne aquifer (BA)

Regulatory Implications The SFWMD allows “credits” for additional water use allocation in exchange for reuse Higher percentage of credit is provided when reuse occurs near well fields where utilities withdraw water from the Biscayne aquifer

Strategic Approach Analyzed entire service area to maximize potential for BA credits while minimizing cost Largest customers (irrigation demands) closest to the City’s BA well fields targeted Preliminary meetings with customer, identified needs and developed initial considerations for future agreements Designed wastewater treatment facilities and distribution pipelines for phased installation

Reuse System Delivery Planning started in 2011 Completion expected June 2018

Evaluated Sites for Highest Potential Reuse Credits 2 MGD demands to be connected in approximately four (4) project phases Current maximum reuse demand is approximately 8 MGD

Centralized Conveyance System

Initial Max Capacity 4 MGD (max 16) March 18, 2008 Initial Max Capacity 4 MGD (max 16) 9

Centralized Reuse Conveyance System Utility Department considering recommending a Mandatory Reuse Area focusing large sites along transfer pipe (in corporate limits only) Reuse Ordinance Update Requiring reuse for all new development Requires reuse for existing developments if service is provided by City to property line Voluntary hook-ups outside of city limits

Infrastructure for Residential Reuse City is replacing older community water systems, which provides an opportunity Residential reuse infrastructure will be less expensive and logistically easier to install when water systems are being replaced A cost benefit analysis was performed to better understand long term impacts

Infrastructure for Residential Reuse March 18, 2008 Additional costs include piping extension from transmission main, the reuse system (mains, services and meters) and wider trenching Residential reuse will also impact utility revenues, since those customers currently utilizing potable water for irrigation will no longer pay a wastewater charge for their irrigation demands

Cost-Benefit Analysis Performed for Residential Reuse City’s meter data was reviewed (between years 2003 through 2012) for Sunrise Golf Village where the water system is to be replaced Irrigation demands were calculated by analyzing seasonal and other differences in water consumption The analysis concluded 25 to 30% of the water demands appear to be for irrigation

Cost/Benefit Analysis (Continued) Capital Cost Analysis for Typical Residential Area Cost/Benefit Analysis (Continued) Capital Cost of reclaimed water system $2.4 M Pipe extensions and meters $ 0.4 M Pro rated share (HLD Treatment Costs)$ 0.3 M Less Cost avoidance of potable trt. $ 0.3 M Net Capital Cost $ 2.8 M Capital Cost/home ($2.8M/480 homes) $5,833/home

Operating Revenue & Expense Analysis for Typical Residential Area Irrigational reuse revenue $3.34/1000 The potable water charge $3.34/1000 The wastewater charge $3.39/1000 Alt. Water Supply Savings $1.40/1000 Treat/pump water for irrigation $0.50/1000 Total Expense/residential unit $2.49/1000 Total annual expense per unit $59.76

Residential Reuse Payback Period Calculation for Reuse Estimated cost to connect a single existing home to irrigational reuse = ($5,833/home) Estimated Annual Operating Revenue/(Expense) per home from irrigational Reuse = ($59.76) Payback Period (Years): No payback possible

Conclusions Reuse in existing residential areas can be installed, but there is no payback possible Application of reuse near water and wastewater plants and well fields maximizes potential for replacing potable water demands on BA

Cost-Benefit Analysis for Large Site Reuse Average Reuse demand = 2 MGD (2,000 Tgal, Avg.) Presuming a reuse commodity charge of $0.85/1000 gals Estimated net revenue = 0.85 + 1.40 - 0.50 = $1.75/1000 gals Reuse revenue = $1.75 x 2,000 Tgal = $3,500/day Revenue per customer = $3,500/40 custom. = $87.50/day Annual Revenue per customer = $87.50 x 365 = $31,938/yr Capital Cost for reuse = ($15.79M) Plant + ($32.75M) Piping - $19.68M (avoided cost for RO Plant) + ($0.080M) meters = 28.94 $28.94M/40 customers = $723,500/customer Payback = $721,679/$31,938/year = 22.6 Years

Current Status of Reuse Program New Sawgrass Reuse Plant soon under construction adding 4 MGD (HLD) Reuse capacity (max). Sawgrass HLD Plant Improvements scheduled for completion in 2018 Southwest HLD nearly complete (0.99 MGD) Distribution System projects currently slated to serve larger users in vicinity of plant wellfields, such as golf courses, parks, commercial properties Initial Phase of distribution system to be completed in 2018.

Q&A

SFWMD Limiting Conditions

Cost/Benefit Analysis (Continued) Residential Capital Cost Analysis (Continued) Estimated cost for reuse treatment and pumping systems at the wastewater treatment plant is ($253,172) for this amount of demand Cost avoidance or savings for additional potable water treatment relative to reduced demand at WTP estimated at $315,616

Cost/Benefit Analysis (Continued) Capital Cost Analysis (Continued) Resulting cost for service = ($2,400,000) + ($335,280) + ($72,000) + ($253,172) - $315,616 = $2,744,836 $2,744,836/480 homes = $5,718.41 cost to connect (each)

Operating Revenue and Expense Analysis (Continued) Cost saved by avoiding Alternative Water Supply Treatment and Delivery is $1.40/Tgal Estimated Additional cost to treat and pump reclaimed water for irrigation purposes is ($0.50/Tgal) Estimated operating revenue/(expense) per Tgal for residential reuse = 3.34 - 3.34 - 3.39 + 1.40 – 0.50 = ($2.49)

Operating Revenue and Expense Analysis (Continued) Annual Irrigational Reuse Consumption per Home (Tgal) = 24 units Estimated annual Operating Revenue/(Expense) per home from Irrigational Reuse = ($2.49) x 24 = ($59.76)