Seven Utilization Lessons

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Delivering as One UN Albania October 2009 – Kigali.
Advertisements

Co-ordination of multi-site evaluations: design, support for execution, QA and synthesis in the Paris Declaration Evaluation Bernard Wood and Julia Betts,
Yvonne Belanger, Duke University Library Assessment Conference
Measuring Value: Using Program Evaluation to Understand What’s Working -- Or Isn’t Juliana M. Blome, Ph.D. , MPH Office of Program Analysis and Evaluation.
What You Will Learn From These Sessions
Ownership, Dialogue and Conditionality Richard Batley May 2006.
Lesson 2: Project: Evaluation, Monitoring, Auditing Macerata, 22 nd October Alessandro Valenza, Director, t33 srl.
Types of Evaluation – For whom and why? Instrumental use – input decision making Instrumental use – input decision making Conceptual – deeper understanding,
Globalizing Information: Persistent Organic Pollutants from Regional to Global Arenas Noelle Eckley 6 October 2001 Open Meeting of the Global Environmental.
Objectives for Session Nine Observation Techniques Participatory Methods in Tanzania Hand back memos.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Designing Influential Evaluations Session 2 Topics & Timing Uganda Evaluation Week - Pre-Conference Workshop 19 th and 20 th May 2014.
Factors that Influence Evaluation Utilisation. Theoretical Perspectives Michael Quinn Patton’s ‘Utilisation Focused Evaluation’ Addresses issue of use.
Negotiating Diverse Contexts and Expectations in Stakeholder Engagement Sue Lin Yee, MA, MPH National Center for Injury Prevention and Control Office of.
PROGRAM EVALUATION Amanda Valbuena Evaluator, CFEP.
Strengthening the quality of research for policy engagement in the African context – achievements and aspirations Tebogo B. Seleka Botswana Institute for.
Capacity Building for Better Agricultural Statistics Misha Belkindas and Graham Eele Development Data Group, World Bank.
Independent Office of Evaluation Evaluation synthesis IFAD’s engagement with indigenous peoples Emerging findings and key issues for reflection Emerging.
MECOVI Program for Statistical Capacity Building in Latin America:** Lessons for Developing Capacity Building Programs Elsewhere 25-27, 2002 February.
INTRODUCTION TO UTILIZATION FOCUSED EVALUATION SLEVA Colombo June 6, 2011 Facilitators: Sonal Zaveri Chelladurai Solomon IDRC Consultants Assisted by Nilusha.
IAOD Evaluation Seminar “Demystifying Evaluation in WIPO- Best Practices from Initial Evaluations” Geneva November, Evaluation Section Internal.
Roundtable #4 Democratic ownership: Managing for Development results and Mutual Accountability.
IAOD Evaluation Section, the Development Agenda (DA) and Development Oriented Activities Julia Flores Marfetan, Senior Evaluator.
Aid for Development Effectiveness -Managing for Development Results- Terence D. Jones UNDP Third International Roundtable Managing for Development Results.
Evaluating Effectiveness To what effect? Joanne Sharpe, Office of Development Effectiveness, AusAID.
Monitoring & Evaluation Presentation for Technical Assistance Unit, National Treasury 19 August 2004 Fia van Rensburg.
EVAL 6000: Foundations of Evaluation Dr. Chris L. S. Coryn Nick Saxton Fall 2014.
Neal D. Kohatsu, MD, MPH Medical Director May 17, 2012 Evaluation and Quality Improvement.
Presented by CIDA on behalf of the Task Team on Multilateral Effectiveness.
International Health Policy Program -Thailand Reflection on experience in using JANS with sector strategy Phusit Prakongsai, MD. Ph.D. International Health.
Indicators Workshop South Africa PARIS21 Consortium April 2002.
The Major Steps of a Public Health Evaluation 1. Engage Stakeholders 2. Describe the program 3. Focus on the evaluation design 4. Gather credible evidence.
DAC Evaluation Quality Standards Workshop, Auckland 6/2 & 7/ Evaluation quality standards in Dutch Development Cooperation Ted Kliest Policy and.
Evaluation Unit EuropeAid Martyn Pennington Head of Evaluation Unit- Devco B2 Workshop on Lessons Learned from International Joint Evaluations French Ministry.
Copyright © 2014 by The University of Kansas A Framework for Program Evaluation.
© 2002, CARE USA. All rights reserved. Applying Quality Standards in Impact Evaluation: Case of CARE Program Quality Framework and Evaluation Policy Ahmed.
Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher
Vito Cistulli - FAO -1 Damascus, 2 July 2008 FAO Assistance to Member Countries and the Changing Aid Environment.
Independent Office of Evaluation IFAD’s Approach to Evaluation of Agriculture programmes Presentation at ECD Workshop, Addis Ababa, 6 November 2015.
Reflections on Country-led Evaluation Roger Slade from the IDEAS workshop on Practical Experience of CLE in the Central and Eastern European Region June.
1 Evaluation Utilization: the case of the Paris Evaluation (Phase 1) and its use in the Accra HLF3 process Paris Evaluation Phase 2 Planning Meeting, Feb.
KPCF Learning Collaborative: Catapult for creating more impactful social change.
Skills Building Workshop on Poverty and Social Impact Analysis (PSIA) Atelier de renforcement des capacités en Analyse de l’Impact sur la Pauvreté et la.
Making Evaluation Work for Effective Policy Reform and Revision Chris Nelson, Director, Quality and Performance Systems Branch Sophie Davies, Manager Evaluations.
Unit 9: Evaluating a Public Health Surveillance System #1-9-1.
LEARNING TARGET: I CAN EXPLAIN THE SIGNIFICANCE AND THE IMPACT OF THE TREATY OF PARIS.
Program Evaluation Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines
1 March 2006 Aline Coudouel Poverty Reduction & Economic Management The World Bank Poverty and Social Impact Analysis in the World Bank.
Clarifying the Evaluation Focus in a Complex Program Context Howard Kress, PhD* Natalie Brown, MPH** *Battelle Memorial Institute, with National Center.
Participatory Evaluation The Fieldworx Way Eleesa Johnstone.
THE PARIS DECLARATION and DAC EVALUATION QUALITY STANDARDS Task Team on New Context for Development Evaluation DAC EQS Workshop, Auckland, 10 February.
Country-led Joint Evaluation Dutch ORET/MILIEV Programme in China NCSTE Country-led Joint Evaluation Dutch ORET/MILIEV Programme in China Chen Zhaoying.
CONTEXT Major International Evaluations Niels Dabelstein.
Independent Evaluation Office NO ONE LEFT BEHIND March 2016 /ieoundp /UNDP_evaluation.
Research Methods Workshop
Improving development evaluation product quality in Africa: Experience from the African Development Bank Foday TURAY; James EDWIN; Mohamed MANAI Colin.
February 7, 2006 POLS Rossi & Freeman (R&F), The Social Context of Evaluation, ; & Levin (L),The Uses of Research: 3 Case Studies Note key.
Learning from evaluations
Aid for Development Effectiveness -Managing for Development Results-
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Tools for Transparency and Monitoring of Natural Resource Contracts
Nutritional Sciences to Policy Framework
Quality in Evaluation: the international development experience
A Framework for Program Evaluation
U.S. Information Quality Standards
Rachel Sturke, PhD Deputy Director and Senior Scientist
MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN THE GEF
MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN THE GEF
MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN THE GEF
MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN THE GEF
Presentation transcript:

Seven Utilization Lessons Making a difference with the evaluation – Input to policy and decision making Michael Patton, Reviewer of the PDE Paris Workshop, 6 February, 2012

Paris Workshop, 6 February, 2012 UTILIZATION LESSONS 1. Importance of being driven by attention to use, in this case, at the 4th High Level Forum. BEING UTILIZATION-FOCUSED Focusing on Intended Use by Intended Users Paris Workshop, 6 February, 2012

Paris Workshop, 6 February, 2012 UTILIZATION LESSONS 2. The relevance of the DAC standards for guiding the PDE and for the meta-evaluation. Paris Workshop, 6 February, 2012

Paris Workshop, 6 February, 2012 Use Lesson 3. The classic tension between stakeholder involvement & evaluator  independence must be skillfully managed. Paris Workshop, 6 February, 2012

Lesson # 4: A Balancing Act Manage Strength of Evidence vs. Timeliness RIGOR On Time Paris Workshop, 6 February, 2012

country-level ownership and utility the need for an international 5. Manage tensions between country-level ownership and utility versus the need for an international  synthesis Paris Workshop, 6 February, 2012

Paris Workshop, 6 February, 2012 UTILIZATION LESSONS 6. There were significant impacts of being involved in the evaluation process for those countries, donors, and participants involved: Process Use. Paris Workshop, 6 February, 2012

Paris Workshop, 6 February, 2012 Use Lesson 7: Independently Evaluate the Evaluation to Enhance Credibility Paris Workshop, 6 February, 2012