Long Noncoding RNAs with Enhancer-like Function in Human Cells

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Advertisements

Microprocessor Activity Controls Differential miRNA Biogenesis In Vivo
Crucial Roles of MZF1 and Sp1 in the Transcriptional Regulation of the Peptidylarginine Deiminase Type I Gene (PADI1) in Human Keratinocytes  Sijun Dong,
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (April 2013)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (April 2018)
Volume 38, Issue 4, Pages (May 2010)
High-Resolution Profiling of Histone Methylations in the Human Genome
Volume 11, Issue 2, Pages (August 2012)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Steven J. Petesch, John T. Lis  Cell 
Volume 54, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
RNA Exosome Depletion Reveals Transcription Upstream of Active Human Promoters by Pascal Preker, Jesper Nielsen, Susanne Kammler, Søren Lykke-Andersen,
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages (October 2009)
Volume 129, Issue 3, Pages (May 2007)
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages (December 2004)
Rose-Anne Romano, Barbara Birkaya, Satrajit Sinha 
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (May 2016)
Human Senataxin Resolves RNA/DNA Hybrids Formed at Transcriptional Pause Sites to Promote Xrn2-Dependent Termination  Konstantina Skourti-Stathaki, Nicholas J.
MYO5A Gene Is a Target of MITF in Melanocytes
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
Volume 23, Issue 5, Pages (May 2018)
Nucleosome-Driven Transcription Factor Binding and Gene Regulation
Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-α Is a Functional Target of p63 in Adult Human Keratinocytes  Silvia Pozzi, Michael Boergesen, Satrajit Sinha,
MiR-34a contributes to megakaryocytic differentiation of K562 cells independently of p53 by Francisco Navarro, David Gutman, Eti Meire, Mario Cáceres,
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
Edwards Allen, Zhixin Xie, Adam M. Gustafson, James C. Carrington  Cell 
Volume 43, Issue 5, Pages (September 2011)
Volume 18, Issue 2, Pages (April 2005)
Regulation of α-Synuclein Expression by Poly (ADP Ribose) Polymerase-1 (PARP-1) Binding to the NACP-Rep1 Polymorphic Site Upstream of the SNCA Gene  Ornit.
Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
High-Resolution Profiling of Histone Methylations in the Human Genome
Direct Interactions of OCA-B and TFII-I Regulate Immunoglobulin Heavy-Chain Gene Transcription by Facilitating Enhancer-Promoter Communication  Xiaodi.
Cell-Type-Specific Control of Enhancer Activity by H3K9 Trimethylation
Minchul Kim, Taekhoon Kim, Randy L. Johnson, Dae-Sik Lim  Cell Reports 
Daniel F. Tardiff, Scott A. Lacadie, Michael Rosbash  Molecular Cell 
Volume 16, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 67, Issue 6, Pages e6 (September 2017)
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (February 2015)
FOXO3a Is Activated in Response to Hypoxic Stress and Inhibits HIF1-Induced Apoptosis via Regulation of CITED2  Walbert J. Bakker, Isaac S. Harris, Tak.
Defining the CREB Regulon
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 44, Issue 3, Pages (November 2011)
Volume 9, Issue 5, Pages (November 2017)
Volume 5, Issue 5, Pages (November 2015)
ADAR Regulates RNA Editing, Transcript Stability, and Gene Expression
Codependent Activators Direct Myoblast-Specific MyoD Transcription
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages (November 2017)
Xudong Wu, Jens Vilstrup Johansen, Kristian Helin  Molecular Cell 
Regulation of the Expression of Peptidylarginine Deiminase Type II Gene (PADI2) in Human Keratinocytes Involves Sp1 and Sp3 Transcription Factors  Sijun.
Human Telomerase RNA Processing and Quality Control
H2B Ubiquitylation Promotes RNA Pol II Processivity via PAF1 and pTEFb
RNA Polymerase II Activity of Type 3 Pol III Promoters
Volume 5, Issue 6, Pages (December 2015)
Amanda O'Donnell, Shen-Hsi Yang, Andrew D. Sharrocks  Molecular Cell 
Transcriptional Regulation of Adipogenesis by KLF4
Volume 32, Issue 5, Pages (May 2010)
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (September 2007)
Hua Gao, Yue Sun, Yalan Wu, Bing Luan, Yaya Wang, Bin Qu, Gang Pei 
Ulf Andersson Ørom, Finn Cilius Nielsen, Anders H. Lund  Molecular Cell 
Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages (March 2016)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (October 2016)
A Role for Mammalian Sin3 in Permanent Gene Silencing
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 2, Issue 4, Pages (October 2012)
Genome-wide Functional Analysis Reveals Factors Needed at the Transition Steps of Induced Reprogramming  Chao-Shun Yang, Kung-Yen Chang, Tariq M. Rana 
A Splicing-Independent Function of SF2/ASF in MicroRNA Processing
Presentation transcript:

Long Noncoding RNAs with Enhancer-like Function in Human Cells Ulf Andersson Ørom, Thomas Derrien, Malte Beringer, Kiranmai Gumireddy, Alessandro Gardini, Giovanni Bussotti, Fan Lai, Matthias Zytnicki, Cedric Notredame, Qihong Huang, Roderic Guigo, Ramin Shiekhattar  Cell  Volume 143, Issue 1, Pages 46-58 (October 2010) DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.001 Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Cell 2010 143, 46-58DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.001) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Identification of Novel Long ncRNAs in Human Annotated by GENCODE (A) Analysis of coding potential using Gene ID for ancestral repeats (AR), long ncRNAs annotated by GENCODE and protein-coding genes. (B) Conservation of the genomic transcript sequences for AR, long ncRNAs, protein-coding genes, and (C) of their promoters. (D) Expression analysis of 3,019 long ncRNA in human fibroblasts, HeLa cells and primary human keratinocytes, showing numbers for transcripts detected in each cell line and the overlaps between cell lines. All microarray experiments have been done in four replicates. See also Figure S1 and Table S1 and Table S2. Cell 2010 143, 46-58DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.001) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Long ncRNAs Display Responsiveness to Differentiation Signals in Human Primary Keratinocytes (A and B) Distribution of differentially expressed transcripts (dark colors) following TPA treatment for long ncRNAs (A), and mRNAs (B). Lighter colors show total number of transcripts, darker colors and percentage show number of differentially expressed transcripts. Bar-plots show number and fractions of transcripts induced (red) or repressed (green) at different fold-change cut-offs. (C) Gene onthology analysis of genes flanking the differentially expressed long ncRNAs (red) compared to genes flanking random positions (black). (D) Graphic representation of a locus with induction of the long ncRNA ncRNA-a1 and the adjacent ECM1 gene, with expression values from microarrays (upper panel) and qPCR quantification of transcripts (lower panel). Microarray experiments and qPCR validation are done in four replicates. Data shown are mean ± SD. See also Figure S2 and Table S3. Cell 2010 143, 46-58DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.001) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Stimulation of Gene Expression by Activating RNAs The thick black line representing each gene shows the span of the genomic region including exons and introns. The targeted activating RNAs are shown in red. Bar-plots show RNA levels as determined by qPCR. (A) ncRNA-a1 locus in HEK293 cells. (B) ncRNA-a2 locus in HeLa cells. (C) ncRNA-a3 locus in MCF-7 cells. (D) ncRNA-a4 locus in Jurkat cells. (E) ncRNA-a5 locus in HeLa cells. (F) ncRNA-a6 locus in A549 cells. All values are relative to GAPDH expression and relative to control siRNA transfected cells set to an average value of 1. The scale bar represents 100 kb and applies to all figure panels. Error bars show mean ± SEM of at least three independent experiments. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 by two-tailed Student's t test. See also Figure S3 and Table S4. The results represent at least six independent experiments. See also Figure S3 and Table S4. Cell 2010 143, 46-58DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.001) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Knockdown of ncRNA-a7 Specifically Targets Snai1 Expression (A) As in Figure 3, the ncRNA-a7 locus is depicted showing effects on RNA levels for the surrounding genes with and without knockdown of ncRNA-a7. The results represent mean ± SEM of at least six independent experiments. ∗∗p < 0.01 by one-tailed Student's t test. (B) Migration assay of A549 cells with control (right panel) or ncRNA-a7 (left panel) siRNA transfections. (C) Quantification of the data shown in (B). Experiments in (B) and (C) are done in three replicates and are shown as mean ± SEM. ∗∗∗p < 0.001 by two-tailed Student's t test. See also Figure S4 and Table S5. Cell 2010 143, 46-58DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.001) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Microarray Analysis of Snai1 and ncRNA-a7 Knockdown Snai1 or ncRNA-a7 were knocked down using siRNA in A549 cells and the isolated RNA analyzed on microarrays in duplicate experiments. (A) All genes differentially expressed (>1.5-fold or <0.6-fold compared to control) in either Snai1 or ncRNA-a7 knockdown, or both, are shown clustered in a heat map according to expression profile. Numbers are log(2) transformed and color scale is shown below the heat map. (B) Analysis of genes showing upregulation (>1.5 fold) or downregulation (<0.6 fold) in both Snai1 and ncRNA-a7 knockdown. Numbers represent number of genes regulated in the indicated condition. (C and D) (C) Validation of microarray data by qPCR and (D) analysis of the Snai1 locus and targets of Snai1 upon overexpression of ncRNA-a7. ncRNA-a7 was overexpressed from a vector in A549 cells and expression of select genes were measured by qPCR. Y-axes show expression value relative to GAPDH of the indicated gene. Values are normalized to those of control siRNA transfected cells, set to 1. ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 by one-tailed Student's t test. See also Table S6. Cell 2010 143, 46-58DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.001) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 ncRNA-Activators Potentiate Transcription of a Reporter Gene (A) ncRNA-a 3/4, 5 and 7 were cloned and inserted downstream of luciferase driven by a TK-promoter in a reporter plasmid as shown. (B) Graphical representation of the inserts in the various vectors used. The pGL3-TK-Control vector contains an insert of approximately 4 kb containing no annotated evidence of transcription. The depicted inserts show exons and transcriptional direction of the ncRNA-a. (C–E) Luciferase reporter assays. The Firefly luciferase vectors were cotransfected with a Renilla luciferase vector (pRL-TK) for transfection control. (C) The vector containing ncRNA-a3 and ncRNA-a4 from a bidirectional promoter, with control siRNA or siRNAs toward either of the two ncRNA-a, or both. (D) Reporter with ncRNA-5, and (E) the reporter with the ncRNA-a7 inserted downstream of luciferase. X axes show relative Firefly (FL) to Renilla (RL) luciferase activity. Cotransfected siRNAs are indicated to the right of the bars. All data shown are mean ± SE from six independent experiments. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001 by one-tailed Student's t test. Cell 2010 143, 46-58DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.001) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 RNA-Dependent Activation of a Reporter Gene by ncNRA-a7 (A) Properties of the ncRNA-a7 containing luciferase reporter vector. (B, C, E, and F) Luciferase reporter assays. The Firefly luciferase vectors were cotransfected with a Renilla luciferase vector (pRL-TK) for transfection control. (D) Semiquantitative PCR of ncRNA-a7. (B) Reporter experiments with the ncRNA-a7 insert reversed as indicated in the left panel. (C) The TK-promoter driving luciferase expression was deleted from the construct and expression values are shown relative to the pGL3-TK control plasmid as a reference. (E) Truncated reporter constructs containing the ncRNA-a7 promoter and downstream sequences, but not the ncRNA-a7 sequence [pGL3-TK-delta(ncRNA-a7)], or one with a poly(A) signal in the beginning of the ncRNA-a7 to induce premature polyadenylation [pGL3-TK-ncRNA-a7-p(A)]. See also (D) for analysis of expression from these plasmids. (F) Protein coding sequences were inserted in place of ncRNA-a7 downstream of the ncRNA-a7 promoter. Full-length GTSF1L or ID1 sequences are used. X axes show relative Firefly (FL) to Renilla (RL) luciferase activity. All data shown are mean ± SE from six independent experiments. ∗∗∗p < 0.001 by one-tailed Student's t test. Cell 2010 143, 46-58DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.001) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S1 Characteristics of the Long ncRNA Transcripts, Related to Figure 1 (A) Number of exons for the entire transcript and the corresponding number of transcripts shown for all 3,019 long ncRNAs and all protein-coding genes. (B and C) Analysis of histone marks H3K4 (B) or H3K36 (C) trimethylation from −1000 to +1000 from the TSS of the 3,019 long ncRNAs for the various sets shown in the legend. Data are extracted from publicly available databases (Barski et al., 2007). Cell 2010 143, 46-58DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.001) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S2 Annotated Long ncRNAs Are Independent Transcripts, Related to Figure 2 (A) PCR amplification using the primer pairs shown in the upper panel on cDNA from HEK293 cells (left panel) or human genomic DNA (right panel). (B) Analysis of the ECM1 locus upon siRNA knockdown of ECM1 using qPCR. y axis shows RNA level compared to Gapdh and normalized to control siRNA values set to an average of 1. Bars show mean ± SE of three independent experiments. (C and D) Plot showing the distance of the long ncRNAs from its nearest protein coding gene at the 5′ end (C) and the 3′ end (D). Y-axes show the distance in bp on a logarithmic scale. Numbers on X-axes represent the 3,019 long ncRNAs ordered by increasing distance to their nearest protein coding gene. Indicated are numbers of transcripts closer than 10 kb or 100 kb, respectively, to their nearest protein coding genes. Cell 2010 143, 46-58DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.001) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S3 Characterization of the Analyzed ncRNA-Activators, Related to Figure 3 (A) RACE analysis of the identified ncRNA-a using the primers indicated (left panel) for 5′ and 3′ RACE analysis (middle panel). PCR analysis of exon-exon junctions of the transcripts are shown in the right panel. Expected product size according to the HAVANA annotation is around 400 bp. The two bands that appear at a larger size (ncRNA-a3 and ncRNA-a6) were sequenced and showed different processing that annotated, as indicated above these two panels in red. (B) In vitro translation assay. Lane + is the pTRI-REF positive control, lane - is a negative control and following lanes are the indicated ncRNA-a cloned downstream of a T7 promoter and transcribed and used in a translation assay in vitro. Cell 2010 143, 46-58DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.001) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure S4 ChIP Analysis of the Analyzed ncRNA-a Loci, Related to Figure 4 (A) Pol(II) ChIP of the Snai1 locus. (B) ChIP for the analyzed ncRNA-a loci using antibodies against p300 or CBP. Y-axes show amount of material in the IP relative to the Input. Bars show mean ± SE of three independent experiments. Cell 2010 143, 46-58DOI: (10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.001) Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions