Conserving New England cottontail rabbits: What other species benefit?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
If You Build It Will They Come? Associations Between Birds and Vegetation Structure During Ten Years After Thinning Sveta Yegorova, Drs. Matt Betts, Joan.
Advertisements

LEGG PARK DOG PARK PROJECT DESIGN Prepared for: Meridian Township Parks Commission Board August 9, 2011.
APPLICATION OF LANDSCAPE-SCALE HABITAT SUITABILTY MODELS TO BIRD CONSERVATION PLANNING Frank R. Thompson III, USDA Forest Service North Central Research.
Twenty Years of Bird Monitoring and Habitat Management at Springbrook Prairie Joe Suchecki Site Steward.
Patterns and processes of recovery in and around an Indiana limestone quarry Vanessa L. Artman, Dana A. Dudle Bryan Helm, David Pope, and Aaron Randolph.
Daren Carlson – MN DNR 14 April Overview Prairie monitoring – Change analysis – Status/trend monitoring – Grassland adaptive management collaborative.
Introduction Methods Results and Conclusions References Acknowledgements Figures and Tables Table 1. Habitat suitability index for forests with different.
Assessing Structure and Composition in Remnant Grasslands: An Interagency Effort Insert Your Image Here © Insert Image Credit.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Northeast Region Talking to the Media Joint NY/New England Society of American Foresters Annual Meeting February 1, 2013.
Bunny Management is… for the birds! Shannon B. Kearney-McGee E. Hinkel 1.
Conservation of Non-breeding Crested Caracaras in Florida James F. Dwyer 1, James D. Fraser 1, and Joan L. Morrison Cheatham Hall, Department Fisheries.
Grackle Blackbird with yellow iris.. Red-winged blackbird Blackbird with red patch on wing.
Tucson’s Birds: Why Scale Matters Rachel McCaffrey.
Wind Energy Development Wildlife Issues and Concerns Wind and Prairie Task Force February 27, 2004 Edward A. Martinko State Biologist and Director Kansas.
New England Cottontail Conservation Efforts Anthony Tur US Fish and Wildlife Service New England Field Office Concord, New Hampshire.
Influence of Chinese privet (Ligustrum sinense Lour.) on floodplain productivity and regeneration Eve Brantley, Jennifer Mitchell, and B. Graeme Lockaby.
Thesis  Erin Harrington  Advisors  Bobbi Low  Phil Myers.
Example of Research Looking at Marsh Bird Density And Relationship to Vegetative Characteristics Upland Habitat Water Marsh.
Birds of the San Pedro. Introduction San Pedro River Drainage North running river Located mostly in SE Arizona Only river that has not been dammed in.
Watershed Approach to Forest Conservation by The Center for Watershed Protection
WALLACE RESOURCE LIBRARY Module 02 – Survey Techniques: D03 – Comparison of bird survey techniques WALLACE RESOURCE LIBRARY Module 02 – Survey Techniques:
UTCFWRU Landscape dynamics of bird and small mammal communities in sagebrush-dominated mountain meadows: A hierarchical, multi- scale study Elizabeth J.
The Relationship Between Hemosporidian Parasites and Song Sparrows (Melospiza melodia) Along an Urban Gradient ABSTRACT Humans turn natural landscapes.
Wyoming Landscape Conservation Initiative An Approach to Landscape Scale Conservation in Southwest Wyoming October 23, 2014.
Using Birds to Guide Post-fire Management in the Plumas & Lassen National Forests Ryan D. Burnett, Nathaniel Seavy, and Diana Humple 4/21/2011.
Lewis River Wildlife Habitat Management Program February 20, 2008.
Young Forest Initiative
Planning for the expansion of biomass production in the Midwest: Remaining wildlife neutral JoAnn Hanowski Natural Resources Research Institute University.
Tree invasion on reclaimed anthracite surface mines in Pennsylvania: Reevaluating inhibition Klemow, K.M., R. Klemish, M. Petras, R. Ali, J. Keller, R.
Composition of the Songbird Community at the DePauw Nature Park and Arboretum Libby Allard, V. Artman, K. Reed, K. Koehler, Department of Biology, DePauw.
Floating Habitat Island for Salt Marsh-Nesting Birds Bri Benvenuti 1, Adrienne Kovach 1, David M. Burdick 1, Jonathan B. Cohen 2, Chris S. Elphick 3, Thomas.
Effects of Selected Forest Management Practices on Forest Birds in Missouri Oak-Hickory Forests.
Birds on the Edge Forest edge effects on bird assemblage size and composition in the Chuckanut Mountains Drew Schwitters Department of Environmental Sciences,
Evaluating Genetic Diversity Between Populations of New England Cottontail (Sylvilagus transitionalis) and Eastern Cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) Tricia.
Breeding Bird Response to Riparian Buffer Width 10 years post-harvest Scott Pearson Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife Jack Giovanini, Jay Jones,
Beneficial Management Practices for Saskatchewan Species at Risk: Greater Sage-grouse Endangered.
The Nature Conservancy: A Pilot Season for Cooperative Grassland Monitoring Meredith Cornett Director of Conservation Science The Nature Conservancy Minnesota,
Response of Birds to Vegetation, Habitat Characteristics, and Landscape Features in Restored Marshes Mark Herzog 1, Diana Stralberg 1, Nadav Nur 1, Karin.
The Great Lakes Binational Marsh Monitoring Program: The Role of Volunteer Participants Steve Timmermans Joel Ingram.
Introduction Limited knowledge of these species: – Yellow Rail – Nelson’s Sparrow – Le Conte’s Sparrow.
ALEX CAVACAS, BRANDON CHATFIELD, KEVIN CHEN, AND STEVEN MEIGS The Effect of Berberis.
1 Occupancy models extension: Species Co-occurrence.
 DNA was extracted from New England cottontail fecal pellets 1 using a QiAmp DNeasy Stool Kit (Qiagen) Genetic Structure of an Isolated New England Cottontail.
Birds of Appoquinimink High Biodiversity Study. American Robin
The Sage-Grouse Plan Tripp Parks Policy Analyst. GREATER SAGE-GROUSE The Greater Sage-Grouse (GrSG) is a large ground-dwelling bird that inhabits 186.
References. Methods Results We conducted avian point counts at pre-established points (created by USFWS within the Whittlsey Creek Watershed in the
5th Grade Sloan Elementary
The Second Colorado Breeding Bird Atlas – Species
Biodiversity Study of the Headwaters of the San Antonio River
Prioritizing Species for Biological Planning in the North Atlantic Landscape Conservation Cooperative (NALCC) USFWS Region 5 Strategic Habitat Conservation.
Heterospecific Attraction in Grassland Birds: Who’s Listening to Whom
Sagebrush Conservation Strategy Workshop
Foresters for the Birds
Christopher Nagy, Mianus River Gorge; Bedford, NY
Identification of Restoration Sites for  a Fire-dependent Bird in an Urbanizing Environment Bradley A. Pickens North Carolina Cooperative Fish and Wildlife.
Birds provide insight for stewardship of urban riparian areas
Golden-cheeked Warbler Population Viability and Habitat Suitability
FIRES IN RIPARIAN AREAS AND WETLANDS
Robert Lafreniere1,2, Alyson Eberhardt2,3
A Comparison of Riparian Vegetation Structures
Patterns of Succession
Eight bird species of Wascana MAPS
Birds AP Biology.
Analysis to Inform Management
Objectives and Challenges of Goal-oriented Landscape Design
Jeff Walters - Virginia Tech
Springsnail Conservation in Nevada and the Great Basin
Robert Lafreniere1,2, Alyson Eberhardt2,3
Eco-Meet 2013 Songbirds.
Massachusetts Foresters for the Birds
Presentation transcript:

Conserving New England cottontail rabbits: What other species benefit? Melissa L. Bauer1, Kathleen M. O’Brien2, Adrienne I. Kovach1 1Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of New Hampshire; 2U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service BACKGROUND Habitat covariates at cottontail sites influence shrubland bird occupancy Species that rely on shrubland habitat are declining throughout the Northeast due to habitat loss and fragmentation from development, succession, and restriction of natural disturbances. Species of particular conservation concern include shrubland birds and the New England cottontail. Each species’ specific habitat associations influence how they will fit into landscape-level management in the Northeast. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service facilitates efficient conservation design for multiple species through representative species designations. The goal of this study was to assess the value of habitat management for the New England cottontail as representative of conservation design for shrubland bird specialists. This research identifies shrubland bird species that will benefit from restoration that improves and increases habitat for New England cottontails. RESULTS Tables 1-5 Supported occupancy models (≤ 2 AICc), from multi-stage modeling with vegetation structure + patch-level + non-living structure habitat covariate groups. Table 6 Covariates, by group, tested in a 3-stage occupancy modeling process. Table 1 Chestnut-sided Warbler. Riparian shrub. Table 4 Black-and-white Warbler. Table 2 Yellow Warbler. Table 5 Eastern Towhee. Table 3 Prairie Warbler. OBJECTIVES Determine habitat and patch-level influences on shrubland bird occupancy at sites occupied by or managed for New England cottontails. Identify shrubland bird specialists that are indicative of the specific habitats required by New England cottontails. We found significant relationships between occupancy of shrubland specialist birds and vegetation structure, patch-level habitat attributes, and non-living structure habitat attributes. Yellow Warblers and Prairie Warblers showed higher occupancy at sites suitable for New England cottontail. Yellow Warblers occupied sites with high stem densities and Prairie Warblers occupied sites with dense vegetation between 2 and 3 m. Fig. 1 Coastal shrub habitat at Crescent Beach State Park in Maine. Table 8 GLM Poisson regression models assessing relationships between measured covariates and shrubland bird specialist richness. Specialist birds are indicative of habitats required by New England cottontails RESULTS METHODS Table 7 Results of indicator species analyses identifying shrubland specialist birds detected with high frequency and exclusivity in habitat suitable for New England cottontails (p<0.05). FIELD: Point counts were conducted 3 times per season and vegetation data were collected at 44 points in 2015 and 66 points in 2016 in Maine, New Hampshire, and on Cape Cod. ANALYSIS: Occupancy models were developed in PRESENCE to identify habitat covariates influencing occupancy of shrubland specialist birds with sufficient data, including: Chestnut-sided Warblers, Yellow Warblers, Black-and-white Warblers, Prairie Warblers, and Eastern Towhees. Indicator species analyses identified bird species detected with high frequency and exclusivity in habitat suitable for New England cottontails, and shrubland bird species richness was compared across sites. Indicator species analyses identified 10 species (p<0.05) that occurred with high frequency and exclusivity in habitat suitable for New England cottontails. Shrubland bird specialist richness was positively associated with proportion of woody invasives (χ2=16.42, GLM, p<0.001) and vegetation hits from 0 to 1 m (χ2=8.46, GLM, p<0.01). CONCLUSION AND MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS Fig. 2 Point count locations in a) southern Maine and seacoast New Hampshire, and b) Massachusetts on Cape Cod. Our findings support the notion that the New England cottontail serves an indicator species role for shrubland habitat management. Ten species of shrubland specialist birds are associated with sites that have been occupied by New England cottontails within the past 5 years, or sites with habitat that could support, and is being managed for New England cottontails. Of these 10 specialist birds, 8 are listed as Species of Greatest Conservation Need. Creating shrub habitat for cottontails with ≥ 20,000 stems per acre and an understory height of ≥ 1.5 m for cottontails will benefit specialist birds including Yellow Warblers, Prairie Warblers, Blue-winged Warblers, Song Sparrows, Indigo Buntings, and Gray Catbirds. Designating the New England cottontail a representative species is an efficient conservation strategy for the management of multiple shrubland habitat specialists. Yellow Warbler Prairie Warbler Blue-winged Warbler Song Sparrow Indigo Bunting Gray Catbird Alder Flycatcher Field Sparrow Brown Thrasher American Goldfinch Acknowledgments Partners: Eileen McGourty, Nancy Pau 2015 Point Counts: Logan Maxwell Image Credits: K. Boland, G. Bartley, L. Elliot Funding: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, NH Agricultural Experiment Station