AGA Gastroenterology Training Exam (GTE): A Progress Report Gregory S. Sayuk, Ikuo Hirano, James T. Fitzgerald, R. Brent Stansfield, Betty A. Armbruster, Tamara N. Jones, Joy Akinyi, Charles E. Willis Gastroenterology Volume 142, Issue 2, Pages 201-204.e2 (February 2012) DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.12.022 Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions
Figure 1 Numbers of gastroenterology training programs and GI fellows participating in the GTE training exam by year. Gastroenterology 2012 142, 201-204.e2DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2011.12.022) Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions
Figure 2 Responses of GI fellows (n = 303/1160) on the 2011 GTE postexam survey and Training Director GTE surveys (n = 66/160). Percent responses shown reflect sum affirmative responses of ≥4 on a 5-point Likert scale (‘Effective’/‘very effective’ or ‘well’/‘very well’ except where otherwise indicated). Gastroenterology 2012 142, 201-204.e2DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2011.12.022) Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions
Supplementary Figure 1 Sample GTE scoring report. Sample trainee scoring report, which highlights for the fellow his or her percentage correct responses in each area of gastroenterology, as well as national averages on each area. Also provided to the fellow are the learning objectives for each question answered incorrectly (not shown). Gastroenterology 2012 142, 201-204.e2DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2011.12.022) Copyright © 2012 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions