Structural Basis for Guanine Nucleotide Exchange on Ran by the Regulator of Chromosome Condensation (RCC1)  Louis Renault, Jürgen Kuhlmann, Andreas Henkel,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Advertisements

Luke D Sherlin, John J Perona  Structure 
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Volume 121, Issue 4, Pages (May 2005)
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages (July 2002)
Volume 127, Issue 5, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Structure and Protein Design of a Human Platelet Function Inhibitor
Jue Chen, Gang Lu, Jeffrey Lin, Amy L Davidson, Florante A Quiocho 
Structure of the Rab7:REP-1 Complex
Volume 17, Issue 11, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Xiaojing He, Yi-Chun Kuo, Tyler J. Rosche, Xuewu Zhang  Structure 
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Yvonne Groemping, Karine Lapouge, Stephen J. Smerdon, Katrin Rittinger 
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages (September 2014)
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 109, Issue 4, Pages (May 2002)
Joseph D. Mancias, Jonathan Goldberg  Molecular Cell 
Crystal Structure of ARF1•Sec7 Complexed with Brefeldin A and Its Implications for the Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Mechanism  Elena Mossessova, Richard.
Choel Kim, Cecilia Y. Cheng, S. Adrian Saldanha, Susan S. Taylor  Cell 
Structural Basis of DNA Loop Recognition by Endonuclease V
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Crystal Structure of PMM/PGM
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Structure of the Yeast Hst2 Protein Deacetylase in Ternary Complex with 2′-O-Acetyl ADP Ribose and Histone Peptide  Kehao Zhao, Xiaomei Chai, Ronen Marmorstein 
Crystal Structure of a Y-Family DNA Polymerase in Action
Volume 4, Issue 11, Pages (November 1996)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Volume 37, Issue 2, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 129, Issue 5, Pages (June 2007)
Elizabeth J. Little, Andrea C. Babic, Nancy C. Horton  Structure 
Computational Modeling Reveals that Signaling Lipids Modulate the Orientation of K- Ras4A at the Membrane Reflecting Protein Topology  Zhen-Lu Li, Matthias.
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages (April 2008)
Structure, Exchange Determinants, and Family-Wide Rab Specificity of the Tandem Helical Bundle and Vps9 Domains of Rabex-5  Anna Delprato, Eric Merithew,
Structural View of the Ran–Importin β Interaction at 2.3 Å Resolution
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages (December 1998)
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages (April 2015)
Crystal Structure of the DegS Stress Sensor
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Microtubule Interaction Site of the Kinesin Motor
Masaru Goto, Rie Omi, Noriko Nakagawa, Ikuko Miyahara, Ken Hirotsu 
Structural Basis of Rab Effector Specificity
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (May 1996)
Structure of the Rho Family GTP-Binding Protein Cdc42 in Complex with the Multifunctional Regulator RhoGDI  Gregory R. Hoffman, Nicolas Nassar, Richard.
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 127, Issue 2, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 91, Issue 5, Pages (November 1997)
Jue Wang, Jia-Wei Wu, Zhi-Xin Wang  Structure 
Crystal Structure of a Procaspase-7 Zymogen
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages (January 2012)
Structure of a HoxB1–Pbx1 Heterodimer Bound to DNA
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 127, Issue 7, Pages (December 2006)
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (February 2014)
Structural and Biochemical Analysis of the Obg GTP Binding Protein
Sabine Pokutta, William I. Weis  Molecular Cell 
Structural Basis for Activation of ARF GTPase
Structure of GABARAP in Two Conformations
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (September 2004)
Presentation transcript:

Structural Basis for Guanine Nucleotide Exchange on Ran by the Regulator of Chromosome Condensation (RCC1)  Louis Renault, Jürgen Kuhlmann, Andreas Henkel, Alfred Wittinghofer  Cell  Volume 105, Issue 2, Pages 245-255 (April 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00315-4

Figure 1 Overall View of the Ran•RCC1 complex (A) Ribbon diagram with RCC1 in gray and the β wedge in green. Ran is yellow, with its switch I and II in light and dark blue, respectively, P loop in violet, and base binding motifs (122NKxD and 149SAK) in black. The anion is green-red; nucleotide is not present but its virtual position in Ran•GDP is indicated as a dotted ball-and-stick model. (B) Electron density simulated-annealing omit map, contoured at 1.1 sigma, of the active site region with the model as ball-and-stick. Green: RCC1, violet: Ran, and polyanion: yellow-red. The coordination (cutoff distance of 3.25 Å) of the polyanion with the P loop is shown by black dotted lines Cell 2001 105, 245-255DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00315-4)

Figure 2 Structural Changes in Ran on Complex Formation (A) Superimposition of Ran•GDP (red) with Ran from the Ran•RCC1 complex (yellow). RCC1 is as in Figure 1. (B) Superimposition of Ran from the complex with Ran•GppNHp (green) on the left, and with Ran from the Ran•GppNHp•RanBD complex on the right, indicating that RCC1 and RanBD (red) can bind simultaneously. (C) Rms deviation plot of Ran (complex 1) against Ran (complex 2) from the Ran•RCC1 complexes (black), Ran from Ran•GDP (red) and Ran•GppNHp from the complex with RanBD1 (green). Gray diamonds on the X axis define Ran residues contacting RCC1 (cutoff distance 3.5 Å) Cell 2001 105, 245-255DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00315-4)

Figure 3 Contact Residues in the Complex Contacting residues (distance cutoff of 3.5 Å) of Ran (A) and RCC1 (B) are shown as balls, black in the case of Ran; colored for RCC1 with a color code indicating the region of interaction of Ran as in Figure 1. Interacting residues of RCC1 are listed with their Ran contact partners (underneath). The virtual position of the nucleotide is indicated Cell 2001 105, 245-255DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00315-4)

Figure 4 Details from the Ran•RCC1 Interaction (A) The β wedge and the rearrangement of Switch II induce a P loop shift supported by α3, coloring as in Figure 2A. The Glu70R side from Ran•GDP structure (red) is reoriented (black arrow) toward the helix α3, where steric clash (red star) induces a 180° flip of the Trp104R side chain such that its ring nitrogen atom interacts with the carboxylate, which is further stabilized by numerous contacts. The new position of Trp104R brings it too close to Asp18R of the P loop. This, together with the action of the β wedge, induces the P loop to move by 1.3 Å. The lower part of (A) has been created by a 90° rotation as indicated. (B) The base binding site of Ran in Ran•GDP (red) and the Ran•RCC1 complex (yellow), shown on the van der Waals surface of RCC1. The interaction of residues from α3 such as Lys99 contribute to tight binding with RCC1, while the clashes with α4 residues such as Lys130R and the 1.3 Å move of the nucleotide induce movement of Asp125R, an important element for interaction with the guanine base. It also leads to clashes with the C terminus of Ran and induces it to be released from the surface of the G domain Cell 2001 105, 245-255DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00315-4)

Figure 5 Influence of Polyanions on the Ran/RCC1 Reaction (A and B) Fluorescence measurements on the effect of polyanions on the (A) overall rates of RCC1 catalyzed nucleotide exchange with 200 nM Ran•mGDP, 1 μM RCC1, and 40 μM GDP or (B) the dissociation of 200 nM Ran•RCC1 with 200 nM mGDP in an APP stopped-flow apparatus, at 20°C. (C) Dissociation of the GST-Ran•RCC1 complex in a BIAcore™ during incubation in control buffer (“X”s), in the presence of 20 mM sodium sulfate (triangles) or 20 mM potassium phosphate (squares) and 100 mM NaCl (diamonds). All lanes were adjusted for the same SPR signal upon start of buffer injection Cell 2001 105, 245-255DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00315-4)

Figure 6 Toward a Unified Mechanism for GEF action on GTP Binding Proteins (A) Superimposition of switch II and P loop from the Ras•Sos, Arf•Sec7, EF-Tu•EF-Ts, and Rac•Tiam complexes with those from Ran•GDP and Ran•RCC1, with the indicated colors. Whereas the P loop is unavailable for nucleotide binding in the first three complexes and modified in the fourth, it is translocated sideways as a rigid body by 1.3 Å in Ran•RCC1 while leaving its structure intact. The positions of acidic residues which contact the P loop lysine (shown only for Lys23 of Ran) in the binary G protein•GEF complexes and in Ran•GDP are indicated. (B) Stopped-flow kinetic analysis, using 0.2 μM wt (open circles) or E70A mutant (closed circles), Ran•mGDP, and increasing concentrations of RCC1 as indicated, and measuring the release of mGDP in the presence of excess unlabeled GDP. The rate constants are analyzed as single exponentials and plotted as indicated Cell 2001 105, 245-255DOI: (10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00315-4)