Logical Fallacies Introduction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Logical Fallacies
Advertisements

Logical Fallacies Introduction.
1 Logical Fallacies Intro to Debate and Argumentation: Snell.
Logical Fallacies Introduction. What is a logical fallacy? A fallacy is an error of reasoning. These are flawed statements that often sound true Logical.
When Claims Go Wrong Recognizing & Avoiding Logical Fallacies Kim Miller Davis.
 Read the following argument. Examine it closely. Do you think it is logically sound? Why?  [T]he acceptance of abortion does not end with the killing.
Introduction and Activities
What Are Essays? The Application of Reason. Define Rhetoric “Rhetoric is the art of persuasion. Its goal is to change people’s opinions and influence.
Logical Fallacies. Syllogism (not a fallacy) A logical argument presented in terms of two statements and a conclusion which must be true if the two statements.
Fallacies (Errors in Logic). What is a Fallacy? A Fallacy is an argument that is flawed by its very nature or structure Be aware of your opponents using.
How to avoid errors in logic
Grading Criteria for Assigment 1 Structure – –sense of time, present and past –conflict with two distinct sides –description of cause of conflict –shared.
Introduction and Activities
AP English Language and Composition
Fallacies As you write your rough draft, be careful to avoid fallacies in your reasoning.
Recognizing Fallacies From Various Sources. Fallacy Illogical statements that may sound reasonable or true but are actually deceptive and dishonest.
Rhetorical Fallacies. Slippery slope: We can’t do ________. That would lead to _______ which would lead to ________. youtube.com/ watch?v=9gJI.
Look for these in the arguments of others and avoid them in your own arguments.
LOGIC 2+2=4… right?. Logical Reasoning Statements formed from sound thinking and proof of reasoning.
Fallacy An error of reasoning based on faulty use of evidence or incorrect interpretation of facts.
Look for these in the arguments of others and avoid them in your own arguments.
Fallacies The quickest ways to lose arguments. Introduction to Logic O Argument: The assertion of a conclusion based on logical premises O Premise: Proposition.
Rhetorical Fallacies Purdue OWL.
Fallacies Mistakes in reasoning or thinking.  Occurs when a speaker makes a claim that presents a range of choices.  Writers that use either/or are.
Common Logical Fallacies Flawed Arguments. Logical Fallacies… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: – Strengthen your own.
Logical Fallacies. Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning.
Common Logical Fallacies Flawed Arguments. Logical Fallacies… Flaws in an argument Often subtle Learning to recognize these will: – Strengthen your own.
Rhetorical Fallacies A failure in reasoning that renders an argument invalid. Faulty reasoning, misleading or unsound argument.
Common Logical Fallacies
Rhetorical Devices and Fallacies
Lecture 10 - ARGUMENT.
Logical Fallacies Introduction.
Types of Fallacies Logical Fallacies (errors in reasoning), Emotional Fallacies (replacing logic with emotional manipulation), Rhetorical Fallacies (sidestepping.
Logical Fallacies.
In other words, people are lying to you ALL THE TIME…
AP Lang wk 7.2- What are FALLACIES in an argument?
Logical Fallacies.
Common Logical Fallacies
Logical fallicies By: Zeke Sloan.
Topic: Logical Fallacies Objective: I will identify various logical fallacies EQ: What are the most common logical fallacies and where do they appear?
4 The Art of Critical Reading Reading Critically Mather ▪ McCarthy
Logical Fallacies Unit 2.
Logical fallacies.
Common Logical Fallacies
More on Argument.
Logical Fallacies.
Common Logical Fallacies
Logical Fallacies, Ch 6, RRW
Logical Fallacy Notes Comp. & Rhet. ENG 1010.
Writing the Argumentative Essay
Looking for false logic in someone’s argument
A Guide to Logical Fallacies
Beginning to 3:27. Beginning to 3:27 What is a logical fallacy?
Chapter 14: Argumentation
Logical Fallacy Study Guide
A fallacy in logical argumentation Or An error in reasoning
Introduction and Activities
More on Argument.
Fallacious Reasoning a.k.a. Fallacy.
(upload to dropbox in Blackboard)
Logical Fallacies Intro to Debate and Argumentation: Snell
Logical Fallacies Introduction.
Chapter 6 Reasoning Errors
Logical Fallacies Introduction.
Common Logical Fallacies
Introduction and Activities
Logical fallacies.
Logical Fallacies English III.
1. Could I receive an A for this class
Logical Fallacies Introduction.
Presentation transcript:

Logical Fallacies Introduction

What is a logical fallacy? A fallacy is an error of reasoning. These are flawed statements that often sound true Logical fallacies are often used to strengthen an argument, but if the reader detects them the argument can backfire, and damage the writer’s credibility

Why study logical fallacies? It is important to develop logical fallacy detection skills in your own writing, as well as others’. Think of this as “intellectual kung-fu: the art of intellectual self defense.” (Logical Fallacies Handlist)

Types of Logical Fallacies The following slides will briefly explain 15 fallacious arguments.

Types of Logical Fallacies 1. “Bandwagon Approach” - All Republicans MUST support the Republican President (or all Democrats MUST hate the Republican President) - ”1500 innocent children ripped from their mothers’ arms at our border. Lost in Trump’s “system”. Give us your tired, your poor, your huddle masses yearning to breathe free — and we will torture them for wanting a better life. From Shining City to Evil Empire in under 500 days.” — tweet Sunday by actor Jim Carrey.

.“Slippery Slope” A fallacious argument built on the supposition that a small step will lead to a larger chain of events “If you don’t stop smoking, then you are going to start shooting heroin.” “Marijuana is the gateway drug.”

Slippery Slope, cont.

Appeals to Authority Using a celebrity or authority figure’s name to support an issue which if not really his or her expertise. “Katie Perry thinks the killer should be pardoned.” FALSE AUTHORITY . Often called.. . Using a suspicious, incredible source to defend a conclusion

Hasty Generalizations This is the chief error in reasoning! – a type of inductive reasoning – conclusions made through insufficient evidence Ex: Two black men broke into a house. Any black man seen near a house is about to break into it. - Some immigrants are trying to come in the US illegally. All immigrants from the South are criminals.

Begging the question A is true because A is true . . . “chocolate is healthy because it is good for you” You know what they said, you saw it and the leaks are absolutely real. The news is fake because so much of the news is fake. [Trump, 2/16/17]

Straw Man Misrepresent an argument to make it easier to attack (Ex: How could he possibly cheat on his taxes? He’s such a great father!)

Straw Man, con.

Appeals to Pity Appeals to Pity: appealing to someone’s emotions in order to distract them from the truth.

Ad Hominem Latin for “To the man” – pointing out a negative characteristic to support one’s argument. I just realized that if you listen to Carly Fiorina for more than ten minutes straight, you develop a massive headache. She has zero chance! Wacky @NYTimesDowd, who hardly knows me, makes up things that I never said for her boring interviews and column. A neurotic dope!

Non sequitur Conclusion doesn’t logically follow the premise (Men are human. Mary is human. Therefore, Mary is a man.) A caravan is headed towards the US. Criminals are in Caravans. Criminals are Invading the US

Cherry picking Cherry picking is also extremely common in politics. A lot of politicians use data that makes them look better like an improved economy or increased trade. This is cherry picking when the data doesn’t show the full picture, for example if the politician has manipulated the start and end dates to eliminate inconvenient data points, or if they are leaving out important context. In the 2004 election, George Bush claimed that “Kerry’s plan will raise taxes by at least $900 billion his first hundred days.” Though people found that Kerry’s health plan would cost $895 billion, they also found that after including cost-cutting measures, it would actually cost $653 billion. When listening to statistics from politicians, look for the context of the data.

14) Either/Or fallacy – aka False Dilemma 14) Either/Or fallacy – aka False Dilemma . . . “You’re either part of the solution or part of the problem”

15.) Post Hoc The arguer infers that because one event follows another, the first event must be the cause of the second event. Causation without correlation Ex: The rooster crowed, the sun came up. Therefore, the rooster made the sun come up.