SNS PPU Cryomodule End Cans

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MICE RF and Coupling Coil Module Outstanding Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 26, 2004.
Advertisements

Pipe Supports and Hangers
ATD Assembly. ATD Assembly #1 Dewar Assembly #1 Status: Dewar has been completely assembled and vacuum tested. No vacuum leaks were detected on the outer.
Mar 13, Low-energy RHIC electron Cooler (LEReC) CRYOGENICS Mar 13, 2014.
Vacuum Vessel Production Readiness Review
Spectrometer Solenoid Design and Procurement Review Steve Virostek Mike Green Mike Zisman Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE Collaboration Meeting October.
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE CM26 at Riverside California March 26, 2010.
CRYO PIPING & INTER-MODULE CONNECTIONS Yun He, Daniel Sabol, Joe Conway External Review of MLC Daniel Sabol, MLC External Review 10/3/2012.
Alignment and assembling of the cryomodule Yun He, James Sears, Matthias Liepe MLC external review October 03, 2012.
1 Cryostat assembly, integration and commissioning procedures M.Olcese Version: 07 May 2008.
MQXF Cold-mass Assembly and Cryostating H. Prin, D. Duarte Ramos, P. Ferracin, P. Fessia 4 th Joint HiLumi LHC-LARP Annual Meeting November 17-21, 2014.
26 April 2013 Immanuel Gfall (HEPHY Vienna) Belle II SVD Overview.
RADIATION SOURCE Design Review Dmitry Gudkov BE-BI-ML.
Spectrometer Solenoid: Plans to Fix Magnet 2 Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Spectrometer Solenoid Review November 18, 2009.
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Status and Schedule Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE RAL October 20, 2008.
Cold Magnetic Shield Update
SCH Controls Readiness Review- Cryostat Nov 4-5, 2015 Kurt Cantrell.
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab NFMCC at LBNL January 25, 2009.
C. Garion Presentation Outline  Overview of the inner triplet interconnections  Q1/Q2, Q2/Q3 interconnections  General view  Working conditions  Compensation.
Main features of PETS tank J. Calero, D. Carrillo, J.L. Gutiérrez, E. Rodríguez, F. Toral CERN, 17/10/2007 (I will review the present status of the PETS.
LAT Transport Container1 GLAST LAT Project8 September 2005 LAT Transport Container Design Review 8 September 2005 LAT Transport Container Design Review.
Alignment and assembling of the cryomodule Yun He, James Sears, Matthias Liepe.
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE CM25 at RAL, UK November 6, 2009.
SPHENIX MECHANICAL D. Lynch August 21, /15/2014sPHENIX Mechanical Design.
LCLS-II Prototype Cryomodule Vacuum Vessel and HGRP Tom Peterson 4 December 2014 Design Review.
CW Cryomodules for Project X Yuriy Orlov, Tom Nicol, and Tom Peterson Cryomodules for Project X, 14 June 2013Page 1.
Comments from the SNS Cryostat Design Review February 2010 Tom Peterson, Fermilab 15 February 2010.
MICE Coupling Coil Fabrication Steps to Complete Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Coupling Coil Working Group January 28, 2014 January.
LCLS-II Prototype Vacuum Vessel (VV) and Helium Gas Return Pipe (HGRP) FDR Planned Quality Control Effort (QC) Ken Premo 12/04/14.
Cryomodules Matthew Howell and Stephen Stewart Cryomodule Design Team Members.
Development of Cryo-Module Test Stand (CMTS) for Fermi Lab (R.L.Suthar, Head,CDM, BARC) Cryo-Module Test stand (CMTS) is a very sophisticated equipment.
Cryomodule Interconnect Installation Issues A Comparison of XFEL to LCLSII Karen Fant 7/29/2015.
Inner Triplet Review 1 H. Prin AT/MEL Activities on the triplets at CERN Reception and Acceptance Triplet String Assembly in Building 181 Handling and.
Prototype Cryomodule FDR Ken Premo 21 – 22 January 2015 High Power Coupler Design.
Integration of the Spectrometer Solenoid Magnets
2K Cold Box Structural Analysis
Panda Solenoid Content Interface Box Cold Mass Layout Cooling Lines
Ti/SS transitions A.Basti INFN-PISA*
Mechanical Design and Analysis of LCLS II 2 K Cold Box
2K Cold Box Structure Analysis
Update on He3 Services design since the ORNL meeting
HFM Test Station Main Cryostat
A. Vande Craen, C. Eymin, M. Moretti, D. Ramos CERN
Overview of Mechanical Design
(vertical cryostat, Gersemi)
Design of Distribution Feedbox at LHC P7
SC1R Cold Box PDR Mechanical Design
SC1R Cold Box PDR Overview
Kimberly Gonzalez United Engineering & Technology Magnet
SNS PPU Cryomodule Instrumentation
Cryomodule Assembly Plan
SNS PPU Helium Vessel Design and Assembly
CRYOMODULE FINAL ASSEMBLY
SNS PPU Cryomodule Thermal Shield
SNS PPU Cryomodule Vacuum Vessel
SNS PPU Cryomodule Space Frame
SNS PPU Cryomodule Magnetic Shields
Bunker Wall Design Wall ESS
SNS PPU Cryomodule Shipping Plans
Work Unit AIK 11.2 CDR of the CDS-SL Mechanics
Pipe fitting Threads on pipe fittings are tapered and rely on the stress generated by forcing the tapered threads of the male half of the fitting.
SNS PPU Cryomodule Instrumentation
SNS PPU Helium Vessel Design and Assembly
SNS PPU Cryomodule Space Frame
SNS PPU Cryomodule Thermal Shield & MLI
SNS PPU CRYOMODULE FDR Magnetic Shields Gary Cheng June 10, 2019.
SC1R Cold Box PDR Assembly Sequence
SNS PPU Cryomodule Design Overview
CRYOMODULE FINAL ASSEMBLY
JLAB CHL 2K COLD BOX REPLACEMENT
Presentation transcript:

SNS PPU Cryomodule End Cans SNS PPU CRYOMODULE PDR SNS PPU Cryomodule End Cans Gary Cheng Wednesday, February 27, 2019

OUTLINE Introduction to SNS PPU End Cans Justification of Design Changes Supply End Can (SEC) Design Changes Return End Can (REC) Design Changes Pressure System Design Shipping Load Considerations Radiation Hardness Procurement Relevant Topics Plan Before FDR

Introduction to SNS PPU End Cans The CEBAF style cryomodule design adopts supply and return end cans, which are used to host supply and return cryogenic pipes as well as control valves. End cans permit to install, remove and cool down a cryomodoule independently from others. On the original SNS MB & HB cryomodules designed by JLab, SEC has 2K primary supply, 50K shield supply, two JT valves, two cryogenic pipe trapped volume pressure reliefs and instrumentation ports. The REC has 2K return, 50K return, cool down line return, cool down valve, 2K pressure relief stack, pressure transducers and instrumentation ports.

Introduction to SNS PPU End Cans (Cont’d) The SNS HB Spare CM design moved the two JT valves from SEC onto the vacuum vessel, which merged the supply & return bridging rings that the original SNS CMs have. SNS PPU end cans are based on the SNS HB Spare CM design. After JLab design team reviewed the end can design, a series of design changes are initiated, with agreement from SNS.

Justification of Design Changes Three main reasons led the design team to make changes in the end cans: In the REC, the clearance between the thermal shield and 2K surfaces is found to be narrow. Both ORNL and JLab agree that adding bellows to the bridging pipes in between the end cans and vacuum vessel would permit adjustments when aligning the end cans to comply with the requirements in the Interface Control Drawing (ICD). ORNL’s method of leaving a few welds to be done by ORNL cannot be implemented at JLab, which is not an ASME shop. ORNL experience tells that it would require Survey & Alignment laser tracker measurements to guide the welder. Shipping loads consideration. Shipping loads were considered in the original MB & HB CM design. However, the end cans are redesigned by ORNL. SNS PPU is based on the HB spare CM, which did not need to be shipped over a long distance. SNS PPU CMs need to travel > 500 miles.

Supply End Can Design Changes A bellows is added to the bridging 6” OD tube. Addition of a bellows is in the first place demanded by REC alignment, which is more difficult to do in practice. The bellows may allow +/- 0.25” transverse displacement and +/- 0.5” tension/compression along the bellows axis This bellows will need an ASME stamp. A set of rotatable and fixed flanges is added too. Spacers between thermal shield and vacuum jacket need to have 0.25” margin. May add springs to make contact for shipping loads.

Supply End Can Design Changes (Cont’d) The support mount/block inserts into a socket engraved on the vacuum vessel’s SEC mounting pad. The socket allows 1/8” clearance all around the support block and +/- 0.25” longitudinal adjustment. The bolt holes on the support plate have at least 1/8” clearance too. Welds will be done after the end can alignment to lock positions. There is a concern about welding to affect the end can position. Consider to control welding sequence, use welding fixture or set screws.

Supply End Can Design Changes (Cont’d) Pipes connecting to the female bayonets are of 3/4” NPS, no more necking down to 1/2“ NPS, no 3/4” to 1/2” reducer. Added “pig tail” loops to the pressure tap lines to mitigate the risk of having thermoacoustic oscillation (TAO). Weld unions added to the pressure tap lines to facilitate welding. Lifting lugs added. A tapped hole on the support link is added so a 3-point lift can be carried out. Cernox diodes holder added.

Supply End Can Design Changes (Cont’d) Tubular thermal shield inside the bridging tube is coped to allow more clearance to the run pipe. The two thermal straps connecting the tubular and box thermal shields are re- shaped. They have dual functions, i.e. thermal and structural links. The threaded tube G-10 standoffs in between the tubular thermal shield and vacuum jacket in the bridging tube are replaced with G-10 spiders for more robust structural support during shipping. Plan to label run pipes to avoid assembly error.

Return End Can Design Changes A bellows is added to the bridging 8” OD tube. Bellows specs same as those for the SEC bellows. The support mount/block also inserts into a socket on the vacuum vessel REC mounting pad. 1/8” all around clearance +/- 0.25” longitudinal allowance Bolt holes on the support plate are slotted to have at least 1/8” clearance Weld to lock position after alignment

Return End Can Design Changes (Cont’d) A couple efforts are made to increase the clearances between the thermal shield and colder surfaces: By making the REC shell and thermal shield concentric to each other (ONLY), some improvements in the clearances are achieved. The .292 dimension represents the extra straight in the shield when it’s concentric.

Return End Can Design Changes (Cont’d) This depicts moving the heat exchanger a ½” and making the shell & shield concentric. Doing both seems to get tight spots close to a ¼ inch & vastly improves the long edge of the HX to the shield.

Return End Can Design Changes (Cont’d) Reroute plumbing due to the move of HX and for simplicity. The top pieces of thermal shield are combined into one. The female bayonets are switched to JLab traditional design. Pipes connecting to the female bayonets are of 3/4” NPS, no more necking down to 1/2“ NPS, no 3/4” to 1/2” reducer. Added “pig tail” loops to the pressure tap lines to mitigate the risk of having TAO. Added a weld union to a pressure tap line to facilitate welding. Five Cernox diodes holders are added.

Return End Can Design Changes (Cont’d) Added a structural support to the HX to resist beam axis shipping load. The vertical long bent rod for HX support is replaced with two straight rods and an offset connector. The other rod is relocated for more clearance. Lifting lugs added. A tapped hole on the support link is added so a 3-point lift can be carried out.

Return End Can Design Changes (Cont’d) Switch the Circle Seal K5120B- 10MP-17 non-ASME PRV with a type RXSO 1 ¼ inlet, 1 ¼ outlet safety relief valve for the 17 PSID low pressure relief. It can be ASME certified. It has a Teflon seat. This PRV’s location is relocated 0.5” in X direction (in/out of paper). Pressure transducer manifold adopts the typical CEBAF design to have a 30/30 gauge and VCR connections that will need adapters to the Honeywell pressure transducers that SNS PPU will use.

Return End Can Design Changes (Cont’d) Plan to label the pipes going into the vacuum vessels to avoid assembly error. To add 4 sets of G-10 standoffs to each of the two side thermal shields near the leading & trailing edges to resist shipping load. Removed the aluminum weld protection shield. Resized tubular thermal shield to be larger to increase cryogenic pipe spacing. Use spider supports between the bridging tube and its tubular thermal shield. Two of such supports need 0.25” headroom. Consider adding springs for cushion shipping loads.

Pressure System Design End can vacuum shells to have ASME BPVC stamps Two major pressure piping in SEC. Five major pressure piping in REC. Design pressures 33 psia, 165 psia, 200 psia, basing on the PRV settings. Design temperature 2-300K. Piping design per 2016 ASME B31.3. 4 relief valves installed, two per end can.

Pressure System Design (Cont’d) Pressure piping wall thicknesses checked against 2016 ASME B31.3 rules, no issues found. Flexibility analysis, considering pressure and thermal contraction loads, will be carried out once plumbing work is finalized. This analysis will include the piping connections inside the cryomodule body that is being worked on.

Pressure System Design (Cont’d) End can shell ASME analyses were performed by ORNL. Current plan is to inherit most, if not all, of ORNL’s code analyses. ORNL noted JLab that the REC bridging pipe to vacuum shell welded connection may have high stress. JLab will work with ORNL to investigate this and come up with a resolution. The addition of the bellows triggers revisiting of the shell ASME code analysis. Pressure piping stress analysis will dictate whether Charpy impact tests are required. All end can drawings will be reviewed for compliance with ASME codes, especially the weld callouts and applicable specifications (ASME, AWS). Pressure system design documents will be stored under SNS PPU Pressure System folder.

Shipping Load Considerations SNS PPU CM Shipping Load Design Requirements: Vertical: 4 g Longitudinal(beam axis): 5g Transverse: 1.5 g Accelerations to be applied independently. SEC 2K supply bayonet heat intercept to thermal shield brazed joint has been checked against shipping loads and found to be sufficient. SEC support plate to support block 0.19” fillet weld is also checked and found to be safe. 0.19

Shipping Load Considerations - SEC The SEC without most of its vacuum shell subjected to 4g vertical acceleration is analyzed. Model still uses the G-10 tubular standoffs inside the bridging tube. Vertical deflection is acceptable. Stainless steel pipes don’t experience high stress. Thermal shield peak stress is localized and too high. Hope that the spider support and adding springs will alleviate the thermal shield stress. C11000 H00 copper yield strength = 10 ksi Stainless steel yield strength = 30 ksi

Shipping Load Considerations - REC On the REC, the 3-1/8” 2K return bayonet to box-shape thermal shield brazed joint is found insufficient to resist the shipping accelerations. The 0.19” fillet weld connecting the support plate and block is safe against all accelerations. Plan is to add more standoffs to the box-shape thermal shield’s leading and training edges, if proceeding along the beam axis, to help in resisting the 5g acceleration. Once the internal piping work completes, detailed analyses will be run to check the structural integrity of REC during shipping.

Radiation Hardness Considerations O-ring candidate materials Viton has max radiation tolerance of 5 x 107 rads and EPDM has 1 x 108 rads. Chevron material PTFE can only take 1 x 105 rads. Years ago, JLab cryo group changed chevron material to Ultra High Molecular Weight Polyethylene (UHMW PE). ORNL prefers to use High Density Polyethylene (HDPE). Plan is to go through all seals materials to make sure the right materials are called out. For example, the 3-1/8” bayonet o-ring, item 19, is called out to be Viton. Item 14, the V-rings are currently called out as PTFE, which will be changed to HDPE instead.

Procurement Relevant Topics HX is on the list of early procurement items. Its design has not been changed so the relevant drawings are ready to go. Statement of work needs to be reviewed to make sure that its content complies with the latest regulations on pressure systems. Vendor is expected to stamp both the SEC and REC. All welds on the pressure boundary will be required to observe ASME code rules. Requirements on submission of CoC, material certificates, serialization, WPS, PQR, WPQ, inspections & reports, etc. will be laid out in the SOW. Cold shock, pressure test and leak check will be enforced. Vendor needs to record SNs and locations of Cernox diodes. Charpy impact test might be required.

Plan Before FDR Both the SEC and REC designs are still ongoing. All mentioned design changes need to be implemented and evaluated. End can due pressure system analyses need to be carried out and design changes may be needed depending on the results. Shipping load analyses also need to be performed to check the robustness of critical welds, fasteners, etc. This likely will demand more design changes. As it appears, a good percentage of end can drawings will need to be revised or re-created.

Comments and suggestions are appreciated! Gary Cheng Jefferson Lab, Newport News, VA THE END cheng@jlab.org Comments and suggestions are appreciated!