Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Design and Multiseries Validation of a Web-Based Gene Expression Assay for Predicting Breast Cancer Recurrence and Patient Survival Ryan K. Van Laar The.
Advertisements

A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Randomized Clinical Trial With Magnesium Oxide to Reduce Intrafraction Prostate Motion for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy 
Late Side Effects After Image Guided Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Compared to 3D-Conformal Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Results From.
P. Therasse, S. Carbonnelle, J. Bogaerts 
Cardiac comorbidity is an independent risk factor for radiation-induced lung toxicity in lung cancer patients  Georgi Nalbantov, Bas Kietselaer, Katrien.
Catarina Dinis Fernandes, Cuong V. Dinh, Marcel J. Steggerda, Leon C
Independent validation of the prognostic value of cancer stem cell marker expression and hypoxia-induced gene expression for patients with locally advanced.
Radiomic-Based Pathological Response Prediction from Primary Tumors and Lymph Nodes in NSCLC  Thibaud P. Coroller, MSc, Vishesh Agrawal, MD, Elizabeth.
Volume 10, Issue 6, Pages (June 2018)
Assessment of leakage dose in vivo in patients undergoing radiotherapy for breast cancer  Peta Lonski, Tomas Kron, Michael Taylor, Alicia Phipps, Rick.
Marcel J. Steggerda, Henk G. van der Poel, Luc M.F. Moonen 
Evaluation of localized region-based segmentation algorithms for CT-based delineation of organs at risk in radiotherapy  Mehdi Astaraki, Mara Severgnini,
Volume 70, Issue 5, Pages (November 2016)
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
11C-Choline Positron Emission Tomography for the Evaluation after Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer  I.J de Jong, J Pruim, P.H Elsinga, W Vaalburg,
Pancreatic tumor motion reduction by use of a custom abdominal corset
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Efficacy of butylscopolamine in obtaining clear MR image for intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer  Osamu Tanaka, Hisao Komeda, Masayoshi.
Patient-induced susceptibility effects simulation in magnetic resonance imaging  Josef Axel Lundman, Mikael Bylund, Anders Garpebring, Camilla Thellenberg.
Patient-reported symptoms and performance status before palliative radiotherapy in geriatric cancer patients (octogenarians)  Carsten Nieder, Thomas A.
Michiel van den Bosch, Michel Öllers, Bart Reymen, Wouter van Elmpt 
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Emma Hedin, Anna Bäck, Roumiana Chakarova 
National audit of a system for rectal contact brachytherapy
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Improving CT quality with optimized image parameters for radiation treatment planning and delivery guidance  Guang-Pei Chen, George Noid, An Tai, Feng.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Frank Detterbeck, MD  Journal of Thoracic Oncology 
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Comparison of complexity metrics for multi-institutional evaluations of treatment plans in radiotherapy  Victor Hernandez, Jordi Saez, Marlies Pasler,
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Changes in apparent diffusion coefficient radiomics features during dose-painted radiotherapy and high dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer  Sangjune.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Comprehensive Computational Pathological Image Analysis Predicts Lung Cancer Prognosis  Xin Luo, MD, Xiao Zang, BS, Lin Yang, MD, Junzhou Huang, PhD,
Potentials and challenges of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in radiotherapy  Sara Leibfarth, René M. Winter, Heidi Lyng, Daniel Zips, Daniela.
Roy Hertz, M.D. (1909–2002): The cure of choriocarcinoma and its impact on the development of chemotherapy for cancer  Jonathan P Yarris, B.S., Alan J.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Radiomic analysis in prediction of Human Papilloma Virus status
Evaluating the prevalence and predictive factors of vasomotor and psychological symptoms in prostate cancer patients receiving hormonal therapy: Results.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
On the conversion of dose to bone to dose to water in radiotherapy treatment planning systems  Nick Reynaert, Frederik Crop, Edmond Sterpin, Iwan Kawrakow,
Angjelina Protik, Marcel van Herk, Marnix Witte, Jan-Jakob Sonke 
Cone-Beam CT-based position verification for oesophageal cancer: Evaluation of registration methods and anatomical changes during radiotherapy  A. van.
Fast 4D cone-beam CT from 60 s acquisitions
Skin dose calculation during radiotherapy of head and neck cancer using deformable image registration of planning and mega-voltage computed tomography.
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Clinical and radiobiological evaluation of a method for planning target volume generation dependent on organ-at-risk exclusions in magnetic resonance.
Analysis of intra-fraction prostate motion and derivation of duration-dependent margins for radiotherapy using real-time 4D ultrasound  Eric Pei Ping.
Krzysztof Chełmiński, Wojciech Bulski 
Catarina Dinis Fernandes, Cuong V. Dinh, Marcel J. Steggerda, Leon C
Uncertainty evaluation of image-based tumour control probability models in radiotherapy of prostate cancer using a visual analytic tool  Oscar Casares-Magaz,
Design, fabrication, and validation of patient-specific electron tissue compensators for postmastectomy radiation therapy  Daniel F. Craft, Peter Balter,
Cone beam CT based dose calculation in the thorax region
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Patterns of practice in palliative radiotherapy for bleeding tumours in the Netherlands; a survey study among radiation oncologists  Jennifer Strijbos,
Rune Slot Thing, Uffe Bernchou, Olfred Hansen, Carsten Brink 
Clinical implementation of magnetic resonance imaging guided adaptive radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer  Shyama U. Tetar, Anna M.E. Bruynzeel,
Technical Innovations and Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Constantinos Zamboglou, Matthias Eiber, Thomas R
Target definition in radiotherapy of prostate cancer using magnetic resonance imaging only workflow  Adalsteinn Gunnlaugsson, Emilia Persson, Christian.
Hydrogel spacer distribution within the perirectal space in patients undergoing radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Impact of spacer symmetry on rectal.
European Urology Oncology
Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology
Hydrogel spacer distribution within the perirectal space in patients undergoing radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Impact of spacer symmetry on rectal.
Probabilistic optimization of dose coverage in radiotherapy
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
MRI basics for radiation oncologists
Presentation transcript:

Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Biochemical recurrence prediction after radiotherapy for prostate cancer with T2w magnetic resonance imaging radiomic features  Catarina Dinis Fernandes, Cuong V. Dinh, Iris Walraven, Stijn W. Heijmink, Milena Smolic, Joost J.M. van Griethuysen, Rita Simões, Are Losnegård, Henk G. van der Poel, Floris J. Pos, Uulke A. van der Heide  Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology  Volume 7, Pages 9-15 (July 2018) DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2018.06.005 Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2018 7, 9-15DOI: (10. 1016/j Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2018 7, 9-15DOI: (10.1016/j.phro.2018.06.005) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 The different regions of interest (ROIs) used for feature extraction. The ROIs were created by expanding (and in the case of the margin also shrinking) the original delineations (thin lines) to obtain the final ROIs used for feature extraction (solid lines). Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2018 7, 9-15DOI: (10.1016/j.phro.2018.06.005) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 A. Original T2w image; B. Normalised and resampled image in the grid of 2 × 2 × 2 mm3; C–E Normalized and resampled images filtered with a Laplacian of Gaussian (LoG) with sigmas = 1,3 and 5 mm. The resampled image as well as the filtered images were used as input for feature extraction. The white contour represents the prostate ROI. Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2018 7, 9-15DOI: (10.1016/j.phro.2018.06.005) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions

Fig. S1 Feature selection, classification and cross-validation pipeline. The stratified 10-fold cross validation (CV) separates the patients in 10 folds, and then iterates the use of 9 folds for training and the remaining fold as test set. Feature selection is performed using stratified 10-fold CV on the training set where different subsets of features are tested. Variable i = 1, 2…M, where M equals the total number of nFeats combinations to test. The number of features resulting in the maximum AUC value in the training set is used to train an LR and RF classifiers which are evaluated on the remaining independent test fold. This process is repeated 10 times Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology 2018 7, 9-15DOI: (10.1016/j.phro.2018.06.005) Copyright © 2018 The Authors Terms and Conditions