Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
KAGRA ISC Electrical Components Layout Yuta Michimura Ando Group Department of Physics, University of Tokyo April 17, 2015.
Advertisements

Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities University of Florida 10/05/2005 Volker Quetschke, Guido Mueller.
Advanced Virgo Optical Configuration ILIAS-GW, Tübingen Andreas Freise - Conceptual Design -
Optical Levers Layout and Cabling Yuta Michimura, Yuya Kuwahara Ando Group Department of Physics, University of Tokyo November 19, 2015.
Intensity Stabilization Servo Plan Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo November 23, 2015.
New iKAGRA Configuration Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo 11th KAGRA F2F (University of Tokyo) Feb 6, 2015.
KAGRA ISC Electrical Components Layout Yuta Michimura Ando Group Department of Physics, University of Tokyo December 8, 2015.
LIGO-G D 1 Status of Detector Commissioning LSC Meeting, March 2001 Nergis Mavalvala California Institute of Technology.
Dual Recycling in GEO 600 H. Grote, A. Freise, M. Malec for the GEO600 team Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik University of Hannover Max-Planck-Institut.
G Z Test Mass Butterfly Modes and Alignment Amber Bullington, Stanford University Warren Johnson, Louisiana State University LIGO Livingston Detector.
CITF A. Allocca, M. Mantovani. Outline CITF schematic Resonance conditions Effect of the misalignment on the error signals Comparison with Virgo+ Effect.
Monica VarvellaIEEE - GW Workshop Roma, October 21, M.Varvella Virgo LAL Orsay / LIGO CalTech Time-domain model for AdvLIGO Interferometer Gravitational.
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016 Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo April 12, 2016JGW-T
IKAGRA 初期アラインメント手順 Initial Alignment Procedure for iKAGRA Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo July 5, 2016JGW-T
Current Status of Main Interferometer Design Yoichi Aso 2011/2/4, LCGT f2f Meeting.
Main Interferometer Subsystem
LCGT LSC Design and other practical interferometer details Yoichi Aso 2010/12/7.
Input Mode Matching of LCGT 2012/1/5, Yoichi Aso.
Arm Length Stabilization Conceptual Configuration Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo JGW-T November 14, 2016.
bKAGRA PSL Design Study
Main Interferometer Subsystem
Main Interferometer Subsystem
Main Interferometer Meeting
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Apr 11-25, 2016
Kazuhiro Yamamoto on behalf of KAGRA collaboration
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
LCGT Main Interferometer Subsystem
Yoichi Aso on behalf of the LCGT ISC Group
Vibration Isolation Systems
The Advanced LIGO Angular Control System (ASC) (Hanford edition)
Design of Stable Power-Recycling Cavities
Possibility of Upgrading KAGRA
Summary of the iKAGRA Run
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
iKAGRA初期アラインメント手順 Initial Alignment Procedure for iKAGRA
Workshop on Gravitational Wave Detectors, IEEE, Rome, October 21, 2004
Arm Length Stabilization Conceptual Configuration
Arm Length Stabilization Conceptual Configuration
Cartoon of the optical layout around IMC, IFI and IMM
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
bKAGRA PSL EOM Layout ~180W ? to IMC Laser EOM (fPMC, PM) PMC EOM
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1 ( )
iKAGRA初期アラインメント手順 Initial Alignment Procedure for iKAGRA
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1 ( )
Summary of the iKAGRA Run
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1 ( )
iKAGRA初期アラインメント手順 Initial Alignment Procedure for iKAGRA
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
Status of KAGRA Yuta Michimura on behalf of the KAGRA Collaboration
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1
Status of KAGRA Yuta Michimura on behalf of the KAGRA Collaboration
Commissioning Procedure for bKAGRA Phase 1
Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 and Beyond
Beam Propagation for bKAGRA Phase 1 with flat ETMs
iKAGRA初期アラインメント手順 Initial Alignment Procedure for iKAGRA
Summary of iKAGRA Test Run Mar 25-31, 2016
Intensity Stabilization Servo Plan
Intensity Stabilization Servo Plan
Arm Length Stabilization Conceptual Configuration
KAGRA ISC Electrical Components Layout
Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo
KAGRA ISC Electrical Components Layout
Presentation transcript:

Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 JGW-T1605595 Aug 31, 2016 Interferometer Design for bKAGRA Phase 1 Yuta Michimura Department of Physics, University of Tokyo for the MIF subgroup

bKAGRA Phase 1 Goal: - Start observation run using 3km cryogenic interferometer by the end of March 2018 - TM temperature should be (close to) 20 K - No requirement for sensitivity Configuration: - 3 km (power-recycled) Michelson - minimum success: Michelson with LSC - extra success: PRMI with ASC - so, we prepare for PRMI with ASC Purpose: - Test cryopayload and cryogenic operation

Configuration Every detection port listed here has both PD and QPDs (for ASC), and placed on output optics tables in air Green lasers are also installed (but not necessary for Phase 1) No requirement for vacuum level invac fixed BRT (could be on isolated table; GPT is on output optics table in air) TRY IMC: Type-C with WFS ETMs: Type-A + ~20 K CRYp (CRYp not final ones) POP PRM misaligned if we give up PRMI IMMT: Type-C TRX PSL IFI IMMT1T 2 W final PMC high power EOM fIMC = 13.78 MHz f1 = 16.88 MHz frequency stabilized with RefCav/IMC/(PRCL) intensity stabilized with PMCT and IMMT1T BS, SRs: Type-B REFL PRs: Type-Bp invac fixed BRT invac fixed STM AS

Layout Adjust layout slightly to compensate ITM wedge Move PR2 and PR3 to stabilize mode of PR cavity see JGW-G1605199 for more detail move PR2 by 1.2 cm BS angle slightly changed (by 0.0187 deg) move PR3 by 1.2 cm beam spot on PR3 5mm off the center in –Y direction

Length Sensing and Control Only use f1 sidebands Sensing matrix: [W/m] MICH PRCL REFL_I +9.92e-01 -7.48e+07 REFL_Q +6.61e+04 -3.52e+07 AS_I +8.97e+02 -2.23e-01 AS_Q -1.67e+06 +4.16e+02

Alignment Sensing and Control Only use f1 sidebands (and TRX/Y DC) Sensing matrix: [W/rad] COMM DIFF BS PRM PR2’ PR3’ REFLA_I +4.98e+02 +2.36e-01 -4.16e+02 -8.13e+01 -2.08e-01 -1.21e+03 REFLB_I -7.01e-01 -2.91e+00 -1.93e+00 -2.10e+01 -1.70e-03 +3.47e+00 ASA_Q +9.80e-01 +1.87e+02 +1.56e+02 -1.39e-01 +1.31e-03 -2.27e+00 POPA_DC +4.04e+01 +1.49e+01 -2.41e+01 +3.91e+02 +8.07e+02 -1.57e+01 TRXA_DC +2.30e+01 +1.71e-01 +1.93e+01 -1.23e-01 -5.66e-03 -6.51e-01 TRYA_DC -2.30e+01 +1.71e-01 -1.91e+01 -1.17e-01 -3.25e-03 -6.36e-01 See JGW-G1605541 and JGW-T1605362 for more detail

Transverse Mode Spacing g-factor 0.8750 in pitch 0.8958 in yaw (with designed RoCs & lengths, PR2-PR3 length shortened by 2.4 cm) See JGW-G1605541 JGW-T1605362 for more detail

PRMI or MI PRMI could be unstable even if PR2-PR3 length is tuned, if combination of PR2/PR3 RoC errors is the worst case We don’t have much time for TMS tuning Thus, we might have to give up PRMI as a configuration for the end of March 2018 Give up PRMI unstable mode unstable lock Shorten PR2-PR3 by 2.4 cm (max) Measure beam profile, Try PR-ETMY cavity stable mode Try PRMI LSC stable mode adjust PR2-PR3 if possible ETMY cryopayload installed ETMX cryopayload installed stable lock Go with PRMI