Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Advertisements

The Vam6 GEF Controls TORC1 by Activating the EGO Complex
Volume 25, Issue 8, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Volume 125, Issue 1, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 24, Issue 7, Pages (July 2016)
Volume 37, Issue 5, Pages (March 2010)
Hierarchical Binding of Cofactors to the AAA ATPase p97
The Structure of the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Chloride Channel ClC-Ka Reveals a Conserved Interaction Interface  Sandra Markovic, Raimund Dutzler  Structure 
Structure of the Papillomavirus DNA-Tethering Complex E2:Brd4 and a Peptide that Ablates HPV Chromosomal Association  Eric A. Abbate, Christian Voitenleitner,
Transformation Efficiency of RasQ61 Mutants Linked to Structural Features of the Switch Regions in the Presence of Raf  Greg Buhrman, Glenna Wink, Carla.
A novel calcium-binding site of von Willebrand factor A2 domain regulates its cleavage by ADAMTS13 by Minyun Zhou, Xianchi Dong, Carsten Baldauf, Hua Chen,
Volume 64, Issue 3, Pages (November 2016)
Volume 18, Issue 9, Pages (September 2010)
Volume 22, Issue 11, Pages (November 2014)
Structural Basis of Selective Ubiquitination of TRF1 by SCFFbx4
Crystal Structure of the Rab9A-RUTBC2 RBD Complex Reveals the Molecular Basis for the Binding Specificity of Rab9A with RUTBC2  Zhe Zhang, Shanshan Wang,
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages (April 2009)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages (August 2016)
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages (March 2011)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Phospho-Pon Binding-Mediated Fine-Tuning of Plk1 Activity
Volume 20, Issue 10, Pages (September 2017)
Volume 24, Issue 10, Pages (October 2016)
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages e3 (February 2018)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (April 2014)
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages (March 2015)
Hyunsuk Suh, Dane Z. Hazelbaker, Luis M. Soares, Stephen Buratowski 
Jiao Yang, Melesse Nune, Yinong Zong, Lei Zhou, Qinglian Liu  Structure 
Volume 25, Issue 6, Pages e3 (June 2017)
Thomas R. Lane, Elaine Fuchs, Kevin C. Slep  Structure 
Volume 23, Issue 2, Pages (February 2015)
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages (March 2010)
Coiled-Coil Domains of SUN Proteins as Intrinsic Dynamic Regulators
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages (January 2013)
Crystal Structure of the p53 Core Domain Bound to a Full Consensus Site as a Self- Assembled Tetramer  Yongheng Chen, Raja Dey, Lin Chen  Structure  Volume.
Terunao Takahara, Tatsuya Maeda  Molecular Cell 
Claudia Schneider, James T. Anderson, David Tollervey  Molecular Cell 
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages (December 2012)
Structure of an mRNA Capping Enzyme Bound to the Phosphorylated Carboxy-Terminal Domain of RNA Polymerase II  Carme Fabrega, Vincent Shen, Stewart Shuman,
Volume 26, Issue 1, Pages (April 2007)
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 23, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015)
A Role for Intersubunit Interactions in Maintaining SAGA Deubiquitinating Module Structure and Activity  Nadine L. Samara, Alison E. Ringel, Cynthia Wolberger 
Flora Ambre Honoré, Vincent Méjean, Olivier Genest  Cell Reports 
Shiqian Qi, Do Jin Kim, Goran Stjepanovic, James H. Hurley  Structure 
Volume 52, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages (July 2015)
Structural Insight into BLM Recognition by TopBP1
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages (June 2007)
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Jue Wang, Jia-Wei Wu, Zhi-Xin Wang  Structure 
Structure of the Siz/PIAS SUMO E3 Ligase Siz1 and Determinants Required for SUMO Modification of PCNA  Ali A. Yunus, Christopher D. Lima  Molecular Cell 
Volume 18, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
The Vam6 GEF Controls TORC1 by Activating the EGO Complex
Vidhya Ramachandran, Khyati H. Shah, Paul K. Herman  Molecular Cell 
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 1-7 (October 2015)
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages (January 2015)
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 41, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages (June 2013)
Nitrogen Regulates AMPK to Control TORC1 Signaling
Presentation transcript:

Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages 2151-2160 (December 2012) Ego3 Functions as a Homodimer to Mediate the Interaction between Gtr1-Gtr2 and Ego1 in the EGO Complex to Activate TORC1  Tianlong Zhang, Marie-Pierre Péli-Gulli, Hui Yang, Claudio De Virgilio, Jianping Ding  Structure  Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages 2151-2160 (December 2012) DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2012.09.019 Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Crystal Structure of the Ego3 Homodimer (A) Ribbon representation of the Ego3 homodimer with monomer A in yellow and monomer B in cyan. (B) Interactions at the Ego3 homodimer interface. Hydrogen bonds are indicated with dashed lines. Left panel: Interactions of the swapping helix α1′ with residues of monomer A. Middle panel: Interactions between helix α3 and the α1/β1 loop of the two monomers. Right panel: Interactions between the N-terminal part of strand β3 of the two monomers. (C) Ribbon representation of the Ego3-M1 homodimer with one monomer in pink and the other in light blue. See also Table S1 and Figures S1, S2, and S5. Structure 2012 20, 2151-2160DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.09.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Structural Comparison of the Ego3 Dimer, the Other Roadblock/LC7 Domain-Containing Proteins, and the Ego3 Tetramer (A) Ribbon representation of the Ego3 dimer and three Roadblock/LC7 domain-containing proteins, namely, the MP1-p14 heterodimer (PDB code 1VET), the MglB homodimer (PDB code 3T1S), and the C-terminal domains of the Gtr1-Gtr2 heterodimer (PDB code 3R7W). (B) Ribbon representation of the Ego3 tetramer (PDB code 3LGO). In a dimer, one monomer is colored in green and the other in blue. Two adjacent dimers associate with each other to form a tetramer. The nomenclature of the secondary structures is after that by Kogan et al. (2010). See also Figures S2 and S3. Structure 2012 20, 2151-2160DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.09.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Ego3 Relies on Its Unique Dimer Conformation and Surface Properties to Interact with Its EGOC Partners and Localize to the Vacuolar Membrane (A) Interactions of the Ego3 variants (baits) with the same Ego3 variants, or with Ego1, Gtr1-GTP, or Gtr2-GTP (preys) were assessed using the split ubiquitin-based membrane two-hybrid system (Dualsystems Biotech). For each combination tested, β-galactosidase activity is expressed in Miller units as mean ± SD from at least three independent transformants grown overnight at 30°C. Empty bait vector pCabWT and pDl2-Alg5 prey were used as negative controls. n.d., not determined. (B) Localization of the wild-type and mutant Ego3-GFP. Left panel: Localization of Ego3-WT-GFP was examined in prototrophic ego1Δ ego3Δ gtr1Δ gtr2Δ cells complemented for all the other EGOC components except the one indicated. Right panel: Localization of the Ego3-GFP variants was assayed in prototrophic ego3Δ cells expressing the corresponding Ego3-GFP mutant protein. (C) TAP pull-down assays were performed on lysates of cells expressing either untagged Gtr1-WT or Gtr1-WT-TAP together with the indicated mutant forms of Ego3-GFP, Gtr2-WT-V5, and Ego1-GST. Coprecipitated proteins were eluted by TEV cleavage. Input and pulldown fractions were analyzed by western blot and probed with the indicated antibodies. (D) Localization of Gtr1-WT-GFP was examined in prototrophic ego3Δ cells expressing the indicated Ego3 variants. See also Tables S2–S4 and Figures S1, S4, and S6. Structure 2012 20, 2151-2160DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.09.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Ego3 Relies on Its Unique Dimer Conformation and Surface Properties to Mediate Adequate TORC1 Signaling (A) Prototrophic WT and ego3Δ strains expressing the indicated Ego3 mutants were grown to exponential phase. Serial 10-fold dilutions were spotted on YPD supplemented with vehicle (veh.) or the indicated concentrations of rapamycin. Alternatively, they were treated for 6 hr with 200 ng/ml rapamycin, washed twice, and spotted on YPD (Rap recovery). (B) In vivo TORC1 activity was assessed by monitoring the phosphorylation level of the TORC1 substrate Sch9 in the indicated leucine auxotrophic strains grown to exponential phase, starved for leucine for 90 min and restimulated with leucine (2.8 mM) for the indicated times. Numbers below represent TORC1 activity in either exponentially growing cells or cells restimulated with leucine for 25 min. WT TORC1 activity was set to 1 in each condition tested. See also Tables S2–S4 and Figures S4 and S6. Structure 2012 20, 2151-2160DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2012.09.019) Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions