Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (March 1997)
Advertisements

Neuronal RNA Granules Neuron
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages (March 2002)
Adam L. Hughes, Bridget L. Todd, Peter J. Espenshade  Cell 
Volume 102, Issue 3, Pages (August 2000)
Measuring and Modeling Apoptosis in Single Cells
by Xingwei Sui, Sanford B. Krantz, and Zhizhuang Zhao
Volume 56, Issue 1, Pages (October 2007)
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Fatty Acid Trafficking in Starved Cells: Regulation by Lipid Droplet Lipolysis, Autophagy, and Mitochondrial Fusion Dynamics  Angelika S. Rambold, Sarah.
A Macrophage Sterol-Responsive Network Linked to Atherogenesis
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages (December 2008)
Dysregulation of LDL receptor under the influence of inflammatory cytokines: A new pathway for foam cell formation1  Dr Xiong Z. Ruan, Zac Varghese, Stephen.
Ayaka Yatsu, Norihiko Ohbayashi, Kanako Tamura, Mitsunori Fukuda 
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (October 2015)
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2012)
Activation of Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase γ by Ras
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages (January 2003)
Guido T. Bommer, Ormond A. MacDougald  Cell Metabolism 
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (August 2011)
Joseph L. Goldstein, Michael S. Brown  Cell 
Ultrasensitivity in the Regulation of Cdc25C by Cdk1
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages (September 2010)
The Human Peroxisomal Targeting Signal Receptor, Pex5p, Is Translocated into the Peroxisomal Matrix and Recycled to the Cytosol  Vincent Dammai, Suresh.
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Crucial Step in Cholesterol Homeostasis
Direct Binding of Cholesterol to the Purified Membrane Region of SCAP
Volume 54, Issue 6, Pages (January 1998)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (September 2009)
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2010)
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (May 2005)
Calnexin Controls the STAT3-Mediated Transcriptional Response to EGF
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Transcription Factor MIZ-1 Is Regulated via Microtubule Association
Jungmook Lyu, Vicky Yamamoto, Wange Lu  Developmental Cell 
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages (May 2008)
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages (July 2012)
MUC1 Oncoprotein Stabilizes and Activates Estrogen Receptor α
Protein Sensors for Membrane Sterols
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (August 2007)
Volume 70, Issue 2, Pages e6 (April 2018)
Nucleocapsid Phosphorylation and RNA Helicase DDX1 Recruitment Enables Coronavirus Transition from Discontinuous to Continuous Transcription  Chia-Hsin.
Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages (February 2017)
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages (July 2014)
Volume 18, Issue 1, Pages (July 2013)
The SREBP Pathway in Drosophila
Volume 85, Issue 7, Pages (June 1996)
c-Src Activates Endonuclease-Mediated mRNA Decay
Volume 126, Issue 6, Pages (September 2006)
Volume 102, Issue 3, Pages (August 2000)
Amphiregulin Exosomes Increase Cancer Cell Invasion
Attenuation of LDH-A expression uncovers a link between glycolysis, mitochondrial physiology, and tumor maintenance  Valeria R. Fantin, Julie St-Pierre,
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Regulation of the Drosophila Protein Timeless Suggests a Mechanism for Resetting the Circadian Clock by Light  Melissa Hunter-Ensor, Andrea Ousley, Amita.
Volume 67, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Richard W. Deibler, Marc W. Kirschner  Molecular Cell 
Gp78, a Membrane-Anchored Ubiquitin Ligase, Associates with Insig-1 and Couples Sterol-Regulated Ubiquitination to Degradation of HMG CoA Reductase  Bao-Liang.
Dap1/PGRMC1 Binds and Regulates Cytochrome P450 Enzymes
Targeted Cleavage of Signaling Proteins by Caspase 3 Inhibits T Cell Receptor Signaling in Anergic T Cells  Irene Puga, Anjana Rao, Fernando Macian  Immunity 
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 6, Issue 2, Pages (August 2007)
Insig-mediated degradation of HMG CoA reductase stimulated by lanosterol, an intermediate in the synthesis of cholesterol  Bao-Liang Song, Norman B. Javitt,
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages (July 2011)
Elva Dı́az, Suzanne R Pfeffer  Cell 
Epstein–Barr Virus Coopts Lipid Rafts to Block the Signaling and Antigen Transport Functions of the BCR  Michelle L Dykstra, Richard Longnecker, Susan.
Transport-Dependent Proteolysis of SREBP
Presentation transcript:

Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages 512-521 (December 2008) Switch-like Control of SREBP-2 Transport Triggered by Small Changes in ER Cholesterol: A Delicate Balance  Arun Radhakrishnan, Joseph L. Goldstein, Jeffrey G. McDonald, Michael S. Brown  Cell Metabolism  Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages 512-521 (December 2008) DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2008.10.008 Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Step 1 in Purification of ER Membranes from CHO-K1 Cells: Elimination of Nuclear, Mitochondrial, Plasma, Golgi, and Early Endosomal Membranes (Left panel) Diagram of ER membrane fractionation scheme. (A)–(G) denote major fractions recovered and analyzed by immunoblot analysis. (Right panel) CHO-K1 cells (∼2 × 108) were treated according to the fractionation scheme as described in Experimental Procedures and shown at the left. Cells were disrupted using a ball-bearing homogenizer and centrifuged at 3000 g. The supernatant was then loaded at the top of a discontinuous sucrose gradient and centrifuged at 100,000 g for 1 hr, yielding two distinct membrane layers. After this step, aliquots representing equal volumes of each fraction (A–E) were subjected to immunoblot analysis for the indicated organelle markers. Cell Metabolism 2008 8, 512-521DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2008.10.008) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Step 2 in Purification of ER Membranes from CHO-K1 Cells: Elimination of Lysosomal and Peroxisomal Membranes (A–E) CHO-K1 cells (∼2 × 108) were fractionated as described in Experimental Procedures. The heavy membrane fraction obtained after the discontinuous sucrose gradient step (Fraction E, see Figure 1) was loaded below a continuous 19%–25% iodixanol gradient, centrifuged for 2 hr at 110,000 g, after which fractions were collected from the bottom. Equal volumes of each fraction were subjected to immunoblot analysis for the indicated organelle markers (A) or assayed for the indicated enzyme activity (B and C). Tubes 2–7 correspond to Fraction G and tube 13 corresponds to Fraction F (see Figure 1). Membranes from Fractions F and G (obtained after fractionation of ∼4 × 108 CHO-K1 cells) were processed and visualized by electron microscopy as described in Experimental Procedures. Representative images of Fraction F (mixture of lysosomes, peroxisomes, and ER) and Fraction G (purified ER) are shown in (E) and (D), respectively (scale bar = 500 nm). Cell Metabolism 2008 8, 512-521DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2008.10.008) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Analysis of SREBP-2 Processing and Its Relation to Sterol Content of Purified ER Membranes in CHO-K1 Cells after Various Treatments (A–C) On day 0, CHO-K1 cells were set up as described in Experimental Procedures in Medium B (5% FCS). On day 3, cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline and each dish received one of the following types of medium: (A) Medium C (lipoprotein-deficient serum) containing 1% HPCD for the indicated times; (B) Medium C containing 1% HPCD for 1 hr, then switched to Medium C containing 50 μM cholesterol complexed to MCD for the indicated time; or (C) Medium C containing 1% HPCD for 1 hr, then switched to Medium C containing 10 μM 25-HC complexed to MCD for the indicated time. At the indicated time, cells were harvested and disrupted by a ball-bearing homogenizer. A portion of the homogenate (5% of total) was saved for lipid analysis and immunoblot analysis of SREBP-2 (30 μg/lane) (P = precursor form of SREBP-2; N = cleaved nuclear form of SREBP-2). The remainder (95%) of the homogenized cells was used to purify ER membranes. Lipids were extracted from both the homogenate and the purified ER, and the amounts of cholesterol, 25-HC, and phospholipids were quantified as described in Experimental Procedures. Approximately 5 × 107 cells (from five 10 cm dishes) were used for each data point. The amount of sterol in each fraction was expressed as the percent of total amount of phospholipid, cholesterol, and 25-HC. Cell Metabolism 2008 8, 512-521DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2008.10.008) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Relation of SREBP-2 Processing to Cholesterol Content of Purified ER Membranes after Treatment of CHO-K1 Cells with Increasing Amounts of Cholesterol Complexed to MCD for Various Times (A) On day 0, CHO-K1 cells were set up in Medium B (5% FCS). On day 3, cells were switched to Medium C (lipoprotein-deficient serum) containing 1% HPCD for 1 hr, then switched to Medium C containing the indicated concentration of cholesterol complexed to MCD. At the indicated time, cells were harvested and disrupted by a ball-bearing homogenizer. A portion of the homogenate (5% of total) was saved for immunoblot analysis of SREBP-2 (30 μg/lane) (P = precursor form of SREBP-2; N = cleaved nuclear form of SREBP-2). (B) (Top panel) Densitometric quantification of SREBP-2 in (A) expressed as the amount of the nuclear form relative to the total (nuclear plus precursor) (▿ = zero-time value). (Bottom panel) The remainder (95%) of the homogenate from (A) was used to purify ER membranes, after which the lipids were extracted and the amount of cholesterol and phospholipids was quantified as described in Experimental Procedures. (C) This graph represents the data from (A) and (B) (red circles) and three other similar experiments (•, ○, □). For each of the four experiments, the amount of nuclear SREBP-2 at zero time was normalized to 100%. Approximately 5 × 107 cells (from five 10 cm dishes) were used for each data point. The solid line represents a best-fit of the experimental data to the Hill equation as described in Experimental Procedures. The best-fit values with 95% confidence intervals for cholesterol concentration (mol%) corresponding to 50% inhibition of SREBP-2 processing and the Hill coefficient were 4.5% ± 0.45% and 3.7 ± 0.23, respectively. Cell Metabolism 2008 8, 512-521DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2008.10.008) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Relation of SREBP-2 Processing to Cholesterol Content of Purified ER Membranes in CHO-K1 Cells after Incubation with Increasing Amounts of β-VLDL for Various Times (A) On day 0, CHO-K1 cells were set up in Medium B (5% FCS). On day 3, cells were switched to Medium C (lipoprotein-deficient serum) containing 1% HPCD for 1 hr, then switched to Medium C containing the indicated concentration of β-VLDL. At the indicated time, cells were harvested and disrupted by a ball-bearing homogenizer. A portion of the homogenate (5% of total) was saved for immunoblot analysis of SREBP-2 (30 μg/lane) (P = precursor form of SREBP-2; N = cleaved nuclear from of SREBP-2). (B) (Top panel) Densitometric quantification of SREBP-2 in (A) expressed as the amount of the nuclear form relative to the total (nuclear plus precursor) (▿ = zero-time value). (Bottom panel) The remainder (95%) of the homogenized cells from (A) was used to purify ER membranes, after which the lipids were extracted and the amount of cholesterol and phospholipids was quantified as described in Experimental Procedures. (C) This graph represents the data from (A) and (B) (red circles) and five other similar experiments (○, •, □, ▵, ▴). For each of the six experiments, the amount of nuclear SREBP-2 at zero time was normalized to 100%. Approximately 5 × 107 cells (from five 10 cm dishes) were used for each data point. The solid line represents a best-fit of the experimental data to the Hill equation as described in Experimental Procedures. The best-fit values with 95% confidence intervals for cholesterol concentration (mol%) corresponding to 50% inhibition of SREBP-2 processing and the Hill coefficient were 5.7% ± 0.28% and 3.5 ± 0.13, respectively. Cell Metabolism 2008 8, 512-521DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2008.10.008) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Relation of SREBP-2 Processing to Cholesterol Content of Purified ER Membranes in CHO-7 Cells Expressing Normal or Increased Ratio of Insig to Scap (A) On day 0, CHO-7 or CHO/pInsig1-Myc cells were set up in Medium B (5% FCS). On day 3, cells were switched to Medium C (lipoprotein-deficient serum) containing 1% HPCD for 1 hr, then switched to Medium C containing various concentrations of cholesterol complexed to MCD or β-VLDL. After various times of incubation, cells were harvested and disrupted by a ball-bearing homogenizer. A portion of the homogenate (5% of total) was saved for immunoblot analysis of SREBP-2 (30 μg/lane). The extent of SREBP-2 processing to its cleaved nuclear form was quantified as described in the legend to Figure 4. The remainder (95%) of the homogenate was used to purify ER membranes, after which lipids were extracted, and the amount of cholesterol and phospholipids was quantified as described in Experimental Procedures. (A) shows the immunoblot analysis of Scap and Insig-1 levels in the whole-cell lysate (400 μg/lane) from CHO-7 cells (lane 1) and CHO/pInsig1-Myc cells (lane 2). (B) The graph represents the combined data from two experiments (red and green symbols) where cholesterol was delivered by cyclodextrin complexes (cholesterol/MCD, see Figure 4) and one experiment (black symbols) where cholesterol was delivered by β-VLDL (Figure 5). For each experiment, the amount of nuclear SREBP-2 at zero time was normalized to 100%. Approximately 108 cells (from ten 10 cm dishes) were used for each data point. Circles denote data from CHO-7 cells (normal Insig-1 content); triangles denote data from CHO/pInsig1-Myc cells (increased Insig-1 content). The solid lines represent a best-fit of the experimental data to the Hill equation as described in Experimental Procedures. The best-fit values with 95% confidence intervals for cholesterol concentration (mol%) corresponding to 50% inhibition of SREBP-2 processing and the Hill coefficient were 5.5% ± 0.74% and 5.1 ± 0.36, respectively, for CHO-7 cells, and 3.1% ± 0.24% and 6.9 ± 0.48, respectively, for CHO/pInsig1-Myc cells. Cell Metabolism 2008 8, 512-521DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2008.10.008) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Cholesterol Homeostasis—A Delicate Balance ER cholesterol levels are tuned to the overall cholesterol content of cells. When cellular cholesterol levels are low, ER cholesterol concentration is below a threshold value (<5 mol%). Under these conditions, Scap escorts SREBPs from ER to Golgi by binding to Sec24, a component of the Sar1/Sec23/Sec24 complex of the CopII protein coat. Once in the Golgi, the SREBPs are proteolytically processed to generate their nuclear forms that activate genes for cholesterol synthesis and uptake. When cellular cholesterol levels are no longer limiting, ER cholesterol concentration rises above a threshold value (>5 mol%). Under these conditions, cholesterol binds to Scap, initiating its binding to Insig, an ER retention protein. This interaction prevents the hexapeptide sorting signal (MELADL) in Scap from binding to CopII proteins, blocking transport of SREBPs to Golgi and thus preventing its subsequent proteolytic cleavage and transcriptional activation. Cholesterol levels are critically balanced by this sharp switch. The concentration of ER cholesterol that defines the tip of the fulcrum (∼5 mol%) is set by the ratio of Scap to Insig. The upper half of schematic diagram was adapted from Sun et al. (2007); the lower half from data in current paper. Cell Metabolism 2008 8, 512-521DOI: (10.1016/j.cmet.2008.10.008) Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions