Ana Losada, Tatsuya Hirano  Current Biology 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Alain Verreault, Paul D Kaufman, Ryuji Kobayashi, Bruce Stillman  Cell 
Advertisements

Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Zhiyu Li, Alfonso Mondragón, Russell J DiGate  Molecular Cell 
BRCA1 Is Associated with a Human SWI/SNF-Related Complex
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
Maria R Rojas, Amine O Noueiry, William J Lucas, Robert L Gilbertson 
Volume 6, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
The Smc5/6 Complex Is an ATP-Dependent Intermolecular DNA Linker
Reconstitution of a Functional Core Polycomb Repressive Complex
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 94, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Yan Jiang, Mingyi Liu, Charlotte A. Spencer, David H. Price 
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (July 1997)
Regulated Chromosomal DNA Replication in the Absence of a Nucleus
Replication-Independent Histone Deposition by the HIR Complex and Asf1
Monica C. Rodrigo-Brenni, Erik Gutierrez, Ramanujan S. Hegde 
Activation of Phosphoinositide 3-Kinase γ by Ras
Peter J. Gillespie, Tatsuya Hirano  Current Biology 
A Human Nuclear-Localized Chaperone that Regulates Dimerization, DNA Binding, and Transcriptional Activity of bZIP Proteins  Ching-Man A Virbasius, Susanne.
ATP-Dependent Positive Supercoiling of DNA by 13S Condensin: A Biochemical Implication for Chromosome Condensation  Keiji Kimura, Tatsuya Hirano  Cell 
Stabilization of Chromatin Structure by PRC1, a Polycomb Complex
Alain Verreault, Paul D Kaufman, Ryuji Kobayashi, Bruce Stillman  Cell 
The Nuclear Hat1p/Hat2p Complex
ClpX-Mediated Remodeling of Mu Transpososomes
Volume 98, Issue 2, Pages (July 1999)
Selective Degradation of Ubiquitinated Sic1 by Purified 26S Proteasome Yields Active S Phase Cyclin-Cdk  Rati Verma, Hayes McDonald, John R Yates, Raymond.
Stephen Schuck, Arne Stenlund  Molecular Cell 
Distinct Roles for CTD Ser-2 and Ser-5 Phosphorylation in the Recruitment and Allosteric Activation of Mammalian mRNA Capping Enzyme  C.Kiong Ho, Stewart.
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
PARP1 Represses PAP and Inhibits Polyadenylation during Heat Shock
Volume 115, Issue 1, Pages (October 2003)
Polynucleotide Ligase Activity of Eukaryotic Topoisomerase I
Volume 6, Issue 5, Pages (November 2000)
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
DNA Topoisomerase I and PC4 Can Interact with Human TFIIIC to Promote Both Accurate Termination and Transcription Reinitiation by RNA Polymerase III 
Efficient Supercoiling of DNA by a Single Condensin Complex as Revealed by Electron Spectroscopic Imaging  David P Bazett-Jones, Keiji Kimura, Tatsuya.
Volume 43, Issue 4, Pages (August 2011)
Volume 24, Issue 8, Pages e4 (August 2017)
Volume 13, Issue 2, Pages (January 2004)
Volume 86, Issue 1, Pages (July 1996)
Hansen Du, Haruhiko Ishii, Michael J. Pazin, Ranjan Sen  Molecular Cell 
Sichen Shao, Ramanujan S. Hegde  Molecular Cell 
Volume 96, Issue 3, Pages (February 1999)
Volume 11, Issue 24, Pages (December 2001)
Gaku Mizuguchi, Toshio Tsukiyama, Jan Wisniewski, Carl Wu 
TopBP1 Activates the ATR-ATRIP Complex
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages (August 2003)
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
Replication-Independent Histone Deposition by the HIR Complex and Asf1
Richard W. Deibler, Marc W. Kirschner  Molecular Cell 
Cdc18 Enforces Long-Term Maintenance of the S Phase Checkpoint by Anchoring the Rad3-Rad26 Complex to Chromatin  Damien Hermand, Paul Nurse  Molecular.
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
RSC Unravels the Nucleosome
Condensin Architecture and Interaction with DNA
Rita Das, Zhaolan Zhou, Robin Reed  Molecular Cell 
Condensins, Chromosome Condensation Protein Complexes Containing XCAP-C, XCAP-E and a Xenopus Homolog of the Drosophila Barren Protein  Tatsuya Hirano,
Human Pre-mRNA Cleavage Factor Im Is Related to Spliceosomal SR Proteins and Can Be Reconstituted In Vitro from Recombinant Subunits  Ursula Rüegsegger,
Yan Jiang, Mingyi Liu, Charlotte A. Spencer, David H. Price 
Michiko Hirano, Tatsuya Hirano  Molecular Cell 
Kei-ichi Shibahara, Bruce Stillman  Cell 
Kazuhisa Kinoshita, Tetsuya J. Kobayashi, Tatsuya Hirano 
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Kirk M Brown, Gregory M Gilmartin  Molecular Cell 
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (November 2009)
Volume 3, Issue 1, Pages (January 1999)
Volume 84, Issue 2, Pages (January 1996)
Presentation transcript:

Intermolecular DNA interactions stimulated by the cohesin complex in vitro  Ana Losada, Tatsuya Hirano  Current Biology  Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 268-272 (February 2001) DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00066-5

Figure 1 DNA binding properties of condensin and cohesin. (a) Coomassie-blue stain of condensin and cohesin purified from HeLa cell nuclear extracts. (b) Gel shift assay. Five nanograms of nicked circular (NC) DNA containing a small fraction of linear (L) DNA were incubated with increasing concentrations of condensin (left) or cohesin (right) in five μl of final reaction volume at 37°C for 30 min. The protein-DNA complexes were fixed with 0.2% glutaraldehyde [21], were fractionated in an agarose gel, and were visualized by Southern blotting. The molar ratios of complex to DNA present in the reaction mixtures were 0:1 (lanes 1 and 5), 30:1 (lane 2 and 6), 60:1 (lanes 3 and 7), 120:1 (lanes 4 and 8), and 240:1 (lane 9). Asterisks indicate the position of DNA-protein complexes. The DNA present in large nucleoprotein aggregates is not quantitatively transferred to a nylon membrane, and this results in the apparently decreased signals in lanes 8 and 9. (c) Filter binding assay. Increasing concentrations of cohesin were incubated with five nanograms of a mixture of negatively supercoiled ([-]SC), nicked circular (NC) and linear (L) DNA in the absence (left) or presence (right) of 1 mM ATP in five microliters of final reaction volume. After 1 hr at 37°C, the mixtures were subject to a filter binding assay [12]. The bound and unbound DNA fractions were analyzed by Sourthern blotting and quantitated with an image analyzer. The fraction of bound DNA for each DNA form ([-]SC, NC, and L) is plotted as a function of the ratio of cohesin to total DNA present in the reaction mixture Current Biology 2001 11, 268-272DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00066-5)

Figure 2 Cohesin directs intermolecular catenation of circular DNA in the presence of topoisomerase II. (a) Five nanograms of nicked circular DNA (NC) were first incubated with increasing concentrations of condensin (left) or cohesin (right) at 37°C for 30 min, and then 3.2 nanograms of phage T2 topoisomerase II and 1 mM ATP were added. After five minutes at 37°C, the DNA was deproteinized, was fractionated in an agarose gel, and was visualized by Southern blotting. The transfer efficiency of the large multimeric catenanes is variable, and the signals of the high-molecular-weight DNA present in the well are not quantitative. The catenation reaction is therefore better estimated from the extent of depletion of the monomeric starting material. The molar ratios of complex to DNA present in the reaction mixtures were the same as those shown in Figure 1b. (b) Multimeric catenanes that formed in the presence of cohesin and topoisomerase II were deproteinized (lane 1) and were treated with topoisomerase II (lane 2) or Hind III (lane 3) at 37°C for 60 min. After fractionation in an agarose gel, the products of these reactions were analyzed by Southern blotting. (c) Different forms of DNA (lanes 1–4: linear [L], relaxed circular [R], negatively supercoiled [S], and nicked circular [N]) were incubated with topoisomerase II only (lanes 5–8) or cohesin plus topoisomerase II (lanes 9–12). The DNA was treated as described in (a) Current Biology 2001 11, 268-272DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00066-5)

Figure 3 Cofractionation of cohesin and the biochemical activities. An affinity-purified fraction of human cohesin was fractionated further on a heparin-Sepharose column. Aliquots were either resolved by SDS-PAGE and stained with silver (top panel) or used in a gel shift assay (middle panel) and a catenation assay (bottom panel). The fractions were load (L), flowthrough (FT, lane 1), wash (W, lane 2), 0.2 M KCl-eluate (lane 3), 0.4 M KCl-eluate (lane 4), 0.6 M KCl-eluate (lane 5), and 0.8 M KCl-eluate (lane 6) Current Biology 2001 11, 268-272DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00066-5)

Figure 4 Ligation assay. Linear DNA (lane 1) was incubated with increasing concentrations of cohesin in the absence (left) or presence (right) of 1 mM ATP for 30 min before E. coli DNA ligase was added. After 1 hr at 22°C, the DNA was deproteinized, was fractionated in an agarose gel, and was visualized by Southern blotting. The molar ratios of complex to DNA present in the reaction mixtures were 0:1 (lanes 2 and 8), 15:1 (lanes 3 and 9), 30:1 (lanes 4 and 10), 60:1 (lanes 5 and 11), 120:1 (lanes 6 and 12), and 240:1 (lane 7 and 13). The positions of the linear substrate (L), the self-ligated (relaxed [R] or supercoiled [SC]) and the intermolecularly ligated products are indicated Current Biology 2001 11, 268-272DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00066-5)

Figure 5 Models for explaining how the two SMC protein complexes might distinguish between intramolecular and intermolecular DNA interactions. For simplicity, condensin and cohesin are drawn as symmetrical rod-shaped structures with a hinge. The oval indicates the non-SMC subunits of cohesin or other interacting proteins. See the text for details Current Biology 2001 11, 268-272DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00066-5)